Forbidden Messianic Titles and Roles for the Body of Messiah

 

 This is “Forbidden Messianic Titles and Roles for the Body of Messiah.” And this discussion is within the purview of the central theme for this ministry: “Yeshua-focused Torah Living.” We are all about promoting the Netzari Faith that was once delivered to the first century saints.

 This Was Not a Planned Post

And just so you know, this topic was not a planned one. I did not plan in advance (over several weeks and days like our other series and reading discussions) to discuss this topic or issue. It came to me while recently surfing some of the Messianic Assemblies and teachings platforms. And what I found in my surfing of these sites and platforms are a lot of religious traditions being propagated by the organizations’ leaders and teachers and so forth, which I generally do not have a dog in their fight so to speak. If these groups want to hang out and worship in religion, have at it.

 Blatant Violations of Yeshua’s Commandment

But then, I ran into a roadblock with these groups when I saw and heard members of their fellowships all but worship their leaders, calling them rabbis and such. For me, it’s one thing for brethren in our Faith Communities to want to adopt rabbinic traditional worship practices and wear the associated garb or attire. But it’s an entirely different thing when brethren see themselves as believers, but then violate the Master’s commandments. For Master stated unequivocally to His disciples:

 

“If you love Me, you will keep My commandments” (Joh. 14:15). And “If you keep My commandments, you will abide in My love, just as I have kept My Father’s commandments and abide in His love” (Joh. 15:10).

 

Too many folks in our Faith Community violate Yahoshua’s instructions by taking unto themselves titles and positions of authority that should be reserved only for Yehovah and Yahoshua Messiah.

 

 Yeshua Contrasts the Religious Leaders of His Day with the Ways of the Kingdom

Matthew 23:1-36–In speaking to a gathered crowd of followers, Y’shua contrasts the ways of the scribes and Pharisees with the ways of the Kingdom. And in the midst of His pointing out the deficiencies of the scribes and Pharisees (which no doubt many of Y’shua’s followers revered and feared), He turns his attention to His disciples and followers instructing them not to take on the character traits of the Jewish religious leaders of His day. In particular, Master instructed:

 

(8) “…you should not be called “My Great One” (virtually every English translation of the Greek manuscripts use the official title “Rabbi“) for there is only One Who is Great and you are all brothers. (9) And do not call yourself Father for your Father is One who is in heaven. (10) And you should not be called leaders (most English translations of the Greek texts use the title Masters), because One is your leader, the Mashiyach. (11) But he who is greatest among you, let him be a servant to you. (12) For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted” (AENT).

 Yeshua Condemns the Religious Leaders’ Intent

And then of course Master goes right into the various levels or mentions of woes that He levels towards the scribes and Pharisees because these defy the established spiritual rules and ways of the Kingdom. As Master states before going into His commandments forbidding the assumption of certain titles of authority and leadership roles in the Body, He exposes the true nature, character and hearts of the religious establishment.

 Is Yeshua’s Prohibition Against Certain Titles and Roles a Matter of Simple Obedience or an Exercise of Meaning?

Yet many folks within our various Faith Communities, resist this commandment. They see no reason to not elevate certain members of our Faith Communities to positions of authority with the titles to go with it, such as Rabbi, Master  and Teacher, and what not. These argue vociferously that Master did not mean we are not to elevate people to positions of authority and grant them titles , such as that which is common among various Jewish Messianic sects. These have no problem calling their leaders Rabbi and Master–even Nasi, which is a Jewish title meaning “prince.”  Nasi was one of the most revered titles rendered to some of the ancient sages such as Hillel, Gamaliel, etc. in the Mishnaic period of Jewish history.  The title “Rabban,” which is a higher title than that of “rabbi” supposedly rendered unto certain Jewish sages or even Nasi’s beginning with Gamaliel the Elder, beginning around the middle of the first century–around the time of our Master’s ministries.

 An Analysis of the Title Master

Master in the Greek is “kathegetes,” which means a guide; a master or teach. Master in Hebrew is “adon,” which means lord; master. It is generally a reference to men. It is typical to superintendent of household or of affairs. It has been used also to reference a king or even Elohim. Adon is clearly the root of the title “Adonai;” a title that we are all familiar with in our Faith Communities. Contrary to conventional teaching and wisdom, Adonai is in fact NOT the Creator’s Name. It is in fact a title that was rendered or given by our ancient cousins for Yehovah.

 People Choose to Apply Titles to the Creator Instead of Referring to Him by His Personal Name

So, in general, when Jews come across the tetragrammaton in Scripture, because of the universal rabbinic banning of the pronunciation of the Eternal name, instead of pronouncing the actual Name of the Creator as far as they may or may not know it, will instead  refer to Him as either LORD (all caps) or Adonia. This ban has deep, even dark ramifications associated with it. Not that the term or title Adonai is dark or evil, for I do not believe it is. It is just a title. The problem, however, is that Scripture promotes the declaring and praise of the Eternal’s Name (not His title) throughout the earth (Psa. 22:22; 102:21; Exo. 34:5; Isa. 12:4; Heb. 2:12; etc.).  When Yah’s people are prohibited from uttering-praising-declaring the Eternal’s Name as they know it, the Eternal is not being honored and properly worshiped in all the earth. To deny the Creator His Name, that He Himself declared throughout the Tanach, is satanic at its very core. The simple fact that we are encouraged to promote His Name (not His title) throughout the whole of Scripture, by Yah Himself, as well as His prophets; Yahoshua Himself; and the apostles, yet certain entities have covered up the true pronunciation and use of the Creator’s Name, clearly shows how the enemy has successfully over the centuries, has promoted blasphemy of the Creator’s True Name. (If you are interested in learning more about what it means to blaspheme the Name of Yehovah, I would encourage you to listen to or read our post entitled: “Blaspheming the Name of God–Part 2 of the Series A Question of One’s Jewishness“).

 

Master in the Greek is “didaskalos,” which means a teacher; one who teaches concerning the things of Yehovah. It was used to refer to Yahoshua, which He endorsed and encouraged:

 

“Ye call Me Master (didaskalos) and Lord (“kurios,” meaning the one who has the power of deciding on matters of the Faith and of an individual’s life): and ye say well; for so I am” (Joh. 13:13; KJV).

 The Focus Must Always Be Yeshua

The focus must always be that of Yahoshua. And Master here, as in other places of the apostolic writings, recognized that He was at any given time competing with men who took unto themselves such titles as Master, Lord and Rabbi, garnering unto themselves recognition, power and authority over humanity. Yahoshua, on the other hand, was the only one who was granted authority and power over humanity by His Father, Yehovah Elohim.  Thus, no human has any right to take on these titles. We, members of the Body of Messiah, are instructed by Yahoshua, to simply refer to those who find themselves in oversight or teaching positions in the Body of Mashiyach as brother or brethren. Titles of authority and notoriety are contrary to the ways of the Kingdom of Elohim.

 Followers of Yeshua Called Yeshua Master and Rabbi

We find in John 1:28, 49; 3:2, 25-26 where certain individuals referred to our Master as Rabbi or Master (“kathegetes”), the title of which Yahoshua did not reject or discourage, because He in fact would be the individual’s Rabbi, and by extension, He is ours.

 

Now today, particularly in certain sects of our Faith Communities, the tradition of conferring such titles and authority continue despite Y’shua telling us not to.

 

Why do so many of us ignore or reject our Master’s instructions regarding this?

 Excuses for Violating Yeshua’s Title and Role Prohibition

The reason given by those who oppose the general, raw understanding to be derived by our focus passage is that Master Y’shua did not mean or say we cannot refer to our leaders as Rabbi or Nasi or Leader or such. These contend that Master was actually referring to the meaning behind these titles, such as that of one being deemed as “Great.” And these will go into a whole lot of discussion justifying their understanding by describing the purpose behind the Master’s instructions as opposed to the commandment Master gave to not call any individual their Rabbi, Father (father not from a biological or relational standpoint but from a ecclesiastical standpoint) or Master. These draw our attention, correctly so I might add, towards addressing the central problem of elitism; of hierarchies; of man-made governments running the Faith once delivered.  But I strongly differ from these as it relates to the direct commandment: Yahoshua commanded us NOT to call any man Rabbi, Father or Master. We can justify doing so all we want, but at the end of the day, our Master, Yahoshua told us not to.

 

 Interesting Story Justifying Violating the Title and Role Prohibition

I came across a teaching by a Messianic Group I look into from time-to-time, the flavor of the group being very rabbinic, which I do not necessarily oppose with a qualifying reason. The qualifying reason I refer to is that, as long as the rabbinic traditions do not supersede the teachings of our Master Yahoshua and the primacy of Torah (i.e., the rabbinic traditions subordinate Torah or outright replace Torah; the rabbinic traditions cause Yah’s people to stumble or send the wrong message to the world that the group in question places their trusting Faith, not in Yahoshua and His sacrifice for their salvation, but instead, in their traditions and the order of their services and in their Jewish-based halachah).  Well, the leader of the group, who has taken on the titles of Rabbi and Nasi, reasoned that this commandment given by Yahoshua to not call any man Rabbi is misunderstood, but instead applies to the meaning of the title, don’t call any man O’ Great One. He went on to assert that the people of his congregation want to have over them a person who they can refer to as their rabbi. Thus, why would anyone seek to deny these individuals that blessing of having a rabbi operating in their lives.

 

Really? Really? Even if this gentleman was completely right in his assertions, why would any true, covenant walking man or woman choose to have over them–over their lives–a human Rabbi as opposed to Yahoshua Mashiyach, who should be their Rabbi. You can’t have two Rabbis, right? And if Yahoshua is anything like His Daddy, He is jealous. I can’t imagine Yahoshua is content with members of His Body referring to certain brethren as their rabbi, with all the authority and privileges that title brings with it.

 

 What About the Gifts Given to the Body?

Now, some might introduce into this argument the roles or ministries given to the Body by Mashiyach:

 

(11) “And He (the He being Yahoshua) gave some Shlichim (aka apostles); and some prophets; and some preachers; and some shepherds (aka pastors) and teachers (12) for perfecting the Set Apart believers for the work of the ministry, for the edification of the Body of the Mashiyach. (13) Until we all become one and the same, in faith and in the knowledge of the Son of Elohim, and one complete man according to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Mashiyach. (14) And that we might not be children uprooted and turned about  by every direction of wind by the wrong doctrines of men who plot to seduce their cunning, (15) but that we  might be established in our love; and that everything in us might progress in the Mashiyach who is the head…” (Eph. 4:11-15; AENT).

 

Mashiyach, who is the head is key here in this Pauline passage, for this is the point that Master was conveying to the gathered followers and disciples as recorded in our focus passage. He, Yahoshua, is our Rabbi and our Master, while Yehovah is our Father. So then, there is no room to call or refer to those individuals in the Body who should be brethren as Rabbis, Masters and Fathers. These are titles and roles reserved only for Yahoshua and Yehovah.

 

But what about the 5-titles or roles listed by Shaul in Ephesians 4:11-15? Don’t these, when exercised or put into operation by brethren in the Body of Mashiyach, accomplish the same missteps and infractions as referring to individuals in the Body as Rabbi, Master and Father? Well, yes and no. For when these roles or titles are used to create hierarchical systems in the Body, they are accomplishing the same thing as having rabbis, masters and fathers operating in the Body.

 

Now, I won’t go further  into this subject because there is a teaching out there that was delivered by my beloved brother and friend, Robert Bills, of highpursuitministries.com, the host of the Way of Spirit and Truth podcast and webcast, that thoroughly addresses this conundrum. Robert lays out all of the concerns and realities to be understood in these often referred to entitles as offices, of which he in his 5-installment series, brilliantly puts to rest the thinking that these roles should be viewed as hierarchical offices in the Body of Messiah. If you are so led, I would humbly refer you to this content rich and important series.

 

 Humans Naturally Categorize and Label People

It goes without saying that humans prefer to place individuals in categorical boxes in order for them to understand where in the society or community an individual belongs. Thus, it is also human nature for humans to apply titles to those that they place into categorical boxes, for the ease of quickly and conveniently identifying them.

 The Economy of the Kingdom Stands in Opposition to that of Human Kingdoms

But the economy and operation of the Kingdom of Elohim does not adopt such practices or thinking. There is One God–One Elohim–Who is our Father. Then there is Yahoshua–the Mashiyach–Who is our Master and Great Teacher. Then there’s the Body of Mashiyach that consists of brothers and sisters, all of whom are undergoing the lifelong sanctification process. We, who are of that Body are all equal. It just so happens that Abba, through Yahoshua, has seen fit to equip certain members of this Body to serve in the capacity of apostles,  teachers (not Great teacher for this one gets his learning from Yahoshua and the Ruach haKodesh); prophets; evangelists; pastors and teachers (Eph. 4:11) as well as those who possess certain gifts that benefit the Body of Mashiyach (1 Cor. 12:28-31). As much as it is a temptation for us at times to elevate those fulfilling these roles or possessing such gifts to hierarchical positions in the Body of Messiah, it behooves us to resist that urge. There’s nothing wrong with honoring those who operate in any of these capacities. But no one is to be esteemed above another. For Master taught:

 

“Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but Yehovah knoweth your hearts; for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of Elohim” (Luk. 16:15; KJV).

 

In another place, Yahoshua taught this fundamental reality of the Kingdom Way of Living:

 

“So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen” (Mat. 20:16).

 My Refusal of Titles and Roles

Many over the years have attempted to confer unto me titles of deacon, elder, teacher, even rabbi, all of which I never felt comfortable with and I often went out of my way to resist and discourage. I much prefer that which my friend and brother in the Faith Robert Bills refers to me by: My brother in the Faith; or my dear brother. This provides for a sense of relationship while also garnering respect for one another.

 

Now, from time to time I will refer to individuals I am referencing in my discussion by their names, along with their various professional and academic titles so as to facilitate you, the readers and listeners of this ministry, in tracking down their reference materials. Nevertheless, as much as I respect them as gifts to the Body of Messiah, and as much as I honor their achievements in the academic world, let’s say, I have no interest in elevating them in the Body as Rabbis, Masters or Fathers.

 Closing Thoughts and Reflections

The conferring and granting of titles of any type, apart from titles such as brother, sister, child of Yehovah, elect, set-apart one, and the like, serve only to incite hierarchies and vanities in the Body of Mashiyach. Master told us simply not to call any man rabbi, master or father. So instead of trying to find ways and reasons for skirting around this direct commandment, why don’t we simply do that–not call any member of the Body rabbi, master or father? And those of us who may find ourselves in the blessed positions or roles of expounding upon the eternal truths of Yah’s Word, why don’t we point those who Abba has given unto us to teach, to Yahoshua as being their one and only Rabbi and Master, and Yehovah as their One True Father and Elohim? If we can do that, we will have stripped the enemy of one more thing that it uses to diminish the Name and Image of Yehovah in the earth.

Usury-Interest According to God (YHVH)

The Practice of Usury Prohibited How does God/YHVH rule on the practice of usury or exacting of interest on monetary loans by His elect? We find in Torah Reading 61 (according to our “triennial reading cycle-- Torah Reading 61--Exodus 22:25-31 ) the prohibition...

read more

The Critical Role Faith Play in the Prayer Life of a Messianic

The prayer lives of many members in the Hebrew Roots-Messianic Community are ineffective and have little to no associated power. In this installment of TMTO, we look at the role faith places in a Netzari’s prayer life and how faith can transform our prayers, when properly aligned with God’s Word and His Holy Spirit, into a powerful and effective tool for the Body of Messiah. 

read more

Paul’s Bold Stand Against Anti-Torah Teachings in the Ephesian Church—Part 15 of the Paul and Hebrew Roots Series

Why did Paul insert the creation story and the fall of man into 1 Timothy? Was it, as convention erroneously teaches, the reason women must not teach and preach in the Church? The answer to this question will shock you and cause you to appreciate battle Paul faced against Gnosticism in the Ephesian Assemblies of Messiah. This is Part 15 of our Paul and Hebrew Roots Series.

read more
What it Means to Walk with God? STAR-4

What it Means to Walk with God? STAR-4

by Rod Thomas | The Messianic Torah Observer's Sabbath Thoughts and Reflections

 

Today’s discussion is entitled: “What it Means to Walk with God;” it is a Messianic Discussion of the 4th Parashah in the 3-year Torah Reading Cycle. Our discussion text for this Shabbat will be Genesis 5:1-6:8.

 

I will be reading and commenting from the Robert Alter Translation of Torah (”The Five Books of Moshe”).

 

___________________________________________________________

 

Well over half of our Torah Reading this week consists of begats or “toledot,” which is essentially a genealogical listing of the “pre-flood” (aka antediluvian) Sethite patriarchs (I.e., descendants of Seth).

 

Now, if you recall last week’s post, roughly the last quarter of our Reading delineated Cain’s lineage, which pretty much turned out to be the darker side of Adam and Eve’s family.

 

Our Reading this week deals exclusively with Seth’s side of the family. Although Seth’s line would ultimately bring about the seed of the woman that would crush the serpent’s head (I.e., Yahoshua Messiah), most of humanity that derived even from this line fell into iniquity.

 

Despite this reading consisting primarily of the pre-flood patriarchal genealogy, there is enough content contained within this chapter and a quarter to keep us busy for a few hours.

 

Key events, subjects and themes to be found in our Reading include, but are not limited to:

 

  • The prophetic sanctity of Sethithe lineage.
  • The lifespans of the antediluvian patriarchs.
  • Enoch’s controversial life-story.
  • The Story of the Watchers and the Nephilim.
  • The corruption of Yehovah’s natural order.
  • Noah finding favor in Yehovah’s eyes.

 

So as to not hold you all for too long this Shabbat, especially given that we posted an installment of the Paul and Hebrew Roots Series, I would like us to avoid the controversial elements of today’s Reading, and simply focus on a Genesis 5:21-24, which reads as follows:

 

“(21) And Enoch lived sixty-five years and he begot Methuselah. (22) And Enoch walked with God after he begot Methuselah three hundred years, and he begot sons and daughters. (23) And all the days of Enoch were three hundred and sixty-five years. (24) And Enoch walked with God and he was no more, for God took him.”

 

_________________________________________________________________

 

Enoch would seem to have been a “giant” (no pun intended) of the pre-flood patriarchs, despite there being only 6-verses attributed to his entire life, the 5th and 6th verses found just a few verses back in chapter 5, verses 18 and 19, that simply address his birth.

 

Much of the intense interest and controversy surrounding Enoch’s life, as it relates to the Genesis accounting of his life, has to do with the entirety of verse 24: “And Enoch walked with God and he was no more, for God took him.”

 

The first-half of this verse suggests that Enoch enjoyed a very close, if not intimate life and relationship with Yehovah. Then the second-half of the verse entails the greatest mystery and controversy: Enoch being taken by Yehovah and being no more.

 

Beyond these 6-verses in Genesis, Enoch is mentioned only in 3-other passages of scripture, all 3 of which are found in the Brit-haDashah. From these 3-biblical passages, we gain a little more information about the great man that was Enoch.

 

  1. From Luke 3:37 we learn that Yahoshua Messiah descended from Enoch.
  2. The writer of Hebrews 11:5 details how Enoch’s faith led to him not experiencing death, but instead being “translated” (the Greek term being “metatithemi” which means to transpose; to transfer; to change; to go or pass over).
  3. And the half-brother of Yahoshua, Jude, mentions in Jude 1:14, a very mysterious prophesy that Enoch rendered that is no where to be found in our 66-Book Special. So there would seem to be other writings out there that the apostles recognized as authoritative as it related to Enoch. We’ll briefly mention a few extra-biblical or apocryphal books in our discussion here today that may contain the information about Enoch that Jude alludes to in this verse.

 

So, let’s discuss for the remainder of our time here today, the issue of Enoch walking with Elohim; what walking with Elohim means Hebraically; and what walking with Elohim looks like for us today, especially as it relates to the Enoch model of walking with Elohim.

 

________________________________________________________________________

 

Before we tackle what “walking with Elohim” means and looks like, let’s take a look at the extra-biblical record to see what the writers of those books thought of or had passed down to them traditionally about the man Enoch.

 

Jasher 3:1-11,17-38

 

Enoch is described as one who:

 

  • Despised the evil ways of men.
  • Served Yehovah.
  • Whose soul was wrapped up in the instruction of Yehovah; in knowledge of Yehovah and His Ways; in understanding of Yah’s Word.
  • Possessed a God-like awe that sat upon his countenance, invoking righteous fear of him among his people.

 

Enoch is recorded to have retired from humanity into seclusion for a number of years.

 

An angel is recorded to have called Enoch out of his seclusion for purposes of teaching humanity “the Way in which they should go and the work which they must accomplish to enter in the Ways of Elohim,” which Enoch did to a goodly amount of success.

 

The author states that the Ruach haKodesh was upon Enoch.

 

In time, Enoch is said to have become a ruler over the portion of humanity that desired to walk in the Ways of Yehovah. During Enoch’s reign, it is recorded that peace reigned over both Enoch and the entire realm that Enoch ruled over. And this reign spanned some 243-years.

 

Also during his reign it is recorded that Enoch taught the people the knowledge and Ways of Yah until the day he was taken up “in a whirlwind with horses and chariots of fire.”

 

Book of Jubilees 4:17-25

 

The author of Jubilees described Enoch as:

 

  • Learned in writing and knowledge and wisdom.
  • As one who wrote down the signs of heaven according to their months or seasons.
  • Who received much of his learning from Yehovah’s messengers (I.e., angels), of which he is said to have spent much of his secluded time with.

 

It is written that he testified to and against the Watchers (I.e., the fallen ones) in response to their iniquitous acts with the “daughters of men.”

 

Ultimately, it is recorded, Enoch was “conducted into the Garden of Eden” where he recorded the “condemnation and judgment of the world, and all the wickedness of the children of men.”

 

It is further recorded that he routinely offered incense of the sanctuary before Yehovah.

 

The Book of Enoch Chapter 6

 

The Book of Enoch is best known for it’s detailed telling of the Watchers story. According to the Book of Enoch, 200-angels, otherwise referred to in the text as Watchers, descended onto Mount Hermon in the days of Jared. They were all bound by an oath to choose and take unto themselves “wives from among the children of men and to beget children.”

 

From that union of the angelic and the human, giants were born and they proliferated upon the earth. These are described as horrific creatures that consumed all the available food stocks, which when those were exhausted, led to them consuming humans and ultimately one another.

 

The Book of Enoch describes these giants, which some refer to as Nephilim, as having “sinned against birds, and beasts, and reptiles and fish.” I guess this means that somehow, the Nephilim discovered ways to corrupt Yehovah’s natural order.

 

And so, it is recorded, that the fallen ones corrupted humanity also by teaching them forbidden knowledge or arts such as warfare; cosmetics; vanities; sexuality; ungodliness; witchcraft and sorcery; astrology and astronomy.

 

These propagated and promoted violence in the earth, which prompted the angels Michael, Gabriel, Raphael and Uriel to petition Yehovah to intervene. Each angel is given an assignment by Yehovah to directly address the situation, which ultimately led to the Watchers’ imprisonments in the earth in anticipation of their final judgment.

 

As far as Enoch was concerned, he was recruited (I believe by Yehovah through the angels) to testify to the fallen ones of the wrath and judgment that is to be brought against them by Yehovah because of their transgressions. The fallen ones in turn recruit Enoch to intercede on their behalf to Yehovah for mercy, the plea for mercy of which Yehovah rejects.

 

________________________________________________________

 

Getting back to our canonical record of Enoch, we find that Enoch is the first patriarch to be described as having “walked with God” (Gen. 5:22). And this mention of someone having walked with Yehovah might cause one to think back to Moshe’s mentioning of Yehovah walking in the Garden of Eden in the cool of the day.

 

That record of Yehovah walking in the Garden in the cool of the day/evening certainly hints at the likelihood of this being a routine thing (Gen. 3:8). In other words, it would seem likely that Yah routinely walked in the Garden to meet and converse with Adam. To me it screams of Adam having a “yada” relationship with the Eternal, part of which was frequent walks and talks with Adam, possibly in the cool of the day.

 

And so we have here, some 7-centuries or so removed from this Garden scene, a man who enjoyed a similar relationship with the Creator. And this Enoch story is not only a historical marker for humanity, it serves as a sign that Yehovah did not completely abandon His human creation after the fall. Indeed, given the right heart, Yehovah was more than willing to engage humanity in an intimate, covenant relationship. It shows that there were individuals, although rare, during some of the darkest periods of human history, that were willing to die to self -bend their will to Yah’s Will, and live a covenant-based life with the Creator of the Universe. Noah seems to the other notable human to have been identified as having “walked with God” in humanity’s early days of existence (Gen. 6:9).

 

As much as it intensely interests me, we will not examine the spiritual elephant in the room as it relates to Enoch: What happened to Enoch. The apocryphal books of Enoch, Jasher and Jubilees provide some accounting, and I also have some thoughts on what happened to Enoch, but that will have to be a subject matter for another discussion I’m afraid.

______________________________________________________

 

Our Torah reading records Enoch as having “walked with Elohim.” This fact is mentioned twice (Gen. 5:22-24).

 

We will find in our next Torah Reading that Noah as well is recorded to have “walked with Elohim” (Gen. 6:9).

 

Throughout scripture we find this concept of “walking with God” mentioned and described:

 

  • Yah instructs Avraham at 99-years of age, to “walk” or “halach” before Him or in His presence and be blameless ( 17:1).
  • It is recorded that Yitschaq (aka Isaac) “walked before Yehovah” ( 24:40; 48:15)—the term “before” as used here to describe the “walk” being the Hebrew term “paniym,” which means in the presence of or in the face of Yehovah.

 

A sister term is also used throughout scripture to signal Yehovah’s people walking in association with His Ways: “yalach.” We find in Exodus 16:4 where Yehovah tests the Hebrews in the Sinai Wilderness to see if they will “yalach” in His Torah. And so we find that “yalach” is used throughout the Tanach in terms of Yehovah’s people walking in His prescribed Ways—His instructions in righteousness. Leviticus 18:4 talks about walking in Yah’s ordinances. Leviticus 26:3 talks about walking in Yah’s statutes. Deuteronomy 5:33 and 8:6 talks about walking in Yehovah’s Ways.

 

Conversely, “halach” seems to take onto itself a somewhat different texture. Halach seems to denote more than one simply obeying or living in accordance with Yehovah’s instructions in righteousness. It goes somewhat further to insinuate and even call for a relationship with the giver of those instructions in righteousness. It seems to clearly denote the one who will walk in Yehovah’s Ways to actually have a relationship with Yehovah; what we routinely refer to as “Covenant Relationship.” A relationship that is intimate—somewhat akin to the concept of “yada”—having an intimate knowledge of Yehovah and His Ways.

 

Yehovah promises to walk or “halach” among His people if they keep covenant with Him (Lev. 26:12) and don’t “halach” after other gods (Deu. 8:19).

 

Now, the Greek counterpart to “halach” is “peripateo” which the translators of the Brit haDashah drew from the Hebrew concept of “to live; to regulate one’s life; to conduct one’s self, such as those who questioned Yahoshua as to why his disciples refused to “peripateo” in the ways of the sages.

 

But Master instructs His disciples (and by extension us) to  “peripateo” not in darkness, and in so doing, they will possess the light that gives life (Joh. 8:12).

 

Master later instructed His disciples to walk in His Ways while they had His light with them, because those that walk or peripateo in darkness have no idea where they are heading (Joh. 12:35).

 

And it was the Apostle Paul who instructed the Ephesian Messianics to peripateo as children of light (5:8) and in love (5:2); to peripateo circumspectly. In other works, to guard their walk in such a way that they always behave wisely and appropriately. Along that line of thinking, the apostle instructs the Messianics of Colossae to peripateo in Mashyach—or rather, live according to the manner in which they were taught and shown (Col. 2:6). To also walk in wisdom (Col. 4:5). And to the Messianics of Thessalonica, to walk honestly, such that they would gain the respect of those outside the Faith (1 The. 4:12).

____________________________________________________________________

 

Benner on Walk or Halach

 

“Halach” literally means to walk, as demonstrated in 2 Sam. 2:29. But in a figurative sense, which is what we’re focusing on in our Reading here today, the term “halach” is used to provide the hearer and reader something of a clear, concrete concept to demonstrate or describe a rather abstract thought or concept. In this case, we’re talking about taking something like the simple act of transporting ourselves on our two-feet, and applying it to our relationship with Yehovah and His Ways. For the Hebrew tends towards more concrete words such as “halach” to convey such concepts so that the one who would be a Child of the Most High will better understand what is expected of him/her and set out to do that which they are supposed to do.

 

One of the best descriptors of the Hebrew term “halach” is found in the example provided in 1 Kings 3:14:

 

And if you will walk in my ways, keeping my statutes and my commandments, as your father David walked, then I will lengthen your days.” (1Ki 3:14 ESV)

 

Here, Solomon is asked by Yehovah to “walk in the footsteps” of his father David, who walked in the footsteps of Yehovah. And so we have introduced here in this passage the concept of a “son walking in the footsteps of his father” in order that he will fair well in his life.

 

In other words, Solomon was asked of Yah that he enter into a covenant relationship with Him just as David did with Yehovah. David lived in accordance with Yah’s Ways (yes, he did have a few slip-ups, but he repented of those transgressions). But just as important, David had a personal, deep, “yada” intimate relationship with Yah. David is described as having a heart after Yehovah (1 Sam. 13:14). David loved Yehovah with his whole heart. And thus, Yehovah was asking Solomon to enter into the same level of relationship with Him as his father David had.

 

Along this line of thinking, Yisra’el was instructed to walk in the footsteps of Yehovah, not in the footsteps of other gods. In other words, Yah required of His people that they give unto Him their whole lives, live according to His instructions in righteousness, and enter into a personal relationship with Him—that is a covenant relationship with Him. In so doing, they would not take on the ways of the pagan nation peoples around them.

 

In terms of our 21st century understanding of such a principle as “halach” or “peripateo,” it may be best understood by us from the standpoint of “culture:” One sets out or chooses a culture and that culture’s principles in which to live by. And of course, there are an almost inexhaustible number of cultures by which one may aspire to live within and by, ranging from nationalistic to ideologies to religions—each of us chooses one or more cultures adopt. Some of us adopt cultures that appeal to us; appeal to our preferences and interests. Others of us adopt cultures that are foisted upon us because of our particular stations in life. And still others of us are chosen to adopt and live out a culture, such as Abba did with Solomon, and Yahoshua is doing with us. We are called, and many of us are chosen to walk—halacah-peripateo in Yehovah—to Walk in Messiah.

 

_____________________________________________________

 

We find in scripture that Yah’s people are called to walk in the ways of faith; in Torah; in love, peace, and truth.

 

But in order that we find favor in the eyes of Yah, we must catch His attention. And scripture tells us that Yah turns towards those who possess a right heart and tremble at His Words. And it is this one—the one who possesses a right heart and who trembles at His Words—who Yah will save (Psa. 34:18; Isa. 66:2); draw near to (Psa. 34:18); accept their worship (51:17Listen to or read our post entitled: The Heart of True Worship-STAR-3); dwell with (Isa. 57:15). These are things we all desire from our covenant relationship with Yehovah.

 

And so, there must be agreement between us and Yehovah. After Yah choses us because we fear/revere/love Him and His Words and we have the proper heart (such that of a circumcised heart—a will that will subordinate itself to Yehovah’s Will—that is die to self), will make for the optimal condition of walking with Yehovah.

 

There must be an agreement—a “ya’ad”, which means to fix; appoint; assemble; to meet; to set; to betroth (Amo. 3:3).

 

But we must first circumcise our hearts such that we die to self—we turn our lives over to Yehovah to do His work in us—to ultimately turn us into His sons and daughters. And so, we must stop sinning; stop resisting Him; not grieve His Ruach (aka His Spirit) (Deu. 10:16; Jer. 4:4; Col. 2:11). And then, He will circumcise our hearts further by inscribing His Words/His Ways upon it such that we love Him with our whole being and we walk in obedience of Faith (Deu. 30:6).

 

This is all part and parcel of our entering into and maintaining that crucial obedient, covenant relationship with Yah that you hear me talk and write about incessantly.

 

For us, halacah with Yehovah is simple. In fact, for us, its the only way to be in a right-relationship with Abba. We must “walk” (aka halach; peripateo) in Mashiyach (aka Messiah). And we walk in Messiah by imitating Yahoshua in every conceivable way (Col. 2:6). We effectively abandon entirely doing things our way, and do only that which we see Him do (just as He described the relationship He had with Father—He did what He saw Father do; and taught and preached what Father told Him to teach and preach; to act as Yehovah instructed Him to act).

 

This, according to Paul, pleases Abba (1 The. 4:1).

 

So, in the midst of our Creator’s kindled wrath and determination to destroy His creation because it had become so corrupted, He takes notice of Noah. Noah attains favor in Yehovah’s eyes. But we find in next week’s Reading that Noah walked with Yehovah.

 

Like Enoch, Noah not only walked in Yah’s Ways, he had a relationship with the Almighty (Gen. 5:9).

 

Our God/our Elohim, is an Elohim of relationships. He desperately desires to have a relationship with us, His human creation. He, in fact, desires to adopt us to be His sons and daughters.

 

Thus, it behooves us to work on our halacah; not from the standpoint of a mechanical, rote-keeping of Torah and the tradition of the sages that so many of us in this Faith community do. But more so, focus on our relationship with the Almighty. We are to seek Him and His strength (1 Chr. 16:11); His Kingdom and His righteousness (Mat. 6:33); His face (Psa. 105:4). And we do this through the Person and Personal Ministry of our Master Yahoshua Messiah. For He taught us how to walk in Yehovah. He left us His Words; His teachings and His example:

 

“For to this have you been called (called to endure for Messiah), because Messiah also suffered for you, leaving you an example, so that you might follow in His steps” (1 Pet. 2:21).

 

Halacah—True Messianic halacah my friends—is not about becoming Jewish and living under the framework of Judaism. It’s about following in the footsteps of Yahoshua. Our halacah is taking Yahoshua’s yoke upon us and ultimately transforming into His image (Mat. 11:29). And to assist us in doing all this, Master promised us that gift of the “paraklete”—the Ruach haKodesh—whom Abba sends to us; to teach us/to help clarify for us; to bring to our remembrance all that Yahoshua has taught and modeled for us (Joh. 14:26). Thus, the Ruach—the Comforter—will confirm to us that which we do—our walk—which is pleasing unto Abba (Joh. 15:26).

 

So, like Yahoshua, we are called to be “echad” with Yehovah. This is what true “halacah” is all about: becoming one—echad—with Messiah and Yehovah our Elohim (Joh. 10:30; 17:21).

 

 

 

 

 

Usury-Interest According to God (YHVH)

The Practice of Usury Prohibited How does God/YHVH rule on the practice of usury or exacting of interest on monetary loans by His elect? We find in Torah Reading 61 (according to our “triennial reading cycle-- Torah Reading 61--Exodus 22:25-31 ) the prohibition...

read more

The Critical Role Faith Play in the Prayer Life of a Messianic

The prayer lives of many members in the Hebrew Roots-Messianic Community are ineffective and have little to no associated power. In this installment of TMTO, we look at the role faith places in a Netzari’s prayer life and how faith can transform our prayers, when properly aligned with God’s Word and His Holy Spirit, into a powerful and effective tool for the Body of Messiah. 

read more

Paul’s Bold Stand Against Anti-Torah Teachings in the Ephesian Church—Part 15 of the Paul and Hebrew Roots Series

Why did Paul insert the creation story and the fall of man into 1 Timothy? Was it, as convention erroneously teaches, the reason women must not teach and preach in the Church? The answer to this question will shock you and cause you to appreciate battle Paul faced against Gnosticism in the Ephesian Assemblies of Messiah. This is Part 15 of our Paul and Hebrew Roots Series.

read more

The Righteousness of God is the Place Where Obedience and Faith Intersect-Part 1-What is the Righteousness of God?

This is “The Righteousness of God is the Place Where Obedience and Faith Intersect—Part 1—What is the Righteousness of God?”

 

  1. Pose the Central Questions

 

Inevitably, the central question facing Messianics is how does one balance a life of Torah-honoring with that of Trusting Faith in Yahoshua Messiah.

 

Denominationalism, for instance, vehemently rejects any attempt by God’s people to be Torah-honoring. Messianics, on the other hand, tend to place much of their day-to-day focus on being Torah-honoring, paying less attention to matters of faith.

 

Secular dictionaries define faith as that which one has complete trust or confidence in. When used in connection to things of faith, we’re talking about a strong belief in Elohim or in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual apprehension rather than proof.

 

The writer of the Cepher of Hebrews defined faith as:

 

“The substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen” (11:1).

 

The Greek word in the Brit Hadashah for faith is “pistis,” which means having a conviction of the truth of anything, belief; conviction or belief respecting one’s relationship to Elohim and set-apart things; the conviction that Elohim exists and is the creator and rule of all things, the provider and bestower of salvation through Mashiyach; a conviction or belief that Yahoshua is Mashiyach, through whom one obtains salvation (Heb. 11:6).

 

In the Hebrew, the term for faith is ‘emuwn {ay-moon}, which means trusting, faithfulness; to be certain or to believe.

 

As members of the true Faith once delivered, one of our core understandings is that one must be Torah-honoring or obedient and possess faith in the personal ministry of Yahoshua our Mashiyach. Unfortunately, due to inherent difficulties associated with some of the Apostle Shaul’s writings, it would appear on the surface that the great apostle to the Gentiles rejected Torah-keeping by the elect of Yah, while promoting faith as the only means by which he/she is to live (Rom. 3:27; Gal. 2:16; 3:2-13). Now, these are critical passages that when read out of context, would certainly lead one to believe that Torah-obedience by Yah’s elect has been done away with. And we will certainly tackle these and other similar passages as we progress along in this Paul and Hebrew Roots Series.

 

Conversely, we have the Apostle Ya’achov (aka James) come out strongly in favor of Torah-keeping which he describes as works (Jas. 2). The half-brother of our Master, goes even so far as to ask whether one is saved by faith alone, absent works (Jas. 2:14). And we find later on in the apostle’s reasoning he declares that faith without works is dead (2:20)  and that one is justified by his/her works in addition to his/her faith (2:24).

 

Who’s right here? Paul or James? Or maybe, both are right, but each is seeing this thing from two different perspectives.

 

And the answer is both. James is quite easy to follow in his explanation of the critical balance that exists between faith and Torah-living. Shaul, on the other hand, tends to be a bit more focused on proving his point that works of the Law/Torah won’t save an elect. However, we will find later on in this very letter that he he does affirm the centrality of Torah in a believer’s life in association with his/her faith (Rom. 3:31).

 

In this first installment of our series within a series, which I’ve entitled, The Righteousness of God is the Place Where Obedience and Faith Intersect, our focus passage being Romans 3:21-22, we will discuss how Yehovah’s righteousness is the fulcrum of the elect’s believing/trust faith and his/her obedience to the terms of their covenant relationship with the Almighty.

 

 

 

  1. Rehash Point of Last Post and Tie into This Discussion

 

Context is the heart of most, if not all of my scriptural studies. And as I’ve mentioned throughout the many installments of this Paul and Hebrew Roots series: Because Shaul is, in so many places in his writings, hard to understand (2 Pet. 3:15-16), it is imperative that we read and study his writings within framework and context of the letter the passage of interest is contained, as well as within the framework and context of all his letters and the whole of scripture.

 

Failure to read and study Paul’s writings in its proper context, again, because of the apostle’s challenging writing style, may lead one to inaccurately interpret the content of his writings, which in turn will lead one to “…wrest [or twist his writings], as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction. (2Pe 3:16 KJV)

 

And so we strive to avoid such misunderstanding and the potential to twist the apostle’s divinely inspired writings by framing our focus passage(s) within its proper context.

 

So let’s conduct a quick context review of Romans, leading up to our focus passage of 3:21-22.

 

  • The Gospel (aka, the Besorah) that Shaul was sent to preach was to both Jew and Greek (1:15-16). That Besorah or Gospel reveals the Righteousness of Elohim, which we will discuss in our discussion today. And now, as in the past, the one who would be righteous is called by Elohim and by the apostle here in this letter to the Romans, to live by faith (1:17).

 

  • As Yah revealed to Habakkuk, the wrath of Elohim is leveled against all ungodliness and unrighteousness. All humanity stands guilty before Yehovah because it inherently knows Yah exists and knows the difference between right and wrong, but still insists on living lives of sin (1:18-32).

 

  • Thus, Yah’s pending judgment against wicked humanity will be righteous, as He will judge all according to their deeds and the workings of their hearts, irrespective of them being Jew or Gentile. Yah is no respecter of person. And the apostle writes about Yah judging humanity according to where each individual falls out. Each will be judged either within the framework of Torah or outside the framework of Torah (2:1-16). [Listen to or read our related post entitled: “What Did Paul Mean by Being Under the Law?”]

 

  • Then Shaul levels a rather harsh criticism of some of his kinsmen, who we described as religious Jews. The apostle makes the earth-shattering statement that a Jew is one who is a Jew inwardly as opposed to one outwardly (in particular attacking the Judaizers’ ferocious enforcing of physical circumcision mandates on those Gentiles entering the Faith—similar to what we’re seeing out there in the secular world today with mandates, heh?). We discussed extensively the realities associated with Shaul putting into a proper perspective one’s Jewishness (I.e., the religious Jew’s reliance on their heritage, biology, their religion, and traditions) as it related to their salvation. [Listen to or read our related series within a series entitled: “A Question of One’s Jewishness.”] According to Shaul, the Jew is no better than their Gentile counterparts, especially when it comes to questions of one’s eternal security or right-standing before Yehovah. Therefore, the Jew must not place their trust in their Jewishness (2:17-3:8).

 

  • Shaul then puts forth the fundamental notion or premise that humanity, on its own accord, is inherently unrighteous in all its ways, while conversely, Yehovah is righteous in all His Ways. [Listen to or read our related post entitled: “Let God be True and Every Man a Liar.” The apostle goes so far as to assert that not even the works of the Law or the works of Torah (we’ll discuss what works of Torah or the Law likely means in this context) will not save a person. At the time, this was no doubt shocking to the converted religious Jews of his day. But Shaul corrected this erroneous belief by asserting that one’s faith in Yahoshua and His Personal Ministry saves a person. It is the chosen one’s faith that results in his/her having righteousness or right-standing imputed unto them by Yehovah (3:9-20).

 

Pretty cut and dry, heh?

 

Contrary to denominationalism conventional wisdom, the apostle was not thrashing or rejecting Torah or Torah-keeping by Yah’s elect. Nor was he rejecting his kinsmen and their religion; just their hypocrisy and their flagrant rejection of a faith-based, obedient covenant relationship with the Eternal, and their stubborn reliance on their Jewishness as the basis for their right-standing before Yehovah.

 

The apostle was simply introducing his Messianic Roman readers to the fundamental realities and application of Yehovah’s righteousness in light of humanity’s (all of humanity) desperate need of a savior. All-in-all, the apostle extols the crucial role an elect’s faith plays in his/her being justified before a holy and righteous Elohim.

III. The Righteousness of Yehovah Manifested Through Faith and an Obedience of Faith

 

Our focus passage reads:

 

“But now, the Righteousness of Elohim without Torah, is manifested; and Torah and the prophets testify of it; even the righteousness of Elohim, which is by faith in Yahoshua the Mashiyach, for everyone and on every one that believes in Him: for there is no distinction…” (3:21-22; AENT).

 

The Righteousness of God Manifested

 

The phrase “But now” in verse 21, separates out for the apostle’s readers, at least two-historical-time-periods in human history where the Righteousness of Elohim was manifested. [Read or listen to our related discussion entitled: “The Righteousness of God Revealed From Faith to Faith.”] The first go-round was via or in the Torah. But now, in Shaul’s day, it was being manifested through faith in the Person and Personal Ministry (that is, in the atoning work) of Yahoshua haMashiyach.

 

I want to examine the concept of the “Righteousness of God/Elohim” in greater detail later on in our discussion here today. But for now, let’s continue analyzing the various components of verse 21.

 

“Without the Law” is Misleading to Modern Readers

 

The KJV’s rendering of “without the law” (”choris nomos”) is terribly misleading to modern readers. It certainly feeds the anti-Torah monster of denominationalism. For the ancient Greek phrase “choris nomos” should not be interpreted from the standpoint of Torah having no purpose or role in the “Righteousness of Elohim.” But rather, and more accurately I might add, “outside the confines of Torah” or the Law.

 

 

Torah and the Prophets Attested of God’s Righteousness

 

Torah attested to the Righteousness of Elohim by defining what sin is, revealing how depraved humanity was because of sin, and humanity’s dire need of a savior whom Yehovah Himself would provide. Simply recall Avraham’s prophetic pronouncement to his son Yitshaq:

 

8 My son, God will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering: (Gen 22:8 KJV).

 

Torah, along with the whole of Tanach, attested to this reality. It just so happens that Yehovah, in Shaul’s day, officially and fully revealed this prophesied reality in the Person and Personal Ministry of Yahoshua haMashiyach. And this explains what Shaul meant by the phrase “without” or “outside of Torah.”

 

Torah Alone Does Not Bring One to Righteousness

 

Contrary to Jewish conventional wisdom of Shaul’s day, Torah in and of itself was not the complete vehicle or means for one to be deemed or imputed righteous by Yehovah. Obedience to Torah was a piece of the equation for Yah’s people to realize the Righteousness of Yehovah. The missing component was always alluded to by both the Torah and Yehovah’s prophets of old.

 

God’s Salvation Imputed in Response to a Trusting Faith

 

And with the advent and personal ministry of Messiah, the fullness of true salvation was manifested and in full operation. Praise Yah! So both Torah and the Prophets preached salvation—that is the conference of righteousness or right-standing to Yehovah’s chosen ones–through faith.

 

Abraham’s Example of the Righteousness of God

 

Again, we have before us the fitting example of Avraham, who by his unshakable faith in Yehovah as His Elohim, was credited or imputed righteousness by Yehovah (Rom. 4:3, 9; Gal. 3:6; Jam. 2:23). In all these testimonies, it is recorded that Avraham believed Yehovah and it was counted unto him for righteousness.

 

Torah-Keeping In and Of Itself Saves No One, But

 

Christian commentators use this passage, as they do several others of Shaul’s writings, to disparage Torah-keeping/Torah-living by Yah’s people. These choose to focus on the fact that Torah-keeping/Torah-living in and of itself does not bring one into right-standing before Yehovah. Which is not entirely true.

 

What most, if not all, Christian commentators—who are in most cases, operating from an anti-Torah perspective—are ignoring is the fact that one’s trusting faith must naturally lead to one’s obedience to Yah’s instructions in righteousness; all of which is part and parcel of a covenant relationship with Yehovah. [Listen to or read our related discussion entitled: “The Righteousness of God Revealed From Faith to Faith.”] Like Avraham, one’s true faith will compel him/her to walk in obedience to Yah’s instructions in righteousness.

 

Keep My Commandments if you Love Me

 

Our Master’s plea was quite compelling:

 

If you love me, keep my commandments” (Joh. 14:15; KJV).

 

In other words, the Master was saying to His disciples: “If you are truly my disciples and you’ve given your all to follow me (that is, you love me over anything and anyone else in your life by comparison), then keep my instruction; My commandments.” And since Master did only that which He saw His Father do and preach only that which He received from His Father, one can logically conclude that Yahoshua’s commandments were the very same commandments as Yehovah’s (Joh. 5:19). Indeed, Master was the walking, talking Torah.

 

Denominationalist Commentators See No Room For Obedience—Just Cognitive Trusting Belief

 

 

These promote a cognitive recognition that Yahoshua Messiah died for our sins, but deny the requirement for us to die—despise our own will, but esteeming only Abba’s Will. Many recognize that Yah’s Ruach haKodesh-His Holy Spirit—inscribes Yehovah’s Torah on the fleshly tables of the convert’s heart as a critical part of the sanctification process. But these see no role for themselves beyond their confession of faith in their understanding of Yah’s sanctification process. These possess no skin in the game. They see no need to die to self and walk in obedient covenant relationship with the Almighty.

 

Works Must Work in Conjunction With Faith

 

But wasn’t it the half-brother of our Master, James the Just, who emphatically asserted that:

 

“Faith without works is dead” (Jas. 2:18).

 

Is Paul Off or What?

 

But wait: Isn’t Shaul saying here in our focus passage that Torah-living/Torah-keeping has no role whatsoever in one receiving right-standing or imputed righteousness before our holy and righteous Elohim?

 

What Shaul is saying in part here is that, just possessing or having knowledge of Torah will not put anyone in right-standing with Yehovah. (Again, we dealt exclusively with this premise in our 4-part series entitled “A Question of One’s Jewishness.”)

 

In fact, one can be blameless in their keeping of Torah, but still not in right-standing before Yehovah. This is due to one placing their trusting-faith in their Torah-keeping alone and not in their trusting-faith-based relationship with the Eternal through the provisions brought about by Yahoshua’s and His Personal Ministry (or rather, Yeshua’s atoning sacrifice).

 

Recall, this is precisely what the religious Jew of Shaul’s day was doing, and it took Shaul to call them out on it—Romans 2. We in fact dealt with this reality in our series within a series entitle: “A Question of One’s Righteousness.” I would encourage you, if you’ve not already done so, to reference those discussion as you are so led.

 

Torah-Keeping/Torah-Living is Still a Requirement—Don’t Be Fooled

 

Now, [this in no way means], and mind you, this is where denominationalism tragically goes off the rails so to speak in regards to Yah’s people obeying His instructions in righteousness, this in no way means we are not required to obediently walk out Torah in conjunction with our trusting faith in Mashiyach.

 

We did a post entitled “Is Torah-Keeping Required for Salvation” where we determined that Torah-keeping is necessary for one’s salvation despite denominationalism’s conventional wisdom to the contrary. Again, Torah-keeping or works of the Law/Torah, alone will not earn one salvation or right-standing before Yehovah. He requires a trusting faith in Him and His Mashiyach first and foremost. But then Yah requires His chosen ones walk in obedience to His instructions in righteousness. I would go even so far as to say that our Faith and our covenant relationship with the Eternal compels us to seek higher heights and deeper depths in our keeping of Yah’s instructions in righteousness, not the opposite.

 

Humanity Judged Either Within or Outside the Framework of Torah

 

 

Remember, Shaul himself asserted that every un-converted soul would ultimately be judged either within or outside the framework of Torah (Rom. 2:12—Listen to or read our discussion on this very premise entitled: “What Did Paul Mean by Being Under the Law Part 1). So, no matter how the denominationalists spin this critical issue, one cannot get around the fact that Torah-keeping/honoring/living are essential to an elect’s walk with Messiah and ultimately being justified before Yehovah.

 

Another Example of Shaul’s Hard-to-Understand Reading Style

 

Unfortunately, I identify, as did the Apostle Peter/Kefa, Shaul’s writing style as the basis for a great deal of confusion as it relates to questions surrounding the delicate balance that exists between one’s faith and one’s obedience to Yah’s instructions in righteousness. For on the surface it would seem the apostle is stipulating that one’s obedience to Abba’s instructions in righteousness has nothing whatsoever to do with the elect of Yah being saved or justified and that one’s justification comes only as a result of his/her faith.

 

This which the apostle writes concerning faith being the only element by which one receives righteousness conflicts with that written by James the Just who wrote that faith without works is dead (Jam. 2:18-26)? It certainly seems to be the case; at least on the surface it does.

 

Recall that Shaul informed his Roman Messianic readers that Avraham’s faith was credited to him as righteousness (Rom. 4:1-16). And further along in this 3rd chapter the apostle wrote:

 

“…it is by faith a man is being made righteous, and not by the Works of Torah” (Rom. 3:28; AENT).

 

The Works of the Law Introduced

 

What does Shaul mean by the phrase “Works of Torah/Law?” Well, as we progress further along in our discussions in this series within a series, we will closely examine what Shaul meant by works of the Law/Torah. And we will find that this phrase may not mean what it appears to mean on its raw surface. (This discussion will be forthcoming in a few weeks.)

 

But suffice to say, by the time we get to the end of this series within a series, we will find that Shaul was not in the least saying that one’s obedience to Abba’s instructions has no role in his/her being saved or justified. In fact, as a sneak peak, we have somewhat of a clarifying passage that proves the opposite: That Torah-Living is required of Yah’s people:

 

“Do we then nullify Torah by faith? May it never be! On the contrary, we establish Torah” (Rom. 3:31; AENT).

 

Boom! Drop the mike! The apostle has left the room! 

 

 

Contextually Understanding What Paul Means by the Righteousness of God

 

As Yehovah is righteous in all His Ways—righteousness being a prime character trait of His—He extends forth or bestows or imputes righteousness to those who would be His chosen ones in response to their faith (Listen to or read our related post entitled: “Let God Be True and Every Man a Liar”). The elect one’s faith, by its very nature, leads or compels this one to walk in obedient covenant relationship with Yehovah: an obedience of faith if you will. This is what Shaul was sent to do as an apostle: to call the world to an obedience of faith (Listen to or read our related post entitled: “Obedience Versus Faith”).

 

 

The Righteousness of God Understood in Context.

 

In order to gain a better understanding of the phrase, the “Righteousness of Elohim” in context to our focus passage, we should step back to Romans 1:17, which reads:

 

”For in it is revealed the “Righteousness of Elohim, from faith to faith; as it is written: “The righteous by faith will live.” (AENT).

 

“For[in] it” in the Greek is “gar auto.” It links to the apostle’s explanation of the gospel he was commissioned to teach and preach by Yahoshua Messiah.

 

The Gospel Stands at the Heart of the Righteousness of God

 

It is the gospel that provides humanity the means—the wherewithal—to receive right-standing before his Creator. Other than the gospel, there is no other means by which humanity may gain access to the Righteousness of Elohim! Shaul explained that salvation comes about firstly through the preaching and then the hearing of the Gospel (Rom. 10:17).

 

Misplaced Focus Among Some Messianics

 

We here in the Messianic/Hebraic Communities tend to forget this critical reality, our focus often being on the rote keeping of Torah, or as we will discuss later, the “Works of Torah.” We often go about our walk in rote commandment-keeping as if we are purchasing our salvation or that somehow, our Torah-keeping in and of itself will somehow bring us into right-standing before the Creator. I’ve noticed little in the way of references to the role that the gospel and faith play towards the elect’s access to the “Righteousness of Elohim.”

 

Righteousness Defined

 

Our English term “righteousness” in the Greek is “dikaiosune,” which as demonstrated by the LXX’s use of the term, is related to the Hebrew term “tzedek.”

 

Tzedek describes those acts or actions that fulfill the divine mandates or obligations of or that are contained in Torah for Yah’s people. Those divine mandates or obligations underscore one’s covenant relationship with the Almighty.

 

The sister-Hebrew term of “tzadik” is descriptive of the one or ones who are deemed “innocent” or “justified” by the Court of Heaven.

 

Tzedek and Tzadik Crucial Terms Undergirding the Righteousness of God

Now, these two terms, “tzadik” and “tzedek” are crucial to our understanding of the concept of “Righteousness.” In concert, both terms express the divine standards by which Yehovah requires His chosen ones to live—which all of humanity fails to meet on their own–and thus the dire need for a savior that would facilitate his/her being deemed justified or righteous before their holy and righteous Elohim. For without the “Righteousness of Elohim,” one is condemned to wrath, judgment and punishment.

 

Understanding the Righteousness of God One of Two Ways—Depending on Context

 

Now, there are at least two-ways of understanding the phrase “Righteousness of God”:

 

  1. One of Yehovah’s character traits is that He is righteous, which by extension means the one who seeks to be conferred a right-standing before Him, benefits by the His righteous acts of salvation toward them.

 

  1. Yehovah declares or bestows righteousness upon those who would be chosen of Yah, which comes only through the chosen one’s trusting faith in His Son Y’shua Messiah.

 

Contextually speaking, the Righteousness of Elohim that is mentioned by Shaul here in our focus passage, is the objective form or the second understanding: Whereby one’s trusting faith in Y’shua is credited as righteousness to Yah’s chosen.

 

The phrase “from faith to faith” must be understood from the perspective of the apostle’s recitation of Habakkuk, that a “righteous one by his faith will live” (1:17; cf. Hab. 2:4).

 

And that, beloved, is where we will pick-up in the next installment of this series within a series—”The Righteousness of God is the Place Where Obedience and Faith Intersect-Part 2-The Righteous Shall Live by Faith.” You don’t want to miss that discussion.

 

 

 

Invitation to Discipleship—to live, not just in Torah, but to also live by faith and by our Faith.

Usury-Interest According to God (YHVH)

The Practice of Usury Prohibited How does God/YHVH rule on the practice of usury or exacting of interest on monetary loans by His elect? We find in Torah Reading 61 (according to our “triennial reading cycle-- Torah Reading 61--Exodus 22:25-31 ) the prohibition...

read more

The Critical Role Faith Play in the Prayer Life of a Messianic

The prayer lives of many members in the Hebrew Roots-Messianic Community are ineffective and have little to no associated power. In this installment of TMTO, we look at the role faith places in a Netzari’s prayer life and how faith can transform our prayers, when properly aligned with God’s Word and His Holy Spirit, into a powerful and effective tool for the Body of Messiah. 

read more

Paul’s Bold Stand Against Anti-Torah Teachings in the Ephesian Church—Part 15 of the Paul and Hebrew Roots Series

Why did Paul insert the creation story and the fall of man into 1 Timothy? Was it, as convention erroneously teaches, the reason women must not teach and preach in the Church? The answer to this question will shock you and cause you to appreciate battle Paul faced against Gnosticism in the Ephesian Assemblies of Messiah. This is Part 15 of our Paul and Hebrew Roots Series.

read more

The Heart of True Worship-STAR-3-A Messianic Discussion of Genesis 4:1-26

by Rod Thomas | The Messianic Torah Observer's Sabbath Thoughts & Reflections

 

Today’s discussion is entitled: “The Very Heart of True Worship;” it is a Messianic Discussion of the 3rd Parashah in the 3-year Torah Reading Cycle. Our discussion text for this Shabbat will be Genesis 4:1-26.

 

I will be reading and commenting from the Robert Alter Translation of Torah (”The Five Books of Moshe”).

 

In terms of a backdrop to our Reading, we must consider the fact that man’s fall certainly damaged the intimate relationship he had with the Creator while in the Garden. It is unclear precisely what form that damaged relationship took after the couple was banished or exiled from the Garden, or even, from Yehovah’s immediate presence.

 

(4:1)  And the human knew Eve his woman and she conceived and bore Cain, and she said, “I have got me a man with YHVH.”

 

Let us take note of the statement:

 

“I have got me a man with Yehovah.” Robert Alter, in his translation of this verse, comments that here we find Eve’s imagining her role in creating a man in partnership with Yehovah. No doubt reflecting back to her and her husband’s origins being that of Yehovah. In essence, all creation traces back to Yehovah.

 

From a rabbinic standpoint, the “I have gotten a man with the help of Yehovah” is believed by some to be an expression of Eve’s rejoicing over her being reconciled to her husband, Adam.

 

The thinking here is that Adam and Eve had become estranged as a result of the tragic events of the Garden. Some in rabbinic Judaism contend that Adam wholly blamed Eve for the couple’s banishment from the Garden. That being so, Eve then believes that through the birth of Cain, she essentially has regained her once estranged husband.

 

As cute as this perspective may be, there’s nothing in our text to prove such musings. Is this musing a possibility. Well, I guess all things considered, it may. But I don’t think so. I think the text as rendered is suggestive of Eve celebrating the birth of her sons, she being the first woman in all of history to experience the miracle of birth, one has to imagine that she would have to say something profound in response to this momentous event. And indeed, she most certainly did.

 

The Ancient Book of Jubilees

 

(4:1)  At the time of this story, Adam and Eve had 3-children: Cain, Abel and Awan.

 

 

(4:2)  And she bore as well his brother Abel, and Abel became a herder of sheep while Cain was a tiller of the soil.

 

“Abel” in Hebrew means “a breath” according to a rabbinic source I consulted (Hertz). The significance of the Hebrew name here seems to play upon the brief, premature, flash-in-the-pan life which will be that of Abel; his life so prematurely ended at the hands of his brother Cain.

 

Now, some contend that Cain, being the elder son, was trained in tilling the soil by his father. In other words, Cain learned the family business—I know, somewhat of an overstatement, but it does seem to fit the norms of ancient Hebrew family customs.

 

Abel on the other hand, was given the less physically taxing task of caring for the family’s livestock. We should take this for what it’s worth.

 

According to Josephus, the name Cain means possession, and Abel means sorrow. The text notes that Abel was a lover of righteousness and believed Yehovah was always with him. Abel excelled in virtue.

 

Cain, on the other hand, is described as “very wicked” and “wholly intent on getting.”

 

 

(4:3)  And it happened in the course of time that Cain brought from the fruit of the soil an offering to YHVH.

 

We have here the first mention—the first documented demonstration of worship. Seems as though the brothers’ offerings were that of thanksgiving, although the specifics are lacking in our text.

 

(4:4)  And Abel too had brought from the choice firstlings of his flock, and YHVH regarded Abel and his offering,

 

Abel’s “firstling of his flock and of the fat therein” is suggestive of Abel rendering unto Yehovah in thanksgiving, the very best of his flock. The fat, even in this early period of human history, was esteemed as the best part of the animal.

 

Abba’s “respect unto Abel” denotes that Abba accepted Abel’s offering.

 

The Ancient Book of Jasher

 

The sons, Cain and Abel, brought before Yehovah “approximating offerings” from their labors. I’ve not been able to ascertain what exactly an “approximating offering” is, but it seems to be somewhat tied to the timing of the agricultural season or seasons. So I guess we can surmise that the offerings Cain and Abel rendered unto Yehovah were timed around the growing season, maybe spring.

 

But the text goes on to detail that Elohim turned and inclined unto Abel’s offering, consuming his offering with a fire from heaven.

 

 

 

(4:5)  but He did not regard Cain and his offering, and Cain was very incensed, and his face fell.

 

Cain’s offering, on the other hand was rejected by Yehovah. And J. Hertz contends the reason for Yehovah’s rejection of Cain’s offering was due to the evil condition of Cain’s heart, as opposed to his offering being that of produce or the fruit from his tilling, which I wholeheartedly agree with. This seems evident by the context and content of Yehovah’s warning to Cain just after His rejection of his offering. Cain’s spirit was not right before Yehovah, and thus Yah rejected His offering.

 

This being the case, what does that say to us today about our worship of Him in connection to the condition of our hearts? I say it says something pretty significant. We’ll get into that in the practical halachah and closing remarks portion of this discussion.

 

Ancient Book of Jasher

 

Yehovh did not turn nor incline towards Cain’s offering because “he (Cain) had brought from the inferior fruit of the ground before Yehovah.”

 

_______________________________________________________

 

Many people of Faith have over the centuries gotten hung-up on the occupations of Cain and Abel, especially as those occupations directly affected the brothers’ respective offerings or worship. It is unclear as to why Abba chose to have Moshe declare the brothers’ occupation and the substance of each one’s offering and worship. Could there have been a issue with the content or substance of Cain’s offering? I guess it’s possible.

 

But at the end of the day, the issue at the core of Cain’s offering being rejected by Yehovah, has to do with the state of Cain’s heart versus that of Abel’s heart. Certainly, if by chance Cain’s offering was rejected because he violated Yah’s requirement that offerings or sacrifices be that of animals, the very crux of the rejection still traces back to the state of Cain’s heart. For when one willfully violates the Creator’s commandments and chooses to do things their way, they are in possession of an uncircumcised heart—a will that is resistant to giving way to the Will and Ways of the Creator.

 

The other thing to consider here as it relates to the consistency of each brother’s offering is the emphasis the text makes on Abel’s offering consisting of the “firstlings of his flock and from their choicest,”—that being a point of the quality of Abel’s offering, which also translates into the quality of Abel’s worship. Conversely, the quality of Cain’s offering, and by extension the quality of Cain’s worship is muted in the text, which in and of itself is telling. I believe we can safely conclude that Abel’s offering and worship was superior to that of Cain’s, although the superiority may have had nothing to do with the acceptance or rejection of one or the other’s offering and worship.

 

Again, it would appear, just from the forthcoming calling out of Cain by Yehovah for his negative demeanor in response to his offering being rejected, the issue at hand is the state of Cain’s heart in connection with his worship of Elohim.

 

Messianic author and teacher Tim Hegg suggests that Abel’s gift or offering or worship was superior to that of Cain’s because Abel brought forth worship that came from a right heart. Cain’s inferior offering or worship, on the other hand, came from a faulty, maybe even corrupt heart. Hegg goes even further to suggest that Cain was simply going through the mechanical motions of worship, absent a circumcised heart, while Abel worshipped Yehovah from a sincere and thankful heart.

 

This to me makes sense since it is inconceivable or unlikely that these were the brothers’ first and only offerings unto Yehovah. It seems more likely the brothers were reared in the proper method of worship, most likely by their father Adam, who himself received the revelation of worship directly or indirectly from Yehovah.

 

(4:6)  And Yehovah said to Cain: “Why are you incensed, and why is your face fallen?

 

(4:7)  For whether you offer well, or whether you do not, at the tent flap sin crouches and for you is its longing but you will rule over it.”

 

“Shall it not be lifted up,” according to Hertz is associated with Cain’s fallen countenance: His dejected, disappointed attitude over Yah’s rejection of His offering. Yehovah immediately recognized the evil that obviously resided within Cain—Cain’s evil heart, as mentioned in the previous two verses discussion. And thus, Yehovah offers Cain a spiritual lifeline, so to speak, in an attempt to head-off or “arrest” Cain’s downward spiritual spiral.

 

For that which was brewing or at work within Cain would only lead to sin. So, we see manifested here before us another example of Yehovah’s grace and love for His human creation. Clearly, Abba could have simply left Cain to his own devices and allowed him to sink into the spiritually evil abyss he was teetering atop of, or just terminated Cain’s life. But Yah offered Cain a Way out, as He does all of humanity. This is the essence of, and a foreshadow of Yehovah’s Plan of Salvation. Yah says to humanity, look, you are destined for destruction. I have a solution to your impending doom. Hearken unto My still small voice and receive the salvation I’m offering before it’s too late.

 

Now, another perspective of the phrase “shall it be lifted up” that Hertz brings up is from the perspective of the “it” being Cain’s offering. In other words, if Cain did well—if he behaved as he should—then his offering would be accepted by Yehovah, or rather, his offering would be “lifted up.”

 

Yehovah, though, warns Cain that his harboring whatever was at work inside him—that which one text described as vexing to him—threatened to rule him and lead him to sin.

 

I have to at this juncture of our discussion wonder whether or not this was another test for humanity. Were the hearts of these two men, in particular Cain, being tested here? We’ve discussed on this forum many times that our Elohim is a searcher of the heart, as well as He tests those who would be His. And Avraham is a prime example of this reality. Abba Himself asserts this fact:

 

“(9) The heart is more deceitful than all else and is desperately sick; who can understand it? (10) I, Yehovah, search the heart; I test the mind; even to give to each man according to his ways; according to the results of his deeds” (Jer. 17:9-10; NASB).

 

Was Yah searching the heart and testing the mind of Cain? According to this critical passage of holy writ, it most certainly was a possibility.

 

Nevertheless, as it was in the garden with Adam and Eve, humanity was granted freewill—the wherewithal to choose how they will deal with their inner struggles and temptations. In this, the temptation is, because Yehovah rejected Cain’s sacrifice, Cain gives in to his innate desire for vengeance or revenge.

 

(4:8)  And Cain said to Abel his brother, “Let us go out to the field.” And when they were in the field, Cain rose against Abel his brother and killed him.

 

Robert Alter notes in his translation that the phrase, “Let us go out to the field” is missing in the Masoretic Text (I.e., the Hebrew text passed down to us by the Masoretes—Palestinian Jewish Scribes–of around 1,000 A.D. Their text is the framework by which most Authorized Versions of our so-called Old Testament Bibles have been translated). This statement, however, is apparently found in the Greek, Syriac and Aramaic texts.

 

As we will see, this statement contradicts with at least one extra-biblical reference of this incident.

 

The fact that Cain lures his brother to a place that is likely remote from the family home, the text describing the place as “the field,” is indicative of the level of planning or premeditation Cain undertook. From the evidence presented in the text, Cain was determined to fully carry out this tragic, heinous act. There was no turning back it would seem.

 

Ancient Book of Jasher

 

The text next denotes that Cain sought a pretext to slay him (I.e., Abel) because Yehovah did not accept his offering. Seems Cain’s argument should have been with Yehovah as opposed to his brother who had only done that which he was supposed to do.

 

Where did or how were or who planted that seed within Cain that would lead to or cause Cain to seek pretext to murder his brother? We’re talking premeditated murder here. Seems as though Cain had within him an iniquitous predisposition that caused or led to him (1) offering an inferior offering unto Yehovah—doing things his way as opposed to doing things Yah’s way; and (2) jealously, having the wherewithal to contemplate murdering his brother–assuming, that is, Jasher’s rendering of the incident has a semblance of truth attached to it.

 

Would we be safe assigning hasatan a role in this murder; in Cain’s internal work-up to his brother’s murder? Did another agent of the enemy somehow get to Cain and ignite in him a flame of rebellion and murder? Genesis of course gives no such information of this. But we do know our Master referred to hasatan as being “a murderer from the beginning” (Joh. 8:44). What did Master mean by that? Did Yahoshua tie Abel’s murder to hasatan, or to the fact that because of him, all of humanity is subject to death? Just some thoughts.

 

(1:18)  The text notes that one day Abel’s flock passed over a portion of Cain’s freshly plowed field, causing Cain much upset. Was this the pretext Cain sought after his offering was refused by Yehovah?

 

(1:18-24)  Well, Cain and Abel engage in a verbal dispute over this situation, with the text going into some detail as to the content of their argument.

 

(1:27)  Well, the verbal dispute leads to Cain’s assaulting Abel. But the text goes into some detail about the emotional state of Cain in the moments after he slew his brother. The text describes Cain as sorely regretting having killed his brother, such that he was “sadly grieved, and he wept over him (Abel’s body) and it vexed him exceedingly.”

 

(4:9)  And Yehovah said to Cain, “Where is Abel your brother?” And he said, “I do no know. Am I my brother’s keeper?”

 

Yehovah’s questioning of Cain, like that of His questioning of his father Adam, is indicative, not of Yehovah’s ignorance as to what transpired, but likely the questioning was done to provide the human the opportunity to repent; to confess; even to teshuva. But in either case, no confession; no repentance; no teshuva was forthcoming, was there? Only misleading rankers by each offender, in a feeble attempt to throw the Almighty off script—off topic—to pass the buck if you will.

 

(4:10) And He (YHVH) said, “What have you done? Listen! Your brother’s blood cries out to Me from the soil.

 

  1. Hertz points out that Yehovah describes—identifies—Abel to Cain no less than 6-times over 4-verses of this passage, as his brother, no doubt in part to emphasize to Cain the heinous nature of his transgression: You killed your brother!

 

The personification of Abel’s blood, in that Yah declares to Cain that it cries out from the ground unto Yehovah, is an introduction into human understanding, the concept of vengeance. In other words, according to Yehovah, Abel’s blood cried out to Him to avenge Abel’s death. And so, Cain is found guilty by the Court of Heaven of his crime, and it falls to the Creator of all, to pass judgment, as Abel’s blood cries out from the ground for justice.

 

The Ancient Book of Jubilees

 

(4:3)  Abel’s blood is recorded to have cried from the ground up to heaven because Cain slew him.

 

Question: Does the blood of the slain innocent even today cry up to heaven?

 

 

(4:11) And so, cursed shall you be by the soil that gaped with its mouth to take your brother’s blood from your hand.

 

(4:12) If you till the soil, it will no longer give you its strength. A restless wanderer shall you be on the earth.”

 

Here we find that Cain is, in a sense, subjected to a repeat of that which his father was condemned to: a life of drudgery, having to till soil that produced more thorns and thistles than produce. For no longer would the earth yield a bounty as it did in the Garden.

 

Furthermore, there’s the sense of both being indefinitely separated from Yehovah, more so Cain than Adam, as a result of their transgressions. However, Cain’s exile seems more specific: He is condemned to being a wanderer, and then in verse 12, the narrator, Moshe, details “And Cain went out from Yehovah’s presence…”

 

But here’s a major difference between the separation from Yehovah that Adam was relegated to, and the separation that Cain was relegated to. It appears that the first family retained some semblance of relationship with the Creator. (No doubt anything close to what it was in Garden, but certainly their relationship with Yehovah wasn’t completely severed.)

 

We know that the text declares Yehovah regarded Abel’s offering. How that regarding of Abel’s offering manifested, we have no indication here. We will see in at least one extra-biblical source, how that “regarding of Abel’s offering” manifested.

 

But suffice to say, if Yehovah had completely severed relationship with the first family, He would not have involved Himself in Abel’s offering. Furthermore, we will find mention of Cain “departing from Yehovah’s presence,” suggesting to me that Yah was still very active in the lives of the first family. Just some thoughts and reflections going on here.

 

Alter’s translation highlights the irony of Cain’s transgression and the punishment Cain received from Yah: The very soil that “gaped with its mouth” to take his brother’s blood from Cain’s hand, would be the very instrument used to punish the tiller by trade, Cain (vs. 11).

 

And to add to his misery, Cain would never be at peace. He would be a wanderer throughout his lifetime; even a fugitive, which is interesting, since we will find when we get to verse 17 here in our focus passage, that after the birth of his son Enoch, Cain built a city that he named after his son. Now, if Cain was condemned to being a wanderer or a fugitive for an indeterminate time frame, his building a city (some resources described that city as a fortified or walled city) would naturally imply that he at some point took up homesteading; at least to some lesser or great extent. I came across at least one extra-biblical source that suggested Cain settled down in the latter parts of his life and found peace, building and dwelling in at one or more of the cities he built.

 

Clearly, the answer to this conundrum is not to be found in our focus passage. But suffice to draw from our text that Cain’s separation from Elohim led him and his posterity down the road to destruction. For we will find that those who departed from the presence of Yehovah devolved into lives of seemingly irredeemable evil. And of course that makes total sense. When one removes themselves from the reality of the light of Yah’s Torah and His beautiful, life-giving presence, the only other reality one is to be exposed to is the darkness of chaos, evil and lawlessness. Separation from Yah is the worst state of existence any human has or will ever endure, and it would seem, from the confines of our text, that Cain experienced that terrible reality.

 

Unfortunately, far too many folks in this world today are experiencing, not just a present day separation from the Creator of the Universe, but if they don’t get their act together, they’re looking at eternal separation from their Creator. Yet, there comes a point in those who’ve lived in that separated state that they’re turned over to a reprobate mind, as noted by Shaul in his letter to the Messianic Assemblies at Rome:

 

“(18) For the wrath of Elohim from heaven is revealed against all the iniquity and wickedness of men who hold the truth in iniquity (19) because a knowledge of Elohim is manifest in them; for Elohim has manifested it in them. (20) For, from the foundations of the world, the hidden things of Elohim are seen by the mind in the things he created, even His eternal power and divinity, so that they might be without excuse (21) because they knew Elohim and did not glory Him and give thanks to Him as Elohim, but became vain in their imaginings and their unwise heart and was darkened. (22) And, while they thought within themselves that they were wise, they became fools. (23) And they changed the glory of the incorruptible Elohim into a likeness to the image of a corruptible man, and into the likeness of birds, and four-legged animals and reptiles on the earth. (24) For this cause, Elohim gave them up to fill the lust of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies with them. (25) And they changed the truth of Elohim into a lie, and worshipped and served the created things, much more than the Creator of them, to whom belong glory and blessing, forever and ever: Amen…(28) And as they did not determine with themselves to know Elohim, Elohim gave them over to a vain mind; that they might do what they should not” (Rom. 1:18-28; AENT).

 

Indeed, this is what Cain and his descendants had to look forward to. And even today, we have generations of souls who are imitators of Cain. Oh, these may not have murdered their brothers or sisters, but through their deceptive and desperately wicked hearts, they’ve bought into the Kingdom of Darkness, lock-stock-and barrel, where murder of the innocents (the poor; the discarded of society; the unborn; the innocent is commonplace. These are in their own right, wanderers and fugitives in the very lands they claim as their homes. Little do they realize, having their hearts seared and made numb to the Truth of the Gospel and their desperate need of a savior, that they will face certain wrath, judgment and punishment. And certainly, wrath and punishment would soon come upon the world of Cain’s era, when Yah would bring about a flood to destroy the evil that had overtaken His once “me’-od tov” creation.

 

And to add to his misery, Cain would never be at peace. Alter renders the passage pertaining to this state: “A restless wanderer…on the earth.” How many people do we know, or for that matter, how many of us are as Cain here: Restless wanderers on the earth; going through the motions of living Yah’s Ways, but when Yah or circumstances reveals the heart of these individuals, they are as Shaul described to Timothy:

 

“(1) But know this: that in the latter days hard times will come: (2) and men will be lovers to themselves and lovers of money, boasters, proud, revilers, unyielding towards their own people., deniers of grace, wicked, (3) unloving, addicted to irreconcilable malicious gossips, ferocious, haters of the good, (4) treacherous, rash, inflated, attached to pleasure more than to the love of Elohim, (5) having a form of respect for Elohim but wide from the power of Elohim. Them who are such, repel from you” (2 Tim. 3:1-5; AENT).

 

Wherever Cain would eventually wander in his life, no matter how skilled he’d become at tilling, the soil would remain barren to him and refuse to bring forth its bounty. He and his wife, now wanderers, would no doubt be forced to forage for their food. It would be this act of foraging for their food that Cain would be forced to put his trust in Yehovah to provide him his sustenance. For Cain no longer had any means by which to provide for his family, since his skills at tilling were fundamentally taken from him.

 

You see, humanity is always going to do things Yehovah’s Way, or humanity’s going to do it Yehovah’s Way. Oh, it may seem to Cain at first that he didn’t need Yehovah (as is the thinking of most humans). But in the end, it turns out that he would absolutely need Yehovah, one way or the other.

 

Ancient Book of Jubilees

 

(4:4)  Yehovah made Cain a fugitive on the earth because of his brother’s blood.

 

(4:13) And Cain said to Yehovah, “My punishment is too great to bear.

 

Cain not only had to contend with the physical penalties of his transgression, but also the guilt that was no doubt seared into his conscience. This punishment, Cain declared, was too great for him to bear.

 

Along that line, the Jasher account goes to great lengths to underscore and bring out the intense grief Cain experienced after he murdered his brother.

 

The Ancient Book of Jasher

 

(1:28) The text details the interaction Cain has with Yehovah over the incident with Abel. Most interestingly, the writer touches on Yehovah bringing up to Cain a couple of his eternal attributes, which would lend to Yehovah’s qualifications to pass and execute judgment on Cain:

 

  1. Yehovah is a reader and judge of the heart of man.

 

  1. Yehovah is omniscient (I.e., He is all knowing and all seeing) and omnipresent.

 

Yehovah, as part of his sentence/judgment against Cain, curses the ground on which Cain would till for his food. Therefore, Cain could no longer be a tiller, but a wanderer—better, a forager.

 

(4:14) Now that You have driven me this day from the soil and I must hide from Your presence, I shall be a restless wanderer on the earth and whoever finds me will kill me.”

 

There’s a sense here that Cain, prior to his murdering his brother, found great comfort and peace in being in the “presence of Yehovah” when he dwelt in his father’s home, or in his dwelling in Eden. There’s a sense that his banishment would remove the protections he enjoyed living in the presence of, or being near Yehovah. That protection, Cain noted, would be effectively removed as a result of his banishment. This situation is referred to in rabbinic circles as a “forfeiture of divine protection.”

 

This spiritual reality is realized in Yehovah declaring that He would hide his face from Yisra’el in the day the people would “arise and play the harlot with the strange gods of the land, into the midst of which they were going;” forsaking Yehovah and breaking the covenant He had made with them (Deu. 31:16-18).

 

This is a reality that we all must be diligent to avoid at all costs, especially in these perilous times. When we turn our hearts away from Yehovah our Elohim, we run the risk of losing or forfeiting the divine protection He has placed over us. So we must always be vigilant to guard our hearts, and we do that most effectively when we willingly endeavor to die to self.

 

So, Cain somehow had the foresight to be concerned for his safety. He feared being killed by an “avenger of blood.” This part of the story paints for us a shadow picture of Yehovah making provisions for the manslayer (Num. 35).

 

In essence, Cain was crying out to Yehovah for a place or means of refuge to escape potential avengers of Abel. Where would he, the 3rd human to come into existence, learn or know about murder; vengeance; divine protection; and such? These are rather advanced concepts that were somehow planted in the mind of Cain, especially given that there were at the time, just two other souls alive on the planet. Somehow, Cain realized that there would come a time in the future when the population of the world would be such that men would take up causes such as vengeance and come after him. Clearly, this would be something to happen only in the distant future.

 

(4:15) And Yehovah said to him, “Therefore whoever kills Cain shall suffer sevenfold vengeance.” And Yehovah set a mark upon Cain so that whoever found him would not slay him.

 

The “mark” that was rendered unto Cain by Yehovah was more that of a mark of protection, than that of a stigma that Cain would be resigned to carried upon his body till he died. Many over the centuries have sought to spiritualize this mark, but sometimes, that which is foreign to our modern day, western sensibilities, are best left to its natural understanding.

 

The establishment of the mark upon Cain that would warn any who would seek to avenge the murder of Abel, served to strike fear in the hearts of men that they themselves would receive a far greater set of punishments from Yehovah than was meted out to Cain if they succeeded in killing Cain.

 

Some in rabbinic circles say that Cain was a repentant sinner, and thus he was afforded by Yah the mercy he received, in the form of this mark. But this to me is pure prairie jibberish at best. Nothing in this text suggests that Cain repented of his transgression. Now, as I’ve always asserted, if the text is silent on a matter, does that silence say a thing one way or another? No, it doesn’t. I will concede that silence in biblical texts leave room for contemplation and discussion. But certainly it is ill-advised for us to take advantage of the silence in order to put forth a doctrine that cannot be proved. It can be misleading and create confusion. It’s best at times to allow the text to speak for itself.

 

(4:16) And Cain went out from Yehovah’s presence and dwelled in the land of Nod east of Eden.

 

Interestingly, the Hebraic cognate with Nod (that is, the term of interest having an attached meaning) is the term used for “wanderer” from verse 12 of our passage here. Coincidence or intentional?

 

Hertz interprets Cain’s removal from the presence of Yehovah as evidence that Eden was a special place. As I mentioned in our last Torah Reading Discussion entitled, “Who is to Blame for the Sins of the World-Adam or Eve,” I believe Eden, especially the Garden located within Eden proper, was an exclusive extension of Yehovah’s Kingdom here on earth. For I’ve always held that wherever Yehovah dwells, there we find His Kingdom. And so, if Yehovah’s Spirit (His Ruach) dwells within us, we can rest assured that the Kingdom of Yehovah is in us, as our Master taught (Luk. 17:21). Josephus, who I would describe as an estranged rabbi, contends here that Cain slew his brother in response to Yehovah viewing Cain’s offering as an “invention of a covetous man” that was “gotten by forcing the ground.” Abel’s offering, conversely, came from “naturally of its own accord.”

 

We find in 1 John 3:12, Yochanan provides a counter explanation to Josephus’ rabbinic thinking for Cain’s murder of Abel:

 

“…Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And therefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s righteousness” (KJV).

 

Yochanan contrasts Abel’s sense of righteousness to Cain’s sense of evil, and it was evil-lasciviousness—iniquity—that drove Cain to murder his brother. More so, an iniquitous spirit and heart.

 

Josephus—Antiquity of the Jews

 

Josephus’ text takes an interesting turn by quoting Yehovah in the midst of His questioning Cain’s evil act against his brother:

 

“I wonder at thee, that thou knowest not what is become of a man whom thou thyself has destroyed.” (More a statement by Yehovah regarding Cain’s evil intent and actions, is it not?)

 

And it is because of this conundrum, according to Josephus, that Yehovah did not carry out the death penalty against Cain, but instead condemned him to be accursed in the earth—a fugitive.

 

The text states that Yehovah casted Cain out of the land along with his unnamed wife.

 

The Ancient Book of Jasher

 

(1:33)  The text, as was mentioned in Genesis, stresses that Cain “went out from the presence of Yehovah, from the place where he was…” And thus, Cain dwelled in the land toward the east of Eden, he and all belonging to him.

 

(4:17) And Cain knew his wife and she conceived and bore Enoch. Then he became the builder of a city and called the name of the city, like his son’s name, Enoch.

 

Hertz casts doubt as to the physical identity of Cain’s wife, citing that incest is abhorrent to the Jew and that it violates Yehovah’s Torah (Lev. 28:9). Indeed, incest is prohibited in Torah. But it would seem that Yehovah permitted what we know today as incest to take place in the early stages of human history in order to establish the human population. And later on, as the number of humans grew in the earth Yehovah prohibited the practice (Lev. 18:7-15).

 

Now, if we believe the biblical narrative to be true—that the first humans to ever exist were Adam and Eve, then there is no other conceivable answer to this conundrum. Cain had to have married his sister. The extra-biblical texts of Jasher and Jubilees both affirm this understanding.

 

This is one of those instances I would assert, where the bible’s silence on an issue can easily be understood, as there is no other explanation. Some have postulated the thinking that Yehovah created another set or sets of humans apart from Adam and Eve. Our bibles, nor do any of the extra-biblical writings support such a contention. And I get how hard it must be for some to swallow the fact that Cain and Seth both married their sisters, but that’s because we have a healthy bias against incest. But we must recognize that Yehovah often works within the framework of what He has in place in order to fulfill His Will in the earth. This same principle is seen in the practice of polygamy: Yehovah established marriage to be between one man and one woman. However, He permitted polygamy to be practiced by His people for a defined period of time in human history.

 

At the end of the day, we can rest assured that the Creator knows what He’s doing. Yehovah commanded the first couple and their progeny to be fruitful and multiply. Why would Father give a commandment without the means by which to fulfill that commandment? Just food for thought.

 

Josephus—Antiquity of the Jews

 

Josephus goes on to attribute Cain with the proliferation of evil in the world at that time; the violent accumulation of personal wealth which he encouraged his acquaintances to do likewise, making him a great, although wicked, leader of wicked men in the earth at that time. An inventor of weights and measures. And it was on account of this that Cain was able to coax the world “into cunning craftiness.” And it was also from this that he established fortified, walled cities.

 

The Ancient Book of Jubilees

 

(4:9)  Question: Where did Cain get his wife from. Genesis speaks about Cain knowing his wife and the two rearing children?

 

According to the text, a second daughter was born unto Adam and Eve, and she was named Azura. Cain took his sister Awan to wife. Ultimately Chavah gave birth to 9 more sons according to this text.

 

People of Faith have severe difficult buying into the fact that Cain and Seth married their sisters. I recognize that there seems to be a built in aversion to what we referred to today as incestuous relationships. However, if we believe the Genesis account to be true, which leads to us believing that Yah made Adam and Eve, and no other beings are mentioned, then based upon the accounting we have, the only logical conclusion we can draw is that Cain and Seth married their sisters. And we have extra-biblical references to sort of back-up that thinking. Nevertheless, many folks within and outside our Faith community find it difficult to access such thinking. And so, these will come up with strange, extra-biblical solutions to their conundrum such as Yehovah created other people besides Adam and Eve, and those people produced female children that Cain and Seth married and produced children with.

 

 

(4:25) And Adam again knew his wife and she bore a son and called his name Seth, as to say, “Elohim has granted me other seed in place of Abel, for Cain has killed him.”

 

 

Adam and Chavah lost 2-sons that day. And so, when they bore Seth, Adam referred to him as a “second seed unto them on the earth instead of Abel.”

 

(4:26) As for Seth, to him, too, a son was born, and he called his name Enosh. It was then that the name of Yehovah was first invoked.

 

Ancient Book of Jubilees

 

(4:11)  Seth took his sister Azura to wife.

 

 

Practical Messianic Halachah

 

Yehovah’s acceptance of Abel’s worship and rejection of Cain’s worship is described from the perspective of Him “giving regard to Abel and his offering, but to Cain and his offering He did not give regard.”

 

The Hebraic terminology used here is fascinating and when understood, opens up vistas of spiritual meaning and insight. The Hebrew terms for “to give regard” is “sha’ah.” “Sha’ ah” means to “turn and give one’s attention” to something. It is obvious that we turn to and give our attention to something that is interesting or important to us. Yehovah would seem to be no different from us here. He obviously found something of interest in Abel’s worship that caused Him to turn towards Abel and give his offering His undivided attention, which translates into Yah accepting Abel’s worship. Conversely, Yah did not turn or give credence to Cain’s worship, but instead, gave serious examination to Cain’s disposition and behavior.

 

If this thing about worship is really about the condition of the worshiper’s heart, this all makes complete sense and holds tremendous importance to Yah’s elect. Because the truth of the matter is that Yehovah recognizes the one with a right heart (Psa. 34:18; 51:17; Isa. 57:15).

 

Hegg further points out a substantive understanding that Yehovah does not deal with humanity in a “capricious way” (I.e., Yah doesn’t just make stuff up to hit humanity over the head with on the fly). It seems pretty evident from Yah’s calling Cain out after He rejects Cain’s offering, that Cain knew exactly what the problem was with his worship.

 

This is a critical piece of information that must be understood by Yah’s people. When Yah takes issue with us, He is not capricious towards us. We invariably know what the problem is. Granted, we may not know precisely the nitty gritty of the problem, but we will invariably have a general sense of what we’re doing wrong. That’s why it is so important that we constantly seek Yah’s leading when we pray: That we ask Him to reveal to us those areas in our lives that need fixing so that our covenant relationship with Him is not impeded.

 

One of the main reasons we were created was to worship Yehovah. If our worship is rejected by Yehovah for whatever reason, we by default fail in our created purpose (Mat. 15:8-9). And we don’t want anything to do with that, do we? That makes for a wasted existence.

 

More so, we must petition the Father to search our heart, as King David described in Psalm 139:23-24:

 

“(23) Search me, O Elohim, and know my heart. Try me and know my anxious thoughts, (24) and see if there be any hurtful way in me. And lead me in the everlasting way” (NASB).

 

One cannot truly be in covenant relationship without inviting Yehovah to conduct a perpetual heart examination and any needed surgery to keep him/her in right relationship with the Eternal. For many folks within and without our Faith Community are faking it and going through the motions of serving and walking out their Faith, no doubt similar to the life of Cain. These are no doubt having their worship routinely rejected by Abba. But these, instead of confronting the problem headlong and seeking to have their situation corrected through corrective heart surgery, too often choose to turn a blind eye to their spiritual depravity and hope for the best in the end. Y’shua made it clear that he will summarily dismiss such individuals from Him and His millennial kingdom, stating that He never knew them (Mat. 7:21-23). My God, that is indeed an edict none of us should ever want to hear.

 

Yah’s grace is extended down to us. As He did with Cain, He’s throwing us a lifeline, through His Word and His Spirit. His Word points us to Yahoshua and our need for a savior (Rom. 10:4—the end of Torah is Messiah…), while His Ruach convicts and corrects us (Joh. 16:8—and when He (the Holy Spirit) comes He will convict the world concerning sin and concerning righteousness and concerning judgment). This is, of course, all contingent upon us allowing these divine resources—Yehovah’s powerful grace—to work on our behalf.

____________________________________________________________________________

 

One of the fundamental themes of this Torah Reading has to do with True, Yehovah-honoring worship.

 

What is true, Yehovah-honoring worship? I’m talking about the worship that gets Abba’s attention; worship that touches the Creator’s heart such that He turns towards our offerings and He accepts it with pleasure.

 

Today, worship is all about a church’s or fellowship’s Praise and Worship offerings, with some churches producing each Sunday, concert-level performances to this end. In these cases, it’s more about performance and eliciting some emotional responses from the group’s attendees. From the attendees’ perspective, it’s often all about the experience: Escapism; happiness; excitement; community; together; having a spiritual high.

 

 

Years ago, before all the gospel and praise and worship performances took center-stage in denominationalism, worship was simpler. It involved the church attendees participating, such as in the singing of hymns and the recitation of prayers. It was up to the attendee to involve themselves in the worship activity, as opposed to what it has become today: Being entertained; at least in most cases.

 

 

True biblical worship is an abandonment of self and a full surrendering to the sovereignty, holiness, and majesty of the Creator of the Universe. It is in fact a true acknowledgment of this reality.

 

Back in the day of the patriarchs, true worship involved solemn acts of reverence in the form of prostrating one’s self before Elohim; offering sacrifices; reciting and expressing reverence of Elohim in the form of psalms and prayers. The focus was entirely on the greatness of Yehovah; being thankful for His provision and safety; to seek forgiveness of one’s transgressions and to pledge allegiance to the Creator’s Way of life.

 

The writer declared:

 

“Come, let us worship and bow down. Let us kneel before Yehovah our Maker” (Psa. 95:6).

 

Worship was a display of one bending their will to the Will of Yehovah.

 

I invite you to listen to or read our post on this subject of worship entitled “Where Do You Worship Yehovah” if you are interested in finding out more about biblical worship.

 

Over time, worship devolved into rote, mechanical halachah that was devoid of the worshiper’s heart bending to the Will of the Eternal. Father exclaimed that He was not accepting and appreciative of such contrived efforts at worship of Him. Indeed, Yehovah required of His people to worship Him in the exacting way He prescribed. But the worship He prescribed for His people to perform meant absolutely nothing if His people’s hearts were not properly circumcised.

 

Of this, the writer declared:

 

“For You do not delight in sacrifice, otherwise I would give it. You are not pleased with burnt offering. (17) A broken and a contrite heart, O Elohim, You will not despise” (Psa. 51:16-17; NASB).

 

Abba stated through His prophet:

 

“For I delight in loyalty rather than sacrifice, and in knowledge of Elohim rather than burnt offerings” (Hos. 6:6; NASB).

 

So, as far as Abba is concerned, worship of Him is not about rote, mechanical Torah-keeping, although keeping Torah is extremely important. For Abba, worship of Him is about bending our Will to His; it’s about loving Him and loving our neighbor; it’s about dying to self and imaging Him in the earth.

 

Our Master, Yahoshua Messiah, informed the Samaritan Woman at ya’achov’s Well, when the woman pressed Him as to where Yah’s people must worship Him (I.e., that rote, mechanical keeping of Torah was at the forefront of the ancients’ minds), that the time was imminent when the people of Elohim would worship Yehovah in Spirit and in Truth.

 

The worship of a child of Yah that is in Spirit is essentially him or her being led by the Father’s Ruach haKodesh, in their reverencing and serving of Yehovah.

 

The worship of a child of Yah that is in Truth is essentially him or her walking out their Faith; in their obedience of Faith; in their being in true covenant relationship with Yehovah. In so doing, the elect’s day-to-day walk in Mashiyach becomes that of perpetual worship unto Yehovah.

 

Both elements of worship require that an elect’s heart be circumcised pursuant to Yehovah’s instructions in righteousness, as rendered in Deuteronomy 30:6 and Jeremiah 4:4.

 

The Apostle Shaul expounded and expanded upon this critical aspect and element of the elect’s walk in Mashiyach when he wrote:

 

“(28) For he is not a Jew who is so in what is external (alone): nor is that (only physical) circumcision, which is visible in the flesh. (29) But he is a Jew who is so in what is hidden: and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter, whose praise is not from men, but from Elohim” (Rom. 2:28-29; AENT).

 

Without a circumcised heart, one’s worship of the Eternal becomes more about us, than it is about Yehovah. How so? Because again, the [uncircumcised] heart of humanity is deceptive and desperately wicked; it is diametrically opposed to the Ways of the Almighty (Jer. 17:9; Isa. 55:8).

 

But when we enter into an obedient covenant relationship with Yehovah, His Ruach haKodesh, takes our heart, even our will, and chips away the stony layers of it to expose the naked flesh therein. Whereby, He may then inscribe His Torah upon that fleshy table of the surrendered soul’s heart (Jer. 31:31; Heb. 8:6-13).

 

I believe Yah rejected Cain’s offering because Cain’s heart was not right. Cain quite conceivably possessed a rebellious heart and disposition that somehow resisted the Creator’s Will and even Purpose. It no doubt put Him at odds with the Creator.

 

Now, a great many contend that Cain’s offering was rejected by Yehovah because he failed to render a blood sacrifice unto Yehovah. He instead rendered unto Yehovah the fruits of his tilling labors.

 

I don’t know whether or not this is true; it’s possible I would imagine. Yah does not reveal clearly the reason why he rejected Cain’s offering. All I know is that Cain’s heart was not right and Abba knew it, as He called Cain out about it before Cain committed the murder. I don’t believe the issue here is about the form in which the sacrifice took. I believe it has to do with the state of the worshiper’s heart here. Abel’s heart was apparently right before Yehovah, while Cain’s heart was not.

 

The simple fact that Cain would carry out that which he did is evidence enough for me that he had a heart problem.

 

We can learn from the example of Cain even today. For I submit to you that we cannot truly worship our Elohim and expect Him to accept our worship and praise if our hearts aren’t right. Scripture tells us that Yah turns His undivided attention to those who possess a broken spirit; a broken and contrite heart (Psa. 34:18; 51:17; Isa. 66:2). (I invite you to listen to our read our post entitled “A Broken Heart and Contrite Spirit Gets God’s Attention—STAR 67” to gain a more in-depth understanding of the relationship that exists between the state of one’s heart and their relationship with Yehovah.)

 

Beloved, if we truly seek to have our worship and our spiritual offerings accepted by Yah, we must endeavor to get our hearts right with the Eternal. It begins with our dying to self and surrendering fully to His Will. And so, we in effect must bring our hearts to Him so that He can inscribe His Torah on it. And if we are successful doing that, Yah will take care of the rest and before we know it, our worship of Yehovah will be where it’s supposed to be because our worship will be led by the Ruach haKodesh, and our walk will reflect our covenant relationship with Yehovah, such that we image Him in all the earth!

Usury-Interest According to God (YHVH)

The Practice of Usury Prohibited How does God/YHVH rule on the practice of usury or exacting of interest on monetary loans by His elect? We find in Torah Reading 61 (according to our “triennial reading cycle-- Torah Reading 61--Exodus 22:25-31 ) the prohibition...

read more

The Critical Role Faith Play in the Prayer Life of a Messianic

The prayer lives of many members in the Hebrew Roots-Messianic Community are ineffective and have little to no associated power. In this installment of TMTO, we look at the role faith places in a Netzari’s prayer life and how faith can transform our prayers, when properly aligned with God’s Word and His Holy Spirit, into a powerful and effective tool for the Body of Messiah. 

read more

Paul’s Bold Stand Against Anti-Torah Teachings in the Ephesian Church—Part 15 of the Paul and Hebrew Roots Series

Why did Paul insert the creation story and the fall of man into 1 Timothy? Was it, as convention erroneously teaches, the reason women must not teach and preach in the Church? The answer to this question will shock you and cause you to appreciate battle Paul faced against Gnosticism in the Ephesian Assemblies of Messiah. This is Part 15 of our Paul and Hebrew Roots Series.

read more

Who is to Blame for the Sin of the World? Adam or Eve?” STAR-2-A Discussion of Genesis 2:4-3:24

INTRODUCTION

This is Sabbath Thoughts and Reflections 2—A Discussion of Genesis 2:4-3:24—Parashah 2 in our 3-year Torah Reading Cycle. Since the rabbis did not have a hand in naming the individual Torah Readings in the 3-year Reading Cycles, for the sake of reference, I’ve named this discussion: “Who is to Blame for the Sins of the World? Adam or Eve?”

 

There’s a lot of content to draw from this reading. So much so that a full in-depth study of this passage would take hours upon hours to conduct. There’s just so much. In-depth study of each passage/verse would entail one looking at each of the various concepts; topics; issues; conducting word studies; examining the Hebrew wording; lexiconal studies; etc. Our purpose here today is not to conduct an in-depth study of this Torah Reading, but rather, conduct an overview of what happened here during the early days of humanity.

 

Indeed, this reading contains a number of themes that we could spend countless hours discussing. But for our purposes, we want to only touch upon just a handful of salient points of interests in our discussion from which you may be led to conduct your own in-depth study.

 

The other thing I need to point out before we launch into today’s discussion is that we must always keep in mind that each of our Torah Readings ultimately point us to our Master Yahoshua HaMashiyach. Thus, whenever we discuss and study Torah, we should be compelled to look beyond the rote and see Mashiyach’s ultimate purpose and work on behalf of humanity. This is one of the things that separates us from our Jewish cousins when it comes to our focus of Torah.

 

I will be reading from the Robert Alter Translation of Torah.

 

 

2:4This is the tale (some English translations render tale as generations) of the heavens and the earth when they were created (or rather, this is how the heavens and the earth came to be).

 

Generations=towledah {to-led-aw}=course of history. History=CJB; story=NAB; NIV, NAS, NET=account; YLT=births

 

Something to consider here at the outset of our reading is: From whom did Moshe receive this accounting of creation? Obviously, Moshe was not present to witness the Creation that he was inspired to record by the Ruach of Elohim. Which leaves the answer being: From the Words of Yehovah (Heb. 11:3). YHVH certified Moshe and we by faith believe this account.

 

2.5—On the day YHVH Elohim made earth and heavens, no shrub of the field being yet on the earth and no plant of the field yet sprouted, for YHVH Elohim had not cause rain to fall on the earth and there was no human to till the soil,

 

It is suggested here that Yah created/recreated the earth to be tended to by his human creation.

 

2.6and wetness would well from the earth to water all the surface of the soil,

 

2.7YHVH Elohim fashioned the human, humus from the soil (I.e., “human,” from the soil, “ ‘adamah”), and blew into his nostrils the breath of life, and the human became a living creature.

 

Yehovah formed (yatsar as opposed to ‘asah, which means to make) Adam (or man) from the soil of the ground.

 

YHVH breathed into Adam’s nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living soul/creature/being/person.

 

The Targum Onkelos renders=breathed upon Adam’s face the breath of lives, and it became in Adam a discoursing (a speaking) spirit.

 

The Targum Onkelos is the official Aramaic translation to/of Torah. It is accepted as an authoritative translation of Torah and thought to have been written in the early 2nd century C.E. The content of this work stems back to Ezra’s time. However, it was later forgotten by the Jewish nation. It was re-recorded by Onkelos, a famous convert to Judaism (~35-120 C.E.).

 

Interestingly, we find in Jasher–1:2—Elohim forms man from the ground, blows into him the breath of life, and man becomes a living soul that is endowed with speech.

 

So, there’s this underlying emphasis in the Jewish mind that Adam is a formed being who is gifted with speech.

 

 

Part and parcel of Adam being the imager of YHVH was his imputed speaking or discoursing spirit. The concept of imaging YHVH stems back to our STAR 1 discussion of Genesis 1:26-27.

 

From the “mean materials” of the earth the Creator was able to form a truly remarkable human structure that the Psalmist described aptly:

 

I will give thanks unto thee; For I am fearfully and wonderfully made: Wonderful are thy works; And that my soul knoweth right well. (Psa 139:14 ASV)

 

From the moist ground man was formed by Yehovah. The passage at this early juncture of our reading sets the stage for what would become one of Adam’s created purposes or divinely ordained tasks. Yah makes man from the moist soil of Eden and relocates him to the Garden which is in Eden proper. It is there in the Garden that Yah tasks the man to tend/till/dress and guard the Garden (2:15).

 

2:8And YHVH Elohim planted a garden in Eden, to the east, and He placed there the human He had fashioned.

 

So, it appears evident from this verse that Yehovah did not create or form Adam in the Garden of Eve. Yah in fact established, or as the text is interpreted in most English translations Yah planted a garden in Eden. The Garden was a self-contained place in Eden. The actual physical location of Eden has been a subject of great controversy and mystery for centuries and many self-professing scholars and experts have persuaded many that they indeed know the location of Eden or the Garden. But the truth of the matter is that no one truly knows where Eden is, if it is in fact a place that still exists here on earth. It does seem evident, however, that the Garden where Yehovah placed the man and his woman, was a place where Yehovah would train, commune and even test His human creation. I would go so far as to propose that the Garden of Eden, if not the whole or portions of Eden proper, hosted a manifestation of the Kingdom of Elohim. For where Yehovah’s presence dwells, there we find His Kingdom. For we find Yehovah is described as walking in the garden in the cool of the evening to commune with Adam in 3:8. Nevertheless, it is safe to presume that Eden existed at some point in the vast regions of Mesopotamia. And the interesting thing about Eden likely existing in Mesopotamia is that ancient Babylon also existed in that region of the world. Clearly, the enemy is about counterfeiting the works of Yehovah wherever they possibly can. For if Eden was conceivably an extension of Yehovah’s Kingdom here on earth, Babylon, located in the same general region of the world, would be the earthly birthplace and headquarters of the Kingdom of Darkness. I just found that to be interesting.

 

In the Ancient Book of Jubilees–There is a sense of the garden being a holy place; a dwelling place of Yehovah. Thus, only the pure could enter and remain (3:13). There is also a sense that certain angels were given instructional charge over the couple in the Garden (3:16).

 

2:9—And YHVH Elohim caused to sprout from the soil every tree lovely to look at and good for food, and the tree of life was in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge, good and evil.

 

The only thing we’re told about the Garden in terms of its composition is that it hosted every type of tree that was pleasant to look at and that bore good fruit, as well as the centrally grown trees of “The Tree of Life,” and the “Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.” And like so many of the elements surrounding this story, the spiritual significance of these two trees could certainly occupy our minds for a number of discussions. But we’ll save that discussion for another time Abba willing. I will say, however, that the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil could be viewed as a test element for Yah’s human creation. The one thing we know about our Elohim is that He often tests those who would be His. He tested Avraham a number of times throughout Avraham’s lifetime; as well as Abba tested Yisra’el throughout her wilderness sojourning.

 

Now, I get it that some take umbrage with the thought that Yah tests His human creation. Well, from a humanistic standpoint, it of course would appear that when Yah puts His human creation to a test He is setting her up for failure. But that’s not the case at all. To begin with, we know that Yehovah is sovereign, and He is privy to deal with His creation anyway that His holy and righteous character leads Him. Secondly, Yah respects humanity’s freewill. He will not force Him or His Ways on His human creation. So, He gives humanity the freedom of choosing whether or not they will adhere to His instructions and keep His Ways.

 

Thirdly, Yah provides His human creation the opportunity to prove its allegiance—its obedience to and total dependence upon Him and His Ways. And in so doing, Yah will graciously engage His human creation in a relationship. The process by which Father certifies whether an individual is suited to enter into a relationship with Him is by searching their heart and ascertaining their intent: Jeremiah 11:20; 17:10; 20:12; Rom. 8:27; 1 Sam. 16:7; Psa. 139:23. In the case of Adam and Eve and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, the couple was faced with an easy choice: To stay within the confines of the relationship they enjoyed with the Almighty, or seek to alter the parameters of that relationship. Turns out that the serpent (aka, the nachash) had figured out that the couple would most certainly entertain becoming something other than that which Yehovah had originally established in and for them (e.g., abandoning their created purpose as imagers of Yehovah in the earth). They chose to be like the gods (i.e., the angels or demigods of the earth). And thus, their (and by extension all unconverted humanity’s) hearts are not suitable for the covenant relationship Yehovah seeks to have with them.

 

In the midst of the Garden, the Creator established two trees: (1) The Tree of Life, and (2) The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. (Interestingly, the Targum Onkelos renders the title of these trees as the Tree of Lives and the Tree of whose fruit they who eat know between good and evil. The LXX renders the second tree as the tree of learning the knowledge of good and evil.) As our story progresses, it would seem that these two trees, in the midst of a Garden that was filled to overflowing with every conceivable and inconceivable food for the couple to enjoy and subsist on, would serve as elements to test the spiritual resolve of the couple (I.e., the obedience of the couple; the couple’s willingness to remain entirely dependent upon Yehovah as their sustainer and sovereign).

 

I often wonder whether the Tree of Life provided the couple the means by which they would be physically sustained indefinitely. If so, this would clearly support the contention that humanity was not designed in its physical form to live forever without the nutrients provided by the Tree of Life. In other words, it was Yehovah that would provide the couple indefinite life through this tree if they remained in covenant relationship with Him. For their life was not inherent in their being—in their make-up.

 

Interestingly, one of the great prophesies found in the Book of Revelation entails of this same Tree of Life in the World Tomorrow, providing sustenance and healing to the nations; a feature of the New Jerusalem (Rev. 2:7; 22:2, 14).

 

2:10Now, a river runs out of Eden to water the garden and from there splits off into four streams.

 

2:11The name of the first is Pishon, the one that winds through the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold.

 

2:12And the gold of that land is goodly, bdellium is there, and lapis lazuli.

 

2:13And the name of the second river is Gihon, the one that winds through all the land of Cush.

 

2:14—And the name of the third river is Tigris, the one that goes to the east of Ashur.

 

2:15—And YHVH Elohim took the human and set him down in the garden of Eden to till it and watch it.

 

Here we read of Yehovah placing Adam in the Garden. There is a hint of the Garden being a sacred place—a set-apart place in the earth. I would go so far as to suggest that the Garden at that time was an iteration or manifestation of the Kingdom of Yehovah. It’s conceivable that it was here that Adam learned specifically how Yehovah was to be worshiped and communicated with by His human creation. Some commentators have suggested that Adam was a priest unto Yehovah in the Garden. (Something to think about.)

 

So, in addition to His tending/dressing/tilling and guarding of the Garden, I would suggest that Adam and Eve (aka Chavah) would have engaged in worship of Yehovah accordingly.

 

The other thing to bear in mind here is that the Garden belonged to Yehovah, not to the man and his woman, despite their being given dominion of the rest of creation (Gen. 13:10; Eze. 28:13).

 

 

2:16—And YHVH Elohim commanded the human, saying, “From every fruit of the garden you may surely eat.

 

2:17But from the tree of knowledge, good and evil, you shall not eat, for on the day you eat from it, you are doomed to die.”

 

The first recorded Torah commandment given to humanity with a prescribed penalty (which turns out to be the prescribed penalty for all sin), which is of course death—both physical and spiritual death.

 

 

2:18—And YHVH Elohim said, “It is not good for the human to be alone, I shall make him a sustainer beside him.” (The phrase Alter uses as “sustainer beside him” is from the Hebrew phrase “ ‘ezer kenegdo”, which denotes more accurately a counterpart that comes alongside the man to actively work with him as well as work on his behalf.)

 

2:19—And YHVH Elohim fashioned from the soil each beast of the field and each fowl of the heavens and brought each to the human to see what he would call it, and whatever the human called a living creature, that was its name. (Take note the importance Abba places on naming and names.)

 

2:20—And the human called names of all the cattle and to the fowl of the heavens and to all the beasts of the field, but for the human no sustainer beside him was found. (Note how Alter’s translation emphasizes not just the naming of the animal creation, but also the fact that Yehovah had made His animal creation to exist in pairs or groups. The “sustainer beside him” is repeated once again to emphasize the reality that the man was alone without a sustainer beside him at this stage of creation.)

 

2:21And YHVH Elohim cast a deep slumber on the human, and he slept, and He took one of his ribs and closed over the flesh where it had been,

 

Here’s something to ponder: Why did Yehovah use a rib from the man to build the woman? Many have surmised and speculated. But the text does not provide any clear answer to this question.

 

 

2:22—and YHVH Elohim built the rib He had taken from the human into a woman and He brought her to the human. (Note that YHVH, as He did with the man, fashioned, or built the woman. Humanity was the one element of the Eternal’s creation that He personally formed and fashioned. It stands to reason that man is uber special to the Creator.

 

A special note as it relates to this verse: We find in The Ancient Book of Jubilees–3:8—that Eve was formed in the 2nd week of Creation history.

 

2:23And the human said: “This one at last, bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh, This one shall be called Woman, for from man was this one taken.”

 

The bringing together of the man and his woman in the Garden was viewed by our Master as the divine institution of marriage (Mat. 19:4-5; Eph. 5:28) [Reference my teaching on marriage and divorce series].

 

The formation of the woman comes about during and in response to the animal naming project that the Creator gave to Adam to perform. It is the first time during this creation period that Father recognized something was amiss; that “it was not good” for man to be alone. Recall that throughout the creation week, Abba recognized that His creation/re-creation was “tov,” or good. And on the sixth day of creation, after He had made man, the Creator acknowledged that His creation up to this point was “me-od tov,” or “very good.” In other words, everything that Yehovah created/re-created was as it should be; it was in its proper place and fulfilling its respective, created purpose; and this would include Adam. Indeed, order had displaced the chaos of Genesis 1:1-3.

 

However, we see here that Father recognized that Adam was not able to complete His divinely given purpose alone (2:17-18). The man in fact required an equal partner, or as the KJV describes or titles, a “help-meet.”

 

Thus, the woman was formed from the rib of the man. And when the Creator brings the woman to Adam, he responds with poetic approval. For it was provided unto him by Yehovah, from this point moving forward, a being with whom He could engage in discourse; with whom he could be at oneness with; with whom he could work with to keep and guard the Garden; with whom He could worship Yehovah in ways that he alone could not achieve (reference my post on Biblical Marriage).

 

2:24Therefore does a man leave his father and his mother and cling to his wife and they become one flesh.

 

2:25And the two of them were naked, the human and his woman, and they were not ashamed.(Note the fact that the text emphasizes to us that the two were both naked and neither of them were ashamed, highlights the innocence and purity that existed in humanity at this pre-fall juncture of human history. Like young children who are not conscious of their nakedness at bath time for instance, the purity and innocence of little children is the state of being that Yahoshua is calling us back to in order for us to be admitted into the Kingdom of Heaven (Mat. 18:3). I’m not talking about nakedness, but the innocence and purity that children bring to our lives. We are thusly called to Teshuva: Back to that place of innocence our first parents had in the Garden before their fall.

 

Yehovah declares that is was not good for Adam, the man, to be alone. And we see here at this juncture of our reading that Yehovah is an Elohim of completeness. Adam initially was not paired with a like being, as was the animal creation. It’s possible Yehovah up to this point was preparing the man for proper social interaction with his soon coming help-meet. It’s not entirely clear in the text.

 

The Targum Onkelos of this passage describes Adam/ the man as having or possessing a “discoursing spirit”—a character trait that yearns for interaction and social connectedness; companionship. The man no doubt observed the animal creation in terms of companionship within the framework of their respective species. The man’s discoursing spirit facilitates his naming and classifying/cataloging the animal creation. Then when the woman is brought to him, he would be prepared to have meaningful interactions with her, no doubt just as He had with the Creator in the cool of each day. I guess the only question I have to this theory is: How would Eve have been prepared for her side of that social interaction with Adam? Did she come into their marriage relationship inherently possessing that interactive ability; or would Adam have had to teach her how to interact and communicate with not only him, but Elohim. Seems this is a likely possibility. But again, we can only surmise from what we have before us in our text.

 

 

3:1—Now, the serpent was most cunning of all the beasts of the field that YHVH Elohim had made. And he said to the woman, “Thought Elohim said, you shall not eat from any tree of the garden—”

 

This creature, materially a serpent according to the text, has the capacity to converse with Eve. Whether or not Yah’s animal creation at the time had the capacity to converse with Yah’s human creation is not evident in this text. However, in the Ancient Book of Jubilees, there is mention that Yah’s animal creation possessed the ability to speak (Ancient Book of Jubilees 3:28). I won’t mention any more on that, other than to say that it would seem this creature was the instrument of a higher spiritual power, most likely that of hasatan; Lucifer (Joh. 8:44; 1 Joh. 3:8; Rev. 20:2). I believe this is the most important thing as it relates to the serpent as we move further along in our discussion.

 

We certainly see the same MO (motus operandi) of the enemy being employed here in our text, as was repeated in his tempting of our Master in the Judean wilderness—Matthew 4:3: The asking of a question that challenges the integrity and veracity of the Word(s) of Yehovah. Since Yehovah had fashioned just the two-humans, unlike the form the tempter took to test our Master in the Judean wilderness–he (hasatan) had few options to manifest himself as, which no doubt led to his choosing to use the most cunning—the most subtle, in the Hebrew “ ‘aruwm”—of Yah’s creatures to effect the deception.

 

Given that Yehovah is all knowing, He would have known this would or was going to happen. He in fact allowed it to happen; the using of a member of His animal creation to effect the transgression.

 

The crafty serpent directly approached Chavah as opposed to Adam. Why? Most likely due to the woman’s diminished sophistication. For all we know, the serpent may have previously attempted to sway the man but was unsuccessful. We just don’t know, other than the fact that he successfully beguiled the woman. (As a dear friend of mine in the Faith is so fond of saying, “we don’t know what we don’t know.”)

 

The serpent brings into question the Creator’s righteousness—The Creator’s intent—The Creator’s integrity. Isn’t that how the enemy works even today in each of our lives? Does he not set out to convince us that that which we desire for ourselves that is contrary to Yehovah’s will for us is okay for us to have because in the end, Yehovah is going to give us a free pass into the Kingdom, right? He seeks to convince us that we deserve that thing we lust for; the evil behaviors and baggage we cling to; the evil thoughts and feelings we keep going back to; the bad relationships and enterprises that we seek to enter into and maintain and that beset us; that if we are to be truly happy in this life, we must rely on ourselves and have those contrary things that prop up our depraved lives. For life in Messiah, according to the voice of the enemy, is truly not a happy one. And so, the enemy targets those weak points in each of us that cause us to be susceptible to his and his seeds’ wiles—their tactics—their methodia. That’s why Shaul taught his Ephesian readers to put on the whole of Yehovah’s armor so that we may effectively ward off the attacks of the enemy (Eph. 6:10).

 

3:2—And the woman said to the serpent, “From the fruit of the garden’s trees we may eat, (Alter’s translation gives a sense of a statement being put forth by the serpent to the woman that the woman effectively cuts off in mid-sentence. It’s as if the woman wanted to correct the serpent right at the start of the questioning, as if she was correcting the serpent’s understanding of the situation. This would give credence to her understanding of Yehovah’s commandment surrounding that tree. Or does it?)

 

 

3:3—But from the fruit of the tree in the midst of the garden Elohim has said, ‘You shall not eat from it and you shall die.’” (Many commentators have gone to great lengths to point out that the woman added to Yah’s commandment, which we know from Torah, is a no-no in and of itself. If this is indeed the case, the woman was already dead, as she would be proved wrong by the serpent in short order.)

 

Could Chavah (aka Eve) have had a diminished understanding of the prohibition surrounding the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil; that there may have been some altered understanding, such that she believed the tree and its fruit were deleterious (even physically poisonous) to the wellbeing of the couple? Remember that she described the prohibition or commandment in such a global sense, that they weren’t even able to “touch the tree lest they die.” Such a thing does not change the fact that the couple was prohibited from eating of the fruit of that tree in the first place. But the text does lend to a sense that Eve possessed a diminished understanding of the tree and its prohibition; or at the very least, since Adam had been around longer than she, he knew more than her about the tree and prohibition surrounding it.

 

And so, in my mind, it stands to reason that the serpent demonstrated to her that the tree was physically safe for her to partake of its fruit. And we can see how a diminished understanding to the prohibition could certainly lead to her transgressing the command, albeit, more accurately, she being deceived. Which by extension offers us the lesson that our understanding of Yehovah’s instructions in righteousness might be lacking in some areas and places in our respective walks. But we are still responsible for adhering to that which we know to be true; to stay the course until such time we are informed of Yehovah otherwise.

 

 

3:4And the serpent said to the woman, “You shall not be doomed to die.

 

Seems to me that Eve possessed some degree of an understanding of what it would mean for them—or any human for that matter—to die.

 

It seems rational to conclude that in order for the couple to understand the implications of transgressing the commandment not to eat of the forbidden tree, they would surely have to understand what it meant to die. So, at some point, it would seem that the couple was taught this concept of death and dying, either by Yehovah Himself or a messenger—an angel maybe. Knowing the consequences of transgressing this commandment would certainly put to the test the couple’s hearts and their loyalty to their Creator. And for the couple to risk everything they possessed by transgressing the Almighty’s commandment regarding the Tree, we will see here in the next in a couple verses that Eve (and possibly Adam) developed a level of trust in the serpent. It’s quite conceivable, at least to me, that this creature was a regular guest or visitor of the Garden. The serpent no doubt had studied and gained an understanding of its target–what drove them; what inspired them; what they knew and what they did not know. I would venture to even submit that the creature had regular conversations with the couple leading up to this point in the story. Indeed, there’s a lot of information we don’t have here. And for all we know, this leaving certain bits of information out of the text was intentional on the part of our Elohim.

 

 

3:5—For Elohim knows that on the day you eat of it your eyes will be opened and you will become as gods knowing good and evil.” (Who are these gods the serpent is referring to here? Is it possible that these so-called gods were elohim or angels that the couple routinely saw transiting about the Garden from time-to-time? If indeed the Garden was an extension of the Kingdom of Elohim, the transiting of these beings were likely a source of great curiosity for Eve. So, it stands to reason that Eve understood what the serpent was trying to sell to her by virtue of her knowing what gods were. And when the opportunity was put forth to her to be like them simply by taking of the forbidden fruit, it was no doubt a done deal in her heart and mind.)

 

The enemy assures his victim that she and her husband would not be punished as the Creator had warned—the serpent basically calling the Creator a bold-faced liar—and more so, the serpent entices the woman by extolling the benefits they as a couple would enjoy if they partook of the forbidden fruit; such that their eyes would be opened and they would be like the elohim or the gods (conceivably the angels the couple no doubt became used to seeing during their time in the Garden).

 

3:6And the woman saw that the tree was good for eating and that it was lust to the eyes (desirable) and the tree was lovely to look at, and she took of its fruit and ate, and she also gave to her man, and he ate.

 

Yah did not, as the serpent erroneously put forth to Eve, set out to keep the so-called knowledge of the gods (I.e., elohim) from the couple. Obviously, knowing what we know of the character of our Creator, this illusive knowledge would come to the couple and their descendants in due time as Yah saw fit to do so. But at this juncture of human history, it was not Yah’s will for that information to be had by the couple, nor was it hasatan’s to give.

 

Interestingly, it was the belief and warped position of certain first-century Jewish Gnostic sects, that Eve was the heroine of humanity, and thus she was to be worshiped as a goddess of sorts. For Eve, according to these gnostics, was able to see through the Creator’s deceptive ways with the serpent’s help (I.e., Yehovah sought to withhold the knowledge of the universe from His human creation out of jealousy and fear). These contended that such knowledge rightfully belonged to humanity. This evil doctrine was obviously a nascent—an early form of “humanism” (I.e., the worship and exaltation of humanity).

 

The Ancient Book of Jubilees’ accounting of the beguiling of Eve is somewhat restrictive, focused on Eve as the reason for the season. The serpent approached her and tricked or beguiled her into transgressing Yah’s instruction. She ate and saw she was naked, covered her nakedness, and she afterwards gives Adam the forbidden fruit, which he ultimately eats, realizes he’s naked, sews himself an apron of fig leaves and covers his nakedness (3:21-24).

 

3:7—And the eyes of the two were opened, and they knew they were naked, and they sewed fig leaves and made themselves loincloths. (Question: Did the fruit cause some biological reaction within the couple to cause their eyes to be opened to the fact that they were naked and that they were in a heap of trouble? Some contend this to be the case, while others like me are not so sure. The text does not in any way provide an answer to this probing question.)

 

Here’s something to ponder: Was this Garden experiment more a test for Eve or for Adam? Because obviously Eve was not as sophisticated as Adam. She was in what I would describe a vulnerable state. She was prime for being deceived; beguiled. That being the case, it could be said that she ended up being a steppingstone by which Adam would transgress the commandment of Yehovah. Hasatan will use the very people in our lives to cause us to fall; to slip up. From time-to-time we may find ourselves in a vulnerable position where the people we know and love the most are used by the enemy to trip us up and lead us to yield to a temptation and transgress Abba’s instructions in righteousness. Thus, I believe the target in this case was Adam, more than Eve. It was Adam that transgressed Yehovah’s commandment, whereas Eve was deceived (1 Tim. 2:13-14).

 

I would think it is something to consider the relationships we have in our lives and what significance we place in those relationships in comparison to our relationship with Yehovah. It was Master who told His followers that if they weren’t willing or able to give up competing relationships in their lives (priority-wise) to follow Him, then they would be unfit to be His disciples (Luk. 14:26).

 

Now, Master wasn’t saying to abandon spousal and family relationships. We cannot walk away from our marriages or close families because we’ve entered into a covenant relationship with the Almighty, unless we are faced with extreme situations that threaten our peace and our walk with Messiah (1 Cor. 7:15). Father still holds us responsible for fulfilling our family obligations. And this is not just fulfilling those obligations begrudgingly. We must fulfill those obligations with sincere loving kindness (Col. 3:19; Tit. 2:4). We have to learn to biblically prioritize how we walk out those relationships in association with our relationship with Yah. You see, we have a problem when we put human relationships ahead of our relationship with Father and our Master, whereby those human relationship become priority in our lives. We’re required to give up everything for Yehovah and our Master Yeshua, while at the same time loving and taking care of our families. If we are walking in a biblically-based marriage or family relationship, our covenant relationship with Yehovah will have us die to self, such that we seek to love and serve Yehovah first and foremost, and then also seek to love and serve our family members in accordance with Yah’s Ways. We cannot allow, however, our family members to dictate to us how we serve, worship, and obey our Elohim.

 

This story shows us that Adam elected to put His woman before Yehovah. His doing so led to dire results, not just for Adam and Eve, but also for the whole of humanity. We men must learn from Adam’s transgression and listen to and obey Yehovah. None of this is to say that we shouldn’t serve our spouses or parents or whoever as is our responsibility as Godly-husbands and Children of Yah. But when a loved one demands we not do something Yehovah has directed us to do, we must learn to lovingly handle that situation and do that which we’ve been instructed to do by the Eternal.

 

 

3:8—And they heard the sound of YHVH Elohim walking about in the garden in the evening breeze, and the human and his woman hid from YHVH Elohim in the midst of the trees of the garden.

 

3:9—And YHVH Elohim called to the human and said to him, “Where are you?”

 

3:10And he said, “I heard Your sound in the garden and I was afraid, for I was naked, and I hid.” (Note here that the man did not confess nor ask for immediate forgiveness of his transgression. He instead framed a convoluted admission that there existed a problem: that he was afraid being found by the Creator without clothing—being found naked.)

 

 

3:11From the tree I commanded you not to eat have you eaten?”

 

3:12—And the human said, “The woman whom you gave by me, she gave me from the tree, and I ate.” (Note here the blame game is learned and played. Was this an effect of the forbidden fruit?)

 

The pair gave the Creator an evasive confession of their transgression. There was no true repentance of their transgression. Instead, when the Eternal questions the pair for purposes of fully unpacking the details of their transgression, the evasive confession turns into a blame-game.

 

The man blames Yehovah—”the woman you gave me…” (3:12). Interestingly, Adam was willing to save his own neck by throwing his beloved under the proverbial bus: She’s the one who caused me to violate your commandment. We see clearly spelled out here that Adam was not inclined to come to the defense of his woman, by taking responsibility for his role in the transgression.

 

 

3:13And YHVH Elohim said to the woman, “What is this you have done? And the woman said, “The serpent beguiled me and I ate.”

 

Conversely, the woman turns and blames the serpent who apparently was too arrogant or foolish to flee the scene before the Poh Poh arrived.

 

The physical creature that was the serpent was consigned to a perpetually loathsome state on the earth; no doubt a significant reduction from the elevated original state of being, to a state of crawling/slithering about on the ground and poetically, eating the dust of the earth upon which it moved. The spiritual entity that fueled the physical serpent to perpetrate the deed against Eve would ultimately lose his exalted and powerful state and die like humans, through the agency of the seed of the very subject of his assault—the seed of the woman that would bruise its head (cf. Psa. 82:7).

 

3:15—Enmity will I set between you and the woman, between your seed and hers. He will boot your head and you will bite his heel.”

 

There would arise a particularly nasty war between the enemy (hasatan) and the woman. No doubt women throughout the whole of human history have had to especially endure perpetual tribulation at the hands of men (some of whom actually use this passage and text to justify their heinous and evil treatment of women). And let me also include children in this equation—the woman’s seed—are the two classes of humanity that are most pursued, attacked and assaulted and tribulated against by the serpent (the nachash) and his seed (both the spiritual and human). The penultimate seed in this prophecy is of course Yahoshua Messiah and those who would, through Mashiyach, become sons of the Most High (reference the dragon being enraged in the end times and setting out to destroy the woman and her seed—Revelation 12:17).

 

The enemy, ignorant of the precise details of the Eternal’s Plan for Salvation, Redemption and Restoration, would bruise—afflict Mashiyach’s physical body (at the execution stake), but ultimately the seed of the woman (haMashiyach) prevails/conquers death and the grave by the agency of the Creator’s Rauch HaKodesh—that same powerful agency that brought order out of chaos and re-created the earth and all therein. And once and for all the seed of the woman will defeat the enemy and humanity will be restored to the state and purpose in which it was originally created for (Rev. 20:10)! Praise Yah!

 

3:16—To the woman He said, “I will terribly sharpen your birth pangs, in pain shall you bear children. And for your man shall be your longing, and he shall rule over you.”

 

This signaled an end to the man’s pleasurable tilling and tending duties in the Garden, and the beginning of a laborious, arduous, and even painful life of turmoil; the man having to battle against thorns and thistles in order to grow and gather enough food to sustain him and his family. And this penalty would persist until the time when man would return to that which he was made—the ground.

 

At that time, Adam and Eve began the moderately slow, be certain process of dying. Interestingly, the Ancient Book of Jubilees gives an interesting perspective on this. The writer notes that 1,000-years is as a day to Yehovah and the court of heaven, and vice versa. Well, turns out that Adam died at the age of 930, just 70-years shy of 1,000-years, or rather, a day in Yehovah’s eyes (Jubilees 4:29-30; Gen. 5:5). And so, it turns out that Yehovah was right on the money when He described the couple’s death as being in the day they partook of the forbidden fruit that they would surely die (2:17). They were, thereafter, denied access to the Tree of Life, which if they had access, would have resulted in a whole host of issues and concerns that extend beyond the confines of our discussion here today.

 

It is here, however, that we have before us, a foretaste of Yehovah’s saving grace: The promise of the Mashiyach that would restore all of creation to its original state, with humankind being restored to the “cool of the day fellowship and relationship with the Creator of the Universe.”

 

The one who was deceived and who introduced sin and death to the human equation, would ultimately bring forth reconciliation and whole life to humanity (1 Tim. 2:15).

 

3:17—And to the human He said, “Because you listened to the voice of your wife and ate from the tree that I commanded you, ‘You shall not eat from it,’ cursed be the soil for your sake, with pangs shall you eat from it all the days of your life.

 

3:18—Thorn and thistle shall it sprout for you and you shall eat the plants of the  field. (Note here that Abba was effectively establishing a vegan diet to humanity until such time that He would reverse His prohibition on the consumption of meat (Gen. 9:3). It is quite conceivable that Abba needed the population of clean animals that could be consumed as food by His human creation to multiply to adequate levels before giving the couple and their descendants the go ahead to start eating meat. Just a thought.)

 

3:19By the sweat of your brow shall you eat bread till you return to the soil, for from there were you taken, for dust you are and to dust shall you return.” (Note: a sobering reminder of whence we all come. A stark contrast to the translated body we will receive when our Master returns and establishes His Millennial Kingdom here on earth. We will be like Him (Rom. 8:29; 2 Cor. 3:18; Phi. 3:21; Col. 3:4; 1 Joh. 3:2)

 

3:20And the human called his woman’s name Eve, for she was the mother of all that lives.

 

Thus, as she would ultimately be the mother of the life-giver, Yahoshua Messiah, these would be those who would become sons of Yehovah and enter into life everlasting.

 

3:21And YHVH Elohim made skin coats for the human and his woman, and He clothed them.

 

3:22And YHVH Elohim said, “Now that the human has become like one of us, knowing good and evil, he may reach out and take as well from the tree of life and live forever.” (Note here the fascination Father had with his human creation’s capacity to imagine and do. There was genuine concern that the couple would develop enough sophistication to know they had to partake of the Tree of Life to stave off death. The thought of humanity living forever in their depraved state is the epitome of the return of chaos to the world.)

 

3:23—And YHVH Elohim sent him from the garden of Eden to till the soil from which he had been taken.

 

 

3:24And He drove out the human and set up east of the garden of Eden the cherubim and the flame of the whirling sword to guard the way to the tree of life. (Note: Yehovah employed one of His Cherubim to do the job that Adam failed to do, which was to guard the Garden.)

 

These being the same species of creatures that guard Yehovah’s heavenly throne (Eze. 10).

 

Overview Thoughts and Reflections

 

One of the central themes of this Torah Reading has to do with “willing dependence.” Independence is a by-product of the human heart: The earnest desire to be independent of Yehovah; willing and able to make its own decisions and its own way. This is common to the sinful mind, heart and soul. The pursuit of independence by Yehovah’s human creation flies contrary to the purpose by which Yehovah created us. We cannot fulfill our original purpose as imagers of Yehovah in the earth if we are bent upon being independent.

 

It is a common practice for us to train our children, for instance, to become independent of us, their parents, so that they may survive and make a way for themselves in the world and not be dependent upon us as their providers and sustainers. This is indeed a Hebraic concept that is endorsed by Yehovah:

 

The writer of Proverbs counseled that one train up their children in the way they should go so that when they become adults, they will not depart from that way (Pro. 22:6).

 

The Hebrew way of training up one’s child is holistic in nature: You train the child in the family trade/business/skills/etc. (e.g., the apostle Shaul was trained in his family’s trade of making goat-hair tents-Act. 18:1-3) in association with daily training in Torah and the ways of the True Faith once delivered. What this holistic approach to training children would ultimately lead to is a child that would grow up being able to engage in a career that would provide income for his/her family, all the while cognizant that one’s sustenance and increase (I.e., income) comes only from the one who grants him/her the strength/power to make wealth (Deu. 8:18).

 

We see manifested in Yehovah’s punishment and edicts handed down to the fallen couple, His mercy and His righteous judgment. As it related to Yah’s righteous judgment, Yah sentenced the man and his descendants to work for their sustenance—I.e., by the sweat of his brow would man physically subsist/live—until they died. The mercy of Yah is manifested in His (1) not outright killing the couple for their transgression; (2) providing a means by which they could sustain themselves outside the garden; and (3) a way back to the relationship the couple enjoyed in the Garden with the Creator, which would ultimately be accomplished through the personal ministry of Y’shua HaMashiyach.

 

In each of these manifestations of Yehovah’s mercy, and even in his righteous judgment, Yah would provide Adam and his descendants the perpetual reminder that their lives are always dependent upon Him. Humanity in and of itself is incapable of sustaining itself (Psa. 121:2).

 

 

Idolatry at its core seeks to disassociate humanity from its connection—its dependent relationship with the Creator, and redirect that dependency and repurpose that relationship with something or someone else. In the case of Adam and Eve, that dependency would be upon themselves—being wise and knowledgeable as the gods—the demigods (I.e., elohim). The relationship, by necessity, would also have to change with the change in dependency. The relationship would be one that would no longer be one of a Father and His Son, but one of equal beings; equal partners; independent partners if you will. Worship would transition from that of the Creator of the Universe to that of humanity; worship of self; to that of worship of knowledge; to that of worship of other entities.

 

The other problem associated with the couple’s transgression was the introduction of and acceptance of the falsehood that Yehovah is a liar; that He is deceptive; that He does not have the best interest of His human creation at heart. And this is part and parcel of the great lie that leads to humanism and paganism: The belief that Yehovah is holding something back from us and that that which He has declared will not come to pass. (Recall that we talked about this in our post “Let God be True and Every Man a Liar—A Messianic Discussion of Romans 3:3-4—this underlying belief in sinful man that Yah is not faithful nor is He Just and Righteous in His Ways.) This my friends is part and parcel of the very core of idolatry that so many have fallen for over the centuries. And this is why, in great part, we have denominationalism: The belief that man knows better than Yehovah, and thus man determines how He will worship the Eternal and how our relationship with the Almighty will look.

 

Thus, Adam became humanity’s representative in the earth. Interestingly, responsibility for sin in the world rests at the feet of Adam. Shaul informed the Roman Messianics that death came to humanity through the one man Adam, but life potentially comes to humanity through the one man Y’shua Messiah (Rom. 5:12-21). Therefore, it is Adam who ultimately holds responsibility for humanity’s depravity and desperate need for a savior.

 

Now, why was Eve not given the dubious distinction of being the progenitor of the human condition? I see it in light of Shaul’s clarity of Chavah (aka Eve) being deceived (aka, having been beguiled) by the serpent’s craftiness. I likened this perspective to the scenario whereby many seniors today fall victim to certain scams and financial schemes and are bilked of their life’s savings. Younger, more savvy individuals do not fall for these scammers’ schemes. Generally, the seniors that fall for such schemes aren’t sophisticated or knowledgeable enough of certain false business practices to ward off such criminals. So, these are prime for being beguiled or deceived by these crafty scammers. Conversely, the younger, more sophisticated population are aware of the risks associated with the scammers’ proposals and will generally resist the temptation to partake in their schemes. However, there are, from time-to-time, those of the more sophisticated lot who, for reasons usually associated with greed, will hedge their bets and go in with the scammers.

 

Now, we know that Adam was created first, then later came Eve. Shaul stated that Eve was deceived, not Adam (1 Tim. 2:14). It would seem safe to conclude that Adam was at least at a journeyman’s level of competency as it relates to understanding the full extent of Yehovah’s commandment regarding the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, while Eve could be described as being at an apprentice-level of competency. Thus, the fullest responsibility for the transgression, or at the very least, knowing better, falls to Adam. Again, Eve fell victim to the serpent’s craftiness. Adam, on the other hand, was not deceived (2 Cor. 11:3). He was just stupid. Yehovah rightly accused and convicted Adam for listening to his woman over that of the Words of Yehovah, His Creator (3:17).

 

The deception of Eve consisted of a small handful of elements: seeing that the forbidden fruit was actually good to eat; the forbidden fruit was appealing to the senses; and the forbidden fruit would ultimately make her as wise as the gods or elohim.

 

Adam’s transgression comes on the heel of Eve offering the forbidden fruit to him and then him eating that fruit. Turns out that Adam was present (”imah”) at the time the serpent was spinning his deceptive trap at Eve (3:6). Yet, Adam apparently remained silent, nor did he fulfill his Yah-given duty of guarding the Garden—maybe guarding the Garden from intruders like the serpent here. Ultimately, Adam capitulated and took of the forbidden fruit. Whether or not the man put up any resistance to any of this is not at all mentioned in the text.  But suffice to say, something within him (I.e., his heart) was not circumcised enough to resist his woman’s agenda that he eat of the fruit, or to obey Yehovah over the instructions of his woman.

 

Yehovah no doubt knew what had transpired between the serpent and the first-couple. Yet Yehovah came searching for the couple, no doubt as He customarily did, in as the text describes, the cool of the day (3:8). Clearly, this act on the part of our Elohim has so many facets and tremendous spiritual implications associated with it. The fact that Yehovah came in search of the couple, not in an aggressive, but rather in a loving manner speaks volumes to the love that Yehovah has for His human creation. Certainly, the Creator could have spoken and put an end to humanity the moment the couple partook of the forbidden fruit, but He didn’t. Instead, the Eternal came with opportunity in hand. He came and offered the couple an opportunity to explain what, why and how. In essence, the Almighty came to the fallen couple with the opportunity for redemption.

 

Soon thereafter, Yehovah slays an innocent animal and clothes the couple with suitable attire to cover their nakedness. This act, in and of itself, of course, speaks untold volumes in what I would describe as a prophetic shadow-picture of the sacrifice that our Master Yahoshua HaMashiyach would eventually make on behalf of fallen humanity; whose sacrifice—whose blood—would cleanse us from all unrighteousness, covering us so that we would not face the ultimate penalty for sin which is death (1 Joh. 1:9; Rom. 6:23). Despite the first Adam’s disobedience resulting in the depraved human condition, the last Adam’s obedience results in redemption and salvation and restoration for humanity (Rom. 5:19). And then in the Eternal’s passing of judgment upon each party of the crime, He prophecizes that although the woman being deceived launched this whole human depravity thing, humanity’s salvation would come via a woman’s conceiving/conception of Mashiyach (3:15). That same Mashiyach in addition to restoring humanity to its proper, original place of “me-od tov,” His ministry will destroy the serpent, the serpent’s seed and the serpents anti-Elohim agenda once and for all. Praise Yah!

 

The transgression in the Garden by the first couple resulted in a perpetual disruption of two levels of relationships: (1) The relationship humans would have with the Creator of the Universe; and (2) the relationship men would have with their wives. Indeed, with the fall, the chaos that existed at the start of creation, returned with a vengeance. And just like we saw played out in the creation overview of chapter one, only Yehovah can return order to these elements of chaos.

 

Sin is at the heart of the relational chaos that ensued when the first couple partook of the forbidden fruit. The beautiful, intimate relationship the first couple enjoyed with Yehovah—and we can only speculate as to the depths and heights that relationship took during the couple’s time in the Garden, was terminated. Sin would always get in the way and even inhibit such a relationship in the future. Because the heart of man is deceptive and desperately wicked (Jer. 17:9), Yehovah cannot and will not have that degree of relationship with human beings. It is only through the personal ministry of Yahoshua HaMashiyach that that level of relationship is at all possible.

 

Also, the intimate, pure and righteous relationship the man and the woman enjoyed as a married couple was also perpetually damaged. Even in the seemingly best, most healthy marriages, there always exists some degree of strife. Issues of control and domination are always being played out and combated in one way or another. The man and the woman, in order to enjoy that original marriage oneness, must overcome their selves; they must in effect die to self, whereby they are willing to serve Yehovah first and foremost, and then serve their mate without concern for themselves. That dying to self comes only through Yehovah’s Ruach HaKodesh operating in each of us.

 

In Mashiyach we become new creations and are privileged to walk in the newness of life (Rom. 6:4; 2 Cor. 5:17; Gal. 6:15). Thus, in Mashiyach, selfish, controlling and fearful agendas are removed and a sold-out couple in Mashiyach can worship Yehovah as one, and in a manner that as individuals, they could never achieve. Their individual and combined love for Yehovah and for one another will be beyond that of human understanding (Eph. 3:19).

 

Usury-Interest According to God (YHVH)

The Practice of Usury Prohibited How does God/YHVH rule on the practice of usury or exacting of interest on monetary loans by His elect? We find in Torah Reading 61 (according to our “triennial reading cycle-- Torah Reading 61--Exodus 22:25-31 ) the prohibition...

read more

The Critical Role Faith Play in the Prayer Life of a Messianic

The prayer lives of many members in the Hebrew Roots-Messianic Community are ineffective and have little to no associated power. In this installment of TMTO, we look at the role faith places in a Netzari’s prayer life and how faith can transform our prayers, when properly aligned with God’s Word and His Holy Spirit, into a powerful and effective tool for the Body of Messiah. 

read more

Paul’s Bold Stand Against Anti-Torah Teachings in the Ephesian Church—Part 15 of the Paul and Hebrew Roots Series

Why did Paul insert the creation story and the fall of man into 1 Timothy? Was it, as convention erroneously teaches, the reason women must not teach and preach in the Church? The answer to this question will shock you and cause you to appreciate battle Paul faced against Gnosticism in the Ephesian Assemblies of Messiah. This is Part 15 of our Paul and Hebrew Roots Series.

read more