Obedience to Torah-Marked for Destruction-The Wisdom of Wearing Phylacteries-Reflections on Torah Portion ‘Ekev

Obedience to Torah-Marked for Destruction-The Wisdom of Wearing Phylacteries-Reflections on Torah Portion 'Ekev

by Rod Thomas | The Messianic Torah Observer

 

This is Reflections on Torah Portion ‘Ekev—Obedience to God’s Instructions—Marked For Destruction—The Wisdom of Wearing Phylacteries.

 We find this week’s Torah Portion/Reading, entitled, “’Ekev,” in Deuteronomy 7:12-11:25.

 

‘Ekev

 

The term ‘Ekev, used as the title of our reading this week, is interpreted by Jewish Torah scholars as “because.”

 

So why do we also have names or titles given to each week’s Torah Portion?

 

The Rabbis, in their apportionment of Torah into 54-weekly sections, also gave each parshah (ie. weekly portion or reading) a name “the first distinctive word in the Hebrew text of the portion in question, often from the first verse” of that week’s reading (Wikipedia).

 

The English rendering of the Hebrew term ‘Ekev is “because.” Because is used in the JPS translation of the Tanakh, as well as by the ESV, CJB and the RSV translations.

 

In the KJV, however, the translators chose to use “if ye.” I find the translation differences interesting: the JPS’ (and the other cited translations) use of “because” in my mind presumes that we have and continue to “hearken to these ordinances and keep and do them, that the LORD thy God shall keep with thee the covenant and the mercy which He swore unto thy father.” Conversely, the KJV, along with other prominent English translations state “if we hearken…” then we would receive mercy and fulfillment of the covenant that YHVH made with our ancestors. The “if ye hearken” to me suggests that we still have to prove ourselves, whereas the “because you did…” suggests to me that we’ve already proved ourselves. Personally, I much prefer the “if ye hearken…” than “because,” but one should not think too deeply on this. I just found it interesting is all.

 

A Content Rich Portion

 

Of the five books of Torah, I have to say that Deuteronomy is my favorite. It is my favorite because it offers us a 30,000-foot overview of the previous four-books of Torah. Moreover, Moshe does a phenomenal job rehashing YHVH’s indescribable exploits. He also describes how He brought us through many arduous experiences in our wilderness journey. As well as Moshe reminds us repeatedly of the benefits of keeping Yah’s Torah and the consequences of not keeping Torah.

 

Moshe writes Deuteronomy at the time of the great “Conquest of the Promised Land.” Moshe does not let us forget, he—Moshe—having put up with the people’s shenanigans for 40-years would, as punishment for his denying YHVH the glory He so just deserved, be denied the opportunity to enter the Promised Land. In addition, in some passages of Deuteronomy Moshe opens up to the reader and describes his anguish and broken-heart, denied the opportunity to enter the Land.

 

Moshe’s punishment stems from the “Waters of Meribah” incident, found in Numbers 20:7-12. It reads as follows:

 

“Then YHVH spoke to Moses: ‘Take the staff and assemble the community, you and Aaron your brother, and then speak to the rock before their eyes. It will pour forth its water, and you will bring water out of the rock for them, and so you will give the community and their beasts water to drink.’ So Moses took the staff from before YHVH, just as He commanded him. Then Moses and Aaron gathered the community together in front of the rock, and he said to them, ‘Listen, you rebels, must we bring water out of this rock for you?’ Then Moses raised his hand, and struck the rock twice with his staff. Moreover, water came out abundantly. Therefore, the community drank, and their beasts drank too. Then YHVH spoke to Moses and Aaron, ‘Because you did not trust me enough to show me as holy before the Israelites, therefore you will not bring this community into the land I have given them (Num. 20:7-12; NET).

 

Thus Moshe’s punishment should serve as a stark reminder to each of us that YHVH is a jealous God who is sovereign, and most importantly, He is righteous and holy in all His ways. Furthermore, He will not share His glory with anything or any being. In fact, Abba stated through the writing of the Prophet Isaiah: “I am Yehovah, that is my name; and my glory will I not give to another…” (Isa. 42:8; ASV).

 

Abba is very serious about this. Moreover, I am afraid that too many of us take this aspect of YHVH’s character for granted. For I contend that many of us may be going through some bad stuff in our lives (be it of a financial, health, or relational nature) in part because we take Yah for granted. In essence, this is what Moshe did at the rock at Meriba. Father instructed Moshe to “speak” to the rock and it would then yield forth water. However, Moshe, in his ire toward the complaining people, struck the rock with his staff—not once, but twice. In addition, despite Moshe changing the script unannounced on YHVH, Father still kept His promise and provided the nation their much-needed water. Nevertheless, Father miraculously carrying through with bringing forth water from the rock did not dismiss the fact that Moshe failed to do as Abba instructed Him to do—which was to “speak to the rock.”

 

Why is this important to Father? Well, for one, Father requires of His chosen ones complete and utter obedience without compromise. And when we choose to go beyond that which Abba commands and do things our way—regardless how genuine and pure our intentions may be—we run the risk of invoking Yah’s wrath. For Father knows exactly what He is doing when He gives us commands and instructions. He is the Creator of all things of course. Moreover, if things are to go as they are supposed to go—according to YHVH’s purpose and timing—then they must go according to Yah’s implicit instructions.

 

Allow me to take you back to the Nadab and Abihu incident. Recall that these were two of Aaron’s sons. This incident took place at the time of the ceremonial installation of Aaron and his sons into what we refer to as the Levitical Priesthood (Lev. 9). During that solemn ceremony, specifically ordered and arranged by YHVH, Nadab and Abihu for whatever reason, elected to offer “unauthorized fire before YHVH.” Some translations famously refer to Nadab’s and Abihu’s actions as “offering strange fire before the LORD” (KJV). Regardless, Nadab’s and Abihu’s unauthorized act led to their cataclysmic, summary execution by YHVH’s consuming fire.

 

In the immediate aftermath of Nadab’s and Abihu’s death, Moshe tells Aaron, in the midst of Aaron’s obvious shocked grief:

 

“Among the ones close to Me I will show myself holy, and in the presence of all the people I will be honored” (Lev. 10:3; NET).

 

In other words, things are going to have to be done My Way, or they are going to have to be done My Way by those that are His elect. For in the end Yah will get the glory and honor that justly belongs to Him.

 

I love how J. H. Hertz, in his commentary of this passage puts it:

 

“…the greater a man’s knowledge or position, the stricter the standard by which he is to be judged, and the greater the consequent guilt and punishment, if there is a falling away from that standard. With the righteous, God is exacting, even to a hair’s breath” (Penteteuch and Haftorahs).

 

Sadly, the same sentiment applies to Moshe’s case, although Moshe was not subject to the horrendous death that Nadab and Abihu experienced. In Moshe’s case, at Meribah, Moshe, no doubt acting out of righteous indignation toward the rebellious people, struck the rock as opposed to speaking to it. This act of striking the rock denied YHVH the honor that belonged to Him and Him alone. For if Moshe would have simply done exactly what Father instructed him to do—speak to the rock which follows Father’s prescription of speaking into existence all that exists in the universe—Yah would have fully own that miracle. Moshe, through his selfish act, stole, in my opinion, Father’s miracle; and consequently unwittingly drew honor unto him.

 

 

How many times in our lives have we pulled a Moshe or an Abihu and Nadab, instead of doing things YHVH’s Way? When we do things our way and they run contrary to the way YHVH wants them to be, we stand a good chance of reaping the consequences of our selfish actions.

 

Paul wrote:

 

“Do not be deceived. God will not be made a fool. For a person will reap what he sows, because the person who sows to his own flesh will reap corruption from the flesh, but the one who sows to the Spirit will reap eternal life from the Spirit. So we must not grow weary in doing good, for in due time we will reap, if we do not give up.” (Gal. 6:7-9; NET).

 

Circling back to our discussion of ‘Ekev, we find in this reading a brief rehashing of the many miraculous and often tumultuous events leading up to our conquest of Canaan. In addition, the theme that is played out repeatedly throughout this entire reading is that of obedience—uncompromising obedience to Yah’s instructions—leading to things going well for our families and us. Repeatedly Moshe instructs us to remember what YHVH did for us individually and for our nation. And he drills into our conscience the wisdom of keeping Yah’s commandments; fearing (yare) YHVH; constantly dwelling upon Yah’s Torah; and to not delude ourselves into thinking that we’ve done anything to deserve the blessings of the Land that was coming to us. Indeed, it is a circuitous read, but these repeated themes and admonishments serve as a reminder to us even today of how important obedience to Yah and His Word is to our well-being, and that our obedience leads to fulfillment of the covenant Yah has made with us.

 

(Now, I am not talking necessarily about fulfilling the “Land Covenant” as is the case in our reading of ‘Ekev. Yes, that covenant continues to exist to this day as Paul taught in Galatians 3:17. We, engrafted into the commonwealth of Israel, are eligible to enjoy that same covenant that Yah made with the Patriarchs. However, our focus is must be on the renewed covenant described in the books of the prophets and is fully summarized in Hebrews 8, 9 and 10. We’ll touch briefly upon covenant a little later on in this post, but suffice to say that discussion of covenant as it relates to us today is something I’m looking forward to discussing with you sometime in the near future.)

 

Highlighting “Ekev.”

 

Therefore, what I wish to do for the remainder of this post is to simply highlight the areas of the reading that stood out most for me in ‘Ekev, and apply those principles to our walk with Messiah today.

 

 

Obedience to YHVH’s Torah

 

We find in Deuteronomy 7:12-8:10—the very first section of our ‘Ekev reading this week—where Moshe extols the blessings derived through obedience to YHVH’s instructions:

 

“And because you listen (i.e., shema—hear-keep-obey) to these rules and keep and do them, YHVH your God will keep with you the covenant and the steadfast love that He swore to your fathers” (Deu. 7:12; ESV).

 

Moshe is essentially communicating to us in this section of the reading that when we keep covenant with YHVH, He blesses us in the here and now of our lives. In addition, that blessing places us in Yah’s favor above all other peoples of the earth. Thus, our lives would be secure and blessed. And all the terrible things of life—the things that happen to so many of the non-believing peoples of the world—well (eg., poverty; sickness; hopelessness, fear, etc.), such things will not be known among us (Deu. 7:12-15).

 

Then in 7:16-26, Moshe instructs us that we were to destroy those nations YHVH would hand over to us in the process of taking possession of the Land of Promise. These nations, interestingly enough, were “marked or devoted for destruction” because of their many abominations.

 

Now, some have marginalized or outright ignored the significance of what Moshe was telling the Israelites regarding the nations that were “marked (or devoted) for destruction.” The common understanding of these nations being “marked/devoted for destruction” is that these 7-nations (the list can be found in Deu. 7:1) had for centuries engaged in idolatry; and that sin alone earned them the punishment of being destroyed—i.e., marked for destruction–by Israel. However, truth be told, the abominations these nations committed went well beyond their worshiping idols. Remember, Israel would have been the only nation on the face of the planet at that time that was not worshiping false gods—Egypt being one of the most notable of the lot.

 

However, so heinous were the sins of these 7-nations—which Father deemed as abominable (Deu. 7:25)–that Father required us to render unto them absolutely no pity and completely obliterate them from the face of the planet: every man, woman and child. As was done to Bashan and Heshbon before, Father, through Moshe recorded:

 

“And we devoted them to destruction…devoting to destruction every city, men, women and children” (Deu. 3:6; ESV).

 

That destruction of these cities (ie., Heshbon and Bashan) took place east of the Jordan River. So a short time later, as we prepared to cross the Jordan and conquer the Land, Abba reiterated the same strong punishment be rendered unto the 7-nations that were in possession of Canaan at that time:

 

“…and when the Lord your God delivers them up before you, and you defeat them, then you must totally destroy them. You shall make no treaty with them, nor show mercy to them. You shall not intermarry with them; you shall not give your daughters to their sons, nor shall you take their daughters for your sons. For they will turn your sons away from following Me so that he may serve other gods; thus the anger of the Lord your God will be kindled against you, and He will destroy you quickly. But this is how you must deal with them: you shall break down their altars, dash their pillars into pieces, cut down their Asherim, and burn their graven images with fire” (Deu. 7:2-4; QBE). 

 

There was no provision in Yah’s grace plan for the abominable nations that would be dispossessed of their land and destroyed. We, Yah’s chosen people—His set-apart people (as flawed as we may have been) would be acting on Yah’s behalf as His “righteous arm” (e.g., strong hand) in this earthly-physical plain. We would physically destroy these abominable nations, although YHVH would be doing the fighting for us in the spiritual realm. Three times in Deuteronomy Moshe told us “YHVH shall fight for you” (1:30; 3:22; 20:4). For Moshe revealed that Father would send ahead of our onslaught “terror” in the form of a hornet infestation (either literally or figuratively, although most sources I consulted support a literal attack of some species or form of hornets or bees) that would drive the enemy from their various hiding-places and systematically reduce their ability to wage war and resist our attack (Deu. 7:20; ref. J. H. Hertz). And one-by-one, in YHVH’s perfect timing and plan, these nations would fall. The leaders of these nations would most notably be destroyed and their names—their reputations—their notoriety—would be wiped out of all memory.

 

YHVH devoted or marked the peoples of these nations for destruction in part because these were descendants of Anak. Apart from their idolatrous activities, it is almost impossible to understand why Father had such disdain for these nations using just biblical references. Why would Father have such disdain for the descendants of Anak—or more so the Amorite peoples, in general terms? The Anakim were a race of giants descended from Anak, according to the Tanakh, who lived in the southern part of the Land of Canaan—Gen. 23:2; Jos. 15:13.) And because these were descended from the Nephilim—the products of the union between the Watchers (Genesis 6 and 1 Enoch–the angels that kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, whose destinies were everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the Great Day—Jude 1:6) and the “fair daughters of men” (Gen. 6:1), Father devoted or marked these races and nations for destruction.

 

Again, the progeny of the union between the watchers and the human women described in Genesis 6 were giants; the most notable of these races in biblical history being Og of Bashan and Goliath. Because these were products of a terribly corrupted natural order, YHVH required that they be marked or devoted for destruction. In addition, this is information that few people in churchianity actually understand. Unfortunately, the general absence of this knowledge and history among, not just people of Faith, but also the non-believing peoples of the world, makes it easy for the average person to view YHVH as a terrible, mean, and unforgiving God or tyrant. However, with such information in the back of our minds when we read these passages, we understand why Abba required no mercy to these nations. If Father were to ever fully restore paradise to this world and mankind to the place he/she was originally designed to be at, the corruption of Yah’s natural order and the worship of fallen angels as gods had to be harshly dealt with.

YHVH devoted the Amorite nations for destruction because their sin was deemed by Him to be abominable.

In fact, few people realize that Y’shua Messiah came not only to atone for the sins of the world, but to also dispossess or remove the legal hold that the enemy—the fallen ones—had over the nations of the world. That legal hold in part goes back to the “Tower of Babel” incident (Gen. 11). Moshe cryptically rehashes what appears to have been Father giving to certain angels oversight of the nations of the world at that time. We read in Deuteronomy 32:8:

 

“When God Most high divided up the nations—when He divided up humankind-He decided the people’s boundaries based on the number of the gods” (CEB).

 

Now, most of the authorized, highly respected English translations erroneously render this verse as “…He (i.e., YHVH) set the borders of the peoples according to the number of the children of Israel” (ASV, CJB,HCSB, NASB, KJV, JPS, and others). But this rendering of “according to the number of the children of Israel” makes no sense given that Israel had not become a nation at the time to which this verses is referring. However, when we look at the rendering of the LXX and the Qumran Deuteronomy Scrolls of this verse, we get what appears to be a more contextually accurate rendering of the verse, whereby the apportionment of the nations of men by YHVH was based upon a set number of divine beings or “sons of God;” sons of God being a general Old Testament reference to angelic beings. Why the difference? It appears that possibly Hebrew scribes around the time of Rabbi Akiba (2nd century A.D.) were responsible for replacing what could only be the original wording of “bene YHVH” with “bene Yisra’el.” Was this an intentional or an innocent scribal error? Or could this be something even bigger? I have my ideas on why, but I do not want to slide down that rabbit hole in this post and take us away from our focus passage. This is certainly something for another day’s discussion. 

 

Anyway, at the Tower of Babel incident, Yah entrusted these angels to oversee the pagan nations of the world. Father eventually separated unto Himself out of these nations a people that would be wholly devoted to Him as their God and who would serve Him as His priests to the unbelieving nations of the world. He of course started off with Abraham of Ur, who Father established a covenant with (i.e., the Abrahamic Covenant), and the rest is history. Moreover, in case you did not know, Father called Abraham out of Ur, a pagan nation. He was neither a Hebrew nor a Jew at the time of his calling. He descended from a family that worshiped these angelic-based false gods. But Father saw something special in Abraham; called Him out of his father’s home; led him away from His family’s pagan nation; and sent him on an amazing journey, replete with covenantal promises and most importantly, a deep and abiding relationship with the Creator of the Universe:

 

“And the Scripture was fulfilled that says, ‘Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness’ and he was called a friend of God” (Jas. 2:23; ESV).

 

YHVH’s War Against Idolatry

 

But getting back to these angels who were tasked with overseeing the nations by YHVH: it appears that those angels ultimately betrayed Yah’s trust. They enslaved the nation peoples by requiring them to worship them as gods.

 

 

What are idols? They are nothing more than carved images of the perceived forms of some of these fallen angels who took over the imaginations of the ancients. Thus the idols of these 7-abominable nations who were devoted or marked for destructions were to be completely destroyed as well (7:25), regardless the idol’s apparent value in gold and silver. For according to YHVH through Moshe, if one were to salvage an idol for its perceived monetary value, it is a certainty that he or she would succumb to the idol’s inherent evil. The whole thing, regardless of its material value, was abhorrent to YHVH. In fact, these idols brought with them curses; for curses inherently rested upon them (7:26). Thus, we must detest—loathe these articles as Yah does. These too were “marked or devoted for destruction” (7:26).

 

Idols Also Marked For Destructions

 

This issue of destroying the idols of the Amoritish nations and those idols having no place in the lives of the ancients, would of course equally apply to us as Netzarim today. How many of us, in many cases unknowingly, have had or currently have in our possession things like Buddhas, Native American articles, or any other articles that have some connection or link to pagan worship? These things, although they are not gods—they’re really just wood, metal, plastic or stone objects designed for the purpose of worshiping these fallen angelic beings–bring with them curses. Thus having them in our lives will ultimately bring curses upon our lives. Additionally, Father just outright hates them with extreme prejudice. Moreover, being a member of Yah’s elect, we must understand the things our Father loves and those things He loathes, such as idols, regardless how innocent they may appear to us. Father has little tolerance whatsoever for such things and neither should we.

 

Israel As An Arm of the Father

 

Thus, Israel would fulfill a few things in dispossessing the Amoritish nations of the Land: (1) We would destroy the last vestiges of the Nephilim—the Rephaim—the descendants of the Genesis 6 Watchers and their human wives. Their forbidden act perverted YHVH’s natural order and threatened to interfere in Yah’s Great Plan of Redemption and Salvation. (2) We would end, in part, the legal hold some of these angels, turned gods, held over nations of that region. In addition (3) our conquest of the Land would fulfill the Land Covenant YHVH made with the Patriarchs.

 

Later on, Y’shua our Messiah would finish the job during His earthly ministry and sacrifice.

 

Oh by the way, Moshe made it a point to let us know that our taking possession of the Land of Promise was in no way a reward for our righteousness. Our taking possession of the Land, in a great sense, was an historical example of Yah’s grace and love towards us and towards all mankind.

 

Father Was Tough On Us For a Reason

 

Moshe went on to remind us how Father miraculously carried us along our 40-year wilderness sojourn, all the while humbling and testing us (i.e., examining our hearts in the process). YHVH subjected us to hunger, thirst for purposes of building our trust in Him so that we would learn to recognize that everything we have comes from YHVH, and that we learn not to be slaves to our physical needs and desires (8:3). For Abba provided for our every need during those 40-years, despite our disobedience and lack of trust in Him, even after witnessing some of the greatest miraculous feats any human has ever seen with their own eyes (cf. Mat. 4:4; Luk. 4:4; 12:29, 30; Heb. 13:5, 6). Thus, we are to obey Yah’s Torah: living as He directs us, and fearing (yare) Him (8:6).

 

A Covenant Written on Stone and Hearts

 

In Deuteronomy 10:1-11, we find where Moshe rehashes the story of his receiving the 10-Commandments the first time on 2-stone-tables. YHVH provided the stone tables and wrote His commandments on them at that first go-round. When Moshe descended Mt. Sinai with those 2-tables, he found that the people had turned to the worship of the Golden Calf (a terrible throwback to their time of Egyptian bondage no doubt). In disgust and fierce anger towards the people, Moshe threw down to the ground and destroyed those 2-tablets that contained Yah’s commandments. He then  destroyed and ground into dust the golden calf, which he threw into a nearby stream, the mixture of which he made the people to drink thereof (Exo. 32:20). It was Moshe’s intense mediation on behalf the people and his reaction to the peoples’ iniquity—their sin—that ultimately spared the nation from complete and total annihilation at the hands of an angry and jealous God (Exo. 32:9-14).

 

Later, YHVH called Moshe back up Mount Sinai to receive His 10-Words: this time, however, instead of YHVH cutting  out stone tables and inscribing His Word upon them, Yah required Moshe to cut the 2-stone tables and bring them to YHVH where He inscribed His Word upon them.

 

This act obviously foreshadows the renewed covenant whereby we—House of Israel–bring YHVH our stony hearts and He inscribes upon them His Words—His Ways:

 

“Behold, the days come, saith YHVH, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith YHVH: But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel: After those days, saith YHVH, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. And they shall teach no more every man his neighbor and every man his brother saying, Know YHVH: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith YHVH: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more (Jer. 31:31-34; KJV).

 

Many contend that the renewed covenant has not taken place yet. And to a great extent I most certainly agree with them. However, I do believe in my heart of hearts that a down payment of that new covenant—a foretaste has already been realized by us: those who are Yah’s elect, saved by the blood of the Lamb, who possess His testimony and His Holy Spirit. Indeed, Yah writes His Torah upon our hearts and on our minds, even today. Soon, physical Israel—both houses of Judah and Israel—will realize this same covenant. Yah will restore paradise lost.

 

 

Phylacteries—Truth or Tradition?

 

In Deuteronomy 11:13-21, we come upon a rather challenging portion of Torah. I say this portion of Torah is challenging because the rabbis have instituted, as a result of their literal reading of the text, traditions and practices that when this passage is read, may cause us to wonder if God really requires us to wear “phylacteries,” otherwise known as “tefillin. “

 

The highlights of this section of our passage reads as such:

 

“And it shall come to pass, if ye shall hearken diligently unto my commandments which I command you this day, to love YHVH your Elohim, and to serve Him with all your heart and with all your soul…Therefore shall ye lay up these my words in your heart and in your soul, and bind them for a sign upon your hand, that they may be as frontlets between your eyes…And thou shalt write them upon the door posts of thine house, and upon thy gates that your days may be multiplied, and the days of your children, in the land which YHVH sware unto your fathers to give them, as the days of heaven upon the earth” (KJV).

 

As mentioned, the rabbis have taken this critical piece of scripture, which is also a brilliant piece of prose, and made it into yet another set of traditions and practices that are based upon an erroneous reading and understanding of this passage.

 

Tefillin or phylacteries are a set of small leather boxes containing scrolls of parchment inscribed with verses from Torah. Tefillin are worn by orthodox Rabbinic Jewish males during daily morning prayers, excluding Sabbaths.

 

The laws governing phylactery composition and use was developed by Rabbis and are contained in the Talmud (Sanh. 88b). These Rabbinic laws are literal interpretations of Deuteronomy 6.8; 11.18; Exodus 13.9,16.

 

Each leather box contains 4 scriptural passages: Exodus 13.1-10, 11-16; Deuteronomy 6.4-9; 11.13-21. According to the Rabbis, these passages must be written in black ink, in Hebrew square lettering, on parchment (reference Shab. 79b; Men. 32a), from the skin of a clean animal (Shab. 108a).

 

Talmud explicitly directs how the Torah verses are to be arranged on the parchment, the mode of writing (ie., rules on how the scribe is to draft the passages onto the parchment), how one is to put on the tefillin (ie., the order in which the phylacteries are to be donned and its exact placement on the body), when the implements may be worn, and the exact blessings to be recited while wearing them.

 

Let’s step back now into reality—spiritual reality that is–and understand the true meaning of this passage in Spirit and in Truth.

 

Contextually speaking, we find in our ‘Ekev Reading that Father was so insistent that we keep His Torah, that He gave to us examples of just how much we are to honor and keep His Word. These examples are essentially metaphors for the depths of Torah keeping we are expected to keep as Yah’s elect. Essentially, Father was saying to us that our commitment to Torah must be manifested in our labor—the works of our hands—thus the binding of His Word as a sign upon our hand. Furthermore, Father’s Torah must be ever on our minds—in our every thought so to speak–likened unto frontlets between our eyes (i.e., the frontlets representing the fulcrum of our thoughts). Additionally, the boundaries of our homes should reflect the pervasiveness of Yah’s Word in our lives, such that it appears as if Yah wrote His Word upon the doorposts and gates of our homes. Remember, in the ancient world, the gates and doorposts of the home was sacred and some have deemed these places as the most important places bar-none of a man’s home. It is a place where covenants were established and deep abiding relationships were made. Back in the day, not just anyone would go into another’s home. One had to be welcomed and then invited through a man’s gate and past the doorpost of his home. Any who would attempt to come into another man’s home absent such a welcome or invitation was customarily viewed as an intruder and they would be dealt with appropriately.

 

 

Thus, for the Hebrew, Yah’s Word must become the first line of defense over a man’s home. For every member of that man’s family would have to fear YHVH; every child must be taught YHVH’s Torah perpetually; the governing of the home would be under the auspices of Torah; the protection of the home and every member’s safety and wellbeing  therein would be under that of Yah’s eternal Torah and the blessings derived from keeping Torah therein.

 

To limit Torah to a verse or two on a piece of parchment that is to be contained in a small box that is to be tied to one’s head and forearms, or that is encased in a mezuzah that is nailed to the doorpost of one’s home, does not in any way fulfill the instruction that Moshe is giving here, nor does it fulfill the context of the passage.

 

Moshe, before getting to the part where he talks about frontlets, bindings and mezuzahs, instructs us to “…lay up these my words in your heart and in your soul.” Therefore, to think that one can simplify the importance of keeping the whole of Torah by wearing phylacteries and nailing mezuzahs to our homes is ludicrous. Our entire life must be occupied by YHVH’s Word; His Ways; His Spirit. And it becomes our responsibility to teach His Words and Ways to our children and so forth. In so doing, we will prosper and live long in the Land that our Elohim gave us (11:13-21).

 

Is it wrong to done tefillin or phylacteries or install mezuzahs on the doorposts of our homes? Yes and no. The answer to that question is dependent upon whose instructions you are going to follow in carrying out these activities. Tefillin or phylacteries are rabbinic inventions and traditions. The rules that govern phylactery use is regulated to the extreme point of being overly complex and difficult to carry out and be compliant with Rabbinic specifications.

 

Remember how Y’shua our Master denounced the traditions and practices of the rabbis:

 

 13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.

 14 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows’ houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.

 15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

 (Mat 23:13-15 KJV)

 

By implementing the traditions of phylactery use, the Rabbis have added to Torah, which in and of itself is a violation of Torah:

 

“Ye shall not add unto the Word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandment of YHVH your Elohim which I command you” (Deu. 4:2; KJV).

 

Thus I would say that the use of phylacteries is not advisable.

 

The traditions and laws of the Rabbis also govern mezuzah use. But I can also see how one may bring glory to Yah and respect to the Faith that is practiced by the household that maintains a mezuzah by following the Spirit of the tradition and this mitzvot. We have a mezuzah on the doorframe of our home, but we do not adhere to the rules of the Rabbis that govern its use. For us it is purely symbolic and ornamental, and it serves as a means by which to attract inquiries into what it is we believe and practice. So, if one is considering installing a mezuzah who is a member of our Faith community, I would only advise him or her to seriously consider under whose authority you would be installing and using the thing, and then do accordingly.

 

Well, that concludes our reflection of ‘Ekev. I pray that it provided you food for thought and that it encourages you to conduct your own read and study of this beautiful and thought-provoking passage.

 

Abba willing, we will be back next week with another installment of the Messianic Torah Observer. Until then, may you be most blessed fellow saint in training. Shalom and take care.

 

Faithfully.

Blessings and Curses–Stuck in the Middle–STAR 24

Blessings and Curses Stuck in the Middle Why did Father drill in our heads in anticipation of entering the land of promise--over and over--the idea of blessings to be had if we stayed/remained in His Torah and curses if we strayed from His Torah? I have some thoughts...

read more

Defeating Satan–Sabbath Thoughts & Reflections 23

  Defeating Satan Matthew 4 and Luke 4 record Satan's tempting of Y'shua (Jesus) in the wilderness and how Y'shua was able to overcome those temptations. This event provides the Torah observing believer in Y'shua Messiah with an example and prescription for defeating...

read more

The Bride of Christ (Messiah) Part 2–STAR 22

  The Bride of Christ (Messiah) Part 2 is the second part of a two-part discussion between Hilary and Rod on the subject. Who or what is the Bride of Christ (Messiah)? This is the central question that demands an answer that most believers are not clear on....

read more

Occupying Territory–Parashah 46 Part 7

Occupying Territory Deuteronomy 11:22-25 This passage brings us to the end of Parashah-46. As it has been throughout this lengthy portion, we see again Moshe's admonishment that we love Adonai our God. This concept of love in the Ancient Near East continues to be...

read more

Barna Group on Same Sex Marriage

The Barna Group Reports on Same-Sex Marriage I came upon these statistics published by the well established and respected Barna Group, regarding the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage. I found these statistics not so surprising  I must admit and it...

read more

Willing Obedience is a True Act of Love–

Willing Obedience is a True Act of Love   Deuteronomy 10:12-11:9   What does our experience tell us about Yahovah? What is our testimony? It is these exploits, these events that occurred in our lives that make us strong and ready to possess the land. We must not...

read more

1 Timothy-The Properly Attired Praying Woman-Part-12 of our Paul and Hebrew Roots Series

1 Timothy-The Properly Attired Praying Woman-Part-12 of our Paul and Hebrew Roots Series

by Rod Thomas | The Messianic Torah Observer

1 Timothy—The Properly Attired Praying Woman—Part 12 of the Paul and Hebrew Roots Series

 

Review of Last Two Posts

 

As promised, we’re going to finally get into an examination of 1 Timothy 2:9-15 and today’s focus will be that of the properly attired praying woman according to Paul.

 

But to quickly bring us up to speed, recall that over the last two installments to this series, in preparation for our examination of 1 Timothy 2:9-15, we discussed the following (https://www.themessianictorahobserver.org/2019/08/09/first-timothy-pauls-war-strategy-against-gnosticism-part-11-paul-hebrew-roots-series/):

 

  1. Inherent problems associated with 1 Timothy such as the language in which the text was originally written; missing information; and expressed concerns over the genuiness of the its author—Paul.

 

  1. Contextual concerns associated with 1 Timothy.

 

  1. The true purpose of 1 Timothy—was it a church organization manual as so many in churchianity claim it to be.

 

  1. The importance of deep study and what it entails, especially when trying to understand some of Paul’s more challenging and difficult to understand passages.

 

  1. We looked at the socio-cultural-economic and religious situation of first-century Ephesus.

 

  1. And we engaged in a detailed discussion of Jewish Gnosticism (ie., proto or early Gnosticism) that had seemingly overtaken the Ephesian Assemblies.

 

Important Considerations

 

So today, we will look at the properly attired, praying Ephesian woman from a couple perspectives:

 

(a) From the perspective of women leading prayers in the assemblies of Messiah.

 

(b) From the perspective of prayer being one of the standards by which the Faith is displayed by Yah’s people and the first weapon of choice for combating false teachers and their teachings.

 

So without further ado, let’s dive headlong into today’s study: 1 Timothy—The Properly Attired Praying Woman—Part 12 of the Paul and Hebrew Roots Series.

 

 

Verses 9 & 10

 

“I desire then that in every place the men should pray, lifting holy hands without anger or quarreling; likewise also that women should adorn themselves in respectable apparel, with modesty and self-control, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly attire, but with what is proper for women who profess godliness—with good works” (ESV).

 

In the same way

 

In order for us to fully comprehend what Paul is communicating to Timothy in this instruction, I believe at the very least we must fall back to verse 1 of this chapter. And what we find is Paul, having already established the basis for this letter (ie., addressing the Gnostic onslaught that had overtaken the Ephesian Assemblies of YHVH), Paul begins to lay out the strategy for combating the problems. And the first thing Paul instructs is that:

 

“…supplications, prayers, intercessions and thanksgivings be made for all people, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way” (2:1,2; ESV).

 

Prayer—Paul’s First Tactic to Defeat Gnosticism in the Ephesian Assemblies

 

So Paul’s first tactic for defeating the Gnostic onslaught against the Ephesian Assemblies was “prayer.” In this case, we’re not just talking about personal, in your prayer-closet—daily prayers, but more so, public prayers. Paul instructs Timothy to ensure that the assembly members publicly pray for “all people,” including world leaders. And the aim of such public prayers was to ensure that members of the Body of Messiah lead a peaceful, godly, and dignified life.

 

And then in verse 8 of chapter 2, after certifying the wisdom of such an instruction, his calling and the God who the prayers would be directed towards, Paul adds something very interesting to his instructions regarding public prayers—singling out the men of the assemblies:

 

“I desire then that in every place the men should pray, lifting holy hands without anger or quarreling…” (2:8; ESV).

 

Considerations

 

Two things I would have you take note of here:

 

(1) Paul’s instruction that “men should pray in every place” is a direct call to the mature, set-apart men of the assemblies (”en topos”) when and wherever they gathered to engage in public prayer. Some may interpret the reference to men in this verse to mean “people,” “humans,” “man-kind,” which if that were the case, the Greek word Paul would have likely used would have been “anthropos.” In fact, this Greek term was used in verse 1 of this chapter where Paul calls for public prayers on behalf of all men (ie., “anthropos”). However, the term Paul uses here for men in verse 8 is “aner.” “Aner” generally refers to an adult male. So what about the women participating in this public prayer for all people? Is this a prohibition against women engaging in public prayer within the assembly gatherings? Absolutely not. In fact, we will see that Paul does indeed include women in his call to public prayer in verse 9, in just a second.

 

(2) The men, having gathered in their assemblies and engaged in petitions, supplications and intercessions on behalf of all people, as is part and parcel of such prayers, these were to lift up set-apart hands (ie., holy hands) unto the Creator, devoid of any anger or argument.

 

The Lifting Up of Holy Hands

 

What’s this “lifting up holy hands?” Well, it appears to be a common posture for prayer among the ancient peoples of Faith and the bible supports this.

 

Exodus 9:29—”Moses said to him, “As soon as I’ve left the city, I’ll spread out my hands to YHVH. Then the thunder and the hail will stop and won’t return so that you will know that the earth belongs to YHVH”” (CEB).

 

1 Kings 8:22—”Solomon stood before YHVH’s altar in front of the entire Israelite assembly and, spreading out his hands toward the sky…”(CEB).

 

Psalms 28:2—”Listen to my request for mercy when I cry out to you, when I lift up my hands to your holy inner sanctuary” (CEB).

 

Psalms 63:4—”So I will bless you as long as I’m alive; I will lift up my hands in your name” (CEB).

 

Isaiah 1:15—”When you extend your hands, I’ll hide my eyes from you. Even when you pray for a long time, I won’t listen. Your hands are stained with blood” (CEB).

 

The stipulation for those who would lift-up hands unto YHVH on behalf of all people is that those petitioners would be individuals who lived holy  lives and the symbolism of the lifting of hands during worship and prayer would need be devoid of evil.

 

Prayer As Paul’s Number One Tactic Against Gnosticism

 

Thus corporate prayer was one of Paul’s first spiritual war tactics to combat the Jewish Gnosticism that’d gripped the Ephesian Assemblies. Because Paul, under the influence of the Ruach haKodesh (ie., the Holy Spirit), knew that the battle for the soul of the Ephesian life. This cannot be overlooked: not every member of the assembly would be prime petitioners. Those who would be considered prime prayer warriors would be those who lived a set-apart life.

 

 

The Vital Importance of Corporate Prayer to the Assemblies

 

Now why do you suppose that Paul would make as his first tactic against the Ephesian Gnostic infiltration of the assemblies of Messiah public prayer? (Recall dear friend that in the last installment to this series—Part-11—I likened 1 Timothy to that of a war strategy; essentially Paul and Timothy’s fight was not against those pesky flesh and blood Jewish Gnostic false teachers he mentions throughout his letter. Instead, Paul’s first tactic in his overall war strategy against false teaching in the Ephesian Assembly was by way of the spiritual. And how does one engage in spiritual warfare? Through prayer my friend. Through prayer—intercessions—petitions.

 

In fact, it was the same Paul who, writing to the very same set of Ephesian Assemblies, that the war for the souls of the assembly members was against spiritual entitles. For Paul writes:

 

“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places” (Eph. 6:12; ESV). 

 

But suffice to say that Paul comes right out of the gate requiring the assembly members engage in public petitions unto YHVH. No doubt, Paul’s secret weapon for launching the initial attack was to take the fight to the enemy’s own battle field: the spirit-realm.

 

And interestingly, Paul sets out to turn the tables on the chaos that had started to overtake the assemblies—anger and argument over stupid stuff; over fables; over endless genealogies. These would be replaced by a simple act of raised, set-apart hands petitioning and interceding on behalf all people.

 

The other thing that we must keep in mind here, which is vitally important to our understanding of the significance of what Paul is saying in these verses regarding corporate prayer is that corporate prayer as passed down by Paul and the other Apostles, when properly practiced, brought light to false teachings.

 

 

Women Appearance—Social-Cultural-Economic Impacts–The Hetairai Revisited

 

Recall we discussed the “hetairai” in previous installments of this series and that they were of “the professional courtesan or prostitution vocation” of Ephesus, Corinth and surrounding Greek cities (Donna Howell; pg. 128). In other words, these were temple prostitutes who held prominent standing in these Greek cities. And it was these women who made the adorning of cosmetics and fashion an art. The cosmetics and fashion were of course designed to elicit the immediate attention of “potential patrons” or clients (Donna Howell, “The Handmaiden Conspiracy;” pg. 128).

 

Now, none of this is to imply that the women of the Messianic Assemblies in Ephesus were hetairai. There’s no evidence to support such thinking. However, like today, fashion trends, regardless from whence they come, can have a tremendous impact on the day-to-day citizen of a society. In the case of the women of the Messianic Assembly in Ephesus, vanity was still a trait among assembly members that probably needed to be weeded out if Paul was to bring complete order to assemblies. So I believe there stands a better chance than not that pagan traits such as the adorning of alluring attire, hair styles, expensive jewelry, and such likely influenced some of the women of the assembly who “began to imitate this form of adornment simply because it looked feminine and pretty” (ibn, pg. 128). Again, I doubt the women of the Ephesian Assemblies were active temple of Artemis prostitute, but they instead “looked the part” for the sake of being trendy or appearing feminine or pretty as Howell suggests in her book.

 

Expectations of the Ephesian Women in Dress and Behavior (Torah and Pauline Expectations)

 

We find, when read in context, 1 Timothy 2:9 instructs Timothy “Likewise also the women” should pray in the same manner as the men in the assembly. Although extremely insightful, this verse also serves as sort of a transition verse to verse 8. Recall that in verse 8 Paul wrote of his desire that the men of Ephesus, wherever they would gather to worship, pray lifting up holy hands that would be devoid of anger or quarrels. Then Paul writes at the beginning of verse 9:

 

In like manner also (”hosautos [kai]”)…” (KJV).

 

Sadly, far too many students of the bible overlook this key transition and focus solely on what comes next in verse 9—that being a discussion on proper women attire and deportment when participating and or leading in public or corporate prayer.

 

In short, Paul writes that he desires the men of the Ephesian Assembly to pray within the guidelines of what he outlined for Timothy in verses 1-8. Then he writes, oh, by the way, I want the women of the Ephesian Assembly to do exactly what I’ve just instructed the men of the assembly to do regarding prayer.

 

The Negative Influence of Koine Greek’s Lack of Punctuation and Sentence Structure to Understanding

 

So why do so many people miss this crucial element to verse 9—in like manner? Well, in Koine Greek manuscripts, there are no punctuations: no periods; no commas; no semi-colons; no colons; no exclamation points; no quotation marks; no brackets; no paragraph starts and ends or indentations. In fact, if you simply pull up an image of a Koine Greek manuscript online, you’ll see that even the individual Greek words aren’t really separated by spaces. Thus, when New Testament translators and transcribers set out to articulate the ancient text into English, punctuation is often left to their discretion. And if you know anything about English grammar, punctuation can influence the meaning of an entire text. And when the author of the original Greek text leaves out clarifying words, translators can add to or subtract meaning to the verse in question, which we all know has the capability of leading to erroneous doctrines and traditions.

 

Let’s take, for instance verse 9, and see how various English translators rendered it from a punctuation perspective:

 

The KJV: “In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel…” Notice here the comma that follows after “also.” And then the sentence continues with Paul’s discussion on women’s apparel. And if one were not careful, one would naturally think that Paul is telling Timothy that women should dress like who, the men, and not like the common women of Ephesus? It doesn’t make sense when you really look at this absent the previous verses to verse 9. Regardless, the “In like manner also” does cause one to ask: like what?

 

The same convention of sentence structure is followed in the ASV, the CEB, the ROT, and the ERV.

 

Other translations simply throw in the word “likewise [comma]” or “also [comma]” such as the CJB, the HCSB, the NASB. Still others such as the NET render “likewise” and leave off the comma entirely, forcing the reader to conclude that women are to dress like the men? Again, it doesn’t make sense.

 

Oh, and in case that wasn’t confusing enough, some translations such as the NLT and the NRS left off the transition words altogether and take the reader immediately into Paul’s discussion of women apparel and appearance.

 

Whether any of this is intentional in terms of forcing the reader to overlook Paul telling Timothy that women should participate in leading corporate prayers in the assemblies is speculative, but I would not rule it out. Let us never forget that the editors and translators and transcribers of our bibles have a tendency to filter their work through the lenses of their denomination and religious worldview. So if these believed as their churches or denominations or sects that women are prohibited from leading public or corporate prayer, they will force a translation in the English that will read according to their beliefs and understandings. Sad, but true.

 

Bringing The Women Into Leading Corporate Prayer

 

So Paul wants to make it clear to Timothy that the women of the Ephesian Assemblies, who met the same criteria as the men for leading the corporate prayers, also be devoid of anger and desputations; living set-apart lives, lifting up their hands in prayer unto YHVH our Elohim in supplications, petitions, intercessions and thanksgivings.

 

However, Paul throws in elements to the leading in public prayer that is germane to the women of the Ephesian Assemblies. And those elements involved the womens’ personal appearance and deportment, which seem to have been negatively impacted by the common fashion styles of the Ephesian culture. (We touched upon this just a moment ago actually.)

 

The Properly Attired Ephesian Woman of Prayer

 

Paul required that the women be arrayed modestly and appear before the assembly in a Godly manner (1 Tim. 2:9):

 

“I want women to enhance their appearance with clothing that is modest and sensible, not with elaborate hairstyles, gold, pearls, or expensive clothes” (CEB).

 

Ancient Greek culture viewed braids as “seductive.” In fact, the hairstyles worn by the hetairai for instance, required a professional to style and arrange. Juvenal, a Roman poet of the late first and early second century C.E., noted that such women who wore those types of hairstyle typically employed a slave to arrange their hair as well as a second slave to stand by with a whip to “lash the unfortunate beautician in case a cowlick proved stubborn” (Howell; pg. 75).

 

It should go without saying that “ostentatious” hairstyles were clear signs of “promiscuity” in the Ancient Near East. Paul instructed that such things as ostentatious hairstyles, as costly as they tended to be, was not an appropriate expenditure of money nor was it a suitable thing for one who professed Godliness to possess and display. As far as Paul was concerned, instead of adorning herself with costly common styles of the day, it was far better for a Godly woman to adorn herself with “good works” (1 Tim. 2:10).

 

 And let’s now throw in verse 10 to round off Paul’s observations here:

 

“…that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness (ie., “aidos,” modesty) and sobriety (ie., “sophrosune,”; self-control) not with broided hair (ie., “plegma,” braided hair), or gold, or pearls, or costly array. But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works” (KJV).

 

 

Interestingly, regarding arraying themselves with good works, the CEB expresses it this way:

 

“They (ie., women) should make themselves attractive by doing good…”

 

In summarizing this key, revelatory passage, researcher Donna Howell wrote:

 

“His (ie., Paul) was with a woman attending church in modesty and humility, and in making sure that her appearance in a place of worship would be for the right reasons (to worship, not to attract the attention of surrounding men). Paul was aware that women were weaving gold into their braids , which was a common practice for prostitutes who wanted to wear an ongoing advertisement in public that they were ‘available for hire.’ These women knew that the culture around them considered their hair to be an extension of the body’s most intimate fluids, so they drew even more attention to it with gold, fine metals, and gemstones” (Handmaiden’s Conspiracy; pgs. 127, 128).

 

The Importance of Prayer to the Assemblies of Messiah

 

Let’s look at prayer in the early Assemblies of Messiah.

 

When we think about corporate prayer today, especially in the so-called Church, we picture a church leader standing up before a congregation who rattles off a series of words—reverential as it may seem—in rather quick order, directed to God or in many congregations, Jesus Christ. And upon quickly dispensing of their acknowledgment of God or Jesus, the church leaders launch right into whatever it was they are set to do: preach—teach—admonish—sell—whatever.

 

But corporate prayer in the first-century assemblies of Messiah was actually a big thing. It was a huge part of worship each Sabbath. And when the assemblies engaged in corporate prayer, they prayed together and listened to prayers said on their behalf, which when ended, the assembly would respond in agreement: “Amen. So be it.”

 

According to Scot McKnight, in his article entitled “Prayer in the Earliest Church,” corporate prayers in the Assemblies of Messiah occurred at least 3-times each day (https://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed/2015/10/13/prayer-in-the-earliest-church/). This practice obviously stemmed from orthodox Jewish customs.

 

In fact it was an early “Christian” document that some claim was written by first-century apostles, called “The Didache,” stipulated prayer in the Body of Messiah take place 3-times daily, and the article actually recites the Lord’s Prayer. So, we’re not talking about free-will, free-form prayers uttered by a church leader during any given worship service or gathering. We’re talking about the recitation of the “Lord’s Prayer.”

 

According to Patristic Church Father Tertullian, the assemblies (ie., the churches) devoted themselves to the “Lord’s Prayer” and the Psalms for their prayer practices. And Tertullian is believed to have taught his followers to pray in the morning and evening and “then also at the three designated hours of 9 AM, noon, and 3 pm, and this was customary for early Christian prayer practices.

 

According to Scot McKnight, “Christians seemed to have prayed with the whole body: standing, kneeling, prostration, or more commonly standing with hands and head raised (cross-like). Hence, too, the sign of the cross.”

 

The raising and extending of the hands and or arms sound familiar?

 

It was under Roman Emperor Constantine that prayer became more public and pervasive to the cities: “The bishop is to urge the people to come constantly to church morning and evening every day, and by no means to forsake it on any account, but to assemble together continually…Assemble yourselves together every day, morning and evening, singing psalms and praying in the Lord’s house: in the morning saying the sixty-second Psalm, and in the evening the hundred and fortieth, but principally on the Sabbath day” (Ap. Const. 2.59).

 

Churchianity at it best huh?

 

According to Philip Kosloski, in his article entitled “4 Ancient Prayers From the Earliest Christians,” Christians prayed “the Psalms in a similar fashion to the Jews at the time, but developed their own prayers that they clung on to in their times of need (https://aleteia.org/2017/09/23/4-ancient-prayers-from-the-earliest-christians/).

 

Of the first 3,000 members of the Way Movement in Jerusalem days after the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the Great Day of Pentecost, Luke wrote:

 

“And they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers” (Act. 2:42; ESV).

 

According to Steven D. Bruns, in his article entitled “How the Early Church Used Prayer to Make Disciples, this insightful verse reveals how the first 3,000 believers were acclimated into the Faith. These learned “the prayers.” These were not simply spontaneous prayers. These “were certain prayers that were specifically taught to the new converts” (https://www.seedbed.com/early-church-using-prayer-make-disciples-2/).

 

Bruns contends that these prayers “served in an instructive and corrective role” for the disciples of Messiah. And as Gnosticism began to take a foothold in the early years of the Faith, “one of the main criteria for determining this fact (ie., which writings were genuine, apostolic writings) was whether or not the writings or sect’s beliefs conformed to how the Christians were taught to pray.”

 

Of course the major prayer that was taught would have been the “Lord’s Prayer.” Thus Bruns describes the “Lord’s Prayer” as the “paradigmatic prayer for the Church.” In the Didache (c. 50-120 AD), there are only 2-prayers mentioned: The Lord’s Prayer and the prayer during the Eucharist (ie., the Lord’s Supper), of which the Lord’s Supper was to be prayed 3-times/day. The prayers were spoken or sung.

 

Justin Maryr, in his “Apology,” (c. 155 AD), wrote that “the president of the service would offer prayers and thanksgivings according to his ability.”

 

In a composition of various writings ranging in dates from 215 to 400 AD, entitled “Apostolic Tradition,” one writer wrote: “It is not altogether necessary for the bishop to recite the very same words which we gave before as though studying to say them by heart in his thanksgiving to God; but let each one pray according to his own ability. If indeed he is able to pray suitably with a grand and elevated prayer, this is a good thing. But if on the other hand he should pray and recite a prayer according to a brief form, no one shall prevent him. Only let his prayer be correct and orthodox.”

 

Thus it appears that over time the rote prayers, especially the Lord’s Prayer, were not necessarily read, but became more guidelines to spontaneous, heartfelt petitions and intercessions.

 

The other thing that I believe is essential information to have regarding prayer in the early Church is that prayer was, according to Bruns, one of the ways the Faith “discipled its people and encouraged them in their spiritual life and growth. Correct prayer, taught by Christians to new Christians, was among the most important means of ensuring the correct faith that was once for all delivered to the saints” (Jude 1:3).

 

So the concern regarding prayer in the early church—in particular for Ephesus who was battling significant Jewish Gnosticism infiltration in the assemblies–was to ensure the one who prays had a proper relationship with God and that the individual “was addressing the correct God and using correct theology when they did speak to that God” (Brun).

 

According to Dr. D. W. Ekstrand, in his article entitled: “Worship in the Early Church:” “The most basic acts of worship in the early church were the reading and exposition of Scripture, prayer, the singing of psalms, hymns and spiritual songs, and the observance of the sacraments; all of these were derived from the example and command of Jesus Himself.” (Can you detect a little Catholicism in this statement?) (http://www.thetransformedsoul.com/additional-studies/miscellaneous-studies/-worship-in-the-early-church)

 

What Constituted Scriptures in the First Century Body of Messiah?

 

In the early years of the Way Movement in Palestine and throughout the various realms of the Roman Empire where home assemblies were established, the scriptures were the books of the Tanakh. Remember, the New Testament did NOT exist in the first century A.D. And the letters that were written and disseminated to the various assemblies by the apostles were at that time in the early stages of being copied and read throughout the whole of the Faith Community—first to the assembly members of which the letter was originally addressed; and then later the copies were shared with all the other assemblies of Messiah that were strewn throughout the Roman Empire. It would be many years before the powers that be of the so-called Church Triumph would codify and canonize these books as inspired and scripture. Nevertheless, as these letters—like 1 Timothy—were introduced to the assemblies, they were read publicly as part of the worship service.

 

The earliest members of the Way Movement were Jewish. Thus, these accepted the Tanakh as the “Word of God.” And we know that these also continued worshiping at the Temple and in their local synagogues alongside their countrymen/countrywomen each Shabbat for several decades, especially in Palestine. Of course the difference between the orthodox Jews and the Jews of the Way Movement was that the members of the Way Community were devoted to Y’shua as their “promised Messiah and that salvation was found in Him alone.” Nevertheless, these continued to worship “in a basically Jewish fashion but added the Lord’s Supper (cf. Acts 2:42, 46) and prayers in the Name of Jesus to their worship regimen (cf. Acts 4:24-30). Furthermore, it appears that the members of the Way Movement, according to Dr. Ekstrand, “gathered daily for prayer, fellowship, preaching, and teaching (cf. Acts 2:46; 5:42), the ‘chief day’ for services of worship in the church was changed from the Jewish Sabbath to the first day of the week almost from the beginning, because it was the day of resurrection.”

 

Sabbath Versus Sunday Worship in the Early Assemblies of Messiah

 

My sources differ from that of Dr. Ekstrand as it relates to the early church worshiping exclusively on Sundays. My understanding is that the early members of the Way Movement worshiped primarily on the Sabbaths, and their fellowship continued on through the following day with worship and study of the scriptures. All indications are that as long as the Apostles were standing watch over the Body of Messiah, the keeping of Shabbat would have been non-negotiable. Furthermore, Sunday worship did not become a requirement of the so-called Church until Emperor Constantine, circa early 4th century AD made it so. For it was on the 7th of March, 321 A.D., that Emperor Constantine decreed that “dies Solis,” or “the day of the sun,” would be observed as a universal day of rest.

 

And of course the sacraments mentioned in Ekstrand’s article no doubt refer to the 7-sacraments of the Catholic Church, but for our purposes, the sacraments would be limited to just the Lord’s Supper and baptism.

 

So with the exception of the Lord’s Supper, the other forms of worship really did not originate with the teachings and example of Y’shua Messiah. These “were derived from the Synagogue worship of the Jews” (Ekstrand).

 

Corporate Prayer in the Early Church Derived Primarily From Synagogal Worship Regimen

 

Synagogue worship came on to the Jewish cultural-religious-social scene around the 6th century BC, about the time of the Babylonian Exile. With the destruction of Solomon’s Temple around 586 BC and many of the Jews of Palestine taken into Babylonian Captivity, synagogues provided for the needs of public worship, absent sacrifices which according to Torah could only be performed at the Temple.

 

Synagogues continued throughout the Land of Palestine (ie., Israel) after the Babylonian Captivity and it was the synagogue that provided for the basic teaching of Torah to the new Jewish and Gentile converts to the Way Movement:

 

“For Moses from ancient generations has in every city those who preach him, since he is read in the synagogues every Sabbath” (Act. 15:21).

 

Torah Taught to First Century Assemblies Via Local Synagogues

 

Note I said Jews and Gentiles received Torah training from the synagogues throughout the Roman Empire. As we can clearly see in James’ Jerusalem Council edict to the assemblies of Messiah (reference Acts 15), Gentiles were supposed to receive training in Torah through their attendance of Sabbath worship services at the various synagogues strewn throughout the Roman Empire. And this is a crucial fact that so many people of Faith either take for granted or simply remain ignorant of. For we’ve all be erroneously taught by churchianity over the years that Jesus Christ brought forth a brand new Faith, totally disconnected from Judaism. Thus, according to churchianity, after Pentecost, the Church Triumphant ran entirely independent of Judaism, neither the two to ever again meet. Unfortunately, this lie from the pit of hades has contributed, in great part, to the hellacious teaching that Torah was done away with by the sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross, and the false understanding that any disciple of Y’shua who would even think of keeping any part of Torah has fallen from grace and shipwrecked his or her chances for eternal life.

 

 

Continuing on: Upon the destruction of Herod’s Temple, the synagogue “replaced Jewish Temple ritual sacrifices with Torah readings, prayer and teaching.” Furthermore, the synagogue served as “houses of prayer” and “houses of study” (ie., of Torah) and for “social gatherings.” It became the epi-center of Jewish life in every town and city where Jews had a presence. And because of these facts, synagogues were generally the first places Paul would go to deliver the Gospel. Sometimes this protocol worked out well for Paul and his evangelistic team, while in others it proved less than fruitful.

 

Recall that it was in Ephesus that Paul and His Gospel message was rejected by the synagogal leaders. Thus he was kicked out of the Ephesian synagogue. Paul ended up taking his disciples with him from the synagogue and setting up shop in Tyrannus’ Yeshivah (ie., a Jewish school for religious studies). And thus Paul evangelized and taught from Tyrannus’ Yeshivah for 2-years, drawing unto himself and his teachings Jew and Greek alike from over Asia Minor (Act. 19:9,10). And if you read further along in Acts 19, you’ll see that mighty works were manifested through Paul’s ministry there in Ephesus, leading up to the 7-sons of Sceva incident, the burning of magic scrolls by Jews and Greeks, and the Demetrius uprising.

 

Dr. Eckstrand in his article goes on to mention that first-century synagogues generally had a hall for prayer, which would constitute the main sanctuary; and smaller rooms for religious studies and other synagogal business.

 

According to Dr. Eckstrand, at some point in the latter-half of the first-century A.D.—generally after the destruction of Herod’s Temple in 70 A.D.—members of the Way Movement were prohibited from worshiping in the synagogues. Regardless, members of the Way continued with the “same rite as their Jewish counterparts with added Christian developments and themes. Thus their meeting strongly resembled synagogal worship.” And synagogal worship included the weekly Torah and Haftorah Readings; the chanting of Psalms; intercessory prayers; and teachings.

 

Is Paul’s Instructions Regarding Women Leading Corporate Prayer and Appropriate Attire Be That of a Normative or Restrictive Nature?

 

Would I mess you up to say both?

 

Indeed, in my mind at least, Paul’s stance on women leading corporate prayer in worship gathering situations and the instructions he gave regarding appropriate attire and deportment are both normative and restrictive instructions to the Body of Messiah.

 

Allow me to break it down for you.

 

Leading corporate or public prayer in the midst of Yah’s elect is a very special privilege that none of us should ever take for granted.

 

 Verse 9 clearly makes normative (ie., universal; applicable for us even today) the practice of women leading congregants in prayer during all forms of gatherings. But as it relates to Paul’s instructions on appropriate womens’ attire and general appearance and deportment in such gatherings and during their leading of corporate prayers, the apostle’s instructions are both normative and restrictive (ie., meant only for the women of the 1st-century Ephesian Assemblies). The instructions regarding womens’ general appearance, attire and deportment is restrictive to the women of the first-century Ephesian Assemblies simply because the wearing of expensive clothes, braided hair, gold jewelry and pearls today in our 21st-century, western culture are not necessarily provocative or alluring. However, Paul’s instructions become restrictive when womens’ attire, appearance and deportment become a distraction to the other members of the assembly.

 

I’m sure that you, like me, have had the experience of attending some type of worship service where certain women (and this would also apply to men for sure) would come into the service, wearing certain attire or who carried themselves in such a way that they drew attention to themselves, especially from the wandering eyes of the young men of the gathering who should have their minds focused on worship of the Almighty. In such situations, Paul’s instructions against women wearing provocative attire and carrying themselves in a common way would still apply today, especially for those women who find themselves in leadership positions in the Body and Assemblies of Messiah.

 

 

The Realities of Women Leading Public Prayers or of Women Fulfilling Leadership Roles in the Body of Messiah

 

Sadly, I have seen first hand many congregations and assemblies of Messiah where women are not permitted to lead corporate or public prayers. But growing up in the Southern Baptist Church of the 70’s and early 80’s, women were permitted only limited public or corporate prayer opportunities. I witnessed the same thing as I moved into the non-denominational sector of churchianity in the 90’s, although I did run into several congregations where women actually did lead congregational prayers.

 

And throughout all this time, I never fully understood why women were generally excluded from leading prayer in church. I knew, erroneously so, that the bible essentially prohibited women from teaching and preaching, and thus I figured this extended over to leading prayer in church as well.

 

Women Are Free In Messiah—Just Like Their Male Counterparts

 

However, it should be common knowledge that just like their male counterparts, women have freedom in Messiah (Gal. 5:1; 2 Cor. 3:17). Not the freedom that churchianity erroneously teaches that pertains to freedom to live life however one chooses (ie., a Torah-less life). But freedom to serve YHVH our Elohim in the beauty of holiness, Truth and Spirit: whether you’re a Jew or a Gentile; male or female; slave or free, we’ve all been freed to serve YHVH as He directs and leads; not controlled by religion and man-made traditions and doctrines (Gal. 3:28).

 

In Torah pass-down days, the time of the Judges and during our time in the Land and the prophets, corporate prayers were conducted exclusively by the Levitical Priests. Indeed, Hebrews commonly prayed on individual bases as their faith and personal situations dictated. Generally, these rote prayers. But the bible provides us a number of stories where women of Faith prayed privately during various situations. But corporate prayers were the exclusive domain of the Levitical Priests.

 

But when Y’shua came, things started to change in terms of women participation and leadership in the Faith. Women became an integral part of the Master’s ministry. For it was through Y’shua Messiah that women were finally “loosed” or freed from the oppression of religion and men. And under the leadership of the Apostle to the Gentiles, Paul, under the auspices of the renewed covenant, women, contrary to the false teachings of so many in churchianity, realized the full extent of the freedom women had in Y’shua haMashiyach. And as we clearly saw played out in previous installments to this series, the bible clearly suggests that women led home assemblies, preached, taught, led corporate prayers, counseled, prophesied, and even served as apostles.

 

Despite scriptural proofs to the freedoms that women were afforded in Mashiyach in terms of leadership in the Faith, male leaders in churchianity have erred on the side of misogynistic practices and mindsets of Greek culture and Judaism. And the thing that kills me about the continued denial of women to fulfill their call in Messiah by certain sects of churchianity and even our Faith Community, is that despite obvious proofs that run contrary to their misogynistic views and understanding, they choose to continue to operate, live and lead in error—much to the chagrin of their precious female members.

 

Nevertheless, our focus passage here—1 Timothy 2:9-15—serves as proof that women have every right, and dare I say every responsibility to serve the Body of Mashiyach—of Messiah—as leaders in congregational prayer. And we will find in Part 13 of this series, that womens’ leadership in the assemblies of Messiah is not limited to corporate prayer, but also extends over into learning and teaching. I pray you join me.

 

Faithfully.

Blessings and Curses–Stuck in the Middle–STAR 24

Blessings and Curses Stuck in the Middle Why did Father drill in our heads in anticipation of entering the land of promise--over and over--the idea of blessings to be had if we stayed/remained in His Torah and curses if we strayed from His Torah? I have some thoughts...

read more

Defeating Satan–Sabbath Thoughts & Reflections 23

  Defeating Satan Matthew 4 and Luke 4 record Satan's tempting of Y'shua (Jesus) in the wilderness and how Y'shua was able to overcome those temptations. This event provides the Torah observing believer in Y'shua Messiah with an example and prescription for defeating...

read more

The Bride of Christ (Messiah) Part 2–STAR 22

  The Bride of Christ (Messiah) Part 2 is the second part of a two-part discussion between Hilary and Rod on the subject. Who or what is the Bride of Christ (Messiah)? This is the central question that demands an answer that most believers are not clear on....

read more

Occupying Territory–Parashah 46 Part 7

Occupying Territory Deuteronomy 11:22-25 This passage brings us to the end of Parashah-46. As it has been throughout this lengthy portion, we see again Moshe's admonishment that we love Adonai our God. This concept of love in the Ancient Near East continues to be...

read more

Barna Group on Same Sex Marriage

The Barna Group Reports on Same-Sex Marriage I came upon these statistics published by the well established and respected Barna Group, regarding the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage. I found these statistics not so surprising  I must admit and it...

read more

Willing Obedience is a True Act of Love–

Willing Obedience is a True Act of Love   Deuteronomy 10:12-11:9   What does our experience tell us about Yahovah? What is our testimony? It is these exploits, these events that occurred in our lives that make us strong and ready to possess the land. We must not...

read more

First Timothy-Paul’s War Strategy Against Gnosticism-Part-11 of the Paul and Hebrew Roots Series

First Timothy-Paul's War Strategy Against Gnosticism

by Rod Thomas | The Messianic Torah Observer

“As I counseled you when I was leaving Macedonia, stay on in Ephesus, so that you may order certain people who are teaching a different doctrine to stop. Have them stop devoting their attention to myths and never-ending genealogies; these divert people to speculating instead of doing God’s work, which requires trust. The purpose of this order is to promote love from a clean heart, from a good conscience and from sincere trust. Some, by aiming amiss, have wandered off into fruitless discussion. They want to be teachers of Torah, but they understand neither their own words nor the matters about which they make such emphatic pronouncements” (1 Tim. 1:3-7; CJB).

 

In this 11th episode to our Paul and Hebrew Roots Series, we pick up where we left off last week and prepare for a full-blown study of 1 Timothy 2:9-15. But before we can fully unravel the mysteries of this controversial passage, we must first gain an understanding of why Paul wrote this controversial passage in the first place. And what we’ll find out in this installment of The Messianic Torah Observer is that 1 Timothy was in a sense Paul’s war strategy against Gnosticism.

 

This is content you likely won’t find anywhere anywhere else; so you don’t want to miss this discussion.

 

Shalom and welcome.

This is “First Timothy—Paul’s War [Strategy] Against Gnosticism—Part-11 of the Paul and Hebrew Roots Series.”

 

Last episode to this series, part-10, I introduced you to our controversial focus passage of 1 Timothy 2:9-15 . In that post I attempted to shed some light upon some of the many historic, religious, grammatical, and cultural difficulties associated with it. And those difficulties are unfortunately experienced both within and without our faith community.

 Gnosticism is a modern name for a variety of ancient religious ideas and systems originating in Hellenistic Judaism and the Jewish-Christian milieu in the first and second centuries A.D. (Wikipedia).

 

 Preparing For Study of our Focus Passage of 1 Timothy 2:9-15

In anticipation of really getting into the nuts and bolts of 1 Timothy 2:9-15, we first have to do some preparatory groundwork. 

Of course, our ultimate goal in examining 1 Timothy 2:9-15 is to gain as accurate an understanding of the passage as we possibly can. Additionally, we we also look to correct as many popular misinterpretations, misrepresentations and false-teachings which have, as you know, spawned hellacious misogynistic doctrines throughout Christianity, Catholicism, Judaism, and certain elements of the Messianic Community. Combined, these have contributed in one form or another to effectively silencing women of faith by denying them the ability to do that which they’ve been called by the Holy Spirit to do.

 Areas of Study in Preparation for our Study of 1 Timothy 2:9-15

So today I’m going to cover just two-major areas in preparation for our next episode, part-12, where we’ll actually break down and closely examine our focus passage. Those two-areas will be:

(A) Gaining a basic understanding of Ephesus—her socio-cultural-religious existence at the time Paul wrote his first letter to Timothy.

(B) We’ll conduct a modest survey of 1 Timothy so as to lay a contextual foundation upon which we may build an accurate understanding of our focus passage.

 A. Understanding the Ancient City of Ephesus 

The City

Ephesus was a port-city that was once considered the most important Greek city and the most important trading center in the Mediterranean region (reference:  https://www.history.com/topics/ancient-greece/ephesus).

It has been described as a thriving city where men and women enjoyed equal opportunities.

Ephesus was a large, affluent Greek city in the Roman Empire and was home to a few Messianic Assemblies of which Timothy was appointed as General Overseer.

It is surmised by certain scholars that Ephesus was home to some 250,000 people. She was a planned city of Greek architecture, possessing advanced public amenities such as an extensive sewage system and aqueducts. Fountains adorned her streets and public squares and convenient public baths and toilets were accessible to the populace.

For all intents and purposes, Ephesus was an affluent city. Many of the Ephesian homes were large in terms of square-footage. These possessed luxurious appointments and were richly decorated with art throughout.

 The Socio-Politico Environment of Ephesus

Roman Ephesus was known as a leading political and intellectual center. She boasted an impressive library and a school of philosophy ( https://www.ancient.eu/ephesos/).

(This is important information to keep in the back of your head, because the Ephesian love for intellectual pursuits played a pivotal role in the overarching problems that  plagued the Ephesian Assemblies. 

Because of heavy silt deposits, the coastline has shifted 3-miles out from where it was in Paul’s day.

 Biblical Perspective of Ephesus

From a biblical historic perspective, the Apostle John and Mariam (Y’shua’s mother) visited the city. Legend has it that Mariam spent her last years in Ephesus with John and her house and John’s tomb can still be visited there in Ephesus today. 


The Religio-Economic State of Ephesus
 

The production of Artemis statutes was a major source of revenue for the city.

This fun fact is supported by Luke’s account of the great riot that erupted in Ephesus proper over Paul’s perceived threat to the city’s Artemis statute making trade (Acts 19). 

Recall, if you will, a Demetrius: a well-to-do Ephesian silversmith, who made his wealth crafting silver statutes of Artemis (aka Diana) which his company no doubt peddled, not only to the citizens of Ephesus, but also the 1,000’s of pilgrims who visited the Temple of Artemis each year. Luke records how Demetrius incited the city’s statute makers to riot over the perceived threat Paul and his evangelistic work in the city posed to their lucrative trade. 

Fortunately, only a couple of Paul’s disciples were ruffed up and no one was seriously harmed; the uprising fizzled out. Paul quickly departed the city, leaving behind a few members of his evangelistic team to continue the work he’d begun.

The Temple of Artemis 

The Temple of Artemis has been deemed as one of the 7-Wonders of the World and was the headquarters of the Artemis cult.

Regarding the Temple of Artemis Antipater of Sidon—an ancient Greek poet of the 2nd century BC–wrote: 

“I have seen the walls and Hanging Gardens of ancient Babylon, the statue of Olympian Zeus, the Colossus of Rhodes, the mighty work of the high Pyramids and the tomb of Mausolus. But when I saw the temple of Ephesus rising to the clouds, all these other wonders were put in the shade.”

The Temple of Artemis was located in the city of Ephesus which is present day Turkey. It was built sometime around 323 BC. The structure was primarily of marble construction, measuring some 425 ft. in length. It was said to have consisted of some 126 giant marble columns. Interestingly, the Ephesus Temple or Shrine of Artemis is said to have been 4-times the size of the Greek Parthenon. 

It was destroyed in 262 AD by the Goths. Unfortunately, there’s little left—archaeologically speaking—of the structure today. Regardless the lack of physical evidence to its former grandness, the Temple of Artemis earned a coveted spot as one of the “7-Wonders of the Ancient World.”

Who Was Artemis? 

According to ancient Greek mythology, Artemis was the daughter of Leto and Zeus and the twin sister of Apollo. She has been referred to as the goddess of the wilderness; of the hunt; of wild animals; and of fertility. Additionally, she has been described as the helper of midwives for she was the goddess of birth—that is the goddess of life (reference:   https://www.ephesus.us/ephesus/mythology_of_artemis.htm).

Artemis was the Greek goddess of fertility and she was Ephesus’ primary god of worship.

An interesting fact to the Artemis myth and cult is that Artemis is said to have asked her father, Zeus, to grant her eternal virginity—which apparently he did. Now, can you see any potential link of the concept of perpetual virginity and Catholicism’s portrayal of Mary, the Mother of Jesus, as possessing perpetual virginity? Truly, as you can clearly see, there’s nothing new under the sun as they used to say.

Another thing I need for you to keep in the back of your noggin in preparation for our upcoming exploration of 1 Timothy 2:9-15, is all the stuff that is tied to the worship of Artemis. For we’re going to touch upon concepts of a “mother-goddess” who was essentially over all life. And it would not be too much of a stretch to link the Artemis cult (aka Diana) and the worship of Artemis to some of the false teachers and teachings that were plaguing the Ephesian Assemblies. 

Continuing: Although seen by some as a goddess of healing, conversely, she was also thought to be responsible for the spread of diseases such as leprosy, rabies and gout.

Interestingly, Artemis was considered a secondary deity throughout much of first-century AD Roman Empire. But to the Greeks of Asia Minor (ie., Modern Day Turkey), she was the prominent deity. The main attribute given to Artemis was that of fertility for which she was identified alongside Cybele as the mother goddess of eastern lands. 

Touching somewhat back onto our earlier discussion of Demetrius—the Ephesian silversmith recorded in Acts 19–who incited a riot among the city’s statute makers over Paul’s work in their city, the cult statutes of Artemis in Ephesus differed greatly from those of mainland Greece. The statutes of her in mainland Greece depicted her as a huntress with her bow and arrows. However, those of her in Ephesus depicted her in the eastern style, standing erect with numerous breast-like appendages adorning her torso (although some scholars reject that the appendages are breasts, but more likely sacrificed bull-testicles). See the image above.

Historical Setting of 1 Timothy 

Contrary to churchianity’s popular portrayal of the Church in Ephesus being some massive brick and mortar edifice housing hundreds of gentile Christians attending Sunday worship services each week, the so-called church of Ephesus at the time Paul consisted of “many house churches” that had become corrupted by false teaching” (Eddie Hyatt—Paul-Women-Church; pg. 91).

Who Was Timothy? 

Timothy is first mentioned in Acts 16:1-3. He is described here as a talmid (ie., a disciple), the son of a believing Jewish woman who had come to trust in Mashiyach and a Greek father. He was well respected among the brethren of Lystra and Iconium. And it seems that Paul was quickly drawn to him—personally and spiritually—thus adopting him as his spiritual son and a trust member of his evangelistic team.

Timothy was Paul’s tool for combating Jewish Gnosticism in the Ephesian Assemblies.

We find recorded in Acts 16:3 that in order for Timothy not to be despised by any potential Jewish converts the ministry would come in contact with, Paul circumcised Timothy. 

We later learn from Paul’s own words, the names of the two individuals who most shaped Timothy’s young spiritual life: Lois, Timothy’s grandmother; and Eunice, Timothy’s mother (2 Tim. 1:5). 

Additionally, we can gather from various Pauline references that Timothy was timid; in need of self-confidence and boldness (1 Cor. 16:10; 1 Tim. 4:12; 2 Tim. 1:7). 

Nikephoros Kallistos Xanthopoulos, the last of the Greek ecclesiastical historians, who lived about 1320 C.E., records that Timothy suffered martyrdom under Roman Emperor Nerva. Tradition asserts that Timothy was bludgeoned to death by an angered, Artemis-worshiping mob who reacted violently to his protests against the mob’s pagan behavior (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Saint-Timothy). 

There’s been a lot of debate as to the length of Timothy’s overseeing of the Ephesian Assemblies. At the very least, it is widely accepted that Timothy served 9-months as the Ephesian Assembly’s general overseer. It’s quite conceivable that Timothy’s service in Ephesus ran beyond the 9-months, but the biblical record fails to definitively innumerate otherwise. 

The fact that Paul addresses the workings of various so-called church offices in 1 Timothy is indicative that all the pertinent offices of the so-called church were already well established and in operation. The problem was, it appears, that those established offices needed some fine-tuning by Timothy. It’s quite possible those offices had fallen into disrepair or were in poor operation and Paul needed to ensure that the right people were placed into and given the opportunity to serve in those key positions. 

So the churchianity-based convention that Timothy was sent to establish church organization or structure from scratch in Ephesus is not accurate.

 B. A Brief Survey of 1 Timothy

 The Nature of the Letter Paul Wrote to Timothy 

It should be abundantly clear at the start that 1 Timothy was written by Paul and was (1) written to a specific person (ie., Timothy) who happened to be very close to Paul; and (2) it was written in response to a specific situation within the “beloved congregation” (John Temple Bristow-What Paul Said About Women; pg. 69). 

The fact that the letter was of a personal nature, addressed to someone Paul dearly loved, the situation on the ground, so to speak, needed not be fully fleshed out in the letter. In this case, Timothy was quite aware of the situation on the ground in Ephesus. So it wasn’t necessary for Paul to elaborate on such commonly held knowledge. Recall that we touched upon this in the previous episode—part 10.

 Background on 1 Timothy 

The early assemblies of Messiah accepted 1 and 2 Timothy, along with Titus as being genuine (ie., canonical)–written of course by Paul.

The 2nd-century Peshita-Syriac canon as well as Muratori’s “Fragment on the Canon of Scripture” (ie., the earliest list of the books to form our present day canon, composed in the 2nd century C.E.) included these letters. As well as the so-called Patristic Church Fathers all acknowledged the genuineness of these letters. 

The Jewish Connection to Gnosticism in Ephesus

Interestingly, and as we’ve discussed in modest detail so far in this series, ascetic Judaism seems to be at ground zero as it relates to the formation of heresies in the assemblies. We’ve come to accept these Judaistic heresies as an early form of Gnosticism or pre- or proto-Gnosticism.

I was at first taken aback by this understanding—that certain elements of first-century Judaism would have been behind some of the Gnostic infiltration of the Ephesian Assemblies. However, when one considers a great many of the early Gnostic stories coming out of first-century Asia, as well as the history of Ephesus that included a wide Jewish participation in magic and the pervasiveness of Jewish folklore (ie., tales) in Ephesus—as recorded in Acts 19, Judaism’s contribution to early Gnosticism simply cannot be overlooked. 

In many ways this whole Jewish basis for a lot of what we’ve come to understand as early-Gnosticism in the Ephesian Assemblies can still be seen in many sects of Judaism today. I will tell you, I’ve come to find that more than a few respected Jewish scholars and rabbis vociferously reject the veracity (ie., the Truth) of many of the stories contained in Torah and the Tanakh. These offer instead idealistic principles and alternative accounts of the stories and Truths of the bible. And this was made very evident to me as I watched Timothy Mahoney’s “Pattern of Evidence” movies where the filmmaker interviewed several, highly regarded Jewish scholars and rabbis, who without apology stated that the Exodus story was a fabrication of some fanciful Jewish writers back in Babylonian Exile days. 

When asked to explain what these stories meant to them, given that they saw them as fabrications, these Jewish experts came up with off-the-wall, contrived ideologies that seemed more humanistic in nature than God-given revelation. 

Y’shua’s Perspective on Jewish-Gnosticism

Y’shua called out such individuals in His Revelation to the Apostle John regarding the many tribulations and impoverished nature of the Assembly at Smyrna:

“I know your affliction and poverty, yet you are rich. I know the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan” (Rev. 2:9; HCSB). 

And again these were identified by Y’shua to John when He addressed the Assembly of Philadelphia: 

“Take note! I will make those from the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews and are not, but are lying–note this–I will make them come and bow down at your feet, and they will know that I have loved you” (Rev. 3:9; HCSB).

 Origins-Reasons-Purpose When Studying Paul

And this is the type of stuff we must keep in the back of minds when we are studying the writings and teachings of Paul: origins; reasons; purpose. Can you imagine how Paul must have felt having to contend with the opposing works and teachings of his fellow Jews (granted Jews by birth only) who had taken the Faith he once held so dear, and made it to be nothing short of a shipwreck (1 Tim. 1:19). And here in 1 Timothy Paul gives us at least two-clues that Jewish-based Gnosticism was at the heart of the false teachings ongoing in Ephesus at the time he drafted his letter to Timothy: 

1 Timothy 1:7–They (ie., the false teachers) want to be teachers of the law, although they don’t understand what they are saying or what they are insisting on” (HCSB). 

 

1 Timothy 4:3–They (ie., the Jewish-based Gnostics) forbid marriage and demand abstinence from foods that God created to be received with gratitude by those who believe and know the Truth” (HCSB).

 Crete-Another Ground Zero For Jewish Gnosticism

And this same stuff was happening in Crete. For we find clearly laid out by Paul in his letter to the Cretan assembly leader and Paul’s frequent companion, Titus, that certain Jews were behind much of the Gnostic heresies plaguing the Assembly of Crete: 

Titus 1:10-14-“For there are also many rebellious people, full of empty talk and deception, especially those from Judaism. It is necessary to silence (ie.; epistomizo; that is to bridle or stop up the mouth)  them; they overthrow whole households by teaching what they shouldn’t, in order to get money dishonestly (and we certainly see that this was occurring in Ephesus as well). One of their very own prophets said, Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons (thus the dubious title given to certain vulgar individuals in our somewhat modern vernacular as Cretans). This testimony is true. So, rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the Faith and may not pay attention to Jewish myths and the commands of men who reject the Truth (HCSB).

 

Titus 3:9–“But avoid stupid controversies, genealogies, quarrels and fights about the Torah, because they are worthless and futile” (CJB).

 Sorting Out the Differences Between the Judaizers and Jewish Gnostics

My point here is not to come against Judaism. For the vast majority of orthodox Jews in Paul’s day, especially Palestinian Jews (ie., Israeli-Jerusalem-based Jews) kept a great deal of the Hebrew Faith. The problem with first-century Palestinian Judaism was that the people were being influenced and ultimately misled in many areas of their lives by rabbinic and proto-Talmudic teachings, designed, according to the Pharisees, to place a so-called “fence” or “hedge” around Torah so as to prevent violations of Torah. And this has of course carried on through today where the Talmud holds more of a preeminent place in orthodox, rabbinic Jewish life, than Torah. Add to this reality the whole Kabala paradigm that is infused in a great many areas of the religion today and viola: You have a form of Gnosticism disguised as Judaism.

 However, the form of Judaism that Paul and Timothy were confronting in Ephesus was NOT that of the “Judaizers,” as described by Paul in his letter to the Galatians in 2:4. That form of Judaism, of course, vigorously sought to require members of the Body of Messiah to convert to Judaism before they could be accepted into the Body and assemblies of Mashiyach (ie., Messiah). However, over time, as documented throughout the apostolic records, we can see a gradual movement away from the religiosity that defined the Judaism that Y’shua personally had to contend with, over to the mystical and eastern esoteric form that is somewhat similar to what we’ve come to identify as kabala today.

The Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Commentary on the Whole Bible referred to this gradual transformation that Judaism took as an “immoral practice that accompanied false doctrine (cf. 2 Tim. 2:18; 1 Cor. 15:12, 32, 33)…a descent from legality to superstition, and from superstition to godlessness” (Commentary on the Whole Bible; pg. 1349). So by the time we get to 1 Timothy, which many scholars believed was sometime in the mid-50’s AD, the movement leading to Jewish, proto-Gnosticism had somewhat matured. And certain members of the assemblies in Ephesus and Crete had fallen sway to its influence, and accepted it as a replacement for the True Faith once delivered.

 Ephesus’ Form of Gnosticism

I want you to bear in mind dear friend that the Gnosticism that Timothy is being tasked by Paul to confront is not the mature Gnosticism that we find in the Nag Hammadi scrolls (Egyptian) and the Gnosticism that the so-called Church Fathers argued against in their writings. The Jewish Gnosticism we’re seeing evidence of here is again more of an early form of that Gnosticism.

 Survey of 1 Timothy 

There’s a lot more to be said about the impact that the Artemis cult, Jewish-Gnosticism and other Greek socio-cultural influences had on the Faith in Ephesus. But we’ll speak more to these influences in part-12 when we drill down on 1 Timothy 2:9-15. 

For the remainder of this installment, however, we’re going to conduct a survey of 1 Timothy for the purpose of establishing context so that in part-12 we can jump right into accurately interpreting our focus passage. 

Chapter 1 

Verse 3—”Remain in Ephesus so that you may instruct certain people not to teach false doctrine.” We are not privy to what the false doctrine actually consisted of, but we are given a number of clues throughout this and the other two-Pauline pastoral letters. 

Verse 4—”Or pay attention to myths  (aka fables) and endless genealogies which promote empty speculations rather than God’s plan which operates by faith.” The myths seem to be legendary tales that formed the basis of the false teachings that were challenging the sanctity of both the Ephesian and Cretan assemblies (1 Tim. 4:7; 2 Tim. 4:4; Tit. 1:14). It seems pretty evident from the studies I’ve conducted on this verse that these myths and genealogies formed the basis of Jewish Gnosticism which ties so nicely into verses 6 and 7 where Paul states that many of these individuals desire to be Torah teachers but have departed from orthodoxy  and are teaching things that are just not even close to Truth. Regarding “endless genealogies, Paul was obviously addressing a common practice of people debating over certain stories tied to genealogies. I know today, there is an immense interest in both Christian and Messianic circles regarding Shem and his descendants as well as the validity of Israeli Jews today who claim to be descendants of Abraham, but are alleged by some to be frauds and impostors and Khazarians and the like. And all this does is create division and contention within the assemblies. 

Verse 5—”The goal of our instruction is love that comes from a pure heart, a good conscience, and a sincere faith.”  

Verse 6, 7–Some, desiring to be Torah teachers, have departed from orthodoxy, and they do not understand even that which they are teaching. 

Verse 8–Torah is good as long as it is properly handled

Verse 9-11-Torah was not meant for a righteous person, but for the lawless and rebellious–and Paul provides a large list of offenses. 

Verses 12-17-Paul provides Timothy his personal testimony of which He testifies to the mercy and grace of YHVH in his life. 

Verses 18-19-Paul is piggy-backing on a prophecy that was pronounced upon Timothy sometime prior to the writing of this letter. We aren’t privy to when and where, but Paul clearly wants Timothy to know that he is the best man for the job of cleaning up Ephesus (1 Tim. 1:3-7). And of course this goes back to that which Paul mentioned to Timothy regarding his upbringing and how his scriptural knowledge and understanding was the basis of his spiritual strength. Those prophecies spoken over Timothy appear to have taken place at his ordination (1 Tim. 4:14). It no doubt had something to do with the great work that would come about through Timothy’s ministry. And as long as Timothy holds firmly to the Faith, he would be successful in the fight. 

Verse 20–Paul mentions Hymenaeus and Alexander who made a shipwreck of their faith through their overt, unapologetic mishandling of the Word of God. As a result, Paul hands the two over to hasatan for discipline so they learn not to blaspheme anymore. 

Chapter 2 

Verses 1-8–Paul entreats Ephesus to enter into a time of prayer, supplication, intercessions and thanksgiving on behalf of everyday people, kings, magistrates, such that all dwell in tranquility with one another and reverence Elohim with purity. The goal is to have all people converted to the knowledge of the truth of the One True God-Elohim and His mediator Y’shua the Mashiyach. And Paul’s sincerest desire was for the people of Yah to pray everywhere, lifting their hands up to YHVH in purity as opposed to wrath and disputation. So Paul’s very first suggestion for getting the assemblies back to some semblance of order is to instill a mindset and practice of universal, public prayer among members of the assembly. And we must take full note that Paul does not limit this admonishment to males; but to every member of the assemblies. 

Verses 9-15–Our focus passage which we will examine in detail in part-12 of this series. 

Chapter 3 

The KJV, ASV, DRA, NAB and others use the title of bishop (episkope) in verse 1, while other translations use a variety of titles including: supervisor; congregation leader; overseer; exercise oversight and elder. I believe the use of bishop here, given our modern perceptions of what a bishop is, is somewhat misleading. The better translation of “episkope” seems to be “overseer.” Paul is obviously responding to a concern or issue related to individuals who aspired to such a leadership office. The fact that he has to put a positive spin on the office of overseer is suggestive that others within the assemblies took issue with not only the office of overseer, but any who would aspire to such an office. 

Chapter 4 

Verses 1-6–Paul receives prophetic word that in latter times many would fall away from Faith, enticed and drawn to deceiving/seducing spirits and demonic teachings (4:1). Here, as in other times during his ministry, Paul receives instruction and teaching from the Holy Spirit (cf. Joh. 16:13; Act. 13:2). And it seems clear that the emergence of these false and seducing doctrines/teachings of demons had already manifested in Ephesus by the time Paul wrote 1 Timothy. Many scholars, and I agree with these, believe much of the false teaching that Paul was combating in Ephesus was a nascent Gnostic movement (ie., Jewish-Gnosticism; proto-Gnosticism) that would really start to come to its own in the 2nd and 3rd centuries AD. And this proto-Gnosticism twisted the Truth of Scripture to such a degree that people in the assemblies didn’t know whether they were coming or going: it was a no-no to marry over here; you couldn’t eat meat over there; and the like. 

Those that hold to 1 Timothy being a church organization manual would have us believe that Paul was simply putting together the organizational structure of the “church” when he wrote this letter. But let us not forget that the so-called “church” structure had already been in place at the time Paul wrote his letter to Timothy. Paul was not introducing anything new to Timothy nor to the assemblies. Instead, Paul was trying to restore order to the assemblies that had by the handy works of the false teachers begun to cause the Faith to become “shipwrecked.” 

The other thing to keep in mind when we read these latter-day prophesies of Paul and the other apostles is that the apostles all believed that the end was imminent in their day. And my guess is that Paul, in hearing about the many terrible things that were transpiring in the Corinthian, Ephesian and Cretan assemblies, felt that the prophesies rendered unto him by the Spirit regarding the end times were imminently coming to fruition.

Another elephant in our spiritual room that should raise eyebrows is the reality of Paul having to certify the obvious understanding that marriage was still a valid  institution. Yet it seems pretty obvious that certain sects were teaching against marriage, which is eerily similar to certain Gnostic teachings that prohibited marriage, and as we progress further along in this series we will find that these groups even forbid the bearing of children (in at least one writing requiring abortions of those in their sect who happened to become pregnant). We know that later on as Catholicism replaced the True Faith once delivered, Catholic Priests were prohibited from marrying and of course having children. This stands in stark contrast to what we know of the Levitical Priesthood in which the priests were encouraged to marry and raise a family. But we know that hasatan’s aim is always to destroy the family unit. And the best way to do that, of course, is to forbid marriage and childbearing in the first place. 

Verses-7-11–Paul directs Timothy to not involve himself with the myths/tales disseminated by old women. Instead, Timothy’s focus would be that of righteousness and to keep his eyes on the prize. Righteousness, according to Paul, is profitable in every aspect of a disciple’s life. And this Truth remains just as faithful as it was in Paul’s day. This will of course remain so even going in to the world tomorrow. 

Verses 12-16–Paul writes specifically to Timothy’s personal and spiritual skills. 

Paul first encourages Timothy to not allow concerns of his youth get in the way of his work. Generally, respect in ministry tends to smile more favorably upon the aged as opposed to the youth. 

Interestingly, Luke records that a contingent of elders (ie., overseers) from the Ephesian Assemblies traveled to Troas upon being summoned there by Paul. These individuals—these overseers or elders—would certainly have been senior—senior in age—to Timothy. And I can’t but help wonder if there may have been a degree of animosity towards Timothy being so much these elders’ junior. Add this to Timothy being an outsider in terms of a non-resident of Ephesus, it would not be surprising to me if these gentlemen weren’t a bit put off by Timothy being installed as the General Overseer to the Ephesian assemblies. Yet Paul counsels Timothy not to concern himself with age when discharging his duties (1 Tim. 4:12). 

The natural tendency is to trust age over youth when it comes to things of Faith, simply because wisdom is believed to be bestowed more abundantly upon the aged over that of the young. And indeed, I believe there’s something to be said about that. But Paul aptly points out to Timothy that his situation is a little different than the normal disparity that tends to exist between youth and the aged. He was special. Prophecies were spoken over him by the elders of the Faith. Hands were laid upon him by elders of the Faith. And Paul encouraged Timothy to not be intimidated by concerns of youth when confronting his task, but to meditate on the things related to his call; give himself fully to his call; persevere despite resistance and opposition. And the end result would be a crown of life for himself and those who would follow his example, lead and teachings. 

Chapter 5 

In this chapter Paul expounds upon the duties of members of the Body and Assemblies and how the Assembly proper is supposed to deal or administrate the various classes of individuals–the mature men and women of the assembly; the youth; the widows; the preaching/teaching elder (who should receive compensation for their work in the assemblies). Paul personally instructs Timothy to not be preoccupied with anything other than that which he is tasked; that he not favor one person over another; be not quick to lay hands on people; and keep himself pure. Essentially the very same qualities that would be required of a Levitical Priest, but elevated even higher under the Melchizedekian Priesthood. Paul also encourages Timothy, who we learned earlier in the letter was not all that excited about the job that was set before him, to self-medicate his intestinal issues and other “unspecified infirmities” with a little wine. 

Chapter 6 

Verses 1-2–Here Paul encourages slaves and slave owners to respect one another and both to live according to their call as disciples of Mashiyach. Now, many who view this passage from a 21st century western mindset may be somewhat put off by Paul not using his apostolic office to condemn the practice of slavery. We in the 21st century west, of course, view slavery as a hideous crime against humanity. And given the innate evil and deprave nature of man, slavery has been used over the centuries to mistreat and destroy human dignity and free will. However, Father in His Torah recognized the reality of slavery in the human experience and He sought out in His Word to ensure that human dignity would be spared and even uplifted and that love would be shared between both slave and slave owner. Paul continues this Torah-based understanding and reality in these 2-verses by having Timothy remind the Ephesian Assembly members who are either slaves or slave owners to be Torah observant in their dealings with one another. 

Verses 3-Then Paul returns to the issue of false teachings and false teachers, citing that any who would oppose (or teach doctrines that are contrary to) the foundational Words of Y’shua Mashiyach AND the Doctrine of the Fear of Elohim (which in the KJV is simply, the doctrine of godliness), he or she “exalts himself/herself while knowing nothing. These purveyors of false doctrine create within the Body of Mashiyach envy, contention, railings and ungodly suspicions. Paul counsels a few times throughout this writing that Timothy avoid engaging in such pointless debates. The people who make it their primary purpose in life to teach that which is not the Truth of Torah or that of the teachings of Y’shua Mashiyach, more times than not make those teachings and doctrines about themselves. And when these are challenged about their selfish false teachings and doctrines in relation to what the bible actually has to say on the matter at hand, it turns out that they know absolutely nothing about the Truth of the Word (vs. 4). 

In verse 3 Paul addresses those who would oppose “The foundational Words of Y’shua Mashiyach” which is easily understood and is of course recorded in the Gospel records. But Paul also writes about a “Doctrine of the Fear of Elohim.” What is Paul talking about here? 

According to AENT author, Andrew Gabriel Roth, “The Doctrine of the Fear of Elohim” is: “a Spirit of YHVH; it is a vital spiritual quality for Life in Mashiyach. The fear of YHVH is a personal guide.” 

The Aramaic term for fear is “yirah,” which: fear/awesome;terrifying. Sadly, churchianity has taken it upon herself to alter the understanding of this crucial term and made it into a simple reference to piety, love; reverence and respect. But as we should do with most New Testament spiritual concepts, we must filter it through a Hebraic perspective if we are to receive an accurate understanding of what Paul is trying to convey to Timothy. 

Torah commands the following: 

“Now this is the commandment, the statutes, and the ordinances, which YHVH your God commanded to teach you, that ye might do them in the land whither ye go over to possess it; that thou mightest fear (yare/yirah) YHVH thy God, to keep all His statutes and His commandments, which I command thee, thou, and thy son, and thy son’s son, all the days of thy life; and that thy days may be prolonged” (Deu. 6:1,2; ASV). 

In Deuteronomy 6:13 Moshe instructs: 

Thou shalt fear (yirah/yare) Jehovah thy God; and Him shalt thou serve, and shalt swear by His Name” (6:13; 10:20; 31:12, 13; ASV). 

And why must we yirah/yare YHVH? We must yirah/yare YHVH for our perpetual good; such that we continue to thrive/live/be well (Deu. 6:24). Moshe rhetorically asked the congregation in the wilderness what was required of them by their Elohim. And Moshe answered with: 

“Elohim requires…but to fear YHVH thy God, to walk in all His ways, and to love Him, and to serve YHVH thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul” (Deu. 10:12; ASV). 

Concerning the administration of the Tithe, Moshe taught that it is instituted so that we “mayest learn to fear YHVH our God always” (Deu. 14:23; ASV). 

Oh how we’ve lost that understanding today. We’re taught to simply revere and respect YHVH. We are hardly ever taught to yirah/yare YHVH. As Andrew Roth so astutely noted: ” man’s religious theology and tradition has made void the Fear of YHVH” (AENT; pg. 632). And somehow, some way, some of the false teachings in Ephesus which Timothy was tasked with opposing was obviously leading people away from a “fear of YHVH.” And when people turn away or are led away from a true “yirah/yare” of YHVH, they end up developing instead “a fear of man, materialism, relativism and all forms of idols, including their religious leaders” (AENT; Roth; pg. 632). 

Thus it is not difficult at all to see why Paul was so concerned about the spiritual well being of Ephesus. For Gnosticism had the terrible potential, if not challenged and tossed out of the assemblies by the proper spiritual authorities, of steering her members towards these other types of fear. 

Thus those that oppose the “foundational Words of our Master Y’shua the Mashiyach” and the doctrine of the “Fear of Elohim,” Paul writes, “exalts himself while he knows nothing.” Could Paul be writing about a specific individual? I contend that it is indeed conceivable. For Paul goes on to note that beyond exalting himself/themselves (ie.; he is puffed up or conceited) while existing in utter ignorance to the Truth, such an individual (or this particular individual) has as the NAB translates: “a morbid disposition for arguments and verbal disputes, which lead to envy, rivalry, insults, evil suspicions and mutual friction among people with corrupted minds, and destitute of the Truth” (1 Tim. 6:4,5). And of course, as we see so well played out in many sectors of churchianity today, “these think that godliness is a way to make money” (1 Tim. 6:5b; CEB). And I’m talking about the Joel Olsteens; the Kenneth Copelands; the T.D. Jakes; the Creflo Dollars who teach a Torah-less, godless Gospel for tremendous financial gain. 

Instead, Paul counsels Timothy to avoid such individuals. Instead, being content with “Godliness” is of the greatest gain to the man and woman of YHVH (6:6). In fact, Paul counseled that money should be the least of Timothy’s concerns. Materially, food and clothing were to be the only things that should matter to the true assembly overseer. The pursuit of money, as is the focus of some in our Faith, is the root of all evils. Timothy was again admonished to follow after righteousness and the fruits of the Spirit. 

Interestingly, at the latter part of the letter, Paul admonishes the rich to not put their trust in their riches. Instead, the rich, Paul advises, should confide in the living Elohim who gives us all things abundantly and that they…be rich in well-doings; and be ready to give and to communicate…laying up a good foundation for that which is future…” (vss. 17-19; AENT). 

And Paul closes his letter by directing Timothy: 

“…be careful of that which is committed to you; and shun vain words and the oppositions of false science (ie., contradictory claims of so-called ‘knowledge;” or Gnosticism): for they who profess it have strayed from the Faith” (AENT). Yet again, Paul re-certifies the true purpose and intent of his letter to Timothy.

In Closing 

Let us not be fooled: what Timothy was facing under the guidance of Paul was nothing short of a full-on-assault against the Body of Mashiyach in Ephesus by the forces of evil. Yet churchianity would marginalize this reality and downplay the role that hasatan and the powers of evil were inflicting upon the assemblies of Mashiyach. What was truly at stake here in Ephesus was the very souls of the Ephesian Assembly members. 

It was the Apostle Paul himself who educated us in the realities of spiritual warfare; that our struggle for holiness, sanctity, peace, truth and righteousness is not really against the Hymenaeus’ and Alexanders of the Body. The true struggle is against “rulers, authorities and cosmic powers governing this darkness; against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realm” (Eph. 6:12; CJB). 

Indeed, First Timothy serves as a case against false teachings and the need to guard ourselves against anything that exalts itself against Torah and the teachings of Y’shua Messiah. 

So I have to ask you: If the premise of 1 Timothy was to combat the false teachers and their heretical teachings, what are the chances that our focus passage of 2:9-15 is about prohibiting women (some say assigning roles to women) from public speaking and from congregational leadership? I’ll just leave that question with you. 

In part-12, we’ll finally tear apart 1 Timothy 2:9-15 and learn what Paul was actually saying to Timothy. You don’t want to miss it. Until then, have a blessed week—Shavu’tov—Shabbat Shalom—be awesomely blessed and in His eternal will. In the Name of our Master Y’shua haMashiyach, take care. 

Faithfully, Rod.

Blessings and Curses–Stuck in the Middle–STAR 24

Blessings and Curses Stuck in the Middle Why did Father drill in our heads in anticipation of entering the land of promise--over and over--the idea of blessings to be had if we stayed/remained in His Torah and curses if we strayed from His Torah? I have some thoughts...

read more

Defeating Satan–Sabbath Thoughts & Reflections 23

  Defeating Satan Matthew 4 and Luke 4 record Satan's tempting of Y'shua (Jesus) in the wilderness and how Y'shua was able to overcome those temptations. This event provides the Torah observing believer in Y'shua Messiah with an example and prescription for defeating...

read more

The Bride of Christ (Messiah) Part 2–STAR 22

  The Bride of Christ (Messiah) Part 2 is the second part of a two-part discussion between Hilary and Rod on the subject. Who or what is the Bride of Christ (Messiah)? This is the central question that demands an answer that most believers are not clear on....

read more

Occupying Territory–Parashah 46 Part 7

Occupying Territory Deuteronomy 11:22-25 This passage brings us to the end of Parashah-46. As it has been throughout this lengthy portion, we see again Moshe's admonishment that we love Adonai our God. This concept of love in the Ancient Near East continues to be...

read more

Barna Group on Same Sex Marriage

The Barna Group Reports on Same-Sex Marriage I came upon these statistics published by the well established and respected Barna Group, regarding the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage. I found these statistics not so surprising  I must admit and it...

read more

Willing Obedience is a True Act of Love–

Willing Obedience is a True Act of Love   Deuteronomy 10:12-11:9   What does our experience tell us about Yahovah? What is our testimony? It is these exploits, these events that occurred in our lives that make us strong and ready to possess the land. We must not...

read more

Let the Woman Learn in Silence-The Problem With First Timothy-Part 10 of the Paul and Hebrew Roots Series

Let the Woman Learn in Silence-The Problem With First Timothy-Part 10 of the Paul and Hebrew Roots Series

by Rod Thomas | The Messianic Torah Observer

 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence” (1 Timothy 2:11-12; KJV).  

These two-verses, attributed to the Apostle Paul, is the basis upon which untold numbers of woman of Faith over the centuries have been denied the opportunity to serve the Body of Messiah: to exercise their God-given gifts and talents of teaching, preaching, prophesying and leadership in both Christian and Messianic Communities.  

A simple plain reading of these cited verses, through the lenses and filters of our 21st century western sensibilities and understanding, could (on the surface) certainly lead us to think that for whatever reason, Paul set out to finally put women into their proper place at home and in the church.  

However, when one takes this passage in context with the whole of the New Testament writings, something seems amiss. For in other places of scripture, we find Paul lovingly endorsing and certifying the offices and works of women leaders, preachers, teachers, prophets and at least one apostle in the various assemblies of the Body of Messiah.  

So what’s up with Paul and his seeming two-faced view of women in Faith?  

Well, as we found in our study of 1 Corinthians 14:34 and 35, that which we at first brush think Paul said about women in the Faith may not be what Paul actually meant when he wrote this letter to Timothy.  

In this 10th-installment of our multi-episodic series on Paul and Hebrew Roots, we will attempt to answer the question: What did Paul actually mean when he wrote that women must learn and live in silence? This is content you won’t likely find anywhere else in the Hebrew Roots/Messianic Faith Community. 

 

 

Now, what we’ve tried to do in this series is to take some of the Apostle Paul’s most difficult; seemingly contradictory; most challenging writings and see if we can make any real sense out of them from a contextual—socio-cultural-historical-Hebraic-spiritual perspective. And not rely on the conventional wisdom and widely accepted, churchianity-based talking points that most of us have been raised and taught to accept as the basis of our Faith.

 

(And of course I invite you to check-out the previous nine-parts to this series if you are led to do so. In particular, I would point you to the installments of this series having to do with Paul and women in the Faith. They will serve as an excellent primer and bring you up to speed to better receive this 10th-installment.)

 

Most of us now recognize, having come out of churchianity in one form or another, that the writings of Paul have been improperly used by churchianity to create a religion that has very little resemblance to the Faith that our Master Y’shua Messiah founded and His anointed disciples turned apostles built upon.

 

 Purpose

 

My purpose here today in this and succeeding additions to this series is to bring the discussion regarding women’s so-called roles in the “church” and in the Body of Messiah back to center and back to Spirit and Truth by examining another one of Paul’s most challenging and widely misunderstood writings found in 1 Timothy 2.

 

 Complex Subject

 

Because of the complex nature of the content I have to share with you, I will break up our discussion on this particular Pauline passage into smaller, easier to consume units.

 

Bear in mind that my studies on just this Pauline passage alone has taken me several months to complete. And for me to try to feed the whole of what I’ve learned and the conclusions I’ve drawn into a single post would be spiritual abuse.

 

So I’ve determined the best way to present this content to you is to do so in bite-size, easier  consume installments that I will try to keep as close to an hour in duration as I possibly can.

 

Today, I want to look at our focus passage—1 Timothy 2:9-15—from the standpoint of its widely accepted conventional interpretation in churchianity and in some Hebrew Roots/Messianic communities. I want to also begin to look at this passage from a contextual perspective as well as break it down into component parts so as to set the table for further examination of the passage in future installments of this series.

 

So what do you say we get started with our study.

 

III. Main Discussion—Our Focus Passage and Why It’s Important to Have an Accurate Understanding of it 

 

Our Focus Passage in Light of Biblical and Extra-Biblical Context

 

Our focus passage for this study is located in 1 Timothy 2:9-15 and it reads as follows:

 

“In like manner women also in decent apparel: adorning themselves with modesty and sobriety, not with plaited hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly attire, but as it becometh women professing godliness, with good works. Let the woman learn in silence, with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to use authority over the man: but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed; then Eve. And Adam was not seduced; but the woman being seduced, was in the transgression. Yet she shall be saved through childbearing; if she continue in faith, and love and sanctification, with sobriety” (DRA).

 

A Plain Reading of our Focus Passage

 

A basic, plain read of this passage, especially when read by itself—absent chapter 1 and verses 1 through 8 of the 2nd chapter—has the natural tendency to appear as a rather harsh and overbearing indictment against women of Faith by the one-time orthodox Pharisee turned apostle to the Gentiles.

 Areas of Concern

Now, I quickly identify  at least 7-areas of concern regarding women of Faith that Paul puts forth to his reader in this letter: 

  1. Women’s dress (ie., apparel or attire).
  2. Women’s deportment (ie., behavior or manner).
  3. The need for women to learn in silence and be under subjection. To whom they must be subject to, Paul does not state.
  4. A prohibition against women teaching. Why? Paul does not state in that verse, but maybe when he gets into the whole Adam and Eve discussion, we get the answer as to why the prohibition against women teaching in the body and assemblies of Messiah. (At least the generally accepted convention wisdom as to why.)
  5. Women must not use or usurp authority over (the) or a man. This seems to suggest that women should be precluded or prevented from taking away or intruding into men’s honored role of teaching or preaching in the body and assemblies of Messiah and in the family.
  6. Women are considered to be secondary to men because the creation order, as recorded in Torah, says so.
  7. Women’s salvation comes, not from the work of Y’shua Messiah and the grace of YHVH, but through childbearing as long as they behave themselves. Why the huge conflict Paul?

Related or Similar Pauline Passages 

It should be readily recognizable to you that this passage is somewhat similar to other Pauline writings regarding women of Faith within the Body and Assemblies of Messiah:

 

1 Corinthians 14: 34, 35—Recall that we examined this passage in detail in parts 8 and 9 of this series. I would highly recommend you take the time and review those posts as a great amount of the content we looked at in those posts will bleed-over into this one. The passage reads: “Let women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted them to speak, but to be subject, as also the law saith. But if they would learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is a shame for a woman to speak in the church” (DRA).

 

I concluded in part 9 of this series that this particular passage in no way was prohibiting women of the Body and Assemblies of Messiah from preaching, teaching, leading, prophesying or publicly praying. For we learned, based upon a great many factors that included the Greek words Paul in this passage, that Paul was simply saying to the Corinthian women: “Hey ladies, when you come to worship gatherings, stop the chattering; don’t try to over-talk the teachers and speakers; and don’t disrespect your husbands by questioning them about things of the Faith in the midst of assembly services. In other words, be respectful of others during assembly gatherings.

 

Titus 2:3-5”The aged women, in like manner, in holy attire, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teaching well: that they may teach the young women to be wise, to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, sober, having a care of the house, gentle, obedient to their husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed” (DRA).

 

Certainly, on the surface, these passages give the reader the sense that Paul requires women to assume the very role that they did under Orthodox, Rabbinic Judaism. And that role, which we discussed in earlier installments to this series, was one of subservient dedication to their husbands, children and their homes. Beyond that, they were to be seen and not heard in Jewish society.

 

Now this is not meant to be an attack on Judaism. Indeed, rabbinic Judaism has her share of faults and her treatment of women back in the day, in my opinion, is one of those faults. But, rabbinic Judaism, for all things considered, has served a righteous purpose through the ages: she maintained the oracles of YHVH for the world. And what are those oracles: Torah and the prophets and the writings—the Word of YHVH. And we cannot marginalize the greatness of that God-ordained achievement and purpose.

 

Important Considerations Related to our Focus Passage

 

In getting to the heart of our focus passage, there are just a few considerations that we all must be cognizant of if we are to be true to our studies: 

  1. 1 Timothy, simply put, is a copy of a personal letter that is widely believed to have been sent from the Apostle Paul to his young protege Timothy, somewhere between 58 to 65 C.E.

We’ll certainly talk more about this in the posts ahead. 

  1. The original letter, of course, is long lost to the ravages of time and space. So what we have now available to us regarding this letter (or book as we customarily refer to it today) is copies of copies of copies of the original letter. And frankly, the oldest complete Greek copy of this and other Pauline letters dates back only to the 4th century C.E. (ie., roughly 1,700-years ago). Needless to say, when those copies of copies were being made, the room for scribal errors was enormous. Not to mention, the opportunities afforded certain ambitious and self-righteous-agenda-driven scribes was wide open, leaving the texts vulnerable to tampering.
  1. Speaking of Greek copies of letters: It is widely accepted by most biblical scholars that the letters of Paul were originally written in Koine Greek. There are, of course, some inherent problems with this. The biggest problem being that Koine Greek is a dead language. No one on the planet actually speaks it today. It’s use spanned roughly a period of 600-years (ie., 300 B.C.E. to 300 C.E.). Consequently, the Septuagint, the whole of the New Testament and the works of the so-called early Church Fathers were all written in Koine Greek.

Most scholars believe Paul’s letters were written in Koine Greek; an extinct language that is not always easy to fully into modern English.

Beyond 300 C.E., Koine Greek gradually fell into non-use by westerners, with the exception of Byzantine official usage until about 1453 C.E. (wikipedia).

 

4. Context—Context—Context. I’ve said it countless times throughout my career here on the Messianic Torah Observer—and I’ll say it a thousand times more: context is king and context must be our primary guide when studying any passage of scripture. And 1 Timothy 2:9-15 is no different a situation. For as we can clearly see in our focus passage, when plainly read by itself, there are a lot of inherent problems associated with it. And if context is properly employed in our studies of the text, it just may help solve and answer some of those inherent problems. 

So needless to say, we’re going to be employing a lot of context to our study of the text and you will see for yourself just how important it is to our arriving at a reasonable understanding of the passage. 

  1. And the last consideration I wish to shed light upon is the question of “restrictive” versus “normative” instruction? In other words: is the instructions given in our focus passage by Paul instructions that apply to the Body of Messiah today (ie., normative instruction), or were they instructions that applied to the specific set of circumstances occurring on the ground in the Ephesian Assemblies?

Problems With Interpreting the Passage as Plainly Written—Contradictions Abound! 

So for the remainder of this post, let’s carefully walk through our focus passage and identify the problems associated with a plain read of the text. In so doing, we’ll refer to the King James Version. 

Verse 9 

In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with boided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array” (KJV).

 

Problem 1—”In like manner…”

 

When we read the phrase “in like manner” in our 21st-century parlance, we generally understand it to mean, “in a similar fashion be.” In other words, Paul is saying to the women: hey ladies, I want you to be just like…I want you to do as…whoever that person or thing is. 

So then, what is that thing or person the women are supposed to imitate or be like? 

Well, that thing or person to be imitated is not found in this verse, is it? Or at least it doesn’t appear to be present. So what do we do about this unknown? It means that we have to step back a verse or two to figure out what that thing or person to be imitated is. And this is the heart of contextual study—acknowledging and understanding that at times we must look verses that come before the passage in question; and at times look at verses that come after the passage in question in order to fully grasp what the writer is trying to say.

 

It is vitally important that we learn what that thing or person is that women must imitate for the sake of all women in the Body of Messiah. If, on the other hand, we overlook context here, we’re sort of forced to either squeeze out a meaning that’s likely going to be wrong; or we’ll simply dismiss that part of the verse altogether and move on to areas of the passage that make better sense to us.

 

We’ll find out what that thing actually is in our next installment to the series.

 

Problem 2—Paul Prohibiting Nice Attire

 

Paul seems to be saying to the reader that women should not wear their hair in braids; nor should they wear gold jewelry or even pearl necklaces; nor nice expensive clothes.

 

As it relates to us living in the 21st-century west, this may seem problematic and a bit off-putting. For it is common for women in this day and age to wear their hair in braids and to wear nice clothes and gold jewelry and pearls.

 

So why would Paul prohibit women wearing such seemingly innocuous things? Is he saying that gold jewelry, nice clothes and braids have some inherent evil associated with them? It doesn’t make a whole lot of sense now does it?

 

We’ll get into some very interesting stuff related to these prohibited items in the next installment of the series.

 

Skipping verse 10 and moving on to verse 11 we find:

 

Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection” (KJV).

 

Problem 3—Paul Once Again Silencing Women Simply Because They’re Women

 

Well, if you’re familiar with the content of previous installments of this series, you’ll easily recognize the inherent problem associated with this verse. If you’re not familiar with previous content, I’ll let you in on a little secret: The biblical record affirms that Paul certified, endorsed and had mad love for women of his evangelistic team. These women included, as previously mentioned: prophets, teachers, preachers, deacons, matrons, congregational leaders and at least one apostle. And to think that Paul would advocate women be silent—can’t teach, preach, prophesy or pray publicly–and then be in subjection to men (or whoever) simply because they’re female, is contrary to the character and person we’ve all come to know and love.

 

The other problem associated with this verse is key: Where would Paul get the idea that women must be silent and subject to men? Is it a Torah command? Did Y’shua or the Holy Spirit pass that instruction on to him? There’s no indication as to the inspirational source of this instruction.

 

The one cool thing that so many people tend to overlook when reading or studying this verse is Paul’s admonishment that women be afforded the opportunity to learn the elements of their Faith. It’s right there in black and white. Paul says “Let the woman learn.” And what we’ll find as we continue on in our study of this passage is the immense relevance of this verse to the entire passage. For contrary to the conventions of Judaism, which we all know Paul grew-up in; was educated in, and zealously practiced, Jewish women were not afforded formal education opportunities whatsoever. So for Paul to break out and promote female education here is huge! Indeed, he was a revolutionary bar none if not for this one single instruction.

 

Verse 12 reads:

 

“But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence” (KJV). 

 

Problem 4—Women Prohibited from Teaching 

Of course this problem is founded in problem 3 above from the standpoint of knowing that Paul promoted the teaching ministries of a number of women on his evangelistic team. So knowing this fact exists and was well documented by Luke in his Acts of the Apostles and throughout a number of Paul’s very own letters, the question must be asked: how can Paul say here that he doesn’t advocate women teaching, which would by default require women to have some authority over men? You know, the teacher-student relationship requires that the student be subject to the teacher, otherwise, learning would be hampered. So is Paul flip-flopping on this issue? Is he two-faced? It just doesn’t make any sense does it? 

At least in this verse—which I’m happy to point out—Paul gives the source of this prohibition against women teachers. The source is him. For Paul writes: “…I suffer…” which strongly suggests that he was the sole source of this instruction.  

Verses 13-15 reads as follows: 

“For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Not withstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety” (KJV). 

 

Problem 5—Adam and Eve and Salvation 

The whole Adam and Eve inclusion here in this passage is extremely mysterious and problematic on a few levels. 

The first level of concern is that it doesn’t fit. What does the story of Adam and Eve have to do with women teaching or being improperly attired or being in silence? And since there is no obvious reason for Paul to include the Adam and Eve story into his instructions here, people have decided to make up stuff to fill in the missing pieces. One of the made-up things is that Paul used the Adam and Eve story to justify the prohibitions he placed on women here in our focus passage. Okay. If that’s what it takes to get you through a day. 

The other level of concern which is actually the big elephant in the room has to do with Paul’s assertion that women are saved through childbearing which is contrary to what we’ve been taught in other parts of the bible. We know that salvation is a free gift from YHVH and it was facilitated by the sacrifice of our Master Y’shua Messiah. 

It was Paul himself who wrote: 

“For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord” (Rom. 6:23; KJV). 

So how then does Paul get away with stating that female salvation is had through childbearing? What happens to a woman who cannot have children or who sadly dies before even having the opportunity to bear a child? Are these hopelessly lost?

 

Fortunately, I have some answers to these problematic questions. As well as I think I may have some reasonable explanations why Paul included the Adam and Eve saga into this portion of his letter. And those reasonable explanations will have nothing to do with justifying his stated prohibitions against.

 

The Context of 1 Timothy—False Teachings and a Word of Encouragement and Instruction

 

If we are intent on properly interpreting this above passage, we must understand first and foremost that Paul’s concern here was not church organization, nor was it an indictment against women leadership in the assemblies of Messiah. This is a popular teaching in most churchianity congregations and not too few Hebrew Roots/Messianic groups.

 

The truth of the matter, based on context, is that 1 Timothy had one purpose and one purpose only: to address “the teaching of false doctrine by both men and women” (Eddie Hyatt; pg. 88).

 

Consider 1 Timothy 1:3 which reads:

 

When I left for Macedonia, I asked you to stay behind in Ephesus so that you could instruct certain individuals not to spread wrong teaching” (CEB).

 

Our focus phrase here is “wrong teaching” which in ancient Greek is “heterodidaskelein,” which simply means a “different doctrine” (ibn; pg. 88).

 

Almost right off the bat we find contained here in this single verse a summary of Timothy’s entire marching orders: to confront false teachings in Ephesus. Period.

 

Now, Paul’s marching orders to Timothy was to deal with the ongoing false teachings in the Ephesian Assembly, but the purpose of the letter was to “encourage and instruct him (ie., you Timothy) in his unpleasant task” (ibn; pg. 89).

 

Thus, once we have this essential, foundational information firmly embedded in our noggins, we are better set to accurately interpret what Paul actually meant in our focus passage of 1 Timothy 2:9-15.

 

The established convention of 1 Timothy somehow being a modern day manual for church organization is churchianity pablum, plain and simple (personal). It’s a ploy by the enemy to quash the voices and talents of women in the Body of Messiah. Again plain and simple. And for a long while I fell pray to that pablum. I’ve since repented and have determined to set the record straight as Yah provides.

 

I touched briefly upon the issue of Pauline passages such as 1 Timothy 2:11-15 being the handy-work of ambitious, misogynistic scribes and not that of Paul. Those who advocate such thinking point to the Greek wording in these troublesome texts being noticeably different from Paul’s other writings. Thus a plain read of such passages as 1 Timothy 2:11-15 and 1 Corinthians 14:34,35 on the surface seem to contradict what we’ve already established as Paul’s pro-women position in the Body and Assemblies of Messiah.  

Call To Action: 

In closing I want to leave you with a couple take-aways: 

  1. Let this be a primer that helps you to recognize and understand the level of dedication you must have to study scripture; especially study Paul’s writings. Paul’s writings cannot be read in a casual manner as so many within and without our Faith so often do. The man is deep and his writings are as Peter described, at times hard to understand (2 Pet. 3:16). And it is those hard to understand writings that people tend to twist which ultimately has the potential of bringing about their own spiritual destruction.

So then if we are to grasp the great things that Father has for us, especially those things contained in His eternal Word, we must be willing do the hard work of searching out the Truth. And that’s what I’ve tried to do here for you in the hopes that you will in turn take this content where I’ve left it and take it to the next level by conducting your own studies. 

King Solomon wrote: 

“It is the glory of Elohim to conceal a thing; but the glory of kings is to search out a matter” (Pro. 25:2; ASV).  

  1. The message of this post—as well as that of the entire series—requires you to do something with it. If you’re a woman of Faith and you know there’s a call on your life to serve the Kingdom of Yah, you must not let anything or any person stop you from fulfilling your call. You must do what you were hired to do. If you’re a man of Faith and you have women in your fellowship, congregation or assembly and you’ve suppressed their voices and their skills and their talents because you bought into churchianity’s erroneous interpretations of some of Paul’s writings and teachings, you need to repent and make it right. Otherwise, of course, you have the freedom to leave what we’ve discussed here today and throughout this series alone and continue the practice of silencing Yah’s people. But at the end of the day, we all have to account for our deeds and what we’ve done for the Kingdom.

And last, have a blessed but powerful week in Y’shua Messiah my friend in the Faith once delivered. Until next time, may you be most blessed fellow saints in training. Shavu’tov. Take care.

 

Blessings and Curses–Stuck in the Middle–STAR 24

Blessings and Curses Stuck in the Middle Why did Father drill in our heads in anticipation of entering the land of promise--over and over--the idea of blessings to be had if we stayed/remained in His Torah and curses if we strayed from His Torah? I have some thoughts...

read more

Defeating Satan–Sabbath Thoughts & Reflections 23

  Defeating Satan Matthew 4 and Luke 4 record Satan's tempting of Y'shua (Jesus) in the wilderness and how Y'shua was able to overcome those temptations. This event provides the Torah observing believer in Y'shua Messiah with an example and prescription for defeating...

read more

The Bride of Christ (Messiah) Part 2–STAR 22

  The Bride of Christ (Messiah) Part 2 is the second part of a two-part discussion between Hilary and Rod on the subject. Who or what is the Bride of Christ (Messiah)? This is the central question that demands an answer that most believers are not clear on....

read more

Occupying Territory–Parashah 46 Part 7

Occupying Territory Deuteronomy 11:22-25 This passage brings us to the end of Parashah-46. As it has been throughout this lengthy portion, we see again Moshe's admonishment that we love Adonai our God. This concept of love in the Ancient Near East continues to be...

read more

Barna Group on Same Sex Marriage

The Barna Group Reports on Same-Sex Marriage I came upon these statistics published by the well established and respected Barna Group, regarding the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage. I found these statistics not so surprising  I must admit and it...

read more

Willing Obedience is a True Act of Love–

Willing Obedience is a True Act of Love   Deuteronomy 10:12-11:9   What does our experience tell us about Yahovah? What is our testimony? It is these exploits, these events that occurred in our lives that make us strong and ready to possess the land. We must not...

read more

Phineas’ Covenant of Peace—Our Road Map to Peace in Messiah—Reflections on Torah Portion Pinchas

Phineas’ Covenant of Peace—Our Road Map to Peace in Messiah—Reflections on Torah Portion Pinchas

by Rod Thomas | The Messianic Torah Observer

Peace—shalom—is one of the greatest benefits promised to every disciple of Y’shua Messiah. In fact, peace is vitally important to every disciple’s day-to-day walk with Mashiyach. For when a disciple’s peace is negatively impacted, or that peace is even absent, the walk is disturbed or even impeded.

Yet peace eludes so many in the Faith for various and sundry reasons.

So today, using the backdrop of this week’s Torah Portion Pinchas, we’ll reflect on this critical issue of peace—it’s importance—it’s absence in so many believers’ lives—and how every believer can find that illusive peace for themselves.

Many within the Faith attribute the absence of peace in their walk with Messiah to outside influences—specifically to demonic spiritual attacks and or just the hardships associated with life.

There’s not a week that doesn’t go by when I don’t run across social media posts from brothers and sisters in our Faith, begging the brethren for financial assistance in one form or another. Others set about complaining about the various physical and spiritual hardships their having to endure each and every day—seeking prayer and or directions from the Body of Messiah to help them through their difficulties.


To be honest with you, it’s not that brothers and sister of Faith are asking for help that troubles me. Rather, it’s generally the same people time and time again who find themselves in some trial or even tribulation, seeking help from the brethren.

And I find myself wondering why do these same individuals time and time again find themselves in problems? Is it really because of attacks by the enemy? Or is it just bad luck?


I would suggest that maybe there is an alternate reason for the lack of peace that so many in our Faith fail to realize. And I believe that alternate reason may be found in the story and example of the Levitical Priest Phineas, which is the main focus of this week’s Torah Portion entitled Pinchas.

The goal of this installment of the Messianic Torah Observer, which I’ve entitled “Phineas’ Covenant of Peace—Our Road Map to Peace in Messiah–is to discover how we as disciples of Messiah may obtain that peace that Y’shua declared would surpass all understanding.

Each of us who claim Y’shua as our Messiah and YHVH as our Creator and Elohim, needs a Covenant of Peace in our lives. It is our birthright as priests of the Kingdom of YHVH.


When peace is absent in our day-to-day walk, we lose focus and purpose. We tend to divert our attention to everything other than our role and purpose as disciples of Y’shua and priests of the Kingdom of YHVH.

As we reflect upon Torah Portion Pinchas for this week, I believe the question of peace—or even a covenant of peace—being the blessed possession of every disciple of Y’shua under the renewed covenant is necessarily available to each of us.

The covenant of peace is not just for the very special members of our Faith as some might erroneous think. Instead, I assert that it is available to each of us who are willing to follow the example of Phineas in spiritual principle.

And this access to a covenant of peace is immediately available to any who would follow the spiritual example of Phineas.

Now I’m certain more than a few folks would outright dismiss all of what I’ve said here, no doubt citing a lack of direct biblical proof to my claims. And certainly for the most part, I too would be cautious in making similar, seemingly unsupported spiritual connections to Torah Portions.

However, I would take issue with dismissing my claim of a covenant of peace for every disciples of Mashiyach through Phineas’ spiritual example because the promise of peace is one of the central promises made to Netzarim by our Master Y’shua. There is a Torah-Prophetic-Messianic foundation for my claim here, just saying.

So it really becomes a question of whether we desire to possess the covenant of peace or not. And I believe most, if not all of you would agree that it’s preferable to have it over not having it.

So, let’s allow scripture to state the case for a covenant of peace for, not just Phineas and his posterity, and for all who would be YHVH’s elect.

Our Torah Portion Pinchas (aka Phineas) is found in Numbers 25:10-30:1 with its accompanying Haftorah Reading in 1 Kings 18:46-19:21. And I should mention that this reading covers two other topics that includes a tribal census to be taken of the nation and the required daily and feast-offerings. Today, of course, I wish to focus on Phineas and the covenant of peace that he received of YHVH as a result of the righteous actions he took against a Simeonite and Midianite who engaged in harlotry and idolatry in the midst of the camp.

Now bear in mind that the two things we should always be cognizant of when we study the weekly Torah Portions is: (1) the elements of each reading contain shadows of good things to come (Heb. 10:1), and (2) everything in Torah points to Y’shua haMashiyach (Rom. 10:4). For our goal is not to simply get through each week’s scheduled Torah Portion for the sake of getting through each week’s Torah Portion. Instead, our goal must be to learn what Father has in store for us through His Son Y’shua Messiah.

______________________________________________

The Zeal of Phineas is recorded in Numbers 25:10-13.

It reads as follows:

“And YHVH said to Moses, Phineas the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest, has turned my wrath from the people of Israel, in that he was jealous with my jealousy among them, so that I did not consume the people of Israel in my jealousy. Therefore say, ‘Behold, I give to him my covenant of peace, and it shall be to him and to his descendants after him the covenant of a perpetual priesthood, because he was jealous for his God and made atonement for the people of Israel” (ESV).

In order for this passage to make sense, you have to refer back to the very tail end of Torah Portion Balak, found in Numbers 25:1-9. In this passage we learn that Midianite Ba’al prostitutes had seduced the men of Israel to commit harlotry and idolatry. Israel’s disgusting sin resulted in the wrath of YHVH being poured out upon the nation in a massive plague outbreak. In the interim, Phineas, son of High Priest Eleazer, witnessed Zimri, a Simeonite chieftain’s son, hand-in-hand with Cozbi, a Midianite Princess-Ba’al prostitute, head into an enclosure and engage in an obvious disgusting act. Phineas, filled with the zeal—the jealousy of YHVH, upon seeing the outrageous hubris of Zimri, grabbed a javelin (ie., a spear), entered the enclosure where the couple had gone into to engage in their disgusting act, and simultaneously executed them.

Phineas’ zealous-jealous-righteous act against Zimri and Cozbi caught YHVH’s attention and stayed Yah’s judgment against Israel.

In this week’s reading, we find Phineas described by YHVH as being “jealous with YHVH’s jealousy” (ASV; ESV) among the people of Israel (25:11). Other translations such as the KJV use the verb “zealous” (as opposed to “jealous”) to describe. The Hebrew verb used by Moshe here is qana’ {kaw-naw} which has a number of similar meanings that include: to envy; to be jealous; and or to be zealous. So it’s conceivable that zealous and jealous within this scriptural context can be used interchangeably.
_______________________________________________

So what was YHVH actually saying about the person—the character of Phineas—in our reading today? He was saying that Phineas possessed and demonstrated a righteous zeal that was devoid of fear and was inspired by pure and holy motives.

In this sense, Phineas was one with YHVH: for he loved what YHVH loved and hated what YHVH hated. In some ways, it could be said that Phineas possessed aspects of the Creator’s righteous and holy nature.

In fact, aspects of Phineas’ righteous zeal is epitomized in the person of the Prophet Elijah. Our Haftorah Reading for this week actually entails the aftermath of another terrible event in Israel’s history. 1 Kings 18 records how Judah, her king Ahab and queen Jezebel had fallen into national Ba’al worship. After YHVH showed the people of Israel that He was indeed Elohim and that Ba’al was really no god at all. YHVH showed the assembled Israelites that He was indeed the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob by a massive display of power and might. Elijah, possessing and acting in righteous zeal similar to that of Phineas, slew all the prophets of Ba’al at the Kishon brook (18:40).

In both cases (ie., both the Phineas and Elijah stories), the nation of Israel had fallen into gross violation of Torah. Both violations involved harlotry and Ba’al worship. Both sets of violations demanded the deaths of the violators, at the very least the deaths of the perpetrators of these sins. And neither hero failed to disappoint and both, through their righteous actions, saved the nation from total destruction.
___________________________________________________________

A Covenant of Peace Over Phineas’ Line

As a result of Phineas’ righteous action, YHVH bestowed upon him His Covenant of Peace and the Covenant of a Perpetual Priesthood.

Why did Phineas over all the people of Israel that day receive such a blessing?

1. He was jealous (aka, zealous) for His Elohim.

2. His actions which resulted in the execution of Zimri and Cozbi atoned for the sins of the people before YHVH. How? Because Phineas’ zealous act made things right before YHVH. The deaths of Cozbi and Zimri were sufficient to stave off the total destruction of the nation for their blatant violation of Torah. Later on, we will see where Phineas’ zealous act was counted unto him as righteousness by YHVH.
__________________________________________________________

For the Midianites’ role in causing the Israelites to sin, YHVH commanded that they be destroyed (Num. 31:1-12). Balaam, our prophet for profit, who was highlighted in last week’s Torah Portion entitled Balak, was also dispatched in Israel’s battle against the Midianites.
______________________________________________________________

Phineas

Who was Phineas?

Biblically speaking, he was the son of Levitical High Priest Eleazer. Thus, he himself was a Levitical Priest.

Phineas was a type of Messiah in that:

1. He was called by Yah to his priestly office. He was not appointed by man. (Heb. 5:4,5)

2. Phineas, like Y’shua, was given a title by YHVH. (Heb. 3:1)

3. Phineas, like Y’shua’s appointment was given to him by YHVH. (Isa. 61:1; Joh. 1:32-34)

4. Both Y’shua and Phineas made atonement for the people. (Lev. 16:33; Heb. 2:17)

_________________________________________

Interestingly, many Jewish sages reject Phineas’ actions (as recorded in Numbers 25), citing that it was not his place to execute judgment upon the couple—Zimri and Cobzi. These sages contend that Phineas acted on personal zeal, and that he did not act according to the teachings of Torah which directed actions against certain violations of Torah be handled in a prescribed, orderly, judicial fashion. Furthermore, the sages fear a lesser individual cannot be trusted to properly assess their own motivations or be trusted to carry out the Will of YHVH.

It seems to me that the sages believe every person needs a rabbi (or two) to instruct and properly ascertain the motivations and actions to be taken by the people of God in such situations difficult situations.

But the sages’ opposition to Phineas’ action is without merit. Their assessment of Phineas is contrary to YHVH’s opinion of Phineas. In fact, YHVH Himself approved of Phineas’ actions. We know that YHVH’s opinion on a matter is the only opinion that matters. And it is this awkward thinking on the part of the sages and rabbis that has led so many people astray and has enslaved the people of YHVH in religion. It’s been for centuries: let’s hear what the Rabbi has to say about the matter. And even for the Christian, for centuries, it’s been, let’s hear what the Bishop/Paster/Elder/Preacher has to say on the matter. And I’m not saying that the people who are in positions of leadership shouldn’t be consulted on certain matters and issues. Indeed, rendering counsel to the flock is a noble, God-given responsibility of overseers. (Or should I say, true overseers of the Body of Messiah.)

________________________________________________

The Covenant of Peace

So what’s the deal with the Covenant of Peace that YHVH bestowed upon Phineas? Better, what is meant, scripturally, by “The Covenant of Peace?”

Peace Defined

Before actually looking at the concept of the “covenant of peace,” let’s first define exactly what peace (ie., shalom in Hebrew) is from a biblical; more so, from a Hebraic perspective.

Peace is Shalom in the Hebrew.

Completeness; welfare (personal); health.

From the Hebrew Root word we get many terms: (1) shalam=completeness; (2) nishlam=finished; (3) I’shalem=to pay a bill; (4) meshulam=repay; (5) shlaymut=wholeness. (https://coffeeshoprabbi.com/2018/05/23/what-is-shalom/)

Genesis 15:15—”And thou shalt go to thy fathers in peace (ie., tranquility; at ease; unconcerned”); thou shalt be buried in a good old age.”

Genesis 26:29—” That thou wilt do us no hurt, as we have not touched thee, and as we have done unto thee nothing but good, and have sent thee away in peace (ie., unharmed; unhurt)…”

Both uses of shalom are essentially the same as they express the root meaning of “to be whole.”

Psalm 41:9—”Yea, mine own familiar friend (ie., friend of my peace) in whom I trusted, which did eat of my bread, hath lifted up his heel against me” signifies “a state in which one can feel at ease, comfortable with someone.

In short, shalom (ie., peace) is about harmony and wholeness.

“A harmonious state of the soul and mind which encourages the development of the faculties and powers.” Thus the state of being at ease is realized both internally and externally.

Shalom is the opposite of strife and war:

“I am for peace: but when I speak, they are for war” (Psm. 120.7).

“Indeed, one may not be at war and still be miserable” (https://coffeeshoprabbi.com/2018/05/23/what-is-shalom/). For a msierable person by definition lacks shalom.

Shalom is also indicative of a “prosperous relationship between two or more parties” (cf. Jer. 9:8); in diplomacy (cf. Jug. 4:17); and warfare (Deu. 20:11).

Y’shua=Prince of Peace” (Isa. 9:6) who kingdom will introduce a government of peace (Isa. 9:7).

The new covenant is a covenant of peace (Eze. 37:26).

The Psalmist wrote that Yah’s elect should pray for the peace of Jerusalem (Psm. 122:6).

As Netzari, it is customary for us to greet and wish one another each Sabbath “Shabbat Shalom.” What does Shabbat Shalom really mean?

According to at least one rabbi, Shabbat Shalom means “Sabbath of Peace.” Informally it means: “I wish you a nice Sabbath.” (https://coffeeshoprabbi.com/2017/08/12/what-does-shabbat-shalom-mean/)

But when we wish someone a “Shabbat Shalom,” from a Hebrew perspective (some would say Jewish perspective), we are actually wishing the individual “wholeness of body and spirit” (https://coffeeshoprabbi.com/2018/05/23/what-is-shalom/).

Because shalom is not an abstract concept, but instead revolves around real-world conditions, persons who are in distress cannot truly possess shalom. The concept of shalom, when rendered to another individual, must include their physical as well as their spiritual. Remember the point of “wholeness” when looking at this thing.

Circumstances that negatively impact an individual’s spiritual and physical needs by default deprives them of their shalom—their peace.

Shalom does not operate in a personal vacuum. When we possess negative attitudes, such as hatred, grudges, anger, self-centeredness, and even access to YHVH’s grace and blessing because of unbelief and sin, we actually deny ourselves “spiritual” shalom. When we mistreat our bodies; deny it the proper nutrition and exercise; introduce unhealthy substances to it, we deny ourselves physical shalom and the body turns to sickness.

Thus, when someone wishes another Shabbat Shalom, what they are biblically saying to the other is: “May you dwell in completeness on this seventh day” (https://www.quora.com/What-does-Shabbat-Shalom-mean).
_________________________________________________

We can’t truly have a substantive discussion on the “Covenant of Peace” without us having a firm understanding of the biblical concept of covenant. Covenant in Hebrew is Berit which means “league” or “confederacy.” It’s root has a meaning of “to fetter.”

The term is used some 280 times in the tanakh. It is used a handful of time to denote a league, treaty or compact, whereby separate military forces or nations come together with a singleness of purpose (Jos. 9:6; 2 Sam. 3:12,13, 21; 5:3; 1 Kin. 15:19). Other places in the tanakh, covenant is used to denote an “agreement between individuals such as seen between Abraham and Abimelech (Gen. 21:32); David and Jonathan (1 Sam. 18:3; 20:8, 16-18, 42) just to name a couple examples. In such cases, the agreement was ratified by oath, blood, and material pledges (Gen. 21:28-31).

The vast majority of instances in which berit is used to denote covenant is where it relates to YHVH’s covenants with people. Generally, the agreement that is put forth by YHVH contains YHVH’s “establishing” of the agreement, which means “cause to stand” or “confirm.” Thus, it is common to read where YHVH states: “I will make my covenant (Gen. 17:2),” or a writer states, “He (YHVH) declared to you His covenant” (Deu. 4:13).

A verb used in conjunction with covenant in the Tanakh is “karat” which means to cut. The thinking here is that YHVH cuts an agreement with an individual, as He did with Abraham (Gen. 15:9-17; cf. Jer. 34:18). We learn from that story how YHVH passed between cut pieces of sacrificed animals to certify the agreement He made with Abraham. In fact, YHVH in that historical event, initiated and fulfilled the agreement.

The concept of covenant “emphasizes the authority and grace of YHVH in making and keeping the covenant and the specific responsibility of man under the covenant.” Thus humans “enter into” (Deu. 29:12) or “join” (Jer. 50:5) Yah’s covenant. It becomes an individual’s responsibility to carefully keep all the tenets of the agreement (Deu. 4:6). Covenants between YHVH and His elect is all about relationship. That relationship is one of love and loyalty between YHVH (the initiator of the covenant) and His elect:

“If ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people…and ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and a holy nation” (Exo. 19:5,6).
__________________________________________________

When putting these two terms together (ie., peace and covenant), it stands to reason that a “covenant of peace” is one in which YHVH establishes an agreement to extend His wholeness and wellbeing upon an individual (in this case Phineas) who He finds deserving and special. And the agreement for this YHVH induced wellbeing and wholeness to be imputed upon Phineas and his posterity (ie., Phineas’ descendants) is generally one-sided, such that YHVH gave no specific requirement for the inputed peace beyond the zealous nature and act of Phineas.

___________________________________________________

Having deliberated a little on the biblical definitions of peace and covenant, let’s now turn our attention to the concept of the “covenant of peace” that was bestowed upon Phineas and his posterity by YHVH.

According to J. H. Hertz (Pentateuch and Haftorah) in his commentary on Numbers 25:11, described “The Covenant of Peace” as the friendly attitude YHVH would have toward Phineas and his descendants. (I’m not a fan of this definition at all.)

The problem with Hertz’ definition of the “covenant of peace” here is that it skirts the meaning of shalom (ie., peace) too much. To me, it diminishes the importance of what Phineas did and ignores in great part the meaning of biblical peace. For Phineas’ zealous, righteous actions brought immediate peace to Israel who was about to be wiped out by YHVH’s wrath. In turn, YHVH established a relational pact, if you will, with Phineas that would involve Phineas and his progeny being in a perpetual state of spiritual and physical wellbeing and wholeness.

Rabbinic Understanding of The Covenant of Peace

The Covenant of Peace that was bestowed upon Phineas, from a Rabbinic standpoint, is more more practical than spiritual in nature. According to Rabbaynu Avraham ibn Ezra, Pinchas, in his zeal, placed himself in mortal danger. For he executed a leader of the tribe of Simeon (ie., Zimri). According to Rabbaynu Avraham, Zimri’s friends and followers would seek retribution. Thus, YHVH promised Phineas “that he would live in peace and Zimri’s people would not succeed in disturbing Phineas’ life. (https://www.ou.org/torah/parsha/rabbi-fox-on-parsha/parshat_pinchas_3/)
_______________________________________________________

The Significance of Peace to Yah’s Elect—The Messianic Age and the Renewed Covenant

Our Covenant of Peace is not founded in Phineas’ version of the covenant of peace. His was a foreshadow of even a greater peace to come. For our covenant of peace is founded in the renewed covenant (Joh. 9:15; 10:1; Psm. 29:11; 85:8; Isa. 54:10). Our future in the Kingdom will be one of “peace” (ie., shalom). Until that time, we enjoy a token/a foretaste of that peace that is described as “surpassing all understanding” (Phi. 4:7; Joh. 14:27).

During what is popularly referred to as “The Last Supper,” Y’shua promised His disciples peace:

“Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you…” (Joh. 14:27; KJV).

Paul, in describing how his Ephesian followers, who were once pagan-Gentiles, having now come to Faith through Y’shua Messiah, were eligible for Y’shua’s peace and were now incorporated into the Body of Messiah:

“For He (ie., Y’shua Mashiyach) is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us; having abolished in His flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace…” (Eph. 2:14-16; KJV).

What’s so special about Y’shua’s shalom—His peace? Well, Y’shua’s peace does not come with strings attached, as man’s peace always comes with uncertainty. For even in the times of immense troubles—even unto certain death—the countless men and women of YHVH faced tribulation with a peace that not even the most astute of society could understand (Phi. 4:7). If you’ve not read Foxes’ Book of Martyrs, I would recommend you put that on your must read list. The author documented executions of some of the Faith’s early believers. In more cases than not, the author documents that the public deaths of these saints was met with a peace that the witnesses to their passing could not comprehend.

Simply consider the peace that Stephen displayed when he was martyred by the stones of an anti-Messiah crowd headed by Saul. Luke made note of the following before Stephen’s stoning:

“And all that sat in the council (ie., the Sanhedrin) looking on him (ie., Stephen), saw his face as it had been the face of an angel” (Act. 6:12; KJV).

And then Stephen’s death was described in peaceful terms:

“And he (ie., Stephen) kneeled down, and cried with a loud voice, Lord (ie., Master), lay not this sin to their charge. And when he had said this, he fell asleep” (Act. 7:60; KJV).

It’s easy to focus on Phineas’ Covenant of Peace, which I surmise a great many this week will no doubt do. But like everything else in Torah, the Covenant of Peace points squarely at Mashiyach and it brilliantly foreshadows some amazing things to come.

In particular, the Covenant of Peace is applied to the Messianic Age, for we find in Ezekiel 34 that YHVH vowed to eliminate the shepherds who were tasked with watching over His flock. The reason for eliminating those shepherds was that they refused to do what YHVH had ordained them to do. These took advantage of and neglected the flock.

Instead of permitting such negligent shepherds to persist over His flock, YHVH promised to install King David over His flock who will tend His flock honorably. And most importantly, as it relates to our discussion here, Ezekiel goes on to entail how YHVH will establish a covenant of peace with His people (Eze. 34:25; 37:26). Imagine that.

As I mentioned just a moment ago, we run across reference to King David ruling over the Kingdom of YHVH in the World Tomorrow as we see in Ezekiel 34, it is presumed to be Y’shua, who is appointed by YHVH to rule over His reconstituted nation [Israel] in the World Tomorrow. For Y’shua is of David’s royal line. And when He finally comes back to earth to sit on His throne in Jerusalem over reconstituted Israel, one of the greatest things He will bring to His people and to the world is peace. Thus a covenant of peace will be established in the Kingdom of YHVH.

Of Y’shua, the coming, reigning, righteous King, the Prophet Isaiah wrote:

“For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon His shoulder: and His name shall be called Wonderful, Counselor, The mighty God, the everlasting Father, the Prince of Peace” (Isa. 9:6; KJV).

Thus, Israel will no longer experience persecutions, wars, plagues, death and destruction. She will exist instead in spiritual and physical wellness and wholeness.

This same covenant of peace will extend over to the entire world as prophesied by the Prophet Isaiah who wrote:

“The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid (ie., lamb); and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them; and the cow and the bear shall feed; their young ones shall lie down together: and the lion shall eat straw like the ox. And the sucking child shall play on the hole of the asp, and the weaned child shall put his hand on the cockatrice’s den. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain: for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of YHVH, as the waters cover the sea” (Isa. 11:6-9KJV)

Another prolific image of this amazing, worldwide covenant of peace is drawn by the Prophet Micah who penned the following:

“And He (ie., Mashiyach) shall judge among many people, and rebuke strong nations afar off; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up a sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. But they shall sit every man under his vine and under his fig tree; and none shall make them afraid: for the mouth of YHVH Savaoth hath spoken it” (Mic. 4:3; KJV).

Now some may say: well, that’s all well and good as it relates to a covenant of peace in the World Tomorrow. But what about us Netsarim having some aspect of that covenant of peace today?

The Millennia Reign of our Messiah will be characterized by a Covenant of Peace.

It should be clearly understood by all of Yah’s elect that one of the greatest components of the renewed covenant is that of a covenant of peace (Eze. 37:25-28). Now, some will contend that the renewed covenant has not occurred as of yet; that it applies exclusively to a reconstituted Israel. I contend, however, that we being part of the first fruits of Yah’s harvest and engrafted members into the commonwealth of Israel, already enjoy some of the benefits of His renewed covenant: that being YHVH having written His Torah in our inward parts and writing it in our hearts; He being our God and we being His people through Y’shua Messiah. Thus, we by default inherit Yah’s covenant of peace through Y’shua Messiah. Ultimately, reconstituted Israel will too come to receive both the renewed covenant and the covenant of peace.

But let me also point out that Yah has since the Fall of Adam, sought after a people who would willingly adopt His unique character and qualities. Occasionally, He stumbles upon those rare individuals such as Phineas who possess aspects and elements of His holy and righteous character. And when He does, He establishes a unique relationship with them that includes His Covenant of Peace.

Under the auspices of the Renewed Covenant and the sanctification process, we gradually take on Father’s unique qualities and character. He told us that He would write upon the fleshly tables of our hearts His Word—His Ways—which are simply a blue print of who He is. When we adopt His Ways, we receive His peace. All that is required of us then is allowing His Ruach to replace the old man/old woman that resided within us, with His righteous and holy character and nature.

Think about this beloved: If as a result of the sanctification process we take on the jealousy or zeal of YHVH such that it becomes part and parcel of who we’ve become in Mashiyach, we by default must receive YHVH’s covenant of peace in our lives.
____________________________________________________________________

So why then are so many in our Faith without peace? I mean, most of us claim that we are Yah’s elect—we’re Hebrew Rooters; Messianics; Netsari; Torah Observant Believers of Messiah; and the list goes on. We make an attempt to keep His Torah to the best of our ability while we possess at least a modicum of Faith in YHVH. And some of us even contribute to the Great Commission in one way or another. But at the end of the day, so many of us still lack peace. We’re always sick; always have strife and perpetual family and relational problems. Many of us suffer from endless financial challenges, while others of us are just unhappy, angry, bitter, grumpy, drug-food-entertainment addicted, and the like. So we ultimately end up asking Father: what gives? Why? Why do I not have your peace and prosperity over my life Father? I’m doing everything I know to do, yet life is just a massive let-down for me. Where’s the peace and abundant life that Y’shua promised? Why don’t I have it?

The writer of Hebrews revealed that the things contained in YHVH’s Torah are shadows of good things to come. That being the case, would it too much of a stretch to suggest that one of the reasons so many of us lack peace in our lives is that we lack the jealousy or zeal of YHVH operating in our lives.

So, let that thought stew in your noggin for a minute or so and we’ll circle back and bring this point to a head.

Certainly today we would not go out and execute those who we catch violating YHVH’s Torah as Phineas did. That would be absolutely foolish. For we live in in a non-theocratic nation (ie., a nation under the Government of YHVH) that does not recognize YHVH’s Torah nor His ways.

So as Netzari/Hebrew Rooters, when we see gross violations of Torah within our faith community, the only options we have to address the violations is separating ourselves from the violators and or admonishing the violator for their behavior. As it relates to violators outside our faith community, well, there’s virtually nothing that we can do to address their sin apart from prayer and actively seeking out and making disciples for Messiah, which of course is the absolute best thing we can do.

The overwhelming vast majority of this world rejects Torah. Thus in their rejection of Torah, they’ve thrown-out the very thing that establishes the standards by which they’re supposed to live. So how can we effectively hold a Torah-rejecting world accountable for gross violations of Torah? Or better, how can you reason with individuals who are hard-bent on living outside the ways and instructions of the Creator? For you could conceivably go out into the major highways and byways of our nation and declare that such things as homosexuality and abortion are abominations unto YHVH and thus are gross violations of Torah till you loose your voice, and you most likely will still not change their minds.
,
Now this is not to say that YHVH cannot change the heart and mind of a sinner to turn from his or her wicked ways, repent and seek after the Kingdom of Yah and His righteousness. For certainly, our God can do that if He so wills.

But for me, going out into the highways and byways of our nation to berate people for their sins is not what we’ve been called to do at all. We’ve been tasked with making disciples for Y’shua Messiah, plain and simple.

Between the 2nd and 4th centuries C.E., the Body of Messiah tragically lost her way. Save but a small remnant of Netzari who were forced into hiding, the Body of Messiah morphed into the so-called Body of Christ as she unceremoniously rejected the Hebrew Roots of her Faith, thereby rejecting Torah; rejected her Hebrew-Messiah, replacing Him with a Greek demigod; and made the organization they called the church into a monolithic entity that is worshiped by her adherents even more than the triune God she professes to serve.

Over time, the Great Commission went from Mashiyach’s instruction to His disciples to go forth into the world and make disciples for Him, teaching the new disciples that which Y’shua taught them, to “getting people saved” by urging the willing to make an emotional decision to adopt the church’s doctrines and traditions with a promise that the convert will go to heaven when he or she dies. In recent decades, the church’s mission has gotten even more watered down, as a result of her getting involved in social engineering, politics, entertainment, community activism and so much more; all distractions and detractions from her real Y’shua-given-purpose and objectives.

Beyond our commission to make disciples for Y’shua Messiah, as YHVH’s elect, we have at least two important responsibilities: (1) to be light and salt to this dying world; examples to the world of how man is supposed to live; and (2) to intercede on behalf the nation-peoples of the world. I believe both responsibilities require YHVH’s jealousy in order for our efforts to be effective.

YHVH desires for every individual to be saved, come to repentance and come into the full knowledge of His Truth (2 Pet. 3:9; 1 Tim. 2:4). And thus He relies upon us to help make this thing happen. And frankly, it is impossible to make this happen if we are not one with YHVH; if we don’t share His thoughts and have His heart and Spirit in us. Thus we must be fully aware of; passionate of; zealous or jealous of that which YHVH loves, hates and cares about. The world must see Y’shua in each of us. And I submit to you, if we have the zeal or jealousy of YHVH as Phineas possessed, we stand to receive YHVH’s covenant of peace.

Let us not kid ourselves: we get Father’s attention when He sees Himself reflected in the lives of His people. When Father does not see Himself manifested in the lives of His children, He may or may not respond to our pleas. Is it no wonder how so many of us never hear from YHVH; that so many of our prayers go unanswered? I would submit to you here today that the reason Father does not respond favorably to some of our prayers and inquiries is because we lack His jealousy—His zeal in our lives. He cannot see Himself in our lives. There’s more of us than of Him in their lives.
_____________________________________________________________

Beloved, I beg you to give this some serious thought.

So many of us in Hebrew Roots get into the circular habit of openly condemning anyone and everyone outside our little faith community. And for some strange reason (probably because of scriptural and spiritual ignorance) we become deluded into thinking that our condemnations of outsiders and of those we simply don’t like are doing the Body of Messiah and the Kingdom of Yah some good.

Indeed, as Yah’s elect, we do have a responsibility to speak out against sin, especially when those evils and violations of Torah are ongoing in the Body of Messiah.

However, it is also our responsibility to intercede on behalf the Body of Messiah and on behalf of the non-believing world: that Father’s judgment and wrath be stayed against this nation and the peoples of our nation and the world; as well as for the salvation of the people of the world.
___________________________________________________________

Consider the fact that we have been called to be priests unto YHVH (Rev. 1:6; 5:10). And one of the main responsibilities of the Levitical priests was to make atonement on behalf of people before YHVH. Today as priests of YHVH, under the Melchezedekian order, we serve the people of the world by interceding on their behalf before YHVH.

In his instructions to Timothy who was taking over leadership of the assemblies in Ephesus, Paul told Timothy that:

“I desire…that the men [of the assembly] pray everywhere by lifting up hands that are holy, without anger or argument” (1 Tim. 2:8; CEB ).

In other words, Paul required Timothy to instruct the men of the Ephesian Assemblies to invest their time in intercessory prayer; supplications; thanksgiving (1 Tim. 2:1); their words and hands lifted upwards to YHVH for His mercy and good will, as opposed to bickering and striving with one another, both within and without the Body of Messiah. And these supplications, intercessions and thanks were not just for the members of the Body, but for “all that are in authority, such that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty” (1 Tim. 2:2; KJV).

Paul goes on to explain to Timothy that interceding on behalf of the world was “good and acceptable in the sight of YHVH our savior” (2:3). Why? Because He wills that all men be saved and come to know Him (2:4). And that’s what it’s all about my friends.

Beloved: are we spending enough time each day on our knees praying, thanking and interceding on behalf of the world?

There is a beautiful story of James the Just, who was also the biological brother of our Master Y’shua, who became known as “old camel knees” among the brethren of his day. Apparently, it was James’ custom to journey from his abode in Jerusalem to the Temple and pray—intercede on behalf of His people—his brethren—the nation of Israel for untold hours each day. So intense and so frequent and long were his prayers, that He was alleged to have developed callouses of his knees that were comparable to the appearance of the knees of a camel.

Church historian and scholar Eusibius (c. 325 C.E.), in citing Hegesippus, wrote of James:

“[James] alone was permitted to enter into the holy place; for he wore not woolen but linen garments. And he was in the habit of entering alone into the temple, and was frequently found upon his knees begging forgiveness for the people, so that his knees became hard like those of a camel, in consequence of his constantly bending them in his worship of God, and asking forgiveness for the people.”

Dr. Robert H. Eisenman, author of “James the Brother of Jesus,” suggests that given the inspiring image that is painted here of James by Hegesippus, “…it is difficult to imagine that Hegessippus simply made it up.” And I concur wholeheartedly.

May we do likewise.
________________________________________________________________

 

 

Let us never overlook the fact that nothing is ever lost when we study and live Torah.

The example of Phineas and his zealousness, his jealousy for YHVH, points us squarely to the place where we all need to be: constantly on our knees; zealous/jealous with the jealousy of YHVH; interceding for the souls of men; coming against every principality, every stronghold; against rulers of the darkness of this world; against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places (Eph. 6:12). Our zeal—our jealousy must be such that we seek to move heaven, through our powerful and righteous prayers and intercessions, to destroy the works of the enemy and bring men and women to a substantive relationship with the Creator of the Universe.

And then to live a zealous and holy life, that is wholly acceptable unto YHVH our Elohim. That we love what Yah loves and hate what He hates. That we get our homes in physical and spiritual order. That we not tolerate evil and sin in our midst. That we speak Truth and honor our God—YHVH Sabaoth—in all that we do. That the world sees Y’shua in us as we walk out our Faith in the power and might of YHVH’s precious Holy Spirit.

Then, just maybe, YHVH will bestow upon us His Covenant of Peace. I believe, in fact, based upon what Scripture tells us, that we will positively inherit YHVH’s peace, not just in the world tomorrow, but even today. For Isaiah wrote:

“You will keep the mind that is dependent on You in perfect peace, for it is trusting in You” (Isa. 26:3; CSB).

Beloved, the only reason any of us lacks YHVH’s covenant of peace is because we lack YHVH’s zeal/jealousy. Therefore, let us make every effort to adopt His Ways and live Torah powerfully as His precious Ruach haKodesh empowers us so wondrously to do.

With that, we will bring this installment of the Messianic Torah Observer to a close. Until next time, fellow saint in training, may you be exceeding blessed and in His eternal, perfect Will.

Shalom. Take Care.

Music by Dan O Music

Foxes Book of Martyrs PDF

 

Blessings and Curses–Stuck in the Middle–STAR 24

Blessings and Curses Stuck in the Middle Why did Father drill in our heads in anticipation of entering the land of promise--over and over--the idea of blessings to be had if we stayed/remained in His Torah and curses if we strayed from His Torah? I have some thoughts...

read more

Defeating Satan–Sabbath Thoughts & Reflections 23

  Defeating Satan Matthew 4 and Luke 4 record Satan's tempting of Y'shua (Jesus) in the wilderness and how Y'shua was able to overcome those temptations. This event provides the Torah observing believer in Y'shua Messiah with an example and prescription for defeating...

read more

The Bride of Christ (Messiah) Part 2–STAR 22

  The Bride of Christ (Messiah) Part 2 is the second part of a two-part discussion between Hilary and Rod on the subject. Who or what is the Bride of Christ (Messiah)? This is the central question that demands an answer that most believers are not clear on....

read more

Occupying Territory–Parashah 46 Part 7

Occupying Territory Deuteronomy 11:22-25 This passage brings us to the end of Parashah-46. As it has been throughout this lengthy portion, we see again Moshe's admonishment that we love Adonai our God. This concept of love in the Ancient Near East continues to be...

read more

Barna Group on Same Sex Marriage

The Barna Group Reports on Same-Sex Marriage I came upon these statistics published by the well established and respected Barna Group, regarding the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage. I found these statistics not so surprising  I must admit and it...

read more

Willing Obedience is a True Act of Love–

Willing Obedience is a True Act of Love   Deuteronomy 10:12-11:9   What does our experience tell us about Yahovah? What is our testimony? It is these exploits, these events that occurred in our lives that make us strong and ready to possess the land. We must not...

read more