Finding Peace with God-Eternal Life and a Blessed Assurance

This is “Finding Peace with God—Eternal Life and a Blessed Assurance.”

 

This is a continuation of our Paul and Hebrew Roots mega-series where we’ve been discussing some of the more challenging—hard to understand Pauline writings. And we’ve been spending most of our time over the last year or more in the Book of Romans.

 

Our focus passage for this discussion is found in Romans 5:1-5 and it reads as follows:

 

(1) Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with Yah through our Master Yahoshua Messiah. (2) By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of Yah. (3) And not only so, but we glory in tribulations also: knowing that tribulation worketh patience; (4) and patience experience; and experience, hope; (5) and hope maketh not ashamed; because the love of Yah is shed abroad in hearts by the Ruach HaKodesh which is given unto us (Romans 5:1-5; KJV; modified).

 

Now, you might be thinking to yourself after reading (or hearing, for that matter) these five verses that there’s really nothing too difficult or challenging here. And to a greater or lesser extent, I would certainly agree with you. But in my studies of this section of the apostle’s letter to the Roman Messianics, I found Shaul’s perspective on the topic or issue of “peace” or “shalom” with Yah to be quite unique and interesting, and I wanted to share those thoughts with you before moving on to other bonafide hard to understand Pauline passages. Not to mention, there are varying opinions and perspectives on what the peace of Yah means and looks like, and how one is supposed to receive it. And so, we need to discuss and attempt to understand these critical spiritual things which powerfully impacts each of our respective walks in and with Messiah.

 

So, let’s proceed by breaking down and discussing each verse of our focus passage, and then explore the prospects of peace or shalom with Yah from a practical, halachic standpoint.

 

 

 

Let us Continue to have Peace-Romans 5:1

 

 

In verse one, the apostle writes: “Let us continue to have shalom (peace, integrity, wholeness, health) with Yah” (CJB translation).

 

While other manuscripts read: “We have shalom/peace with Yah

 

The rendering of “let us continue,” according to Messianic author and commentator J.K. McKee, seems to flow better with verses two and three, whereby, as a byproduct of the peace we enjoy with Yah, our peace places us in a position where we may (vs. 2) rejoice in the hope of Yah’s glory; and (vs. 3) rejoice in our sufferings.

 

Why would anyone rejoice in their sufferings. Isn’t that counterintuitive?

 

Well, when we realize and understand the full extent of the peace we have in Yah, we know that our redemption and restoration is ahead of us. And the sufferings that we must endure in this life, instead of destroying and damaging us, when taken within glorious context of our peace with Yah, will produce in us “endurance” or “patience.” And despite the fact that this  life is temporal, we know that, like our Master Yahoshua, we will be raised to a life that is eternal with Yah:

 

For if we have become united with Him (that being Yahoshua) in the likeness of His death, we will certainly also be united in the likeness of His resurrection” (Romans 6:5; NET modified; cf. 8:23).

 

Praise Yah and Amein!

 

 

Being Reckoned Righteous by Yah Through a Trusting Faith

 

 

Now, those of you who’ve been with us for any appreciable length of time will know that we’ve gone over the role of “faith” as it relates to one’s salvation quite a bit over the last half-year or so. (And if by chance you are new to TMTO, we would humbly encourage you to go on over to the website “The Messianic Torah Observer” and simply go through the last half-dozen or more installments of this program where we go into detail about the roles faith and obedience must play in the life of the Netzarim/Messianic.)

 

And so, the apostle begins this portion of his letter to the Roman Messianic Assembly by reiterating the central truth that one is justified or reckoned righteous by Yah through a trusting faith in the Person and Ministry of Yahoshua Messiah.

 

And he then proceeds to connect to this central truth of one’s trusting faith resulting in him or her being reckoned righteous by Yah, to him or her then having “peace with Yah” or “existing or being in a state of shalom or peace with Yah”.

 

 

Humanity’s Ongoing State of War Against and Hostility Towards Father Yah

 

 

Prior to one coming into a faithful-obedient-covenant relationship with Yah, he or she exists  in a perpetual state of hostility towards and war against Him.

 

Shaul describes this state of being at odds with Yah as being hostile to or in enmity against Him. Why? Because the unconverted mind–(Greek of “phronema” {fron’-ay-mah}, which means that which one has in their mind, or in their thoughts, or their intentions to do)—well that unconverted mind and heart is, on its own, incapable of “submitting to the law (or rule) of Yah” (Romans 8:7).

 

This inability to overcome that “enmity against” or “hostility toward” Yah and His ways comes only through the one repenting of his or her life of sin, asking Yah for His forgiveness, and then entering into a faithful-trusting relationship with Yah through Yeshua Messiah.

 

Yah does the heavy lifting here as it relates to the elimination of the state of hostility and war that exists between Yah and His human creation. And the heavy lifting He does is that of providing humanity the means by which it can be at peace with Him, since on its own, it is incapable of reconciling with and being at peace with Yah. Consequently, there must be an acceptable and effective intercessor to bring about that peace. And that acceptable and effective intercessor, of course, is none other than Yeshua our Master.

 

 

The Children of Wrath in Need of Reconciliation

 

 

Now, for the portion of humanity that is not reconciled or brought to peace with their Creator, they remain “sons/children of wrath” (I.e., subject to Yah’s wrathful judgment).

 

In order to have true communion and a relationship with the Almighty, there must be a reconciliation between Yah and the “son/child of wrath”.

 

Speaking to the Ephesian Messianic Assembly, Shaul wrote:

 

(1) And although you were dead in your transgressions and sins, (2) in which you formerly lived according to this world’s present path, according to the ruler of the kingdom of the air, the ruler of the spirit that is now energizing the sons of disobedience, (3) among whom all of us also formerly lived out our lives in the cravings of our flesh, indulging the desires of the flesh and the mind, and were by nature children of wrath even as the rest(2:1-3; NET).

 

“Children of wrath” are “children of disobedience”. Disobedience to what? Disobedience to Yah’s Way of life that He has ordained for His human creation; Yah’s instructions in righteousness; Yah’s Words of Life.

 

But wait a minute. I thought, according to the denominationalists, obedience to Yah’s ways-His instructions in righteousness—were not required for Yah’s people because Paul wrote that we are “saved by grace through faith and not of ourselves and that salvation is a gift of Yah” and that man’s works–works often erroneously interpreted as obedience to Yah’s Torah– has no part in a believer’s life (Ephesians 2:5-8).

 

But here, Shaul clearly refers to his Ephesian readers, before their coming to Faith, as being “sons of disobedience” (vs. 2; and later on in 5:6). The situation that the apostle is describing here is that of humanity falling into two distinct, exclusive classes: (1) Those who are obedient to this world and who are disobedient to the way of life that Yah ordained for His human creation to walk-out; and (2) Those who are obedient to Yah’s exclusive Way of Life. Thus, there are only two classes of souls in this world, without any crossover or middle-ground.

 

As Ya’achov (aka James) wrote:

 

Faith without works is dead” (James/Ya’achov 2:20, 26).

 

Unfortunately, we have a great many folks claiming Yeshua as their savior, but who refuse to be obedient to Yah’s instructions in righteousness. Well, according to these Pauline passages, these folks fall in the category of “sons/children of disobedience”. They have Yah’s instructions in righteousness and the teachings of Yahoshua Messiah accessible to them in the 66-special (aka the Bible), along with tons of resources and helps to facilitate their understanding and the applicability of those instructions in righteousness. However, as we saw manifested through the Hebrew ancients, there exists a “stiffneck” spirit that controls the minds and hearts of the modern Jew and the Denominationalist. Sadly, these simply do not want to conform to Yah’s righteous ways.

 

Consequently, children or sons of disobedience are subject to Yah’s wrath (Ephesians 5:6; Colossians 3:6 cf. Romans 1:18).

 

 

The Peace Offering—A Foreshadow of Yeshua’s Facilitated Peace Between Yah and Us

 

 

Back in the day, Yah instituted in His Torah the required ritual of the “peace offering” (Leviticus/Vayiqra 3:1-9).

 

Peace offerings/sacrifices (the Hebrew term for “offering” being “karbanot” and the “Peace Offering” in Hebrew is “zebach sh’lamin”)—Yah instructed His people to submit unto Him peace offerings/sacrifices to show their thanks and gratitude for the work He’d done in their lives. Such offerings consisted of a perfect yearly lamb, goat, or calf. These sacrifices were to be “volitional” (ie., voluntary or of one’s free will) and “vicarious” in nature (that is the animal’s death represented that of the offerer). And so, the blood that would be drawn from these sacrifices was to be splashed on the sides of the brazen altar. A portion of the sacrifice was to be burnt upon the brazen altar. Another portion was to be consumed by the servicing Cohenim/Levitical Priests. And the remaining portion was to be consumed by the offerer and his family.

 

This sacrifice/offering-the Peace Offering—clearly points to our Master Yahoshua HaMashiyach as the intercessor and facilitator of the peace we now enjoy with the Creator of the Universe.

 

The Prophet Yesha’Yahu foretold of the peace-inducing role our Master Yeshua would play in Yah’s Plan of Salvation-Redemption-Restoration:

 

For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. (Isaiah/Yesha’Yahu 9:6; KJV)

 

Here, Yesha’Yahu identifies the prophesied Mashiyach as “the Prince of Peace (Shalom)”, which certainly screams of Yahoshua being the facilitator and mediator of a permanent peace that He would usher in between His Father and those whom His Father chooses to be His sons and daughters.

 

 

Since the Fall Yah Has Sought to Have a Relationship with His Human Creation

 

From the very beginning Father Yah has desired to have a true and substantive relationship with His human creation; that is, for humanity to commune with Him. But that substantive relationship would not be possible unless the hostility and state of war that is brought about by sin—that impenetrable barrier that exists between Him and humanity–was somehow eliminated. And in the days when Torah was being communicated to our ancient cousins (Yisra’el), Yah had not enacted the final solution to eliminate that hostility and perpetual state of war that exists between Yah and humanity.

 

But rather, in the interim, Yah enacted temporary fixes to the hostility. And those temporary fixes were in the form of “burnt and peace offerings”. Thus, when an offender sought to make amends with Yah, he/she would offer peace offerings/sacrifices. And if excepted by Yah, the offender would temporarily exist in a state of peace until the offender broke covenant—sinned—transgressed Torah—offended Yah. And when the offender broke covenant with Yah, he or she would have to repeat those sacrifices and burnt offerings: A perpetual, lifelong, repeated process of making amends with Yah through Father’s sanctioned offerings and sacrifices.

 

And just as it was with our ancient wandering cousins, it was impossible for humanity to be right before Yah without the appropriate offerings/sacrifices and a repentant and sorrowful heart (Psalm 34:18; 51:17; Isaiah/Yesha’Yahu 57:15; 66:2). Otherwise, our ancient cousins would remain in a state of hostility/enmity towards Yah. Similarly, we today, cannot be in a right, substantive, relationship with Yah without Yahoshua (our vicarious substitute—our intercessor—our mediator) and without a circumcised heart that seeks first the Kingdom of Yah and His righteousness.

 

 

What Does Peace With Yah Mean or Look Like?

 

 

In light of what we’ve been discussing thus far, what did the Apostle mean by the phrase “we have Peace with God”?

 

Well, according to Messianic Torah scholar and commentator Tim Hegg of Torah Resources, as far as Shaul (aka Paul) is concerned here in our focus passage, “being at peace with Yah” has less to do with the [subjective] feelings we might have about our relationship with the Almighty—that is our being in possession of a blessed assurance that we are in communion with Yah. But more so, it has to do with an [objective] “state of being at peace as opposed to being enemies” with Yah (T. Hegg; Romans Commentary)—that is, existing in a covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe.

 

It is the Person and Ministry of Yahoshua Messiah Who enacts/facilitates/mediates this peace that comes to a would-be child of Yah. Thus, the one who enters a life of peace with Yah is no longer viewed by Yah as a “child of disobedience” or a “child of wrath”, but rather, a “reconciled child of Yah” or “child of obedience”:

 

For if while we were enemies, we were reconciled to Yah through the death of His Son” (Romans 5:10a; NET).

 

 

Humanity Inherently Knows Right From Wrong

 

 

Whether unredeemed humanity chooses to admit it or not, it inherently knows that a state of hostility exists between it and its Creator. This inherent knowledge of Yah and Yah’s embedded moral constitution is found in every rational human being.

 

Shaul wrote extensively about this in Romans 1:18-32 and we broke down this passage in our post entitled What Did Paul Mean by Being Under the Law”. (Please check it out if you are so led to so.)

 

 

The Realities of Peace Between Netzarim and Yah

 

The peace that exists between the covenant-keeping Netzari and Yah is not enacted or arrived at through obedience to Torah. It is enacted or arrived at strictly through faith in the Person and Ministries of Yeshua Messiah.

 

This new state of peace that Netzarim enjoy completely eliminates the animus or state of enmity that he/she once walked or lived in. This former “enemy” or “enmity” state of being was the thing that was, in essence, nailed to the execution stake along with our Master:

 

(13) And you, being dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He has made alive together with Him, having forgiven you all trespasses. (You see, it was our trespasses—our sins—our contrary way of life that brought about our enemy/enmity status.) Continuing…(14) blotting out the handwriting of ordinances (I.e., the bill of charges against us (CJB); a certificate of indebtedness (NET); record of charges) that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to His cross” (Colossians 2:13-14; KJV).

 

 

Yah will not commune with those who are in a state of opposition and hostility towards Him. And this makes perfect sense in light of what the Prophet Amos wrote:

 

Can two walk together, except they be agreed? (3:3 KJV)

 

 

Shaul likened such a relational situation to that of two domesticated animals plowing a field:

 

Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? (2Co 6:14 KJV)

 

Although Shaul is contextually addressing discord between brethren and outsiders to the Faith, the same principle certainly applies to a potential relationship between Yah and humanity. For true peace and a personal relationship to exist between Yah and His would-be son or daughter, he or she must think and act like Yah. They must be in a state of righteousness that is acceptable to Yah. And that state comes only through faith in Yahoshua Messiah. The would-be child of Yah must be walking in the ways of life and of light, not in the ways of the world and in darkness. Otherwise, he or she will remain in a persistent state of enmity and hostility towards Yah. And that state of enmity and hostility makes one subject to Yah’s wrath and judgment.

 

 

The Wonderful Results of Being in Peace with Yah—Verse Two

 

Shaul continues in our focus passage:

 

Through Whom (the Whom being Yahoshua HaMashiyach) we have also obtain access by (our trusting) faith (faith being Yah’s loving kindness and favor) in which we presently stand, and we rejoice in the hope of Yah’s glory” (5:2; NET modified).

 

Yah’s “unmerited grace” or Yah’s “unmerited favor”, if you will, comes only through Yeshua:

 

I am the door: by Me if any man enter in (I.e., enter into Yah’s glory via His grace), he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture (that is, in essence, find peace!)” (John/Yochanan 10:9; KJV).

 

…I (Yahoshua) am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me” (John/Yochanan 14:6; NET).

 

I trust you see the direct connection that exists here between Yah’s grace and Yah’s peace. The peace that we as a child of Yah enjoys is a direct result of Yah’s grace that He pours out upon us in response to our trusting faith in the Person and Ministry of Yeshua our Master. And thus, the one reckoned righteous before a Holy and righteous Elohim exists or stands in perfect peace with and before Him.

 

That faithful, peaceful existence we have with Yah through Yahoshua, provides us access to Yah. We no longer require “Cohenim” or Levitical Priests to intercede on our behalf in order for us to have access to the Creator of the Universe. For the veil in the Temple was indeed “rent from the top to the bottom” when Yahoshua died on the execution stake on our behalf (Matthew 27:51).

 

According to Messianic author and commentator J.K. McKee, our English term “access” as used in this verse is “prosagoge” {pros-ag-ogue-ay’}, which is used in the Tanach to describe one’s turning aside to gain access to something, such as found for instance in Exodus 3:4, where “Yah seeth that he (ie., Moshe) hath turned aside (ie., prosagoge) to see the miracle of the burning bush (YLT).

 

And so, this very exclusive access to Yah that we enjoy is a benefit that we absolutely should rejoice over.

 

But then, Shaul, in the same verse 2, declares unto his Roman Messianic Jewish audience that this peaceful, faithful covenant relationship is the very thing that they should rejoice about, as opposed to their rejoicing about their Jewishness.

 

Bear in mind, this is all connected, contextually, with the apostle’s overall message to the Roman Messianic Assembly members, most of whom were Messianic Jews, with a powerfully influential grouping of Judaizers.

 

C.E.B. Cranfield, a 30-year Theological Professor at the University of Durham, wrote:

 

Whereas between human judge and an accused person there may be no real deep personal relationship at all, the relationship between God and the sinner is altogether personal, both because God is the God He is and also because it is against God Himself that the sinner has sinned. So, God’s justification of sinners by necessity involves also their reconciliation, the removal of enmity, the establishment of peace” (Romans 1-8; pp. 256-7).

 

 

Therefore, the apostle asserts that the child of Yah not only has their peaceful standing with Yah to rejoice in, but also their eternal destination or salvation—Yah’s glory—Mashiyach’s return—the coming Kingdom of Yah to rejoice about.

 

We find this sentiment expressed in the writing of the Prophet Yermi’Yahu/Jeremiah:

 

(23) YHVH says, “Wise people should not boast that they are wise. Powerful people should not boast that they are powerful. Rich people should not boast that they are rich. (24) If people want to boast, they should boast about this: They should boast that they understand and know me. They should boast that they know and understand that I, YHVH, act out  of faithfulness, fairness, and justice in the earth and that I desire people to do these things,” say YHVH (9:23-24; NET modified).

 

The peace of Yah, in a sense, can also be viewed as a down payment or token of the future glory that we will possess when Master returns and we are instantly “changed” and “transformed” and “wrapped” in Father Yah’s dazzling glory:

 

(51) Behold, I shew you a mystery; we shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, (52) in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. (53) For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality. (54) So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, ‘death is swallowed up in victory’ (1 Corinthians 15; KJV).

 

As it relates to the hope of Yah’s glory, many within and outside our faith community believe that before the fall, Adam and Eve radiated Yah’s glory. That Yah provided a source of light that clothed them and radiated from their bodies.

 

Could this glory that Shaul alludes to here in verse two, which is derived from the peace that Yah’s people are granted because of their faith in Yeshua, could it be a passing mention of Yah’s chosen ones receiving that dazzling radiance—Yah’s radiant glory, to be restored to them in the Kingdom?

 

And the answer is: Indeed, yes. For our Master makes mention of that lost radiance being restored to His bride when He returns and establishes His Kingdom:

 

 

Then the righteous (ie., those who possess Yah’s peace and who are in a right-relationship with Him) will shine like the sun in the Kingdom of their Father. The one who has ears had better listen” (Matthew 13:43; NET).

 

This is a reference from the Prophet Daniel who wrote:

 

And they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever” (12:3; KJV).

 

Beloved, what an amazing promise. This is indeed something to rejoice about, wouldn’t you agree?

 

 

Yah’s Peace Leading to a Rejoicing in Suffering

 

 

But then, in verse three of our focus passage, the apostle throws his readers somewhat of a curb-ball as it relates to the called-out ones’ peace with Yah:

 

(3) Not only this, but we also rejoice in sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, (4) and endurance, character, and character, hope (5:3; NET).

 

 

Clearly, the called-out ones of Yah have a lot of positive things to rejoice about: (1) an abiding peace with Yah; (2) salvation; (3) a faithful covenant relationship with the Creator; and (4) access to Yah’s favor—His grace. But who would ever fathom the blessed called-out one rejoicing in troubles; tribulations; afflictions and such. For this reality is counterintuitive to that which we’ve all been raised to understand as it relates to when and why we rejoice.

 

The world has taught us that we are to celebrate the good things that happen to us during our lives; conversely, that we are to lament, or be saddened by the bad things that happen to us in life. But the Kingdom economy—or the way that the Kingdom operates–naturally runs contrary to that of the world’s economy—the world’s way of thinking: As we rejoice in the wonderfully good things that happen to us in this life, we as Yah’s set-apart people, must also rejoice at the bad or negative things that happen to us throughout our walk with Messiah.

 

Since we’re hardwired, almost from birth, to be sad and mournful about the negatives that overtake us in life, how do we overcome that natural negative reaction to adversity? How are we to rejoice in adversity/tribulation/troubles?

 

Simply this: We apply that same faith—that Avraham-level-faith—that is saving us and making us righteous before Yah—we apply that trusting faith to those sufferings/afflictions/troubles. We trust that Yah will take us through and deliver us from those problems. And because we believe this, we can rejoice in our adversities/troubles/sufferings.

 

 

Turn Our Focus to Yah During Times of Suffering and Troubles

 

 

Another way of looking at this is for us to stop focusing on or looking at that situation or thing that is causing us problems, but instead, turn our attention and focus entirely upon Yah and His keeping and saving power.

 

So then, as you can see, our faithful-peaceful-existence in Yah is tied directly to our being in a position to rejoice in whatever sufferings may come our way.

 

And oh by the way beloved, this concept of rejoicing in our sufferings, is not a Brit-HaDashah (aka New Testament) concept. For we find in Midrash Tanchuma, which is a collection of Torah midrashim or aggadot—non-legalistic rabbinic exegesis/study; a collection of rabbinic texts, folklore; historical anecdotes, moral exhortations, and practical advice), we find the following eye-opening text:

 

To him who gives thanks for his afflictions and rejoices over them, God grants life in this world and in the world to come, life without end, “for a lamp are the commandments and the Torah is light” (Proverbs 6:23). Why then, did Moses merit that his countenance should shine, even in this world, with a light destined for the righteous in the next world? Because he was ever striving, yearning, watching to establish peace between Israel and their Father in Heaven.

 

So, early rabbinic thinking as it relates to Yah’s people rejoicing in their afflictions, is a known commodity and reality of Yah’s chosen ones. The primary difference for those of us who are under the renewed covenant and our often wayward Jewish cousins is that the orthodox Jew feels that God’s people should rejoice in sufferings because God from time-to-time causes His people to suffer. We, on the other hand, place our trust in our faithful, obedient covenant relationship with Yah to take us through and deliver us from any and all afflictions that come our way. And so, we, in the process of our trusting in Yah’s delivering and saving power, rejoice. We rejoice in our sufferings.

 

It can be positively said of the rabbis’ view of rejoicing in one’s affliction that the suffering is meant to produce Godly qualities in the child of Yah: (1) endurance/patience/steadfastness/constancy—all of which is vital to the maintenance of one’s covenant relationship with Yah (vs. 3). (2) Character or experience—which not only helps us navigate through our redeemed life, but also means that we are to come alongside and help a brother or sister who is in need of sound, Godly counsel in their walk with Messiah (vs. 4). And (3) hope/expectation—which is that thing that gives us a sense of purpose each day in our walk. To expect not just the covenant promises of Yah to be fulfilled without exception, but that we make it into the coming Kingdom of Yah (vs. 4).

 

 

The Peace of Yah Breaks Down the Barrier that Existed Between Jew and Non-Jew

 

 

This shalom that Shaul writes of extends beyond the relationship that exists between Yah and humanity (be it a hostile or peaceful one). Yahoshua’s ministry not only made peace between Yah and His human creation possible, it also served to tear down the wall that existed between the Jew and the non-Jew:

 

(14) For He (Yahoshua HaMashiyach) is our peace, the One who made both groups into one (the true Jew and non-Jew) and who destroyed the middle wall of partition, the hostility (15) when He nullified in His flesh the law of commandments in decrees. He did this to create in Himself one new man out of two, thus making peace, (16) and to reconcile them both in one body to Yah through the cross, by which the hostility has been killed (Ephesians 2).

 

So then, Yah purposed to (1) bring peace between Himself and humanity, and (2) make one unified Body consisting of the remnant—the true believing Jew and the believing non-Jew, both miraculously accomplished tasks were accomplished through the Person and Ministry of Yahoshua HaMashiyach.

 

 

What Does Shalom With Yah Look Like—Practical Halachah?

 

 

Beyond the obvious, what does shalom with Yehovah look like?

 

Well, we are wise to look back to Torah as our guide. For we find in Yah’s instructions to Aharon as it relates to the blessing he was to put on the people, the following:

 

(24) YHVH bless you and protect you; (25) YHVH make His face to shine upon you, and be gracious to you; (26) YHVH lift up His countenance upon you and give you peace/shalom (Numbers/Bemidbar 6).

 

 

The Peace of Yah Linked to Salvation and Redemption and Deliverance

 

 

The rabbinic understanding of the peace/shalom of YHVH  or with YHVH is intricately linked to the “salvation or deliverance that Yah brings” to His chosen ones, especially in the latter days (Douglas Moo Commentary on the Book of Romans).

 

We see this relationship between Yah’s shalom/peace and the delivering/salvation of His people throughout scripture:

 

How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him that bringeth good tidings, that publisheth peace; that bringeth good tidings of good, that publisheth salvation; that saith unto Zion, Thy Elohim reigneth” (Isaiah/Yesha’Yahu 52:7; KJV modified).

 

Behold upon the mountains the feet of him that bringeth good tidings, that publisheth peace!O Judah, keep thy solemn feasts, perform thy vows: For the wicked shall no more pass through thee; he is utterly cut off” (ie., Judah is delivered from her enemies; Nahum 1:15; KJV).

 

The association that salvation has with Yah’s shalom/peace should handily serve as a greater understanding of the state of being that we enjoy as Yah’s chosen and beloved sons and daughters:

 

  • Peace of mind: “And the peace of Yah, which passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds through Messiah Yahoshua” (Philippians 4:6; KJV modified).
  • More so, the reality and state of being in a peaceful and substantive relationship with the Creator of the Universe.

 

Yah’s people have a blessed assurance (or simply, a peace of mind) that comes from their belief and faith that Yahoshua’s sacrifice has remitted—paid for–covered their sin debt. And that their trust in His atoning sacrifice, connected with their covenant relationship with Father Yah, guarantees them an eternal, peaceful existence or state of being.

 

Beloved, we’re talking about salvation; talking about the Child of Yah being saved, redeemed and delivered from Yah’s wrath; talking about his or her receiving and entering His coming Kingdom. Consequently, Yah’s true sons and daughters are afforded a foretaste of that future Kingdom in their day-to-day lives as they live by and walk in their faith (Habukkuk 2:4). Their faith and the resulting peace he or she enjoys from Yah protects them from the wiles of the enemy; provides for them; sustains them; keeps them; teaches them; and so forth.

 

When we parcel or tease out the term “peace from a Hebrew sense/perspective”, we are uniquely talking about the covenant-keeping son and daughter of Yah living in the very best life they could possibly be living in, which is made possible only through the Person and Ministry of Yeshua Messiah. And no, we’re not necessarily talking about the son or daughter of Yah living large in terms of the standards of this world. But rather, we’re talking about “living the life abundant” that Yahoshua promised His disciples in John/Yochanan 10:10. It’s about experiencing some of the highlights of that peace that Yah’s chosen ones will experience in the coming Kingdom. It’s about having unspeakable joy when the worldly circumstances surrounding Yah’s chosen ones would suggest otherwise (1 Peter/Kefa 1:8). It’s about overcoming the world in the midst of tribulation as Yahoshua said:

 

I have told you these things (ie., the events that were about to befall our Master) so that in Me you may have peace. In the world you have trouble and suffering, but take courage: I have conquered the world” (John/Yochanan 16:33; NET).

 

 

Peace and the Miraculous

 

 

It’s also about experiencing the miraculous in a world that does not believe in the miraculous, and neither the things of Yah:

 

I tell you the solemn truth, the person who believes in Me will perform the miraculous deeds that I am doing, and will perform greater deeds than these, because I am going to the Father” (John/Yochanan 14:12; NET).

 

You see, the unredeemed world is not entitled to such peace and the wonderful things that flow from a peaceful, faithful covenant relationship with Yah.

 

 

The Restorative Nature of Yah’s Peace

 

 

In a broader, yet Messianic sense, the peace of Yah or peace with Yah can also be understood from a restoration or restorative perspective.

 

Let’s once again look back to the Tanach and its Hebraic understanding of shalom or peace. And we find that in many instances where the term “shalom” is mentioned, it is intricately tied to a restoration of Yisra’el.

 

We know that Yisra’el throughout her history repeatedly broke covenant with Yah. Yet Yah, because of His love for Yisra’el, His covenant promises, and His grace, has promised to restore Yisra’el unto Himself. That same sentiment of restoration is easily applied to the Netzari—the Messianic of today, whereby he or she is being engrafted into the commonwealth of Yisra’el. And as a result of that engrafting, the Netzari-the Messianic-will enjoy the innumerable “told and untold” riches to be rendered unto believing Yisra’el when she is finally restored unto Yehovah in His glorious kingdom to come. We, under the auspices of the renewed covenant, are blessed to receive a foretaste of that coming restoration.

 

 

Hope Fuels the Peace We Have with Yah

 

 

Finally, Shaul wraps up this section on having the peace of Yah or finding peace with Yah by attaching that peace to the Hebrew concept of “hope”: Hope being the vehicle whereby the restored, redeemed, and delivered child of Yah may experience the love of Yah through the Ruach HaKodesh:

 

And hope does not disappoint, because the love of Yah has been poured out in our hearts through the Ruach HaKodesh who was given to us” (5:5; NET).

 

The hope-that expectation that we have embedded within us through Yah’s Ruach HaKodesh, is multifaceted and multi-layered in my opinion. For we know that Yah delivers us from our afflictions/tribulations/sufferings/troubles, as well as we expect Yah, without reservation or question, to complete and fulfill everyone of the wonderful covenant promises that He gave to Yisra’el. Those promises of course include the restoration of Yisra’el and the advent of His Kingdom here on earth, alongside the restoration of all things that were lost when Adam fell. For as Shaul mentioned previously in this same letter, regarding Yah’s promises:

 

…let Yah be true, but every man a liar…” (3:4; KJV modified).

 

So then, that which we expect from Yah is well founded. And our trusting faith—the very peace we have in Yah and with Yah certainly supports the understanding that Yah will do what He has promised He’ll do. Praise Yah!

 

Turns out that the phrase “love of Yah” that the apostle uses here and in other parts of his letters, can be taken from either an objective or subjective perspective. The objective perspective has our love going up to Yah: that is, we  have love for and we express our love to Yah. The subjective perspective has it where Yah loves us: that is, Yah expresses His love for us, and thus, His love comes down to us or is pour out upon us.

 

Given that Shaul adds to his explanation of our hope being something we can confidently take to the bank, so to speak, he seems to be expressing or conveying the subjective form this verse. For he says that Yah’s love comes to us—is poured out in our heart—the Ruach being that which Yah metaphorically pours out onto and into those He chooses like one pours water out onto that which requires cleansing and refreshing. And thus, Yah’s love is directly linked to His Holy Spirit, which He gives to His sons and daughters liberally. Yah’s  love is manifested in His giving of His Spirit to His beloved. That Spirit dwells with and in us. Thus, Yah effectively dwells within us, and in His dwelling within us, He communicates His love and His peace. The indwelling of Yah’s Spirit in the Temple of Yah’s elect—that is, their physical bodies (1 Corinthians 6:19)—serves as a token—a guarantee—a down payment—that He will complete the work that He has begun in His chosen ones; the culmination-the grand outcome-being that of reigning with Master Yahoshua in His Coming Kingdom.

 

And that is certainly something to write home about.

 

 

Let’s Us Pursue Yah’s Peace at all Costs

 

 

So then, let us pursue the peace of Yah as we seek His Kingdom and His Righteousness by living and walking firmly in our Avraham-level-faith as Yah has instructed us to do (Habukkuk 2:4). Let us develop the little faith we currently have into that Avraham-level faith such that Yah considers us His friend (James/Ya’achov 2:23). And we develop that faith simply by learning about and claiming (even out loud) Yah’s covenant promises. Listening to His still-small voice as He directs us through His Word and His Holy Spirit. Asking Abba what He wants us to do and how He wants us to do the things He instructs us to do. Then follow through with those instructions.

 

Let us trust Abba in every aspect of our day-to-day lives, including our finances, careers, and relationships. Which means that we have to learn to put Yah first in our lives and factor Him into everything we do.

 

Let us make it a habit to ask Him about everything we intend to do. I know that sounds outlandish, but that’s how we start trusting Him. Putting even the smallest things into His hands. Learning to say no on certain things until we  hear from Yah, and yes to those things that Yah requires of us to do.

 

As hard as it may be for some of us, let us push ourselves to only think of things from a Godly/Elohim and positive perspective. So then, we learn to become hopeless Pollyannas whereby we replace complaining with thanksgiving and praise (1 Thessalonians 5:18-19).

 

And let us joyfully and with unshakable hope look forward to the day when we see our Master face-to-face (1 Corinthians 13:12) and we reflect for all eternity the glory of our Creator. And let us proclaim to all the world, on whatever platforms we have access to and to whatever circles we have influence in, the coming Kingdom of Yah. Even in our prayers, let us repeat daily the affirmation: “Thy Kingdom come, thy will be done, one earth as it is in heaven.”

 

If we invest our time and efforts in these little things, our faith will grow exponentially over time and we will enjoy the fullness of Yah’s peace—Yah’s Shalom.

 

 

 

 

Paul on Being Under the Law-Part 2-Torah Meets Grace

Goal What I would like to do in today's installment of TMTO is to lay the ground-work or set-the table if you will in our gaining as complete an understanding of what the Apostle Shaul (aka the Apostle Paul) meant when he wrote to his Roman Messianic readers that "sin...

read more

The False Hope of Imitation Christianity

If you've been called and chosen, this message is for you. But it's not for everybody. Questions: What does John 8:32?--You shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free. We are to get our information from Scripture. Do you know what you worship? What's the...

read more

Shavuot-Pentecost 2022 in Focus–Netzari-Messianic Perspectives on the Feast of Shavuot

1. An Introductory Primer on Shavuot

What is Shavuot?

For the Torah Observant Believer in Yeshua Messiah, Shavuot—The Feast of Weeks—Pentecost is about the giving and receiving of YHVH’s Torah and the establishing of the marriage covenant between YHVH and the Children of Israel. The Feast of Weeks is about the re-establishment of a broken covenant through the grace of YHVH and the outpouring of His Holy Spirit to aid fallen man in their keeping of the Creator’s instructions and their maintaining a faithful and obedient covenant relationship with Him. Pentecost is about life and the establishing of the Body of Messiah through the atoning sacrifice of Yeshua Messiah and the infilling of the Holy Spirit.

Shavuot is one of the seven-annual and the second of the 3-pilgrimage Feasts of YHVH. The instructions related to its keeping is found in the 23rd chapter of Leviticus/Vayiqra. However, the origin of this set-apart day is founded upon the story behind the Creator’s giving of the commandments to the mixed multitude at the base of Mount Sinai as recorded in Exodus/Shemot 19 through 24.

As the story goes, a mixed-multitude of souls, composed of the 12-tribes of Ysra’el and various nationals from other nations, had escaped Egyptian-bondage roughly seven-weeks prior to their settling at the base of Mount Sinai. YHVH, the Creator of the Universe, who bore this mixed multitude (with some estimates as high as 2 to 3-million souls) on eagles’ wings (Exodus 19:4) and brought them unto Himself. It was here and at this time that Father proposed a covenant between He and the Children of Israel that would be the shadow picture of an even greater covenant occurrence in the years to come.

The seven-week trek from Egypt to Sinai foreshadowed the 50-day or 7-Sabbath Count (traditionally referred to as the Counting of the Omer) that begins at Wave Sheaf and culminates at Shavuot, also known as The Feast of Weeks and Pentecost in the Greek.

We find in Exodus 19 that Father proposes the establishment of a Covenant between He and Israel, whereby He would be Israel’s God and Israel would be His special and favored people above all the nation-peoples of the world (i.e., their Elohim) if they would hear His voice and obey His instructions (i.e., His commandments; His Torah; His Covenant). The Children of Israel agreed to the terns of this covenant and on that fateful day, at the foot of Mount Sinai, YHVH, in the midst of fire, lightening, smoke and loud shofar blowing, spoke His commandments directly to the people. Although the people were terrified by this indescribable manifestation, even to the point of demanding that YHVH, from that time onward, speak exclusively through Moshe to them so as to not repeat this terrifying manifestation, the covenant was ratified by the sprinkling of blood upon the written contract and upon the people.

A covenant is an official, established agreement between 2 or more interested parties. A blood covenant, which is what the Sinai Covenant was, required that both parties swear to abide by the terms of the contract. YHVH, because He is Creator and Elohim, certified His agreement to abide by the terms of the covenant (i.e., He would be the nation’s God and the people would reap the benefits of being a special possession of YHVH); and so Yah certified this covenant simply by stating His Name—I am YHVH. Yisrael’s promise (I.e., oath or shava) to abide by the terms of the contract was embodied in the nation’s collective, verbal affirmation that they would obey YHVH’s instructions and not worship or follow any other gods. Thus, the contract—the covenant—was ratified and sealed by the sprinkling of blood upon the written contract and the people.

We will also see a little later that the covenant that Yah established with Yisra’el at Sinai can be viewed as either a marriage proposal—marriage contract—even a wedding. And so, in essence, this very first Shavuot was a marriage of sorts: A marriage between YHVH and the nation of Israel.

Shavuot is known by a number names that include:

1. Feast of Weeks

2. Feast of Oaths

3. Shavuot

4. Pentecost

5. Yom HaBikkurim

6. Feast of Harvest

7. Chag HaShavuot

The Swearing of and Making of Oaths Related to Shavuot

Shavuot means feast of weeks/feast of the 7-days. The root of Shavuot being “shavuah” means week or seven-days.

We can also derive the Hebrew term “shavah” from Shavuot. Shavah means oath/to swear. And so, it stands to reason that Shavuot may be linked to the giving of an oath or the swearing of an oath. Some Jewish thinkers have suggested that Shavuot represents an annual renewal of the Sinaitic Covenant between Yah and His people. And in establishing any and all covenants (including all the Tanach/Old Testament covenants) between two Hebrews or between Yah and Yisra’el, well each party to the covenant or agreement must (in writing and verbally) swear or promise to uphold their end of that agreement. And part of verbally promising or swearing to uphold their end of the covenant agreement requires each party to swear to that end in the Name of Yehovah (Deuteronomy/Devarim 6:13; 10:20).

Combine this concept of making oaths or swearing to uphold our end of the covenant agreement-or ketubah in the Name of Yehovah, with the concept of “shabuah”, we arrive at a common ancient Hebrew practice that is to “seven-oneself”: To make seven-declarations when one makes an oath to show one’s deepest sincerity and intent to abide by the terms of an agreement. In a sense, to repeat that oath seven-times.

So, at any length, there appears to be a link between the establishing of oaths to abide by the terms of the covenant between Yisra’el and Yah, and the Feast of Weeks. Covenant and swearing. Thus, it could be understood that the sincere Netzari keeps the Feast of Weeks—Shavuot—each year from the perspective of a renewal of the covenant—even the covenant relationship between he/she and Yah—and declaring an oath and swearing to stay true to his/her end of the covenant agreement.

2. The Commandment Given to Keep Shavuot Through the Original Covenant—A Look at Leviticus/Vayiqra

We find in Leviticus/Vayiqra 23:15-22 our marching orders as it relates to our keeping of Shavuot:

15 “‘You must count for yourselves seven weeks from the day after the Sabbath, from the day you bring the wave offering sheaf; they must be complete weeks.
16 You must count fifty days– until the day after the seventh Sabbath– and then you must present a new grain offering to the LORD.
17 From the places where you live you must bring two loaves of bread for a wave offering; they must be made from two tenths of an ephah of fine wheat flour, baked with yeast, as first fruits to the LORD.
18 Along with the loaves of bread, you must also present seven flawless yearling lambs, one young bull, and two rams. They are to be a burnt offering to the LORD along with their grain offering and drink offerings, a gift of a soothing aroma to the LORD.
19 You must also offer one male goat for a sin offering and two yearling lambs for a peace offering sacrifice,
20 and the priest is to wave them– the two lambs– along with the bread of the first fruits, as a wave offering before the LORD; they will be holy to the LORD for the priest.
21 “‘On this very day you must proclaim an assembly; it is to be a holy assembly for you. You must not do any regular work. This is a perpetual statute in all the places where you live throughout your generations.
22 When you gather in the harvest of your land, you must not completely harvest the corner of your field, and you must not gather up the gleanings of your harvest. You must leave them for the poor and the foreigner. I am the LORD your God.'” (Lev 23:15-22 NET)

Wave offerings were generally food offerings that were literally waved back and forth by the Levitical Priests in front of the Tabernacle/Temple. One resource I consulted described the wave offerings as a motion emblematic of the priests presenting or giving it to Yah and then receiving it back from Him as a gift to them. And of course, such offerings would afterward be available for the priests to consume.

The other aspect of food and drink offerings (minchah) that should be kept in mind is that these represented the fruits of one’s harvest. These were products of one’s labor that was offered to Yah. Therefore, the food and drink products that were offered here would not be considered as “natural products”. Consequently, a portion of these offerings would be burnt on the brazen altar while the remaining portion was to be consumed by the Cohanim.

The spiritual context and application here was that the Levitical Priests would be subject sacrifice on behalf of the people of the nation. But the offerings served as a substitute for them. This hearkens back to Romans 12:1: “you are living and holy sacrifices” unto Yah.

Burnt offerings (”olah”) were sacrifices that were completely consumed by fire on the brazen altar in the outer court. No part of this sacrifice/offering is eaten. It is meant for complete submission to Yah’s will. Thus the entire offering belongs to Yah. It is meant to atone for sins as the offerer seeks to commune with Yah. So, there must be an expiation of sins in order for the offerer to truly commune with Yah.

Peace offerings (”Zevach Sh’lamim”) were offering that expressed gratitude to Yah for His mercies and blessings. Note the Hebrew term “sh’lamim” is related to its sister Hebrew term “shalom” which means “peace” and to be “whole”. Generally, these offerings consisted of three portions: (1) the Burnt portion; (2) the portion given to the kohanim; and (3) the portion that is consumed by the offerer and his family. Other specific offerings that are intricately linked to thanksgiving offerings (”todah”), free-will offerings; and offerings made at the fulfillment of a vow.

Shavuot (aka the Feast of Weeks) Emblematic of a Wedding Proposal

Now, we mentioned just a short while ago that Shavuot can be seen as being emblematic of the Ancient Hebrew Wedding Ceremony through which we learn that Father Yah is seeking the perfect bride for His beloved Son (cf. Proverbs 31:10-11).

One way of looking at the Feasts of Yah is from the perspective of these appointed times being prophetically emblematic of the Ancient Hebrew Wedding process. And Shavuot represents one of the elements or aspects of this wedding process.

Norman Willis of Nazarene Israel states that there are three phases of the Ancient Hebrew Wedding. Phase one is referred to as “shiddukhin”. Shiddukhin is simply the “match-making” phase of the overall wedding process. And this phase is best illustrated in the story of Yitschaq (aka Isaac) and Rivka (aka Rebecca) whereby Avraham sends forth his trusted servant Eliezer to go to his former kinsmen and find Yitschaq his son a wife. Eliezer does this very thing. He selects Rivka for Yitschaq. And so, Eliezer enters into negotiations with Laban, Rivka’s father, to send Rivka home to Canaan with Eliezer to marry Avraham’s son, Yitschaq. And Laban and Rivka agree to the proposal.

This is laid out for us in Beresheit/Genesis 24.

Fast forward a few hundred years, we come to the example of enslaved Yisra’el. Father Yah, remaining true to the covenant promises He established with the patriarchs, called Yisrael out of Egypt (Egypt of course being emblematic of the world at large)—and thus, Yah calls Yisra’el unto Himself to become a bride for His Son Yahoshua Messiah forever. And thus, in that emblematic sense, Yisra’el would be taken under Yah’s care and receive all the covenant blessing promises that would abundantly fulfill all her needs and more. And the only thing Yisra’el, the bride, would be required to do is submit to Yah’s sovereignty over her life through a steadfast faith in Him and obedience to His house rules.

The Hebrew model of marriage consists of the bride coming from under her father’s household covering or headship, to under the household covering or headship of her new husband.

The wonderful earth-shattering news about this Yisra’el-Bride of Mashiyach model, especially as it relates to the Renewed Covenant, is that any man, woman, or child may join themselves to the commonwealth that is true Yisra’el, and enjoy all of the benefits associated with being the bride of Yahoshua. Like with Yisra’el proper, any who would be engrafted to the commonwealth of Yisra’el would simply enter into a covenant relationship with Father Yah through trusting-faith in the Person and Ministry of the Bridegroom, Yahoshua HaMashiyach. Such a covenant relationship requires the called out one to come from under their previous father’s headship or household (I.e., the world—the gods of this world) and come completely under the Headship and covering of our Master Yahoshua Messiah. There must be no compromise in terms of adhering to that change of headship and sovereignty. Shaul wrote to the Roman Messianic Assembly he oversaw:

“And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of Elohim” (12:2).

Yahoshua Himself said:

“If you keep My commandments, you will abide in My love (reminiscent of a bride abiding under the household and love of her husband), just as I have kept My Father’s commandments and abide in His love” (John/Yochanan 15:9-10).

Interestingly, the Bridegroom Yahoshua, has gone back to His Father’s house to prepare a place for His Bridegroom: Us!

And how about this:

“In My Father’s house are many mansion (dwelling places; also suggestive of rooms or compartments in the Temple): If it were not so, I would have told you” (John/Yochanan 14:2).

Beloved, this is right in line with the paradigm of a wedding and marriage. The Bridegroom goes to prepare a home for His beloved Bride. It’s as it should be. And within Yah’s household there is a way of life that is upheld by His righteous house rules. Yahoshua followed those very house rules. He conformed to His Father’s Way of Life. And thus, we as His Bride, must too conform to the Yah-family house rules, which is Torah-based.

This of course is a point of contention that exists between us who are Torah-honoring and observant and our wayward cousins in Denominationalism. Our cousins erroneously believe that Jesus’ grace (because Jesus and God the Father are one and the same Persons) covers not only a multitude of sins, but also any requirement or need to keep Yah’s Torah-instructions. And this is essentially so because of misinterpretations and manipulations of scriptural passages that have led millions to believe that Yah’s instructions in righteousness were nailed to the cross along with Yahoshua (Colossians 2:14). But this belief could not be further from the truth. Shimon Kefa (aka the apostle Peter) brought this issue up in his general epistle when he astutely wrote that:

“…They (that is, those who do not possess a trusting-obedient covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe) stumble, being disobedient to Yah’s Torah, to which they were also chosen to keep” (1 Peter/Kefa 2:8; modified).

So, in a sense, Pesach/Passover and Unleavened Bread represent the “shiddukhin” phase of the ancient Hebrew/Netzari wedding/marriage, for it was during this phase that Yisra’el, the bride to be, was selected by the Bridegroom.

The next phase in the marriage/wedding process is the wedding/marriage proposal, which in essence is emblematic of Shavuot. The proposal phase of a Netzari/Hebrew wedding/marriage is called the “erusin.” During the “erusin” phase of the wedding process, the terms of the marriage contract are announced and the proposal is put forth to the bride to accept. Once the bride accepts the marriage proposal, the “erusin” or the “marriage proposal” then becomes legally binding. It’s almost as if the couple were fully married. The difference is that the couple does not consummate the marriage nor do they live together until after the wedding ceremony.

And so it was, at the foot of Mount Sinai, that the terms of the marriage agreement was read to our ancient cousins. And our ancient cousins accepted the marriage proposal:

Moses came and told the people all Yah’s words and all the decisions. All the people answered together, “We are willing to do all the words that Yah has said,” (Exo 24:3 NET)

It is strongly believed by many within our Faith community and among our Jewish cousins, with me included, that the giving of the marriage proposal or Torah was done roughly seven-weeks after Yisra’el had departed and exited Egypt. We know that Yisra’el exited Gershom of Egypt on the first-day of Unleavened Bread. This being the case, the giving of Torah and the marriage proposal would have occurred on Shavuout.

The Torah that was given to our ancient cousins at the foot of Mount Sinai on that first Shavuot is emblematic of a “ketubah.” A “ketubah” is a written Hebrew marriage contract. It contains the rights and responsibilities of the groom and his bride. Furthermore, the ketubah delineates any associated penalties for breaking or violating elements of the marriage contract. And this is essentially what Torah is. For as it was for ancient Yisra’el, it too serves as our marriage contract to our husband to be Yahoshua. And when Yisra’el worshiped the “golden calf” some days after she received Torah, she violated and broke the “ketubah.”

Not only is Shavuot the set-apart day of Yah’s Biblical Calendar Year where His people received the “ketubah” or “Torah,” but some 1,500-years later in Yerushalayim, on Shavuot, 50-days after our Master’s crucifixion, Yahoshua’s disciples would receive the promised “comforter” or the Ruach HaKodesh.

Some have taken the giving of Yah’s Holy Spirit to His chosen ones as being emblematic of, still using the Hebrew Marriage/Wedding paradigm, the time between the marriage proposal and the wedding, the couple is not allowed to interact with one another. Any communication between the Bridegroom and His “bride to be” would be carried out by an friend of the Bridegroom. This is in essence a shadow picture of we as the bride communicating with our Bridegroom through the intermediary of the Ruach HaKodesh (aka the Holy Spirit). As Yahoshua tarries in his preparation for his bride (John/Yochanan 14:2), He employs or sends Yah’s precious Holy Spirit to intercede on our behalf till He returns for us at the Wedding Super of the Lamb (John/Yochanan 14:15-16).

Thus, the Ruach is an essential intercessor during our time of waiting for the return of our Bridegroom. For without the Ruach operating in our lives, we will not know how we should function; how we should carry on; and such (Acts 1:8). And so it was that the Ruach HaKodesh was gifted to the Body of Mashiyach on that Great Day of Shavuot in Yerushalayim (Acts 2).

Today, as with our ancient cousins attending that Shavuot in Yerushalayim in Acts 2, we are under a renewal of the original “ketubah” or covenant (Jeremiah/Yermeyahu 31:31). It’s the same “ketubah” or covenant, but now on steroids, whereby the tenets of that energized agreement are manifested in Spirit and in Truth (John 4:23-24).

It could be viewed as well that the Ruach HaKodesh is another form of the Ketbuah: The marriage agreement or contract between we, Yah’s beloved and chosen, and Yahoshua, our Bridegroom. For it attests to our covenant relationship with our Heavenly Father as well as He, during the justification process (emblematic of Chag HaMatzot/Feast of Unleavened Bread) inscribes Yah’s written Torah onto the fleshly tablets or tables of our hearts and minds.

 

3. The Timing of Shavuot—Calendrical Concerns and Issues Yet Again

Timing of Shavuot

Shavuot is the only feast or set-apart day that is not given a hard calendrical date by Yah. But rather, Yah requires us to count weeks, commencing with the waving of the firstfruits barley sheaves presented to the Levitical Cohanim during the Feast of Unleavened Bread pilgrimage festival (Leviticus/Vayikra 23:15).

The Jewish/Rabbinic Reckoning of Time for Shavuot

According to the Jewish reckoning of time, Shavuot occurs seven-weeks after Pesach, specifically 50-days after the so-called first seder. In other words, the counting of the days and weeks leading up to Shavuot begins on the second evening of Pesach (Aviv 15).

Judaism concedes some connection of Shavuot to an ancient grain harvest festival that took place annually in early summer. However, the rabbis place greater meaning to the day on the giving of Torah at Mount Sinai, which they contend occurred seven-weeks after Yisra’el’s exodus from Egypt. It is here that Yisra’el enters into a covenant with Yehovah.

Modern Jews traditionally favor dairy products on Shavuot. From a religious, community standpoint, the day centers around synagogal worship. Medieval poems are recited and the Book of Ruth is read. Why the Book of Ruth. Well, the rabbis contend that Ruth’s conversion to the Hebrew Faith mirrors Yisra’el’s acceptance of Torah at Sinai.

It should be mentioned, if one were to consult the Jewish Calendar (one is published on Chabad.org), they would notice that Shavuot occurs on two consecutive days. The first Shavuot occurs on S-nday, 6/5/2022 and the second on M-nday, 6/6/2022. (Consequently, Observationalists will observe the day on S-nday, 6/12/2022.)

It is believed by the rabbis that the first Shavuot to be observed each year represents the date that Torah was given to the nation in 1313 BCE (or 2448 FC), seven-weeks after the mixed multitude departed Egypt. The nation (600,000 heads of households and their families) came to Mount Sinai and it is here that the people experienced Yehovah: visually and audibly. And Yah spoke His commandments to the people.

As an aside, the rabbis also contend that King David died on Shavuot in the year 837 BCE at the age of 70.

As it relates to the second Shavuot on the rabbinic calendar, turns out that there are sects of Judaism outside Yisra’el that observe Shavuot for a 2nd day. The reason given for some sects to observe Shavuot a second day has to do with yet another calendar-related issue: Some sects begin the counting of the omer on “the evening following the first day of Pesach,” (I.e., the 14th of Aviv/Nisan) while other sects begin their count at sundown on the morning of 15th day of Aviv/Nisan.

Sectarian Confusion Surrounding the Timing of Shavuot

As it related to the timing for Shavuot on the biblical calendar, there were essentially three-competing sects in first-century Judea that we should endeavor to be knowledgeable of. Each sect had their own interpretation of Leviticus/Vayikra 23:15, which profoundly affected when they believed Shavuot should be kept.

1. Boethusians: These were an off-shoot of the Sadducees. The sect was originally founded and headed by Simeon b. Boethus who had been appointed high priest [of the Sanhedrin] by Herod the Great in 24 BCE (reference Josephus, Antiquity of the Jews: 15:320). Unfortunately, the Boethusians did not have a good reputation among the Pharisee sect for a number of reasons, the most glaring reason having to do with their reckoning of time for the Feasts. And this is relevant because the Pharisees held majority rule in the Sanhedrin (reference: b.Pesachim 57a; t.Menachot 13:21). And because the Pharisees held majority rule in the Sanhedrin, their reckoning of time as it related to all calendar concerns, including the reckoning of time for the feasts, tended to be what all practicing Jews throughout the Roman Empire adhered to.

Recall Leviticus/Vayiqra 23:15 which reads:

“And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the Shabbat, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering [that which was offered during the eight-day celebration of Chag HaMatzot/Unleavened Bread]…” (Cepher).

Now, the Boethusians interpreted the phrase the “morrow after the Shabbat” as being the first-day of the week since their understanding of Shabbat in this verse was the “weekly Sabbath that fell within the week of Chag HaMatzot/Unleavened Bread”. Thus, under Boethusian reckoning of time, Shavuot would always fall out on a “first day of the week” (aka S-nday).

That being said, I should add that I subscribe to the Boethusian reckoning and understanding of Leviticus/Vayiqra 23:15.

This understanding of Leviticus/Vayiqra 23:15 proved historically and halachicly critical since it ran contrary to the Phraisaic and Essennic reckoning of time for the Wavesheaf Offering (which directly affected the timing for the pilgrimage festival of Shavuot) and other calendar considerations.

2. Pharisees: The most influential of the Jewish sects in first-century Judea, believed the Sabbath referred to in Leviticus/Vayiqra 23:15 was the first-day of Chag HaMatzot or Unleavened Bread (I.e., the 15th day of the first month), which meant that the Wavesheaf Offering would take place on the 16th day of the first month. Thus, the 7-week count was that of 7-weeks from the first-day of Unleavened Bread. So, Shavuot could fall out on any day of the week, with the exception of a weekly Sabbath.

3. Essenes: This sect is believed by many to be those folks who lived and worship in Qumran of the Dead Sea Scrolls fame, although we know from the writings of Jewish historian Josephus that many Essenes also resided throughout the whole of Judea.

But in terms of the “sabbath” mentioned in Leviticus/Vayiqra 23:15, the Qumran sect understood it to mean the weekly Sabbath that occurs after the last day of Chag HaMatzot/Unleavened Bread. And so, as with the Boethusians’ understanding of the “morrow after the Sabbath,” Chag HaShavuot itself would always occur on a first day of the week (aka S-nday).

Most Messianics adhere to either the Boethusian or Qumran/Essennic reckoning and understanding of the term “sabbath” in Leviticus/Vayiqra 23:15: That of the “morrow after the Shabbat” being a first-day of the week or a S-nday.

Although the Pharisee sect had the majority rule of the Sanhedrin in first-century C.E. Yerushalayim, and thus, it would seem that Pharisaic rule would be the law of the Jewish religious and political landscape in Judea and throughout the Roman Empire, we have no written proof as to which reckoning for Wavesheaf and Shavuot was actually adhered to. Mishnaic passages such as m. Menachot 10:3 strongly suggests that the Pharisaic reckoning was followed. That being the case, Yahoshua and His disciples would have likely followed suit and kept the feast along with every other first-century orthodox Jewish Judean. Some have suggested, however, that the apostle John’s (aka Yochanan’s) account of Yahoshua and His disciples’ keeping the Feasts may not have been consistent with how Yahoshua reckoned the timing of certain feasts, but instead, deferred at the time to the Pharisaic reckoning:

After this there was a feast of the Jews; and Jesus went up to Jerusalem. (Joh 5:1 KJV)

And the passover, a feast of the Jews, was nigh. (Joh 6:4 KJV)

Other similar passages include John 2:13 and 11:55.

In these cited passages, the focus is on the phrase “a feast of the Jews,” which more times than not in the Brit HaDashah is a direct reference to the rabbinic (Pharisaic) Jewish sect and its religious leaders.

For the longest time, I used to dance around these passages and attribute them to intentional scribal errors thinking it entirely uncharacteristic of someone like the apostle to refer to the feasts as “a feast of the Jews”. But given what we know regarding the likely meaning of the phrase “feast of the Jews,” one has to factor in the possibility that Yochanan meant what he wrote: the referenced feast was of rabbinic reckoning and not of Yah’s and Yahoshua’s reckoning.

And so it stands, at least for me, that this disconnect that existed between the various first-century Jewish sects in terms of their respective reckoning of the timing for the feasts, could be the very answer to my questions regarding the wording of these four-mysterious verses in Yochanan’s Gospel account.

Consequently, we find that even today, the vast majority of Jews in the world still adhere to the Rabbinic (aka Pharisaic) reckoning of time for the feasts, although many Messianics—both Observationalist and Rabbinic Calendar fans alike—seem to adhere to the Boethusian reckoning of time for Wavesheaf and Shavuot.

It would seem intuitive that the three-opposing Jewish sects might keep Wavesheaf and Shavuot according to their respective reckonings, although that might have led to some push-back from the ruling Sanhedrin. For with separate observance time-frames for each of the three-sects, there’d have to be separate ceremonies and sacrifices that would have to be conducted on those competing days as well. Nevertheless, and strangely enough, neither of the historical writers such as Josephus nor Philo seem to have mentioned such conflicting observances taking place during that time and in that region.

I should also add that the conventional wisdom of first-century Judaism in terms of determining the start of a new biblical calendar year and the start of each calendar month seems to have consisted of a combination of both the observational and calculated as suggested by 1 Samuel 20:18:

“Then Yahunathan (aka Jonathan) said to David, ‘tomorrow is the New Moon (chodesh) and you shall be missed, because your seat will be empty” (Cepher).

So, it would seem by this historical example that even in King David’s day, the Hebrews reckoned time on their calendar through the sighting of the renewed moon each month in combination with calculations as to when the lunar conjunctions would occur. In other words, how did Jonathan confidently know that the new moon would occur the following day unless he possessed knowledge of when the renewed moon would occur before hand.

Now, despite this combination of the observational and the calculated, the observational always took center stage for reckoning the key dates of the biblical calendar year with the Sanhedrin employing anywhere between three to seven councilmen to make their final ruling on when each year and month began (reference the Tosefta—t.Sanhedrin 2.1; 2.6; 2.12; m.Rosh HaShannah 1:1).

So, communicating the start of each calendar year and month after confirmation of the sighting of the renewed moon (it is believed that the Cohenim would confirm the renewed moon sightings with their lunar conjunction calculations)—they’d communicate their ruling to the scattered people of the land originally by way of hilltop fires. But after confusion erupted between Jewish authorities and Samaritans over the meaning of these hilltop fires, communication was accomplished by way of messengers (ref.m.Rosh HaShannah 2:3).

4. The Commandment Given to Keep Shavuot Through the Renewed Covenant—A Look at Shavuot Through the Lens of the Acts 2 Pentecost Event

Down Payment on the Renewed Covenant

Although the New (or Renewed) Covenant has not been fully enacted, we saw the down-payment of it played out on the Temple Mount on Shavuot, just 10-days after Yahoshua commissioned His disciples on the Mount of Olives and then ascended up on high to be with His Father and to serve in the Heavenly Mishkan. On that fateful day, Pentecost 28 C.E., the Holy Spirit (i.e., the Ruach HaKodesh) was poured out upon the disciples of Yahoshua who were attending Shavuot, gathered on the Temple Mount (Acts 2). This was the fulfillment of the “shadow picture” of the very first Shavuot at Mount Sinai. At the first Shavuot, YHVH gave the Children of Yisrael His Torah—His instructions in righteousness—His commandments. On the Day of Pentecost in 28 C.E., YHVH gave the redeemed and faithful Children of Yisrael (i.e., starting off with the disciples of Yahoshua Messiah) His Holy Spirit (His Ruach HaKodesh). Thus, we see how Torah became fully manifested and made to dwell within the people of YHVH. At the time of the first Shavuot, 3,000 souls perished because Yisrael chose to break the covenant. At the time of Shavuot on the Temple Mount as recorded in Acts 2, 3,000-souls entered the Body of Messiah and into life eternal.

5. The Why and How of Shavuot for the 2022 Netzari—Spiritual and Practical Halachah

The Importance of Shavuot For Messianic Believers Today

Shavuot remains relevant to every Torah Observant Believer in Messiah today. Beyond the fact that we are commanded by YHVH to keep Shavuot (Leviticus/Vayiqra 23:21, 22), we gain invaluable and crucial understanding of the New (Renewed) Covenant that Messianics are now privileged to be under. Shavuot is important in reminding the Netzari of the importance of keeping Torah and being in a right-relationship with the Creator of the Universe. Shavuot also serves as a prompt for every Torah Observant Believer to seek the leading and guidance of the Holy Spirit in their lives such that they live lives of their chosen status as Kings and Priests of YHVH Elohim. And Shavuot teaches the Netzari that just mechanically keeping Torah does not secure their place in the Kingdom of YHVH. Torah is Father’s house-rules that help us maintain a substantive relationship with Him. Admission into the Kingdom of YHVH is gained through faith in the shed blood of Yahoshua, for salvation is a gift from Yah. YHVH’s gifted Holy Spirit (I.e., Ruach HaKodesh) then aids the Netzari in his/her keeping of the Creator’s house-rules—rightly walking out Yah’s Torah while remaining in a covenant relationship with Yah—even in the midst of his/her living in this corrupt and dying world.

Shavuot then is about living the life that the Creator of the Universe always had in mind for His chosen people. Shavuot is living life in the Spirit.

Keeping Shavuot in 2022

The keeping of Shavuot by today’s Torah Observant Believer in Yahoshua Messiah is pretty simple. We find in Leviticus 23: 21 that Messianics are to:

  • Make a proclamation on Shavuot; such that believers are to extol the glories of the Creator and speak to others of YHVH’s Word.
  • Participate in a holy convocation; such that Netzarim come together (e.g., in fellowships and congregations and assemblies) for the reading of Scripture and the breaking of bread.
  • Perform or conduct no servile or laborious work.
  • Worship Yah in Spirit and in Truth.

With the Temple in Jerusalem no longer in existence, Messianics can not truly keep Shavuot as one of the 3-pilgrimage Feasts of YHVH and as instructed in Torah (Exodus/Shemot 23:14-17; Deuteronomy/Devarim 16:16). However, under the auspices of the renewed covenant, the well intentioned Netzarim’s bodies have replaced the Temple proper as the dwelling place of YHVH (1 Corinthians 3:16; 6:19). Thus, wherever two or more Netzarim have gathered together in their Master’s Name, there Yah will be in their midst (Matthew 18:20). Our implements or elements of worship, which back in the day were sacrifices and offerings, are today the giving of our bodies unto Yah as living sacrifices that are holy and acceptable unto Him (Romans 12:1); and sacrifices of praise to Yah which is the “fruit of our lips” giving thanks to His Name (Hebrews 13:15); and exhorting one another (Hebrews 10:25).

How this all actually looks for a Netzari living in 2022 depends wholly upon where Yah has placed them at the time of any of the mandated feasts of Yah, not just Shavuot. As ideal as it is to participate in a live, physical convocation or fellowship on the day of Shavuot, it just may not be possible from some of us do. So, it falls to the diligent Netzari to search out opportunities to fulfill the mandate of convocating on these set-apart days such as Shavuot, which means well in advance of the day, searching out local fellowships and assemblies if they exist; pulling up live gatherings on-line; or convocating with willing, like-minded family members on the day. We are thus called to study to show ourselves approved a Yah, workmen that need not be ashamed (2 Timothy 2:15). In other words, we are called to do our best to fulfill the tenets of Yah’s Feasts in Spirit and in Truth, allowing Yah’s Ruach HaKodesh to lead and guide our keeping of the day.

I have another teaching on Shavuot that I posted back in 2018 that is near and dear to me that I would absolutely love to share with you. I thought about incorporating it into this discussion, but found that it would be prohibitively too long. But if you are interested in going deeper into the spiritual implications and applications of Shavuot, I would humbly encourage you to listen to or read our post entitled: The Shavuot-Pentecost Connection. I promise you, it will cause you to think and see Shavuot a little differently than you may otherwise have done.

 

The Inapplicability of Torah–Part 3 of Where There is no Law There is no Transgression

This is “The Inapplicability of Torah.” It is the final installment to our 3-part series within a series entitled “Where There is no Law There is no Transgression.”

Because I have so much content to cover today and I’m led to bring this series within a series to a close, I will only encourage you to, if you’ve not had the opportunity to listen to or read, Parts 1 and 2 in order to be familiar with some of what we’re going to cover today. Therefore, I will not rehash/review those installments. But rather, we will pick-up today where we left off in part-2 and bring this installment to a practical conclusion.

Our focus passage remains Romans 4:9-15, with particular attention paid to verse 15.

The Torah-Faith-Righteousness Connection

Shaul’s ultimate goal in our focus passage is to appeal to his Roman Messianic readers to choose righteousness that is derived from a trusting, obedient covenant relationship with Yehovah, and to reject the so-called righteousness that they once believed came only through their Jewishness—their oral and written Torah; their circumcision; their heritage and culture. They erroneously believed that their reliance on Torah for their justification made them favorable to Yah while their Gentile counterparts’ lack of Jewishness made them subject to Yah’s wrath and judgment. (We discuss in a series within a series this ideal of one’s eternal security resting upon one’s Jewishness. If you’ve not already read or listened to that series, I would humbly encourage you to do so if you’re so led.). And it was this erroneous belief that Shaul set out to refute in this portion of his letter.

Being Under the Law

When Torah is introduced to an individual in one form or another, violations of it, along with the prescribed punishment for violations of its commandments (I.e., the invoking of Yah’s righteous wrath) will bring that person “under the law”. That is, the one who possesses (I.e., possesses knowledge of Torah) is subject to Yah’s righteous wrath and judgment unless he or she enters into a faithful-obedient covenant relationship with Yah through a trusting faith in the Person and Ministry of Yahoshua Messiah.

Conversely, if an individual remains ignorant and devoid of any knowledge or possession of Torah, they are not subject to or “under the law.” But rather, these individuals are subject to Yah’s “natural moral laws” which any transgression thereof makes him/her subject to Yah’s wrath and judgment (Romans 1). And just as in the case of the one who is “under the law”, his or her only escape is by entering into a faithful-obedient covenant relationship with Yah through Yahoshua.

Final Work-up to our Focus Verse: An Examination of Romans 4:9-14

With that said, it’s now time to do a final work-up and examination of our focus passage of Romans 4:9-14 and a final explanation of our focus verse of Romans 4:15.

Romans 4:9-10

(9) Is this blessedness (that being the covenant blessings and promises) then for the circumcision or also for the uncircumcision? For we say, “faith was credited to Avraham as righteousness.” How then was it credited to him? Was he circumcised at the time, or not? No, he was not circumcised but uncircumcised (NET).

Shaul brings into question the truth or wisdom of one’s justification being a byproduct of one’s Jewishness, or rather, one’s circumcised, proselyte status. Was justification or the righteousness of Yah exclusive to the Jew? Or, was justification or righteousness inclusive of the non-Jews or the nations of the world?

In a sense, this verse is a continuation of the rhetorical argument the apostle posed to his Roman Messianic Jewish readers back in chapter 3. (We covered this rhetorical argument in detail in our discussion entitled “A Question of One’s Jewishness”.) And in order for us to accurately interpret and understand the point that the apostle is trying to convey here, we must take our focus passage and verse within the contextual framework of this letter, from chapter one all the way up to this passage. For what we have here before us is, in a broad sense, is a refutation of the actions and philosophy of the Judaizers or Influencers who were bent on forcing incoming believing Gentiles to convert to Judaism. And the issue that Paul had regarding this issue was not that converting to Judaism was a sin or a bad thing. But rather, the issue at hand was the religious—the spiritual—emphasis that the Judaizers/Influencers placed on a Gentile’s conversion to Judaism. As far as the Judaizers/Influencers were concerned, conversion to Judaism was a “salvific.” The coerced conversion of incoming believing Gentiles would cause those who went through with the conversion and undertook the rite of physical circumcision to place their eternal security, not in a covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe, but rather in their pending Jewish status; what would ultimately become their Jewishness. Thus, as Shaul critically saw it, the bedrock of the Messianic Faith, which is that of a trusting faith in the Person and Ministry of Yahoshua Messiah would become null and void. Which would mean that their eternal security would be imperil.

Recall that we embarked on that series within a series entitled “A Question of One’s Jewishness” where we discussed the first-century religious Jewish mindset that held to the erroneous belief that one’s salvation and admittance into the congregation of Yisra’el was based entirely upon one’s Jewishness. And one’s Jewishness consisted of one’s Jewish heritage, biology, physical circumcised state, adherence to the written and oral laws/Torahs, and such. And last installment to this series within a series (The Role of Torah in the World) we discussed how one was deemed righteous only as a result of their adherence to Jewish sect-specific halachah—that is, adhering to a specific Jewish sect’s laws, traditions, and rules. Which meant that according to the Judaizers/Influencers of the Roman Messianic Assemblies, only those who were proselytized into their Jewish Messianic Sect through physical circumcision could (1) be admitted as members of their Messianic Assembly, and (2) be saved or be admitted into the Kingdom of Elohim. In other words: No Proselytized Gentiles Allowed. Salvation and Righteousness belonged exclusively to the religious Jew.

Evidence of this erroneous mindset is found in certain medieval midrashic writings such as Pesikta Rabbati 45 (185b). Midrash, by the way, is a genre of rabbinic literature that contains Jewish Biblical exegesis (critical interpretation of Hebrew texts), hermeneutics (interpretation of biblical passages), and compilations of homilies (rabbinic commentaries that follow a prescribed reading of a Hebrew text).

The irony in this is that Yah never made any such stipulation that one’s righteousness was derived from one’s adherence to a sect’s set of established traditions, laws, and rules; for that matter, one’s Jewishness. The fact remains that Yah reckons one righteous based solely upon his or her trusting Faith in Him. And so it is that we find here in our focus passage work-up of verses 9 and 10 Shaul making the case that no Gentile need become a proselyte in order to be forgiven their sins and to be reckoned righteous before the Creator of the Universe, which of course was contrary to first-century Jewish conventional wisdom. And to prove his point, the apostle to the Gentiles draws upon the life-example of Avraham, whom Shaul points out was deemed righteous by Yah before he was physically circumcised.

I would add to the understanding and proof of this paradigm (that is of Avraham’s faith-producing righteousness coming before his obedience), that one may view the Feasts of Yah from the perspective of a convert’s spiritual journey. Pesach is emblematic of our Master Yahoshua’s atoning sacrifice and ministry that makes our entering a faith-based covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe possible. And then, emblematic of the 7-day long Feast of Unleavened Bread (aka Chag HaMatzot), we begin and engage in the lifelong justification process—or rather becoming saved and being made righteous–which involves developing and maintaining a trusting-faithful relationship with Yehovah. In this portion of the journey, we are being saved; we are being justified and reckoned righteous before a holy and just God. We learn what it means to trust Father and reap the spiritual benefits of being in an intimate relationship with the Creator. Then Shavuot/Pentecost, where Yah’s precious Holy Spirit (I.e., His Ruach HaKodesh) begins to inscribe His Torah on the fleshly tablets of our hearts. In this portion of the journey, we begin to walk obediently in Yah’s Ways—His Torah—His instructions in righteousness—His lively oracles. And our obedience is facilitated by the work of the Holy Spirit/Ruach HaKodesh.

So, all in all, if we view this journey from the perspective of the Feasts of Yah, we see that obedience always follow faith and being reckoned righteous, which is consistent with Avraham’s journey and experience. Like Avraham, one enters the process of being justified and saved on the basis of his or her faith in advance of being Torah observant. And this being the case, logically speaking, the covenant blessings would not be exclusive to faithful and obedient Jews, but accessible to Gentiles as well.

Romans 4:11

And he (Avraham) received the sign of circumcision as a seal of the righteousness that he had by faith while he was still uncircumcised, so that he would become the father of all those who believe but have never been circumcised, that they too could have righteousness credited to them (NET).

Every English translation of verse 11 has Shaul referring to Avraham’s physical circumcision as “a sign” of the covenant relationship he enjoyed with the Creator of the Universe. More so, according to Shaul, the sign or mark of the physical circumcision was intended by Yah to serve as a reminder of the ultimate covenant promise of “Avraham’s seed blessing the nations—blessing the families of the earth (Genesis/Beresheit 12:3; 18:18; 22:18; 26:4; 28:14). And of course, this blessing of the families or nations of the earth is none other than the Person and Ministry of our Master Yahoshua Messiah.

Beloved: the premise of, or as commentator Tim Hegg refers to it, physical circumcision, was that it was a sign of the “essence” of the Avrahamic covenant, which is where the Original Covenant brilliantly intersects and builds upon the Renewed Covenant.

Messianic Jewish thinking attaches specific spiritual importance to physical circumcision being applied to the male organ of procreation and the promise that in Avraham’s seed (that is, the Hebrew nation and ultimately the Yahoshua Messiah) all the nations or families of the earth would be blessed. Why? Because this points directly to the promised Son of the Covenant: Yeshua HaMashiyach.

Beyond this such thinking, the act of receiving physical circumcision was intended to be an outward sign of one’s trusting Faith in the Elohim of Yisra’el. It was never meant to be a fraternal emblem of one’s Jewishness. It was meant to be an outward show of one’s trusting covenant relationship with the Elohim of Avraham, Yitschaq, and Ya’achov.

For as Shaul attempted to convey to his Roman Messianic Jewish readers, Avraham’s trusting faith came many years before he and his household received the sign and seal of physical circumcision. And for Avraham to go through the ritual of physical circumcision, it would be a sign or mark of his trusting Faith in Yah and dedication to the Way of Life that Yah instructed him to walk in. And so for us today, obedience naturally flows from a trusting faith in the Creator of the Universe, through the Person and Ministry of Yahoshua Messiah.

From Avraham’s life story we see how his trusting faith in Yah led to him receiving the covenant promises. However, when Avraham’s faith was lacking and he instead placed his trust and faith in the ways of the flesh, as brilliantly seen in the Hagar incident, the outcome was not at all consistent with the covenant promises of Yah. The outcome of Avraham’s momentary, misguided trust in the ways of the flesh, prompted Avraham to return to that legendary trusting faith in the Creator of the Universe.

So here, Shaul puts forth the understanding that since Avraham walked in faith well before he received the mark of circumcision that proved his faith producing righteousness, that he (Avraham) became the “father of faith” or the “father of the faithful.” He is the father of those physically circumcised Jews who possess a trusting faith in Yah through Yahoshua Messiah. As well as he is the father of those who have not been led to receive physical circumcision, but who have a trusting faith in Yah through Yeshua Messiah. For the fact stands that Avraham set the example of faith for his seed—both circumcised and uncircumcised—to follow. And within that paradigm of being a seed of Avraham through faith, one is reckoned righteous by the court of heaven.

Romans 4:12

And he is also the father of the circumcised, who are not only circumcised, but who also walk in the footsteps of the faith that our father Avraham possessed when he was still uncircumcised (NET).

The Apostle’s emphasis here is on the pre-circumcised faith of Avraham. This is the form and intensity of faith that Yah is calling for in terms of a would-be child of His. That child being of either the circumcision (I.e., a believing orthodox Jew) or an uncircumcised believing non-Jew/Gentile.

Now, it should go without saying that Avraham did in fact become the father of the biological, cultural, orthodox and religious Jew of this world. These are those who Shaul referred to as being of the circumcision.

However, more so, Avraham is also the father of the believing, circumcised, Messianic Jew as well as the believing, uncircumcised Gentile. In short, in accordance with the covenant that Yah made with him, Avraham became the father of the faithful as well as what some would refer to as the Jewish nation, by virtue of his trusting Faith in the Creator of the Universe.

However, as much as the apostle cherished his kinsmen, he recognized that the decisive factor that Shaul is addressing here is faith. Not circumcision or sect-specific halachah.

Let us not fall for the false impression that many within and outside our Faith Communities have: That physical circumcision has for all intents and purposes been done away and replaced by circumcision of the heart. Shaul meant no such thing here. The apostle’s emphasis, rather, was on the proper, as J.K. McKee so astutely puts it, “…sequence of events in the Torah would have it—secondarily to his (I.e., Avraham’s faith) in Yah” (”Romans for the practical Messianic,” pg. 106). In other words, physical circumcision must be viewed and treated as “a subsequent and external seal of that righteous status which Avraham already possessed as Yah’s free gift; it neither created nor enhanced that righteous status” (ibn; pg. 106). (We discussed the relevance of physical circumcision to Yah’s called out ones in Part 3 of our “A Question of One’s Jewishness” series within a series.) For as in Avraham’s case, physical circumcision is meant as “an outward and visible attestation of the status of righteousness (the byproduct of a trusting faithful covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe) which he (Avraham) already possessed” (Ibn., pg. 107). One must first enter into and remain in a trusting faithful covenant relationship with Yah, and then, if so led by Yah’s Ruach HaKodesh, receive the mark of physical circumcision as a testimony or mark of one’s faithful covenant relationship. Bottom line beloved, physical circumcision or Torah-keeping as a whole, again as in the case of Avraham, must always come after righteousness that is conferred as a result of one’s trusting faith.

 

Romans 4:13

For the promise to Avraham or to his descendants that he would inherit the world was not fulfilled through the law, but through the righteousness that comes by faith (NET).

The covenant promises were linked exclusively to Avraham’s faith. Consequently, our being partakers and inheritors of those same covenant promises (I.e., our being heirs of the commonwealth of Yisra’el) is linked exclusively to our trusting faith in Yah through Yahoshua Messiah. To link one’s inheritance of the covenant promises to one’s halachah and or keeping of Torah/Law is to deny the truth of Scripture. For the covenant promise existed well before Torah was gifted to us at Mount Sinai. Avraham’s righteousness was inextricably linked to the Promised Son Yitschaq (aka Isaac)—His seed—his covenant promised descendants (that being the nation of Yisrael), but more so, to The Seed. The Seed that would crush the head of the serpent and bring humanity back to a true and substantive relationship with Yah and usher in Yah’s eternal Kingdom here on earth. Of this Yahoshua our Master said that “father Avraham was overjoyed to see [His] day, he saw it, and was glad” (John 8:56; NET).

According to the apostle, it is the restoration of all things that were taken from us by the enemy (I.e., the covenant promises in its grandest revelation) that will be inherited by those that enter and remain in a trusting, faithful covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe through Yahoshua Messiah:

(21) So then, no more boasting about mere mortals! For everything belongs to you, (22) whether Shaul or Apollos or Cephas or the world or life or death or the present or the future. Everything belongs to you (you, being the faithful Corinthian who is in covenant with Yah), (23) and you belong to Mashiyach, and Mashiyach belongs to Yah (1 Corinthians 3; NET modified).

In other words, beloved, we who are in a trusting, faithful relationship with Yah through Yahoshua, are heirs of Avraham, who himself received the promise of inheriting the whole world. Thus, we stand to inherit everything as well. And like Avraham, this promise of inheriting the world is not achieved through sect-specific halachah, or for that matter, simple Torah-keeping. But rather, through the righteousness that comes by way of our Trusting Faith.

Many in Judaism and in sectors of our Faith Community will argue, citing passages such as Genesis/Beresheit 26:2-5, that Avraham’s obedience resulted in him receiving the blessings of the covenant promises, which may in and of itself seem contradictory to all that we’ve been talking about here as it relates to faith coming before obedience.

But the truth of the matter is this: Indeed, as the passage declares, Yitschaq received Yah’s divine protection and blessings; his seed received possession of the Land of Canaan and his descendants made as numerous as the stars; and the Messiah would come through his line because Avraham obeyed Yah and “kept Yah’s commandments, statutes and laws” (Genesis 26:5).

But let’s not be confused here. It was Avraham’s trusting faith in Yah that netted Him Yah’s righteousness and friend-status and compelled his obedience. Avraham’s faith came first, followed by his obedience.

A proper interpretation of “For the promise to Avraham or to his descendants that he would inherit the world was not fulfilled through the law/Torah” should simply be that Yah’s instructions in righteousness were never meant or intended to save anyone. But rather, salvation and righteousness came to Avraham in accordance with his trusting faith alone, which compelled him to be obedient to Yah’s instructions; all of which pleased Yah and brought about the covenant promises which we are engrafted heirs to. For faith comes first then obedience. And so, as the half-brother of our Master so elegantly wrote, without obedience, one’s faith is dead; and without works, one’s faith is dead as well (James 2).

Romans 4:14

For if they (religious, unbelieving Jews) become heirs by the law, faith is empty and the promise (that being the covenant promises) is nullified (NET).

Those who have been in our faith community any appreciable length of time would know of individuals who have placed all their spiritual eggs or marbles into Torah-keeping (both written and oral). In fact, one would rarely if ever hear a word about faith come out of their mouths. These want so much to look and act Jewish that they abandon and or avoid any talk or teaching having to do with faith. Unfortunately, this obsession and misplaced focus (that is, of Torah-Torah-Torah) nwill not lead one to righteousness nor salvation.

When Yah made the covenant promises to Avraham, He did not condition those promises on Avraham being circumcised or on him being Torah-observant. But rather, those covenant promises were made to Avraham by virtue of Yah making a unilateral promise to Avraham and to his seed. And all that Avraham would need do to receive those covenant promises was to simply trust Yah.

Conversely, and hypothetically speaking, if Yah would have commanded Avraham to be circumcised and instructed to keep His Torah and then receive the covenant blessings—which He did not—but if Yah would have orchestrated events as such, then there’d be no need for Avraham to have a trusting, faithful relationship with the Almighty in order to inherit those covenant blessings.

It’s sort of akin to one going to the store, picking up an item that you desire, going up to the counter, paying for it, and then walking out of the store with that desired item in your hands. You just completed a financial transaction: You received goods or even a service in exchange for your obedience: You followed a procedure of paying for the item(s) you wanted, and then you received the desired items.

However, if that same item you wanted was promised to be given to you or gifted to you by someone (assuming with no strings attached), all you needed to do to receive that item was to simply wait and trust that person to eventually get it to you.

If you decided to not wait to receive that item, but instead went to the store and purchased the item yourself, you would have in principle voided the promise of being given that desired item.

Let’s look at the example of Avraham again. Avraham was promised of Yah a son who would be his heir. Years passed after Yah made the promise of a son to Avraham and Avraham got antsy because he and Sarah had gone pass their childbearing years without having that promised heir or son. So what did the couple do? Well, the couple rationalized that in order to bring forth the promise of an heir/son, Sarah, who was barren at the time, would have to put forth a substitute or surrogate to bring Avraham’s heir into the world. And in Sarah offering her handmaid Hagar to Avraham for purposes of forcing the promise of an heir, Avraham shifted his Trust in Yah (I.e., he essentially voided his faith in Yah) to that of the flesh—the carnal. Avraham trusted that Hagar would successfully bear him a son and heir and through her the covenant promise of an heir would be fulfilled.

Hagar, consequently, did bear Avraham a son—Ishmael, unfortunately to much turmoil and family/household strife. But the reality is that Hagar did not bear Avraham the covenant promised heir. Abba instead had to correct Avraham’s error and get him back on track of trusting Him for the promised heir of the covenant.

You see, Yah was about doing the heavy lifting here and He alone bringing about the covenant promises to Avraham and his seed. All Avraham had to do was trust that Yah would bring about that which He’d promised. Avraham’s trust in Yah merited him Yah’s righteousness and Avraham’s trusting covenant relationship with Yah also merited Him friendship status with Yah (Genesis/Beresheit 15:6; cf. James/Ya’achov 2:23).

And it is this trusting faith in Yah—this reliance on Yah doing the heavy lifting for us—that will ultimately bring us into a justified state before Yah and ultimately entry into the Kingdom of Yah. In response to our trusting, faithful relationship with Yah, we are compelled to walk in His Ways because we love our Heavenly Father and we want to please Him. And most importantly, we are obedient because we realize it is the absolute right thing to do.

 

Making Sense of Romans 4:15

For Torah is a worker of wrath: Because where no instruction is, there is no transgression of Torah.

In his commentary, Andrew Gabriel Roth, editor and interpreter of the AENT, rightly interprets this verse from the perspective of where there is no Torah provision against an action, then there is no transgression. Essentially, Shaul was making here a rhetorical statement to his religious Messianic Jewish readers.

Contrary to the anti-Torah rhetoric of denominationalists who use this verse as one of their proof-passages, the apostle appears to be saying rather, that “wherever Torah is not being taught, people will do what is right in their own eyes…” Which is pretty much true. Because the world rejects Yah and His ways. And it is this unconverted human attitude that Shaul asserts makes them subject to Yah’s wrath and judgment outside the framework of Torah (Romans 1).

So, with this understanding in mind, we as Yah’s set-apart people should recognize that Torah was never meant to be OUR condemnatory instrument or weapon to beat unbelieving humanity about their heads: Not by Yah, nor by Yah’s set-apart people against others.

The religious Jew of Shaul’s day believed that by virtue of him being a steward of Yah’s oracles—Yah’s Torah—and their Jewishness, that they were justified/made righteous before a holy and righteous Elohim. And therefore they believed themselves superior to their Gentile counterparts in the eyes of Elohim. Thus, they proudly stood in judgment against and condemnation of the Gentile.

In response to this erroneous notion, Shaul, here and in other areas of this same letter, was simply pointing out to his readers that all have sinned—both Jew and Gentile alike—and have fallen short of Yah’s glorious standards of righteous living (Romans 3:23). Therefore, all who have not placed their faith/trust in the Person and Ministries of Yahoshua Messiah will be subject to Yah’s righteous wrath. Those who are so-called people of the Book (I.e., Catholics, Denominationalists, Jews, Messianics, etc.) will be judged within the framework of Torah because of their transgressions against Yah’s Torah, while those outside of any understanding of Torah will be judged outside the framework of Torah (Romans 1:18-2:6). (We discuss what this all means in our series within a series “Being Under the Law.” And if you’ve not had the opportunity to read or listen to any of those posts, we humble encourage you to do so as you are so led.)

So, we who have the mind of Messiah must keep Torah in a proper perspective. First must come faith in the Person and Ministry of Yeshua Messiah. That which flows from a Trusting Faith, as seen in the example and life of Avraham, is obedience to Yah’s instructions in righteousness—Yah’s written Torah.

You see, Yah never intended for Torah to be the instrument by which we are justified before Him. But rather, Torah serves as a decipher or identifier of sin and the penalties that are associated with incidents of sin. It applies only to Yah’s chosen ones as well as those who have knowledge or possession of it. It does not apply to those who have no knowledge of Yah and His Ways/instructions in righteousness.

Therefore, it should be clear to any with eyes to see and ears to hear that Yah’s people are held to a higher standard than people of the world. Why? Because we know better. We know Yah’s ways and His Will. We have no excuse for living outside Yah’s Ways and His Will. Thus, those who possess knowledge of Yah’s Torah who are not in a trusting, obedient covenant relationship with the Almighty through the Person and Ministry of Yeshua, are subject to the wrath of Yah; the penalties of Torah which is death and ultimately eternal separation from Yah.

So, when it comes to us having to deal with others who may not have an understanding of Torah as we do, we have to be patient, loving, and show understanding towards them. They are lacking in understanding. They’ve not entered into the journey that we have been called to. Or maybe they have entered the journey we’ve been called to, but they are not at the same place that we are in our journey. Thus, it falls to us to recognize that and be available to any who may seek our knowledge and understanding.

And so, we cannot judge or condemn folks on their keeping or lack of Torah keeping/living.

Paul’s Righteous Perspective Laid Out

Shaul attempted to put into proper perspective the realities of Torah in relation to the circumcised believing and non-believing Jew, as well as the believing and non-believing uncircumcised Gentile.

The way the apostle saw it, and I absolutely agree with his assessment, was that the believing Gentiles that had begun streaming into the Roman Messianic Assemblies would not have any true knowledge of Torah. Thus, they would not have been subject to the stipulations of Torah since they could not have possibly transgressed that which was not part of their knowledge base and life. Consequently, the Roman Judaizers/Influencers had no ground upon which to judge the so-called Gentile transgressors of Torah nor consider them common or unclean.

This hearkens back to the true meaning of the vision that the Apostle Shimon Keefa (aka Peter) had on that rooftop in Joppa just before Yahoshua sent him to witness and evangelize the Roman Centurion Cornelius. Upon entering Cornelius’ home, Keefa—Peter—tells Cornelius:

“…You know that it is unlawful for a Jew to associate with or visit a Gentile, yet Yah has shown me that I should call no person defiled or ritually unclean” (Acts 10:28; NET modified).

The erroneous mindset of the religious Jew towards any and all Gentiles in Shaul’s day was that they were inherently defiled and ritually unclean—violators of Torah. This of course was derived from a manipulation and misinterpretation of the Written Torah by way of their Oral Traditions and teachings. For the Oral Tradition taught that because Gentiles were inherently idolaters, they must be avoided by any and all Torah-observant Jews. (We spoke about this earlier in this post.)

But the truth of the matter is that Father Yah did not see the Gentile as such. He saw them just as He saw the Jew: sinners worthy of righteous wrath and judgment. But Yah also saw the Gentile, as He also saw the Jew: sinners worthy of saving and adopting as His beloved children. And so Abba has never been a respecter or person as the religious Jew of Shaul’s day erroneously believed (Deuteronomy/Devarim 10:17; 2 Chronicles 19:7; Acts 10:34; Romans 2:11; Ephesians 6:9; Colossians 3:25; 1 Peter 1:17).

And so, it seems that we find here, in our focus passage, Shaul conveying to his Roman readers, that any and all thoughts of trying to clean-up the Gentiles through proselytizing them—converting them to Judaism—was fool-hearty. They (the converted, faithful, uncircumcised Gentiles) were not condemned by their Torahs, for Torah did not apply to them during their pre-conversion lives. Thus the converted Gentiles were not to be viewed, judged, nor condemned as transgressors or violators of Torah since the Torah was not known to them.

But rather, the faithless Jew stood subject to Torah because he/she were transgressors of the very instrument they condemned the Gentile with. Their lack or refusal to place their trusting faith in Yah through the Person and Ministry of Yahoshua, made them subject to Yah’s wrath and judgment.

And this was the perspective and general understanding of our focus passage and verse.

Practical Messianic Halachah Application of our Focus Passage and Verse

From a practical Messianic Halachah standpoint, our focus passage should serve as a reminder for us to keep Torah in its proper perspective in our walk in Mashiyach. To not stand in condemnation against those who may not understand Yah’s Way of life the way we do or who may despise our way of life. But rather, let us love the foreigner and those who are afar off from Yah’s Covenant promises, knowing that Yah is no respecter of person and that He is calling not just the circumcised religious Jew to salvation and a covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe through Yahoshua our Messiah, but also the nation peoples of the world (Ephesians 2:13-17).

So then, it falls to us, as Yah’s chosen ones, to first and foremost walk in faith as the apostle so aptly counseled us to “walk in the footsteps of the faith that our father Avraham possessed when he was still uncircumcised” (Romans 4:12; NET). That walking in the footsteps of the faith that Avraham possessed even before he was circumcised in short is our coming into covenant relationship with Father Yah through a trusting faith in the Person and Ministry of Yahoshua. And because of our trusting faith and our close abiding relationship with Yah, we will joyfully keep His instructions in righteousness. And in our obedience of faith we conform to the very image of our Master and we love the foreigner (I.e., those who do not possess Torah or who do not identify with our Way of Life) just as we love one another in our Faith Community (Leviticus 19:34).

 

Paul on Being Under the Law-Part 2-Torah Meets Grace

Goal What I would like to do in today's installment of TMTO is to lay the ground-work or set-the table if you will in our gaining as complete an understanding of what the Apostle Shaul (aka the Apostle Paul) meant when he wrote to his Roman Messianic readers that "sin...

read more

The False Hope of Imitation Christianity

If you've been called and chosen, this message is for you. But it's not for everybody. Questions: What does John 8:32?--You shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free. We are to get our information from Scripture. Do you know what you worship? What's the...

read more

Where There is no Law There is no Transgression-Part 2-The Role of Torah in the World

Quick Review of Part 1

 

  1. Our focus passage was Romans 4:11-15 with particular emphasis on verse 15: For Torah brings wrath, because where there is no law there is no transgression [of the law]. Unfortunately, denominationalists erroneously use this and related Pauline passages as their anti-Torah proof passages.

 

  1. We highlighted the denominationalists’ erroneous claims that no one is capable of keeping or walking out Torah blamelessly—what the rabbis have enumerated as 613 Torah Commandments (correction from last installment)–that is, one not being prone to violating Yah’s commandments, especially in contrast to those outside of our faith and the wicked of this world–despite biblical statements to the contrary. All the while no one doubts he or she can be a law-abiding U.S. citizen without transgressing any of the 100’s of 100,000’s of federal, state, and municipal laws on the books of this nation.

 

Of Zechariah and Elisheva—Yochanan the Immerser’s parents–Luke wrote:

 

They were both righteous in the sight of Yah, following all the commandments and ordinances of Yah blamelessly (Luke 1:6).

 

And excuse my oversight in not mentioning this key passage in that installment, but Father Yah Himself asserted that we can indeed keep Torah blamelessly:

 

(11) This commandment I am giving you today is not too difficult for you, nor is it too remote. (12) It is not in heaven, as though one must say, “Who will go up to heaven to get it for us and proclaim it to us so we may obey it?”(13) And it is not across the sea, as though one must say, “Who will cross over to the other side of the sea and get it for us and proclaim it to us so we may obey it?” (14) For the thing is very near you—it is in your mouth and in your mind so that you can do it (Deu. 30:11-14; NET). 

 

The Yerushalayim Targum (an ancient commentary of the Hebrew Scriptures) expresses in particular verse 14 as:

 

For the word is very nigh you, in your mouth, that you may meditate upon it, and in your hearts, that you may perform it. See, behold, I have set before you this day the way of life, which is the path of the good, and the way of death, which is the path of the evil.

 

And so, it turns out that it was not a question in the first-century Torah-keepers’ minds that they could walk-out Torah perfectly. Such thinking is denominationalist misdirecting and misinterpretation of the true context of what walking Torah blamelessly or perfectly means. But rather, it was the understanding that one MUST “abide”, “dwell”; walk in Torah as an uncompromising lifestyle. And truth be told, regardless of what lifestyle humans choose to live out, they can never maintain without incidents of failure or error. Humans are by nature prone to mess up. We error in every aspect of our lives: Areas within and outside our faith. And Yah realizes this basic fact.

 

So then, as it relates to our being able to walk-out Torah blamelessly, if one were to stumble in their walking out of Torah, they were to follow the prescribed provisions for atonement. Before Yeshua, the would-be Torah-keeper would follow the prescribed provisions in Torah to atone for their transgressions. Coupled with following those atonement provisions (sanctioned sacrifices), the offender had to present those atonement provisions having a contrite and humble spirit and broken heart, enjoined by a sincere repentance and a desperate seeking of forgiveness by Yah.

 

  1. We cited the likely reason for such widespread acceptance in the belief that no one can keep Torah perfectly as having to do with a misunderstanding or a lack of understanding and distinction between the concepts of “sin” and “transgression of the Law”. Although the two concepts are connected in fundamental ways, there is also a distinction between the two.

 

 

Today, I want us to examine some key concepts that I believe will put us in the best position to properly interpret what Shaul meant by “Where there is no law, there is no transgression.” And those concepts are (1) understanding the apostle’s use of the term law, aka “nomos”; (2) the phrase “works of the law” that Shaul uses once in Romans 9 and 4 times in Galatians; (3) the role of Torah in the lives of Yah’s chosen ones and in the lives of those who have no knowledge of Torah.

 

 

Nomos (I.e., The Law) in the Brit HaDashah—An Issue of Discernment

 

As crazy as it may sound to many of us who are sensitive to the things that are contained in the Oral Tradition—the Talmud and Mishnah and such—that which is attributed to the so-called Jewish sages—the first-century A.D. religious Jew steadfastly viewed the Oral Torah to be equal to, if not greater in some respects, to the Written Torah, popularly referred to as the Law of Moses. For the “Oral Law/Torah/Tradition” specified for the observant Jew, the proper manner in which one kept or walked out the “Written Torah.” Some have described the “Oral Law/Torah” as the essential “fence around” the “Written Torah” or the “Law of Moses.” In many observant Jewish minds (both ancient and modern), the Oral and the Written served as sort of a “unified whole”. They were indiscernible. They were inseparable.

 

So, when one is studying the apostolic writings, it behooves the spiritually discerning Messianic Truth-seeker to carefully discern which Torah (oral, written, or both) the Greek term “nomos” (in the English, “law”) is specifically addressing in that passage. That is, if there is to be any true understanding of author’s true distinction at all. In Shaul’s case, many Messianic Commentators have concluded that wherever the apostle employed the term “nomos”, he more than likely meant both the Oral and Written Torahs, with a handful of exceptions which are made evident by those passages’ overall context.

 

When I first learned that certain Messianic Commentators of scripture believed Shaul’s use of the term “nomos” in just about all cases referred to both the Oral and Written Torahs, I was a bit skeptical. However, after coming to understand just how intertwined the two sets of laws had become in early Rabbinic Judaism, and how influential the Oral Torah had become in virtually every religious and nominal Jew’s life, I have come full circle and agree, in principle, with those commentators’ sentiment.

 

Case in point: We have the story of the Gentile convert Cornelius in Acts 10. If you recall, Cornelius was a Roman Centurion who happened to be what Judaism would refer to as a “God-fearer”. Cornelius was led through a vision from heaven to send for the Apostle Shimon Keefa (aka Peter) who was at that time dwelling in Joppa. As Cornelius’ men approached the home where Keefa was staying, Keefa himself was experiencing an ecstatic vision. And we find out that the vision he had served to enlighten him to the profound fact that Yah is no respecter of person. That Abba is calling and loves both the Jew and the Greek. And thus, he—Keefa/Peter-could no longer hold the biases against Gentiles that most religious Jews of his time held towards Gentiles.

 

As Keefa was entering Cornelius’ home, he says to him:

 

You know that it is unlawful for a Jew to associate with or visit a Gentile. Yet Yah has shown me that I should call no person defiled or ritually unclean (Acts 10:28; NET modified).

 

Was this which Shimon Keefa stated to Cornelius, from a “Law” perspective, accurate? Well, yes and no. You see, the Written Torah never made such a prohibition. Yah has never been “a respecter of persons” (reference: Romans 10:34; Deuteronomy/Devarim 10:17). However, according to the Oral Tradition, Keefa was absolutely correct. (Reference: Avodah Zara 29b, Shulchan Aruch Yoreh Deah 113; 123:51; 128:1; Mishnah Avodah Zarah 1:1; and others.)

 

Now, although Jewish thinkers and teachers, not wanting to appear bigoted and haters in general to the outside world, have over the centuries gone to great lengths to stress that these and other rabbinic laws were rendered for purposes of “separating Jews from gentiles in order to prevent Jews from adopting idolatrous behavior”: These laws were instead used to foster and incite fear and bigotry among the Jewish citizenry, which in effect led to the erection of an oftentimes inseparable social and religious partition between Jew and non-Jew.

 

And so, we see here in this example that even one of the greatest apostles, well after his receiving of the Ruach HaKodesh (aka the Holy Spirit) on that Great Day of Shavu’ot (aka Pentecost), up to the Cornelius incident, still held tightly to many of the tenets of the Oral Law. And that vision that Keefa experienced was meant to purge out that error that is the Oral Tradition/Law/Torah.

 

Summary: “Nomos”, as used throughout Shaul’s writings, may be referring to the Written Torah; or the Oral Tradition/Law/Torah; or both. It just depends on the context in which it is used in the focus passage. When the context is not clear, as we find in many instances throughout the Book of Romans, it’s generally safe to conclude that the apostle is referring to both the Written and Oral Laws or Torahs.

 

Interpreting Paul’s Popular Phrase: “Works of the Law”

 

In addition to the Greek term “nomos”, Shaul uses the phrase “works of the Law” at leasts five-times in his writings (references: Romans 9:32; Galatians 2:16; 3:2, 5, 10).

 

The underlying concept that sort of partially defines this phrase is one that: If you steadfastly walked out Torah (let’s say the Written Torah) in accordance with whichever Jewish sect’s Oral Laws/Traditions in which you affiliated with (halachah), you would be deemed as righteous by that sect. And being deemed righteous by that sect because you walked in that sect’s ways, you would escape the curses of the covenant (contained in the Written Law) and also Yah’s righteous wrath.

 

Those of course who neglected or disregarded those sect-specific halachic principles in their walk would be subject to Yah’s wrath and the curses of the Covenant.

 

This was made all the more evident in the example of those who made up the Qumran Community, who despised the other Jewish sects (e.g., Pharisees and Sadducees) that worshiped and operated at the Temple in Yerushalayim. According to certain Dead Sea Scroll writings, only those who adhered to the halachah of their [Qumran] community were to be considered righteous before Elohim. They were referred to in some of the Dead Sea Scroll writings as “Sons of Righteousness” (DSS 4QMMT).

 

So, one’s righteousness was often seen as being dependent on the specific set of halachic laws, rules, and traditions that one kept or walked in.

 

Therefore, in great part, it was this “sect-specific righteousness” mindset that Shaul was having to contend with in his writings to both the Roman and Galatian Messianic Assemblies. And so, the phrase “works of the Law” had to do with these “sect-specific” halachic requirements that were being forced upon new non-Jewish converts in order for him/her to be admitted into the Assemblies of Messiah. Again, to the Orthodox Jew of Shaul’s day, these halachic practices served to make one righteous according to the leaders of those sects. This “sect-specific,” halachic-generated righteousness had nothing to do with being in a faithful, obedient, covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe. But rather, their brand of righteousness had everything to do with conforming to sectarian Jewish halachah.

 

For the Judaizer, or as Torah Scholar/Commentator Tim Hegg prefers to call them, “Influencers”, “works of the Law/Torah” featured, in many cases, physical circumcision for the men entering their assembly. To these, a Gentile male was required to become a proselyte in order for him to be (1) admitted to the ekklesia/kehila, and (2) to be reckoned as righteous. You see, to these so-called “influencers”, the Gospel message was about becoming Jewish and trusting in one’s “Jewishness”. And so, when you drill down to it, only a sectarian Jew could ever be viewed as righteous in this world, and escape Yah’s judgment and wrath.

 

This sentiment and understanding among the sectarians/Influencers/Judaizers seem to have been substantially based upon their manipulation of Deuteronomy/Devarim 27:26:

 

Cursed is the one who refuses to keep the words of this law (I.e., as they saw it, their oral law because they believed Moshe passed down the oral tradition to their religious leaders to administer) (NET).

 

Shaul, being the consummate Torah scholar and former Pharisee that he was, anticipated the Judaizers’ stance on this verse of Torah by phrasing the text accordingly:

 

Cursed is everyone who does not remain in everything that is written in the Book of the Law to do them (Romans 4:10).

 

Needless to say, the anti-Torah crowd simply loves this passage. Right? Because the way that Shaul words it, helps feed the notion, on their part, that any who would dare keep Torah are cursed. So, in the error-ridden mind of the anti-Torah activist, they rectify the question of Yah’s people walking in Torah by asking: “Why [would you] keep something [such as the “law”] where you’ll automatically be cursed? Thus, their remedy for this predicament is for one to outright abandon Torah-living, and embrace their “grace perverted” Gospel.

 

Summary: Paul’s use of the phrase “works of the law” is generally referring to an adherence to sect-specific halachic laws, traditions, and practices such as circumcision, for purposes of being saved, so to speak, and admitted into the Body of Messiah. It is never to be understood as derogatory of those who are in an faithful, obedient covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe and who are properly walking out Yah’s Torah.

 

The Role of Torah in the Lives of Yah’s Chosen People

 

It must be understood that Yah’s Torah was never meant as the means by which one enters into a covenant relationship with the Almighty. Nor does Yah’s Torah make one righteous by steadfast keeping of it. But rather, Torah serves in great part as the standard by which Yah’s chosen ones are to live and walk-out as they exist in that covenant relationship with Him.

 

Torah not only identifies or defines what sin is in the eyes of the Creator, but also the required penalties that are associated with violations/transgressions of Yah’s instructions in righteousness (I.e., Yah’s Torah).

 

And this is a point of much confusion for those who are within and outside our Faith Community. For as it served to do with our ancient Hebrew cousins, Yah’s Torah “magnifies” or “illuminates” our desperate need for a savior; our human tendency to not meet Yah’s established standards and marks of righteousness in the eyes of the Holy One of Yisra’el. Thus, Torah-defined-sin is all the more made evident to the transgressor of Yah’s instructions in righteousness. Consequently, it will not have the same illuminating or magnifying effect for one who does not respect Yehovah and His Ways. Why? Well, Abba stated it beautifully through the Prophet Isaiah/Yesha’Yahu:

 

(8) For My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways My ways, saith YHVH. (9) For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are My ways higher than your ways, and My thoughts than your thoughts (55:8-9; KJV modified).

 

Shaul wrote to the Corinthian Assembly of Messianic Believers:

 

(14) But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit (Ruach) of Yah: For they are foolishness unto him. Neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. (15) But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man. (16) For who hath known the mind of the Master, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Messiah (1 Corinthians 2:14-16; KJV modified).

 

In other words beloved: Humanity has her own concepts of what constitutes sin, while Yah has His own understanding of what sin is. Consequently, Yah’s concept and perspective of sin is the only one that matters. Man’s perspectives and concepts about sin mean absolutely nothing in the whole scheme of things.

 

What’s more, Yah’s perspectives of what constitutes sin also come with prescribed penalties for said sins.

 

That being said, when Yah’s Torah is not the law of the land, there can really be NO such transgression or violation of Torah. But rather, sin is defined by humanity’s own thoughts and concepts.

 

Certainly, to some lesser or greater extent, unrepentant humanity may define sin and treat sin according to their natural ability to discern between right and wrong.

 

Shaul wrote about this to his Roman Messianic readers:

 

(18) For the wrath of Elohim is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of people (I.e., sin) who suppress the truth by their unrighteousness, (19) because what can be known about Yah is plain to them, because Yah as made it plain to them. (20) For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes—His eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, because they are understood through what has been made. So people are without excuse. (21) For although they knew Yah, they did not glorify Him as Elohim or give Him thanks, but they became futile in their thoughts and their senseless hearts were darkened (Romans 1; NET).

 

So then, rulings or verdicts that human courts render to address violations of sin as they see it, or violations of their established rules and laws and traditions, in many cases will not properly address the sin as Yah sees it.

 

Thus, as we saw evident with the ancients who left Egypt, their transgressions were made all the more evident after Yah codified and gifted His Torah to them. Case in point: Many of the Exodus Yisra’elites no doubt had been worshiping the “golden calf” their entire lives up to the point when Yah commanded that they have no other gods before Him (Exodus/Shemot 20:3-6, 23). Prior to the giving of this commandment, our ancient cousins’ worship of the gold calf was never an issue and the worship of it was viewed in many ways as a sanctioned way of life for them.

 

Despite Yah being known to those who were attached to the patriarchs, they persisted in their worshiping pagan gods:

 

(1) And Yah said unto Ya’achov, ‘Arise, go up to Bethel, and dwell there. And make there an altar unto Yehovah, that appeared unto thee when thou fleddest from the fact of Esav thy brother.’ (2) Then Ya’achov said unto his household, and to all that were with him, ‘Put away the strange gods that are among you, and be clean, and change your garments. (3) And let us arise, and go up to Bethel; and I will make there an altar unto Yah, who answered me in the day of my distress, and was with me in the way which I went. (4) And they gave unto Ya’achov all the strange gods which were in their hand, and all their earrings which were in their ears; and ya’acho hid them under the oak which was by Shechem (Genesis/Beresheit 35; KJV modified).

 

Did the ancients’ worship of their pagan gods constitute “sin?” In the eyes of Yah, indeed. And certainly, to these who worshiped their pagan gods, they had instilled in them naturally the understanding that Yehovah existed, and they inherently knew the difference between right and wrong. These will in the end be subject to Yah’s wrath and judgment based upon their natural understanding of the difference between right and wrong and their knowledge of Yah as Elohim. But they would not be subject to Yah’s Torah because it had not been codified and rendered to them at this point. And where Yah had not established commandments prohibiting the worship of these pagan gods, rhetorically, as Shaul is stating in our focus verse of Romans 4:15, there can be no transgression. For how can one violate an instruction that did not previously exist? 

 

But idolatry and pagan worship certainly was something that could be transgressed or violated once Yah gave the commandments prohibiting His chosen ones from engaging in it. So, from that point forward in the life of His chosen people, golden calf worship was to be viewed and treated as a violation of Yah’s way of life and subject to the penalties associated with it. Thus, worship of the golden calf by Yah’s people would naturally incite or invoke Yah’s righteous wrath and judgment upon violators or transgressors of Yah’s instructions prohibiting pagan worship.

 

But as clear as Yah’s instructions were prohibiting His people from engaging in pagan worship, there remained within many of them, the desire and stubborn willingness to disobey this commandment and engage in the prohibited worship. And of course, we know from scripture that the violators of that commandment faced Yah’s deadly wrath.

 

Today, those who profess to be people of the Bible have knowledge of Yah’s Torah, to a greater and lesser extent let’s just say. And thus, each and every one of those rational individuals are subject to Yah’s wrath which will be rendered through the judgment He will mete out through the framework of Torah. Those who for whatever reason do not possess knowledge of Torah, they will be subject to Yah’s wrath which will be rendered through the judgment He will mete out outside the framework of Torah.

 

Shaul addressed this in his letter to the Roman Messianic Assembly:

 

(12) All who have sinned outside the framework of Torah will die outside the framework of Torah; and all who have sinned within the framework of Torah will be judged by Torah. (13) For it is not merely the hearers of Torah whom Yah considers righteous; rather, it is the doers of what Torah says who will be made righteous in God’s sight. (14) For whenever Gentiles, who have no Torah, DO NATURALLY WHAT THE TORAH REQUIRES, then these, even though they don’t have Torah, for themselves are Torah (I.e., these operated in Yah’s moral laws. These simply did not possess the ritual and ceremony of Torah) (Romans 2; CJB).

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paul on Being Under the Law-Part 2-Torah Meets Grace

Goal What I would like to do in today's installment of TMTO is to lay the ground-work or set-the table if you will in our gaining as complete an understanding of what the Apostle Shaul (aka the Apostle Paul) meant when he wrote to his Roman Messianic readers that "sin...

read more

The False Hope of Imitation Christianity

If you've been called and chosen, this message is for you. But it's not for everybody. Questions: What does John 8:32?--You shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free. We are to get our information from Scripture. Do you know what you worship? What's the...

read more

Where there is no law, there is no transgression: Part-1-The Difference Between Sin and Transgression of the Law

A Continuation of Where we Left Off

 

Today, we sort of pick up where we left  off in our previous Paul and Hebrew Roots series. If you recall from our last installments to this series, the so-called Apostle to the Gentiles asserted to his Roman readers that he fully endorsed Torah-living/keeping for Yah’s set-apart people, as well as he fervently encouraged them to recognize that no amount of Torah-keeping is going to save them. That their salvation came by way of their trusting faith in the Person and Ministry of Yahoshua Messiah.

 

 

Our Focus Passage

 

 

Now, it should go without saying that we’ve all heard denominationalists harp about our keeping of Torah. They vehemently postulate that grace has replaced Torah-keeping. And for anyone who is in Christ to keep Torah, they tragically fall from grace.

 

And they use passages such our focus passage today to support their flawed premise:

 

Romans 4:11-15, paying particular attention to verse 15:

 

(11) And he (Avraham) received the sign of circumcision as a seal of the righteousness that he had by faith while he was still uncircumcised…

 

So, according to the Apostle Shaul (aka Paul), Avraham’s righteousness was reckoned unto Him by Yah before He was circumcised. And so, Avraham’s righteousness was attained by him as a result of his trusting faith in Yah.

 

Continuing:

 

…so that he could become the father of all those who believe but have never been circumcised, that they too could have righteousness credited to them.

 

So, through Avraham’s trust-based obedience of Yah, before he himself was ever circumcised, Yah promised an adoption into the covenant promises/the commonwealth of Yisrael, of those who were not of the circumcision—I.e., the Gentile. And like Avraham, they too would be reckoned righteous by a holy and just Elohim by their Faith. No circumcision. No Torah required in order to be reckoned righteous in the eyes of Elohim.

 

Continuing:

 

(12) And he (Avraham) is also the father of the circumcised, who are not only circumcised, but who also walk in the footsteps of the faith that our father Avraham possessed when he was still uncircumcised. (13) For the promise to Avraham or to his descendants that he would inherit the world was not fulfilled through Torah, but through the righteousness that comes by faith.

 

So then, Avraham’s exceptional faith and His chosen status, led to him being the spiritual father of all that trust in Yah and His Son Yahoshua for their eternal security. Avraham exemplified the ideal person of faith that Yah looks for in a would-be child of his. Avraham’s epic faith was the springboard that led to him being justified by the court of heaven.

 

Master taught that the “meek will inherit the earth.”

 

And it was our Master Yahoshua, who came through Avraham’s biological line, who is the de-facto heir to the world. Although the promise Avraham received was for the land of Canaan and to be the father of many nations (Gen. 12:3), it is Yahoshua who will inherit the world. And we who are of Him are through our covenant relationship with Yah, co-heirs of the world. All this is traced back to the Avrahamic Covenant:

 

“…and in thee shall all the tribes of the earth be blessed” (Gen. 12:3; LXX).

 

Continuing:

 

(14) For if they (both Jew and Gentile alike) become heirs by Torah, faith is empty and the promise is nullified. (15) For Torah brings wrath, because where there is no law there is no transgression either (Romans 4:12-15; NET modified).

 

With Shaul making this shock-wave of an announcement just a few verses earlier that he established/upheld/confirmed/supported Torah-living in the life of Yah’s set-apart ones, how can he make such an abrupt turn-around with a statement like this? Was Shaul really suggesting here that with the Law/Torah having been done away with, the person who comes under grace is no longer in danger of violating or transgressing it? Therefore he or she is free and clear from the penalties and wrath associated with having to keep the Law/Torah perfectly?

 

Or, is the great Apostle to the Gentles saying something else entirely?

 

It is by way of Pauline passages such as our focus passage today that traditionalists/denominationalists contend that people are incapable of keeping Torah. And thus, according to their anti-Torah patron the Apostle Paul, those who choose to live a life of Torah are inevitably subject to the Creator’s wrath.

 

But riddle me this then Batman: If Yah’s people are incapable of keeping His Torah, why then would Yah give Torah to them in the first place? Was Yah simply setting His people up for a great fall? Was He giving His people an impossible task, only to get a point across and in the process humiliate them? To trip up the very people that He said He loved (Hos. 3:1)?

 

Beloved, is this the type of Elohim that we serve? One who plays games with His human creation? One who abuses and uses the very ones that He claims to love? I don’t think so.

 

Of Yisra’el, Abba said:

 

“For I know what I have planned for you,” say YHVH. “I have plans to prosper you, not to harm you. I have plans to give you a future filled with hope” (Jer. 29:11; KJV modified).

 

Now, does this seem like a God who seeks to set His loved ones up for failure? No. It does NOT!

 

The anti-Torah crowd loves this particular passage. For it goes a long way to play on their desperate search for reasons not to obey Yah’s Torah. For if one can simply take this passage and interpret it from the standpoint that it is impossible for anyone to keep Torah, and that one’s righteousness and eternal security is entirely dependent on Yah’s grace, then there stands absolutely no reasons for one to obey the Creator, the example of Avraham tragically not withstanding.

 

The Impossibility of Keeping Torah (According to Some)

 

Is it possible to keep Yah’s Torah, and to walk in it blamelessly? Of course it is.

 

Allow me to ask you this:

 

Can you or I resist murdering; stealing; fornicating; adulterating? Is it possible for us to love Abba Father and love our neighbor as ourselves? Is it possible for us to keep His weekly Sabbath? To abstain from consuming forbidden foods? Is it possible for us to keep/observe Yah’s set-apart days? Granted, these examples are not the entirety of Torah commandments, but just a sampling. But I think we can all agree that we can keep the applicable Torah instructions blamelessly.

 

But then the anti-Torah crowd is likely to come back at us with: “Oh, but James and Paul say that if you break a single Torah commandment, you’re guilty of breaking the entirety of Torah. Right?

 

Well, in a sense they’re right.But not entirely, however. For the observation that was made by Yahoshua’s brother Ya’achov, James the Just, is properly understood from the perspective of when one “intentionally” breaks one of Yah’s commandments at the expense of keeping all of Yah’s commandments,” then yes, he/she is guilty of breaking the whole of Torah (Jas. 2:10). James made this key statement in context of warning his readers against the temptation and lure of being partial towards another (vss. 1-9). So then, when one’s heart is not right and he or she intentionally seeks to break Torah in order to appeal to his/her own sensitivities and preferences, then indeed, they have transgressed the whole of Torah.

 

For the keeping of Torah is a way of life. And when one absolves themselves of keeping only those elements of Yah’s way of life that best appeals to them, then indeed, they have denied and rejected Yah’s entire Torah and Way of Life.

 

We are indeed flawed creatures. And so, we are prone to sin. Sin is the transgression of Torah (1 Joh. 3:4). Now, any transgression of Torah on our part should never occur. But if a transgression were to occur, it should only come about through ignorance and by mistake. And knowing how flawed we are, Yah made provision in His Torah for such sins, which are often referred to as “sins of omission”.

 

But intentional transgressions of Torah, aka “sins of commssion”, are a completely different ball of wax. These require Yah’s complete restructuring of the offender’s heart, mind, and soul, in order for that offender to walk uprightly before Him. Such sins of omission are born of a rebellious heart. And although repentance and forgiveness are required to get pass such transgressions in the mind and heart of our loving Father, the offender must have work done inside of them—that is a circumcision of the heart—in order for them to leave at and burn-up such sin and evil at Yah brazen altar. In other words, it’s not enough to repent and seek forgiveness of wanton, sins of commission. One must endeavor to not repeat those sins ever again.

 

This is where the real issue of keeping the whole of Torah comes in: This habitual, even intentional transgression of Torah that we don’t want to think or even talk about. It makes us uncomfortable to admit that we’ve intentionally broken or violated Yah’s Torah.

 

So, many folks who, for whatever reason, refuse to come to terms with their rebelliousness choose to side with the majority that holds that it is impossible to keep Yah’s Torah and that violations and transgressions of Torah really don’t matter, because we are inherently incapable of keeping Torah. And thus, we are saved from having to keep Torah by God’s outrageous grace.

 

An Irreconcilable Disparity

 

 

I find the disparity that exists between Yah’s law and the laws of this nation very interesting. By rabbinic count, there are only 611 commandments that make-up the Creator’s Torah. But according to a 2015 article entitled: “How Many Federal Laws are There Again?”, there are some 5,000 federal criminal laws, with 10,000 to 300,000 regulations that can be enforced criminally in this country. And this is just federal laws. There are essentially 100’s of 1,000s of state and municipal laws that the citizens of this country are required to abide by if they want to maintain the freedoms afforded to them by the constitution of this nation. Yet you’ll never hear a single person say that it is impossible to keep the laws of this country or this land. How does such a situation exist? That denominationalists and such declare without equivocation that NO one is capable of keeping Torah, yet they themselves have no problem keeping the laws of this nation. Doesn’t make sense, does it? And the bigger irony of this dichotomy is that a great many of these municipal, state, and federal laws are in whole or in part based loosely on Torah principles and commandments. (Not all of federal, state, and municipal laws of course, but some.)

 

Yochanan gave us a remedy for willful and intentional transgressions of Yah’s Torah:

 

(9) If we confess our sins, He (Yah) is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. (10) If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar, and His word is not in us (1 John 1:9-10).

 

David wrote of this very thing:

 

Then I confessed my sin (sin being the transgression of Torah); I no longer covered up my wrongdoing. I said, “I will confess my rebellious acts to YHVH.” And then You forgave my sins. (Selah) (Psa. 32:5).

 

Beloved, David’s solemn admission was written before Yahoshua’s earthly ministry. Seeking forgiveness for transgressions of Torah (apart from the required animal sacrifices) was indeed a known element of one’s obedient covenant relationship with Yehovah back in the day.

 

Then there’s Solomon who wrote of this:

 

The one who covers his transgressions will not prosper, but whoever confesses them and forsakes them will find mercy (Pro. 28:13).

 

Beloved, there is forgiveness for our transgressions of Torah. That is, if we confess, ask Yah to forgive us, and then forsake our sinful ways. Back in David’s and Solomon’s day, they had to comply with the proper animal sacrifices to temporarily atone for their transgressions. But in addition to those required sacrifices and offerings, the offender was still compelled to repent of their transgression, seek Yah’s forgiveness, and endeavor never to repeat that transgression again.

 

 

But then, Yehovah provided us the perfect sacrifice that would permanently atone for our transgressions. But Yahoshua’s perfect sacrifice is only as effectively as the extent of one’s heart is truly circumcised. When we transgress Yah’s Torah, are we truly convicted and repentant of our transgressions? Will we work to overcome and not repeat those transgressions in the future? Or are we simply looking for a moment’s forgiveness so that we may continue about our sinful ways. I’ve been there. I know that I’ve asked Yah’s forgiveness, knowing full well that I would likely repeat those transgressions in the future. And that attitude is a serious problem beloved. For Yah’s grace does not cover such continued, rebellious, willful lawlessness. And that’s where a complete change of heart and surrender of our lives to Yahoshua comes into play. Otherwise, we engage in an endless, circular game with Father Yah: Sin. Seek Yah’s forgiveness. Repeat the same sin. Seek Yah’s forgiveness for that same sin again. And so on. And Father Yah is not into playing games I’m afraid.

 

Praise Yah that I’ve overcome, for the most part, most if not all vestiges of rebellion that I had toward Him and His Ways and His Torah. But my overcoming of my rebellious ways came only after I finally died to self and asked Yah to scrape and remove that rebelliousness out of me. That desire and propensity to intentionally transgress Yah’s Torah.

 

I gave a teaching to a Sabbath-keeping group in Baltimore Maryland back in 2019 that I entitled, “Stuck in the Outer Court.” And in that teaching, I discussed the process by which one would bring their atoning sacrifices to the Tabernacle or Tent of Meeting, to address a transgression of Torah. The goal of that process was to be in right standing with the Almighty who whose presence was in the Holy Place. The atoning sacrifices took place in the outer court.

 

And I brought to the listeners’ attention that that process would be often be repeated in an endless cycle of transgressing Yah’s Torah, seeking atonement and or repentance, only to be repeated by the offender. And in so doing, the offender found him/herself stuck in the outer court of the Tabernacle.

 

Thus, I asked the group whether or not we are stuck in the outer court, never ever making it to Yah’s true presence because we refuse to break the cycle of transgressing, atonement/repenting, transgressing, atonement/repenting.

 

In that sense beloved, that unbreakable cycle, indeed for some, is proof that it is impossible to keep Torah blamelessly.

 

 

Here’s the Problem Related to Keeping Torah Perfectly

 

So then, it seems to me that the real issue as it relates to being able to walk in Torah blamelessly or perfectly has nothing really to do with one being physically, emotionally, and spiritually capable of doing so, as we’ve shown to be the case otherwise.

 

The problem with people accepting the lie that it is impossible to walk out Torah blamelessly has to do with an accurate—a true—understanding of (1) the role and purpose of Torah in the life of Yah’s people. (2) A true understanding of the biblical concepts of sin and transgression. And (3) where Torah fits in as it relates to the entire world.

 

For the remainder of this discussion, we will seek to gain an understanding of the biblical—the Hebraic—concepts of sin and transgression/violations of Torah. For indeed, there is a notable difference between the two, although the two concepts do indeed intersect and often become indistinguishable.

 

Then in Parts 2 and 3 we will further define the role and purpose of Torah in the life of Yah’s people, as well as seek to understand where Torah fits in as it relates to the entire world.

 

And so, armed with the knowledge of these concepts and elements, we will be very well situated to understand what the Apostle Shaul (Paul) meant when he wrote: “Where there is no Law, there is no transgression” (Romans 4:15).

 

 

Distinguishing Sin from Transgression of Torah—There is a Difference

 

For us who are of the Hebraic—Messianic Faith Community—it has been drilled into our heads that sin is lawlessness or is the transgression of the law (1 Joh. 3:4; KJV).

 

So, we’ve been conditioned to conflate the two concepts of “sin” and “transgression of the law.” Which in and of itself makes perfect sense. But it only makes sense if we place very human on the planet, be they Yah’s people or people of the world, under Torah for purposes of judgment and lifestyle expectation.

 

But is every soul on the planet under Torah? Is every soul going to be judged through Torah by Yah? And the answer to these questions is a resounding no. We covered this extensively in our series entitled “What Did Paul Mean by Being Under the Law?

 

In that discussion we concluded that those who possess knowledge of Torah will be judged of Yah within the framework of Torah, while those who have no knowledge of Torah will be judged outside the framework of Torah.

 

And this concept is the very basis of our coming to a proper understanding of our Romans 4:15 focus passage: “Where there is no law there is no transgression.”

 

What Exactly is Sin Then?

 

Our English term “sin” in Hebrew is “chatta’th”. It is essentially acts that are rebellious against Yah and His Will and Plan. It is a deviation from that which the Creator mapped or marked out for His human creation to abide by. Sin then is a moral failure toward both Yah and men.

 

From a Hebraic standpoint, the ideological concept of sin hearkens back to the act of one “shooting an arrow or other object to a target” (Reference Jeff A. Benner; Ancient Hebrew Lexicon of the Bible; pg. 121). So then, the distance that the shooter’s arrow, let’s say, misses the target is measured by a cord, which serves to inform the shooter of just how far they were from their intended target or mark.

 

This physical, natural activity of determining how far one’s arrow strayed from its intended mark is intended to help us understand that Yah measures one’s wrong actions against the correct and proper actions that He from the beginning of time established for His human creation.

 

So, when one sins, he or she has engaged in an activity or action that is beyond or outside of the proper, correct behavior that Yah expects from any rational human being. Thus, the one who sins misses Yah’s established mark.

 

Bear in mind, we’re not necessarily talking about the established, sanctioned behavior that Torah marks out for those who are Yah’s. But rather, we’re talking about doing something—engaging in behavior that we inherently—intrinsically know is wrong (Romans 1).

 

That being said, we know that all humans sin and fall short of Yah’s naturally established standards (Rom. 3:23). And because each of us has sinned, we find ourselves subject to Yah’s judgment and wrath (Rom. 1:18). And as a result of Yah’s grace, the vast majority of us have not experienced Yah’s judging wrath as yet. That judging wrath sadly looms ahead of every human being. Thus, there is a debt hanging over every individual’s soul. And that debt must be paid in full to satisfy the offense that is every human’s rebellion.

 

But Praise Yah from Whom all blessings flow. Yeshua made one qualified, atoning sacrifice for the sins of this world (Joh. 1:29). And the sacrifice that He (our Master Yahoshua) made on behalf of all humanity satisfies the sin debt that is owed by every human being who will place their trust/faith in Him and enter into an obedient, covenant relationship with the Creator of the Universe.

 

Transgressions

 

Now, when it comes to the concept of “transgression”, specifically of Yah’s Torah, we find that Father sees it as sinful. However, the term is used generally to describe the commission of an established, codified offense such as Torah. Someone crosses an established line. And that established line, in our context, is Torah. One commits a transgression when they break a Torah instruction or commandment: whether by omission or commission. So, when we consider the question of transgression of the Law, we must have at the forefront of our conversation and thoughts an understanding that the transgressor is subject to Torah. If the individual in question is not subject to Torah (I.e., they do not possess knowledge of Torah), they cannot possibly transgress or violate the commandment or law in question. Yes, in principle they can violate Torah commandments. But in reality, they are not subject to the penalties associated with violation of Torah commandments. Which essentially means that only those who have knowledge of Torah can transgress or violate Torah. The rest of the world, instead, misses Yah’s prescribed mark for all humans. And Shaul goes into stark detail to outline specifically what we’re talking about here in Romans 1:18-32. (We discussed this in an earlier post.) These essentially rebel against Yah’s natural laws, of which they will be held accountable.

 

And this is essentially what Shaul is saying to His Roman Messianic readers. Torah is not a universal entity as far as it concerns the world. Torah invokes guilt on those who possess Torah, not those who are outside of Torah. Those who possess knowledge of and who transgress Torah will be held responsible for their violations or transgression of Torah (I.e., they will be judged within the framework of Torah), while those who do NOT possess Torah and who sin—who do not meet Yah’s natural moral standards and who rebel against His righteous and holy Plan and Will, they shall be subject to His wrath (I.e., they will be judged outside the framework of Torah).

 

This is the point that Shaul is trying to convey to His Roman Messianic readers here. He also touches upon this principle in other areas of his letter to the Romans:

 

“For all who have sinned apart (or outside the framework of Torah) will also perish outside the framework of Torah, and all who have sinned within the framework of Torah will be judged by Torah” (2:12; CJB).

 

 

(12) So then, just as sin entered the world through one man and death through sin, and so death spread to all people because all sinned—(13) for before the law was given, sin was in the world, but there is no accounting for sin when there is no law (5:12-13; NET).

 

Beloved, we will continue this critical conversation/discussion in Part 2 of this series within a series: Where There is no Law There is no Transgression.

 

 

 

Paul on Being Under the Law-Part 2-Torah Meets Grace

Goal What I would like to do in today's installment of TMTO is to lay the ground-work or set-the table if you will in our gaining as complete an understanding of what the Apostle Shaul (aka the Apostle Paul) meant when he wrote to his Roman Messianic readers that "sin...

read more

The False Hope of Imitation Christianity

If you've been called and chosen, this message is for you. But it's not for everybody. Questions: What does John 8:32?--You shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free. We are to get our information from Scripture. Do you know what you worship? What's the...

read more